Bookworm
Transcripts
Episodes
Search
About
215: Poor Charlie’s Almanack
Show notes on bookworm.fm ↗
Scroll along with the audio
Click any line to jump to that moment.
00:00:00
So we've got some follow-up items here.
00:00:03
I'll go first.
00:00:04
I've got two, one of them I did great, one of them I did awful.
00:00:11
Care to guess which one is which?
00:00:13
I'm going to say that you were able to build out
00:00:16
the latter of importance.
00:00:17
But when you went with Get Social, maybe I'm wrong.
00:00:22
You are wrong.
00:00:25
I guess you haven't been on social media much.
00:00:28
I have no judgment here.
00:00:31
But yeah, I have been successfully scheduling posts
00:00:37
for social media ahead of time.
00:00:39
I still want to do more with this,
00:00:41
but I am publishing regularly.
00:00:44
And this was sort of necessitated
00:00:46
by the Practical PKM cohort starting.
00:00:50
So I kind of had to do it.
00:00:53
But I feel like this is sustainable, famous last words,
00:00:59
I guess, because over the last week,
00:01:01
my cue has gotten down there quite a bit.
00:01:04
And I need to create some new stuff.
00:01:06
But yeah, so that has been successful.
00:01:09
Well, building out the latter of importance from my topic
00:01:12
has not been something I've been able to set aside
00:01:15
any time or mental resources towards.
00:01:18
And I don't think that is probably
00:01:20
going to happen until the cohort is over at this point.
00:01:25
But I am going to be working with the same designer developer
00:01:30
that updated the cohort page for updating the rest of the site.
00:01:34
So it is going to be necessary for me
00:01:36
to figure that stuff out in terms of giving them
00:01:41
what they need to build out the sales pages.
00:01:45
But yeah, that's not happening in the immediate future.
00:01:49
How did you do?
00:01:51
I did terrible, absolutely horrible, terrible.
00:01:54
So Mike, I don't even know if it's worth talking about them.
00:01:56
I had to apply the belief ladder to the CCU engineering
00:02:00
program and choosing engineering and then develop a ladder.
00:02:03
Well, I guess it's just one, really, kind of the develop
00:02:06
to the ladder for the CCU program.
00:02:09
But one of the things that I struggle with
00:02:10
is when we get back into the semester,
00:02:13
the week before the semester starts
00:02:15
and then the first week or two of the semester,
00:02:18
it's kind of like all hands on deck, go, go, go, go, go.
00:02:22
And then when you're not in that mode,
00:02:24
like brain just shuts down, right?
00:02:26
So the fact that I'm reading the books
00:02:29
and like engaging in the books is like win.
00:02:32
So here's the intervention question, Mike,
00:02:35
which we've had multiple of these.
00:02:38
I need a way to prioritize these action items.
00:02:41
And I don't know how to do it.
00:02:42
Like we've talked a little bit about this in the past.
00:02:45
I don't know whether or not I should just not care about it.
00:02:49
And it's like, if it becomes important enough, it'll happen.
00:02:51
Or if it's like, I need to set aside a time every week
00:02:55
and be like, this is my bookworm action item period of time.
00:03:01
Which I'm against that inherently.
00:03:03
Like I more go on the philosophy of like,
00:03:06
if this is important enough, it'll bubble to the top.
00:03:09
Like it's going to rise to the top.
00:03:13
But I also don't know if that's right.
00:03:15
Like if I should schedule some time in there.
00:03:16
So I need to think about that.
00:03:18
I need to figure it out.
00:03:19
One of the things I wanted to tell you about your action item,
00:03:22
maybe this will help me too.
00:03:23
You know, maybe we need to schedule
00:03:25
like a half hour working session, right?
00:03:27
That is, you know, our bookworm action items
00:03:30
or whatever it might be.
00:03:31
It's like the Corey, Mike, working session.
00:03:34
- We need to figure out the details of this yet.
00:03:36
But the library, my private community,
00:03:39
we do these co-working calls.
00:03:42
And a bunch of people show up, Christopher was someone
00:03:47
who's been involved in my different cohorts
00:03:49
and is now the community manager actually hosts the calls
00:03:52
and he gets a bunch of people that show up every week.
00:03:55
And maybe we could do something like that
00:03:58
for bookworm pro listeners.
00:04:01
I do think like having time set aside
00:04:04
to work on things together is a cool idea.
00:04:07
And virtual tools make that easy.
00:04:10
But we're still working out the details for that.
00:04:14
Hopefully we'll have something that we can announce
00:04:17
by the next episode.
00:04:20
We were working on something and then it took a detour
00:04:24
and now we're back to the beginning kind of.
00:04:27
So yeah, it's not that we've neglected this completely.
00:04:31
They've been progress made and then kind of had to pivot.
00:04:35
So, but that is something that we could certainly look into.
00:04:39
The other thing is I mentioned this to you,
00:04:44
the group coaching stuff that I'm gonna be doing,
00:04:48
which this is related to your creative action item.
00:04:53
But if you want some direct accountability,
00:04:56
I mean, yeah, happy to provide that.
00:04:58
Maybe we just need some public shaming
00:05:02
from the bookworm club listeners.
00:05:04
I don't know.
00:05:05
Or we could just, you know, continue as is
00:05:07
if you're fine with that too, whatever.
00:05:10
Part of me is like, well, we read these things
00:05:12
and like, I actually think, okay, this is a good one.
00:05:14
I should work on this, I should do that.
00:05:15
'Cause that's, I don't make action items just for fluff,
00:05:18
like just to make action items.
00:05:20
So I think like, okay, I should really work on this one.
00:05:22
And then we finish recording, life comes at me
00:05:27
and overwhelms and then I don't ever make it back to it,
00:05:29
which we'll probably get into some of this in the show today.
00:05:34
But one of the things I did just write down
00:05:35
is I just wrote down an action item
00:05:37
that says lead the effort on the library
00:05:40
co-working sessions.
00:05:41
So one of my action items, not even from the book,
00:05:44
is to lead the effort on the library co-working sessions.
00:05:46
Now Mike, before you get your hopes up,
00:05:49
before you get your hopes up,
00:05:51
I'm really bad at following through on these action items.
00:05:54
So maybe I'm trying to get you
00:05:57
to help me be more accountable, but I will work on the action.
00:06:00
- Okay, well, let's just have a conversation about that.
00:06:03
That'll be the action item.
00:06:04
How about that? - Yes.
00:06:05
(laughs)
00:06:06
- 'Cause I think that one will be pretty easy to implement,
00:06:09
especially based on some of the stuff
00:06:11
that we had kind of talked about already, so.
00:06:14
- Yep.
00:06:15
- All right, cool.
00:06:16
Well, we don't need to belabor your failed action items
00:06:19
any longer, you want to just talk about today's book?
00:06:22
- Thanks, Mike, thanks, Mike.
00:06:24
- Yeah, let's talk about it.
00:06:25
- Yeah, let's do it.
00:06:26
- All right, so today's book is poor Charlie's Almanac.
00:06:29
Who do you say this book is by, by the way?
00:06:33
- Okay, this is a really good question
00:06:36
because it's really kind of like an editorial book, right?
00:06:42
Like, I mean, somebody brought some stuff together,
00:06:45
added some commentary in and out of it,
00:06:48
but the main gist of this talk is,
00:06:51
or sorry, this book, you heard me kind of allude to it there.
00:06:53
The main gist of this book is these 11 talks
00:06:56
that Munger gave at these different places
00:06:59
throughout the years, primarily through like the early 2000s.
00:07:03
And then they brought in,
00:07:05
and I'm forgetting the guy's name,
00:07:06
I'm blanking on the guy's name right now,
00:07:07
but the editor came in and he put them all together
00:07:10
and wrapped them in a package and put it out
00:07:12
as poor Charlie's Almanac,
00:07:14
which we're gonna talk about the pros and cons of that,
00:07:16
I'm sure, as we get into the book and into style and rating.
00:07:21
But I think it's like a authored by Charlie and Friends
00:07:28
and then edited by this other guy, right?
00:07:31
- Yeah, and again, I'm blanking on his name right now.
00:07:33
- So if you look it up on Amazon, the author,
00:07:36
even though it says in parentheses, editor,
00:07:38
that's Peter Kaufman.
00:07:40
I don't know if there's different versions
00:07:42
of poor Charlie's Almanac,
00:07:43
and that's the specific one that we read,
00:07:47
but the stripe.press version,
00:07:50
which you made me aware of last episode,
00:07:53
which is really well done, if--
00:07:56
- Incredibly well.
00:07:57
- Even if you read physical books all the time like I do,
00:07:59
you need to check out this website.
00:08:02
There's like little floating Charlie Munger balloons.
00:08:05
You can poke with your mouse and stuff like that.
00:08:08
It's really cool.
00:08:10
This website is amazing,
00:08:11
and it's basically the entire book for free online.
00:08:14
So great place to read it.
00:08:15
There's also a lot of additional photos and things.
00:08:18
A lot of the things that they talk about are linked
00:08:21
and you click on them and it'll open up photos
00:08:23
of those particular things.
00:08:24
So that's a better resource, I think,
00:08:27
for really grocking what is a summary of the website says,
00:08:37
by the way, let me look up the whole title.
00:08:39
The Essential Whitney Wisdom of Charles T. Munger.
00:08:41
So it's really a book about Charles Munger,
00:08:45
which is Warren Buffett's Right Hand Man,
00:08:47
Berkshire Hathaway.
00:08:49
The structure of the book is kind of different.
00:08:52
There's a couple chapters at the beginning
00:08:56
where a portrait of Charles Munger
00:08:58
remembering the children on Charlie,
00:09:01
the Munger approach to life learning and decision making,
00:09:04
and then there's 11 talks,
00:09:05
which is what you were alluding to,
00:09:07
things that he's said different places.
00:09:09
Some of them are, this is the talk that he gave at this place,
00:09:12
but because this is really the life of Charlie Munger,
00:09:20
and it's little snippets of these different things
00:09:23
that he said at different moments in time.
00:09:24
There's a lot of overlap, so it's been edited in a way
00:09:27
where it's like, okay, Charlie talks about this stuff again
00:09:29
here, it's a long book, it's like 350 pages,
00:09:35
but it could have been a lot longer.
00:09:37
- And let me say a couple of different things here.
00:09:39
One, I really think that you gotta say Charlie Munger
00:09:43
is the author of it.
00:09:45
And the reason why, especially in the version I read,
00:09:48
which I believe is the same version that you read,
00:09:51
he does the revised portion after each talk
00:09:54
where he goes back in and says,
00:09:56
and here's the update,
00:09:57
and I think that really doubles down on the fact that
00:10:01
he wrote this and then he had a very strong hand
00:10:05
in coming back and just kind of giving you an overview of it.
00:10:08
Now, those aren't long, it's not like he takes that talk
00:10:12
and like changes a bunch of stuff,
00:10:14
it's mainly a page, half a page or something,
00:10:16
of like, oh, and I've had this thought since,
00:10:18
or I really wanna drive this point home or whatever it is.
00:10:21
But I wanna go back to something
00:10:23
that we were talking about, the stripe,
00:10:25
the press.stripe book.
00:10:27
I believe this is what iBooks was supposed to be.
00:10:32
Do you remember iBooks and what they touted iBooks
00:10:34
to be like these interactive books
00:10:36
where you could zoom in and zoom out
00:10:38
and there's multimedia built into them
00:10:40
and presentations and stuff like within the book
00:10:43
and how amazing it was gonna be?
00:10:44
Like, I think this is the realization
00:10:50
of what iBooks promised and never delivered.
00:10:53
And I think it's like incredible.
00:10:55
Like, I loved reading the press.stripe version
00:11:00
of this book as compared to just the normal bound
00:11:04
or even digital form of the book.
00:11:06
Like, I loved, loved, loved reading that version of this book.
00:11:10
- Yeah, this is a really cool website.
00:11:14
I read the physical version
00:11:16
and I still think that is a worthwhile addition
00:11:22
to the collection.
00:11:23
That in and of itself is actually a pretty beautiful book.
00:11:27
But yeah, having it all available for free on this,
00:11:32
this website is pretty cool.
00:11:35
There's also the alternate formats on this website
00:11:39
so you can buy the actual book itself.
00:11:41
There's the audio book so you can listen to it.
00:11:43
And then there's what they call Berkshire Mode.
00:11:47
Did you click on that at all?
00:11:48
- Oh, I didn't see Berkshire Mode.
00:11:50
Hold on, I gotta go ahead and check this out.
00:11:52
- Yeah, it's basically a really ugly website
00:11:55
where all the text is on one page.
00:11:58
I don't get the inside joke there
00:12:01
about this being Berkshire Mode.
00:12:04
- Okay, hold on, how do I get there?
00:12:06
Where's the setting that says put it into Berkshire Mode?
00:12:09
- You don't see that in your web browser, huh?
00:12:11
So if you go to the website,
00:12:13
you've got the chapters on the left.
00:12:14
- Okay, down at the box.
00:12:15
- On the right, yeah, you've got alternate formats
00:12:18
and there's Berkshire Mode.
00:12:19
And that one just opens up a really ugly website.
00:12:22
It's like web 1.0 with all of the text.
00:12:25
- My suspicion that is that ties into the fact
00:12:27
that Buffett eats a McMuffin every morning
00:12:32
and what does he want to drink a Coke?
00:12:35
Right, that's all the most drink is a Coke, right?
00:12:37
So it's a McMuffin and a Coke every day.
00:12:38
It's like he's reading the newspaper.
00:12:41
That's Berkshire Mode.
00:12:43
- Yeah.
00:12:45
So this is again, maybe a terrible pick for Bookworm
00:12:50
because we're gonna try and talk about a 350 page book
00:12:55
and provide a summary which is in and of itself
00:12:58
a bunch of random thoughts from a bunch of different places
00:13:00
at a bunch of different times in his life.
00:13:03
So I have no idea like the structure for this episode.
00:13:07
I've got the mind map and it's broken down
00:13:11
into the main chapters and then the 11 talks.
00:13:13
I have in the outline all 11 talks
00:13:17
but because there's a lot of overlap
00:13:18
maybe we'll jump between them.
00:13:20
I'm okay with that.
00:13:22
I really think if you were to condense all of the talks
00:13:25
there's probably five or six recurring themes
00:13:28
that he ends up hitting a lot.
00:13:32
But yeah, you're ready to dive into the specifics?
00:13:37
- Yeah, I am. I think my disclaimer to anybody
00:13:41
who's thinking about reading this, right?
00:13:43
And whether you decide to after our conversation or not,
00:13:46
you know, he's a pretty eccentric guy
00:13:50
and he's also an insanely famous eccentric guy.
00:13:53
So it's like whether or not you know him
00:13:56
or you've ever even heard of him or not.
00:13:59
If you're interested in some of the quips, the wit,
00:14:02
you know, if what we talk about here kind of goes,
00:14:05
oh, that'd be interesting to talk about.
00:14:07
The other one would be really, really big
00:14:10
into economics, psychology.
00:14:13
And then just I would say like general rational thinking.
00:14:16
So it's like while some of the stuff got really specific
00:14:19
and personally wasn't really that relevant or interesting,
00:14:23
you know, like I wasn't going into it going, man,
00:14:25
I really want to read that, you know, that talk.
00:14:29
There were some general principles
00:14:30
that you can get out of this.
00:14:31
So it's like if you're looking at this
00:14:33
and you're like a Charlie Munger, I don't care.
00:14:35
I don't even know who that is, you know,
00:14:37
kind of go into it with a little bit more of an open mind,
00:14:38
especially after you listen,
00:14:40
if you decide that like, okay,
00:14:41
those are some pretty interesting thoughts.
00:14:43
That would be my disclaimer before we get going.
00:14:46
- Yeah, that's fair.
00:14:48
All right.
00:14:49
Well, let's start by talking about the introductions.
00:14:53
There's multiples here.
00:14:56
There is a forward by John Collison who I did not look up.
00:15:01
There's a forward by Warren E. Buffet.
00:15:04
So Charlie's business partner, basically,
00:15:08
where Warren says some nice things about Charlie
00:15:11
and then there is a rebuttal by Charles T. Munger
00:15:14
where he responds to the nice things
00:15:15
that Warren said, basically.
00:15:17
And then there's an introduction by Peter D. Kaufman,
00:15:19
who is the editor.
00:15:22
The, I guess the forward by John Collison,
00:15:26
it sounds like this was a younger guy
00:15:28
who got to know Charlie directly in his 20s
00:15:33
and had the opportunity to meet him directly.
00:15:36
This is the one where it says the quote,
00:15:42
there's no better teacher than history
00:15:43
and determining future.
00:15:44
There are answers with billions of dollars
00:15:45
and a $30 history book.
00:15:46
And that's kind of the thought that
00:15:49
I've heard other people talk about this book,
00:15:51
how it's a very valuable business education in a book.
00:15:56
Yes and no, in my opinion,
00:15:58
Charlie had a bunch of success.
00:16:01
And so those are the types of people
00:16:02
you wanna learn from.
00:16:04
It's not as simple as just copying what they did
00:16:07
and he's not gonna provide you a simple system on anything.
00:16:11
So if you're tired of those books, kind of like I am,
00:16:14
this is sort of a breath of fresh air.
00:16:17
But also this isn't one that you pick up
00:16:19
because you're trying to solve a specific problem.
00:16:23
This is one just because you're interested in the person
00:16:26
and you wanna find out more about them.
00:16:28
And if you go into that with an open mind,
00:16:30
I think you can learn a ton
00:16:32
and that's kind of what Peter Kaufman talks about
00:16:34
in his introduction.
00:16:35
These are all fairly short.
00:16:37
I actually don't have any notes on these in my mind map.
00:16:41
It's really just setting the stage for the rest of the book
00:16:44
and I don't have anything more to say about these.
00:16:46
Do you have anything from the introductions
00:16:48
that you wanted to go up?
00:16:49
No, no, I didn't have any notes on this either.
00:16:50
But my question to you, Mike, is where did this book come from?
00:16:55
Like why did you pick this book up?
00:16:57
Like what was the motivation when you picked it?
00:17:01
Yeah, well, I have this general rule
00:17:05
where when someone that I respect recommends a book,
00:17:09
I buy it immediately.
00:17:11
And so this was one that when this version
00:17:14
was actually published, I saw multiple people recommend it.
00:17:18
Oh, you gotta pick this one up.
00:17:19
So it had been sitting on my bookshelf for a long time.
00:17:23
A long time, yeah.
00:17:24
I saw that it was, well, long time.
00:17:26
I think it came out like a year ago.
00:17:27
So I'm not super long.
00:17:29
Sorry, I thought it came out way before that.
00:17:30
My fault, it came out in '23, yeah.
00:17:32
Yeah, this version, probably shortly after Charlie died,
00:17:36
would be my guess.
00:17:38
And so it had been sitting on my bookshelf
00:17:40
and I'd look at it every once in a while.
00:17:42
I'm like, oh, I should really read that.
00:17:44
But it's really big.
00:17:45
I've got other books that I've got to read
00:17:47
or I'm more interested in reading.
00:17:50
And then when we did simple marketing for smart people last,
00:17:53
I ran it by you ahead of times.
00:17:55
I didn't want to give you a whole bunch of extra homework.
00:17:59
But this is one that I've heard good things about.
00:18:02
And maybe with the shorter one before this,
00:18:05
this is a good timing to do this particular book.
00:18:08
You said, sure.
00:18:10
So we went for it.
00:18:11
I didn't really know what to expect.
00:18:13
And I didn't really know exactly what it was.
00:18:16
It's sort of like modern meditations,
00:18:19
though I think I prefer meditations by Charles Munger
00:18:22
more than meditations by Marcus Aurelius.
00:18:24
I can tell you I 100% prefer meditations by Munger
00:18:28
than I did meditations by Marcus.
00:18:32
But do you think that's a fair kind of description of it?
00:18:35
That's sort of how it's written.
00:18:39
Yeah, I would say if you combined meditations
00:18:43
with the 101 essays, right?
00:18:46
And if you smoosh those two books together,
00:18:48
that's this book only.
00:18:50
It's written by what's out of you, not even written.
00:18:53
It's edited and put together based on his talks,
00:18:57
which is it's just strange.
00:18:58
Like it's a strange concept for a book,
00:19:00
but it works really well.
00:19:01
And I think it came together well.
00:19:04
So we should get into the chapters.
00:19:05
So thanks for letting me know how we got to it.
00:19:08
Yeah.
00:19:09
So the first chapter is a portrait of Charles T. Munger.
00:19:13
And this is basically kind of just like a life history.
00:19:19
And I guess I'll just share some of the things
00:19:22
that I have in my notes here, just some details.
00:19:27
This is this part of the book.
00:19:28
It's really not, you know, the way that I took notes was
00:19:32
I wanted to have a couple of historical facts.
00:19:35
Like in my mind, I'm thinking of what does this look like
00:19:38
when I transfer it to Obsidian.
00:19:41
This is gonna be like the important details
00:19:43
if I wanted to go back and look up,
00:19:45
you know, who was Charles Munger.
00:19:46
So born in Omaha, Nebraska, January 1st, 1924.
00:19:50
Cool birthday, New Year's Day.
00:19:53
He worked at Buffett and Sun,
00:19:55
an upscale grocery store owned by Warren's grandfather, Ernest.
00:19:58
That was kind of interesting
00:19:59
that they had a family connection.
00:20:00
And then they kind of grew apart.
00:20:03
His parents gave the kids several books at Christmas,
00:20:06
which I thought was a really cool idea.
00:20:09
They got reacquainted at a dinner party with Warren
00:20:12
when he was 25 and Charlie was 31.
00:20:16
That's where Warren convinced Charlie
00:20:18
to quit practicing law.
00:20:19
A lot of the talks come from his connection
00:20:21
to Harvard Law School.
00:20:23
So that's kind of a fascinating subplot there.
00:20:28
And then they make a point to call out
00:20:31
that despite his wealth,
00:20:32
Charlie would prefer to remain anonymous.
00:20:34
You kind of get that vibe as you go through
00:20:36
the rest of the book.
00:20:37
And he's a huge fan of Benjamin Franklin.
00:20:40
There's a lot of additional details there
00:20:44
which are probably not interesting for bookworm,
00:20:47
but that kind of gives you a synopsis,
00:20:49
I think, of who he was and how he got to be,
00:20:52
where he was at Berkshire Hathaway.
00:20:54
- Something that I didn't realize as I was reading this
00:20:57
and I'm almost positive in this first chapter
00:20:59
was he did a lot of different things, right?
00:21:02
So he had his hand in a lot of different stuff
00:21:04
throughout his life.
00:21:05
I mean, I always knew of him as he and Buffett
00:21:09
were two peas in a pod and they were taking Berkshire Hathaway
00:21:14
and they ran it to crazy success.
00:21:17
But I didn't know, he was in real estate development,
00:21:20
he was in law, you know, he had then done the economics
00:21:25
and the financial different side of things.
00:21:27
Like he had his hand in a ton of different things
00:21:30
which I think when you look at his background
00:21:34
and then you look at like the way,
00:21:36
I guess when they get to into the details
00:21:38
of his investment strategies later on,
00:21:41
it kind of makes sense why he's well-rounded,
00:21:44
you know, kind of disciplined in a bunch of different fields
00:21:46
in a bunch of different ways
00:21:47
is because he had a lot of life experience.
00:21:49
I mean, he had a whole lot of life experience
00:21:51
living in the Midwest and moving to California
00:21:53
and all of that stuff.
00:21:55
So that was really interesting.
00:21:56
I like the fact that, you know, from chapter one,
00:21:59
he talks about basically making friends
00:22:03
with what they call the eminent dead who had good ideas
00:22:07
and like having this, you know, this education
00:22:11
through smart people that came before you
00:22:12
and trying to have, I guess, this dialogue with them
00:22:15
even though they can't dialogue back because they're dead
00:22:17
which that ties into his connection to Franklin
00:22:21
and like, you know, Franklin and then Samuel Johnson
00:22:24
and a bunch of these people that he'll cite
00:22:27
or he'll reference over and over and over again,
00:22:30
Keynes, like it was like he was friends with these people
00:22:33
even though there's no way he possibly could
00:22:35
which I think that's a cool aspect of his personality
00:22:38
or an aspect of the way he tried to engage
00:22:41
with historical content.
00:22:44
- Yeah, and so the reason that this is even titled
00:22:49
Poor Charlie's Almanac is kind of a nod
00:22:53
to his affinity for Benjamin Franklin
00:22:56
with what's his version, Poor Richard's Almanac?
00:22:58
- Poor Richard's Almanac, yep.
00:23:00
- Yeah, so I think if he had a historical figure
00:23:03
that he wanted to be like, it's probably Benjamin Franklin
00:23:08
and that's kind of how the editor, I think,
00:23:10
positions him as like a modern Benjamin Franklin.
00:23:13
You think that's fair?
00:23:13
That would agree, for sure.
00:23:15
- Cool.
00:23:16
All right, the next chapter is remembering
00:23:19
the children on Charlie and this is basically
00:23:23
just some snippets and some memories from Charlie's kids.
00:23:27
I don't think there's a whole lot here
00:23:29
that is worth discussing, to be honest.
00:23:34
I will say a couple things I jotted down for my notes.
00:23:38
One of the things that one of the kids had mentioned,
00:23:41
they really impressed by, is do the job right the first time.
00:23:45
They mentioned that they always saw him reading books,
00:23:48
which you can also pick up from some of the things
00:23:50
that he says later on, but it's cool to hear
00:23:52
that he actually walked the walk,
00:23:55
basically didn't just talk about
00:23:57
how you need to read books all the time.
00:23:59
And then they spent a lot of time at the lake
00:24:00
in Minnesota growing up, so again, Midwest roots.
00:24:04
But it's interesting that I think all of the talks,
00:24:07
or most of the talks, happened at places
00:24:10
that were in California, that's obviously that's where
00:24:14
he was most of the time.
00:24:16
- I think that one of the major things
00:24:18
that came out of this chapter for me,
00:24:19
and in my prior research-type work,
00:24:24
and a lot of the stuff that I did
00:24:26
in academia before coming to this position,
00:24:28
it was like entrepreneurship education,
00:24:30
and we always take these entrepreneurs,
00:24:32
or these business people, and we put them on pedestals
00:24:34
and talk about how amazing they are,
00:24:36
and all these wonderful things that they've done.
00:24:38
Man, and the one thing that came out of this one,
00:24:40
that made me sad, there are a lot of the gems from Minnesota.
00:24:43
This is one of the kids talking.
00:24:45
In those days, when Charlie worked so long and so hard,
00:24:48
that was the only meaningful time we spent with him.
00:24:50
During the work weeks, he was off before dawn,
00:24:53
home about dinnertime, and then studied Standard and Poor's,
00:24:56
and later, we spent a couple hours on the phone with Warren,
00:24:59
and it was like, this guy sacrificed,
00:25:01
there was no easy, he didn't have this easy,
00:25:05
like, oh, I just fell into this really good investment
00:25:08
strategy, and became a partner with this other guy.
00:25:11
It's like, he really dedicated and committed the time to it,
00:25:15
and, I mean, they don't pitch it like this,
00:25:18
but I have to think, on some level,
00:25:19
his family suffered because of it.
00:25:21
Like, the relationships among the family
00:25:23
were just not there from a time standpoint, right?
00:25:28
'Cause he had his nose in a book,
00:25:30
or he was working, or whatever he was doing,
00:25:32
which I think is just a really interesting tidbit,
00:25:37
but it's very, very common across really successful people
00:25:41
that people will put on a pedestal,
00:25:42
is there was this gigantic sacrifice
00:25:44
in some aspect of their life,
00:25:46
in some way, shape, or form of their life.
00:25:48
- I kind of wonder if, I mean, just up front,
00:25:53
I think you're probably right,
00:25:56
like, that's not how I would want to be remembered,
00:25:59
but I do wonder if that is maybe a little bit
00:26:04
of like a different era sort of a--
00:26:08
- Generational thing, yeah.
00:26:09
- Yeah, I don't think he probably saw that as a sacrifice,
00:26:13
and they probably just, because of his age,
00:26:19
and when this happened,
00:26:21
I don't have a whole lot of memory
00:26:24
from my grandpa on my dad's side,
00:26:29
but I do remember a little bit,
00:26:31
and I think he passed away when I was maybe like 10,
00:26:36
and what I remember is that grandma was always
00:26:41
the social one, and grandpa had his routines,
00:26:44
and you did not mess with grandpa's routines.
00:26:48
He was the primary breadwinner,
00:26:50
and he did his thing,
00:26:51
and everyone else just kind of supported him,
00:26:54
but stayed out of his way.
00:26:56
And no one thought less of him for that,
00:27:00
it was just like, well, that's what he does,
00:27:01
and that's kind of the picture that I got
00:27:03
with that description was not like,
00:27:06
well, he needed to spend a couple of hours
00:27:08
talking to his boss every night on the phone,
00:27:11
but that was his way of unwinding after our day of work,
00:27:17
which sort of doesn't make sense, but sort of I get it.
00:27:21
I don't know, I'm projecting at this point,
00:27:23
but I feel like if you're as successful as he was,
00:27:28
you probably get to,
00:27:29
I mean, they're spending the summer
00:27:30
at a lake in Minnesota when they,
00:27:32
sounds like he's living in California,
00:27:35
so I don't know, maybe like they're well off enough,
00:27:40
obviously, that they can go spend the summer at the lake,
00:27:43
so I don't think he's wondering
00:27:45
where he's gonna make the next buck,
00:27:47
that's just how he's wired maybe,
00:27:49
and that's what he does for fun.
00:27:52
- Yeah, I would agree.
00:27:53
I think that's how he was wired, right?
00:27:55
Like I get the impression that his brain was always churning
00:28:01
on some sort of multidisciplinary thing
00:28:04
and how do I connect the dots
00:28:05
and how do I do this other thing?
00:28:08
I just think that was an interesting,
00:28:09
'cause isn't there a part two
00:28:11
where they talk about walking into his office or something
00:28:13
and you basically just saw the top of his head,
00:28:15
like you saw a portion of his head behind the newspaper
00:28:19
'cause he was always had his nose in something,
00:28:21
either a book or the newspaper.
00:28:23
- Yeah, so. - All right, I'm ready to go to chapter three.
00:28:26
- All right, so chapter three,
00:28:28
the Munger approach to life learning and decision making.
00:28:34
So a couple things that stood out to me from this,
00:28:36
number one, he's a big fan of mental models.
00:28:39
- Yes. - And the message
00:28:40
that he had about a hundred of 'em that he used
00:28:42
to evaluate companies to invest in.
00:28:44
He didn't make a ton of investments
00:28:46
and he tended to hold them for a long time
00:28:49
and he attempts to assess and understand
00:28:52
competitive advantage in every aspect
00:28:55
and the durability of that advantage.
00:28:57
And there's these different,
00:28:59
he's got a investing principles checklist,
00:29:02
which I think don't think there's a whole lot
00:29:04
to be gleaned by this,
00:29:05
but I'll just share risk, independence,
00:29:07
preparation, intellectual humility, analytic rigor,
00:29:10
allocation, patience, decisiveness, change and focus.
00:29:13
And I say it's not a lot to be gleaned here
00:29:14
because I'm not in a place where I'm asking myself
00:29:18
for a checklist of investing principles.
00:29:21
Maybe some of our listeners are.
00:29:23
Go check out that section of the book.
00:29:25
- Exactly. (laughs)
00:29:27
But not for me.
00:29:29
- I really liked here how,
00:29:33
I mean, you saw like kind of his whole structure, right?
00:29:36
And you talked about the mental model.
00:29:37
So Mike, this is why I thought you were,
00:29:40
this is why I thought you picked this book.
00:29:41
I was like, oh, Michael loves mental models.
00:29:43
So he wanted to know monger's mental models, right?
00:29:46
And I was like, so he picked this book, right?
00:29:49
But I don't know, was it just coincidence?
00:29:51
- I see it was just coincidence.
00:29:52
- Yeah, I mean, to be honest,
00:29:54
I don't think his discussion of mental models
00:29:57
is really all that effective.
00:30:00
If you're looking for a better book on mental models,
00:30:03
Shane Parrish just redid the whole mental model series.
00:30:07
You can get the box set with the different colors.
00:30:10
Those are the ones that I think are the best.
00:30:12
And then after that, it's super thinking.
00:30:15
I think we covered that one.
00:30:17
- Yeah, we covered that one, yeah.
00:30:18
- And that's just a big list
00:30:19
of all the different mental models.
00:30:20
And so if you're trying to discover mental models,
00:30:23
that's more effective.
00:30:24
But it is interesting to see
00:30:25
which ones he thought were important.
00:30:28
He's not gonna go crank through the whole list
00:30:31
of all the mental models, by the way.
00:30:33
And I actually think that's a good thing.
00:30:35
- And I think he would say the multidisciplinary approach
00:30:38
is the important part, right?
00:30:39
Like it isn't even necessarily the specific mental models.
00:30:42
It's this multidisciplinary approach
00:30:44
and then figuring out what is the fundamental model
00:30:46
in that field or in the thing you,
00:30:48
you know, you are paying attention to.
00:30:51
You get a little bit of inside his personality here.
00:30:53
So it's kind of fun to sit there
00:30:55
and outthink people who are way smarter than you, right?
00:30:58
Like it's like, it was almost like life was a game, right?
00:31:00
Like he was like trying to, you know,
00:31:03
go into the game and play the best game he could all the time.
00:31:05
He talks about investing and it basically is like,
00:31:09
okay, well, we do the basic math on that.
00:31:11
He goes, but then, you know, it becomes philosophical as well
00:31:15
and there's psychology involved into it,
00:31:16
but then it's also mathematical and, you know,
00:31:19
like the feel comes,
00:31:20
which I really like that aspect of it is
00:31:23
when you become such an expert
00:31:24
or you've refined your process so much,
00:31:27
like you can just feel what's gonna work.
00:31:29
You're like, oh, yeah, like that's gonna work, you know?
00:31:31
Or, nope, I got this weird feeling about it.
00:31:34
It's just not gonna go well.
00:31:35
Like that's not gonna work.
00:31:36
And I like that he, that he hits on that.
00:31:39
I am a big fan of, and I wanna do this more.
00:31:43
I think if I was gonna create a vague action item, right?
00:31:46
Like one that's really, really hard to measure
00:31:48
and really hard to keep track of is,
00:31:50
I wanna practice this invert principle more
00:31:53
or this think about one to avoid more, you know?
00:31:55
'Cause I think that's a really valuable concept.
00:31:58
And it says, Charlie, generally focused on
00:32:01
what to avoid first, what not to do
00:32:03
before he considered what to actually do.
00:32:05
And I think that's a really interesting way
00:32:07
to approach the world that I don't,
00:32:09
like I don't approach the world that way
00:32:10
only when it's gonna like kill me or hurt somebody, right?
00:32:14
That's really when I go,
00:32:15
how do I not get hurt in this situation?
00:32:17
- Yeah, I do like that.
00:32:19
The inversion, invert always invert,
00:32:21
I forget the specific person who said that,
00:32:23
but that is-- - Jacoby.
00:32:25
- Yeah, Jacoby. - Yep, that's right.
00:32:27
That one comes up over and over and over again.
00:32:31
So the next chapter is really short.
00:32:34
Chapter four is 11 talks.
00:32:36
And this is really kind of the philosophy behind the talks.
00:32:40
And then the rest of the book is the talks.
00:32:42
So real briefly, a couple of things
00:32:46
from this, just a couple pages.
00:32:47
Chapter mentioned that Charlie is not shy
00:32:50
when offering both frank criticism and constructive advice,
00:32:52
whatever the topic, you can tell it like it is.
00:32:55
And then these 11 talks are a special compilation
00:32:59
for this particular book.
00:33:01
And yeah, that's the meat of the book.
00:33:03
So we should probably jump into those next,
00:33:06
anything else you wanna mention before we do?
00:33:08
- Yeah, so if you're gonna read this book,
00:33:09
if you haven't read it yet, every talk will have a preamble
00:33:13
and that's by Kaufman.
00:33:14
Kaufman will explain to you what is gonna happen.
00:33:17
Then there's Charlie's talk and I believe it's verbatim.
00:33:21
It's just a transcript of his talk that he gave,
00:33:24
wherever he gave it.
00:33:25
And then at the end, Charlie will revisit the talk
00:33:28
and say, oh, here's what I'd change
00:33:30
or here's what I won't change or this stays true
00:33:32
or I'd tweak this story a little bit
00:33:34
or whatever it might be.
00:33:35
So that's the nature of the next what 11 sections,
00:33:39
if you will, of the book.
00:33:40
And some of them are real short.
00:33:41
Like some of them are, you know, you can read it
00:33:43
in 15 minutes and then other ones,
00:33:45
like the last one is like three hours long.
00:33:47
I mean, it's a really long chapter.
00:33:50
- Which, we'll get to that one.
00:33:51
That's actually a combination of talks.
00:33:54
So kind of weird.
00:33:56
Yeah, let's start with the first one though.
00:33:59
So talk number one is titled
00:34:03
Harvard School Commencement Speech.
00:34:06
And this was given June 13th, 1986
00:34:09
at Harvard School in Los Angeles.
00:34:13
The format of this speech is interesting
00:34:16
because he's kind of building off
00:34:19
of him putting his own twist on Johnny Carson's
00:34:22
commencement speech that he gave,
00:34:24
where he shared three ways to guarantee misery.
00:34:28
And that was just, yeah.
00:34:30
And just chemicals in an effort
00:34:31
to alter mood or perception, envy and resentment.
00:34:35
So he starts by sharing those three
00:34:37
and then he adds four more prescriptions for misery.
00:34:41
Be unreliable, learn everything you possibly can
00:34:43
from your own experience, minimizing what you learned
00:34:45
vicariously from the good and bad experiences of others,
00:34:48
living and dead.
00:34:49
That's all the second one.
00:34:52
Go down and stay down when you get your first,
00:34:54
second or third, severe reverse in the battle of life.
00:34:57
That's the third one.
00:34:58
And the fourth one is ignore a story of a rustic
00:35:00
who said, I wish I knew where I was going to die.
00:35:02
Then I'd never go there.
00:35:04
And then he kind of extrapolates
00:35:06
and shares a whole bunch associated with those points.
00:35:09
So Johnny Carson's points are a lot more succinct
00:35:13
and probably better as a list.
00:35:15
But it's an entertaining speech, I think.
00:35:17
And yeah, you could probably dig in further
00:35:22
and expound more on each one of those different prescriptions.
00:35:26
But I don't know, there's not a whole lot
00:35:29
I want to go into with these talks.
00:35:32
I'd rather just kind of crank through them fairly quickly
00:35:34
and then stop and park on some of the main ideas
00:35:37
and the themes that emerge from them.
00:35:40
But anything else that stands out to you
00:35:42
from this first talk?
00:35:43
- Nope, you highlighted exactly what I highlighted.
00:35:45
So we can move on.
00:35:47
You want me to answer your number two
00:35:49
or do you want to?
00:35:49
- Sure, go for it.
00:35:51
- All right, so number two.
00:35:52
Number two was a lesson on elementary worldly wisdom
00:35:57
as it relates to investment management and business.
00:36:00
And the title is going to attach to where he gave it,
00:36:04
he gave it at the USC Marshall School of Business.
00:36:06
So this one, and this is where this book
00:36:09
is really interesting to me because this one digs
00:36:11
a lot more into investment management,
00:36:13
digs a lot more into business,
00:36:15
and some of them will be like that.
00:36:17
This one was given on April 14th, 1994,
00:36:21
to like I said, the USC Marshall School of Business.
00:36:24
And so coming out of this one,
00:36:28
you get into everything like stock picking,
00:36:30
but also you get into his like models of many disciplines
00:36:35
and how you have to lattice work these models.
00:36:37
But you get into stock picking, let me see what else.
00:36:42
- Well, I've got a specific question for you.
00:36:45
So he actually shares,
00:36:46
what should a young person look for in a career?
00:36:49
I jotted down these three things.
00:36:51
Don't sell anything, you wouldn't buy yourself.
00:36:52
Don't work for anyone, you don't respect and admire it.
00:36:55
Work only with people you enjoy.
00:36:57
Do you think that's good advice,
00:36:58
and would you give that to the students that you work with?
00:37:00
- Okay, I think that is great advice.
00:37:04
I also think as a new graduate coming out of school,
00:37:08
you have so little agency in so many of those things,
00:37:12
and then you have so little knowledge about like,
00:37:14
that is stated from a position of someone
00:37:17
who can walk into any room
00:37:19
and immediately start talking to whoever they wanna talk with,
00:37:22
because that's his background.
00:37:24
Most people don't ever get that, right?
00:37:26
So if you could figure that out,
00:37:28
don't sell anything to you and buy yourself shirt.
00:37:29
Like that makes complete sense, right?
00:37:32
Don't work for anyone you don't respect and admire.
00:37:34
Well, and that takes a while to figure out.
00:37:36
Now you can see it on the front end, right?
00:37:39
Like you can be like, okay,
00:37:40
I've seen enough of that person to know like,
00:37:42
nope, I don't want anywhere near them professionally,
00:37:44
and then work with only people you enjoy.
00:37:46
Again, you need to work with people
00:37:47
before you know whether or not you enjoy them.
00:37:50
This is a much easier thing to do at 80, right?
00:37:55
Or much easier thing to say at 70 or 80
00:37:58
than it is at 20 something
00:37:59
when you're coming out of school going, okay, here we go.
00:38:02
But you get to the ideas,
00:38:03
like there's a whole question and answer section of this one,
00:38:05
which is really, really, I think it was really interesting.
00:38:09
Listen and do his answers.
00:38:10
- One of the things that I jotted down from this section,
00:38:13
just because it was personal interest to me,
00:38:16
was on page 99, he mentions owning a newspaper in Oshkosh.
00:38:21
Do you know where Oshkosh is?
00:38:24
I know of Oshkosh.
00:38:25
I don't know where Oshkosh is,
00:38:27
but I know of it because my neighbor
00:38:29
has referenced Oshkosh before.
00:38:31
- Okay.
00:38:32
- Cause the only reason I know it.
00:38:33
- So Oshkosh is actually where I grew up.
00:38:36
It's a small town in Wisconsin, probably 60,000 people.
00:38:40
But the reason that he's probably familiar with it,
00:38:43
'cause he reads a lot of history,
00:38:44
is it was World Famous City back in the day
00:38:49
because it's located right on the Fox River
00:38:51
in the whole Fox Valley where we are was a big paper industry.
00:38:55
So a lot of, when the Chicago fire happened,
00:38:58
the lumber that they used to rebuild came from Oshkosh.
00:39:02
- Okay.
00:39:02
- And a lot of these big old mansions in Oshkosh
00:39:06
that were tied to Thomas Payne,
00:39:08
who was the big lumber bearing in the area.
00:39:11
So it's kinda interesting to hear him mention Oshkosh.
00:39:15
- I'm gonna turn it back on you though.
00:39:18
So one of the other questions that he was asked
00:39:20
and at the end of this talk,
00:39:22
what overall life advice do you have for young people?
00:39:25
And he puts out three things.
00:39:26
Have low expectations, have a sense of humor,
00:39:29
and surround yourself with love of friends and family.
00:39:32
What do you think about those?
00:39:34
- Probably generally good.
00:39:38
The have low expectations.
00:39:40
I don't think he's saying don't try to be successful.
00:39:44
I think he's saying don't get bent out of shape
00:39:47
when stuff doesn't go the way you think it will,
00:39:49
which younger me could probably afford to hear that.
00:39:54
So yeah.
00:39:56
And then the other thing from this section,
00:39:58
which is probably worth calling out,
00:40:00
is he talks about the multiple models
00:40:02
that come from multiple disciplines,
00:40:04
the multidisciplinary approach.
00:40:05
That's something that he hits on the rest of the talks.
00:40:08
And you can't really know anything
00:40:10
if you just remember random facts.
00:40:11
You have to have these models in your head.
00:40:13
There's one funny quote which was on page 87.
00:40:17
It's like if you don't, he says,
00:40:18
if you don't get this elementary but mildly unnatural,
00:40:20
mathematics of elementary probability into your repertoire,
00:40:23
then you go through a long life,
00:40:25
like a one-legged man in a butt-kicking contest.
00:40:30
Which people have probably heard that quote associated
00:40:32
with Charlie Munger before would be my guess.
00:40:35
- He's a really like interesting guy
00:40:39
in terms of like kind of a spitfire, if you will.
00:40:42
It has some good one liners, has some good quotes.
00:40:45
But then like when he goes, you know, deep into a topic,
00:40:50
like he goes deep really, really quick.
00:40:52
I feel like it's like, oh, you know,
00:40:54
and he's telling these stories and next to you know,
00:40:55
like he drops into it and he goes real quick.
00:40:58
The, he is, and we're gonna see this throughout the talks,
00:41:03
he's very hard on education and the educational system.
00:41:08
- I wanna talk to you about that but probably not yet
00:41:11
'cause I think he hits it a little bit further
00:41:13
in some of the later talks.
00:41:15
But what I wanna get out here is his many models,
00:41:18
or his models and many disciplines,
00:41:20
we still get the question all the time when we say,
00:41:22
well, hold on, with everything being on the internet right now,
00:41:24
why would anybody go to university?
00:41:25
Why would anybody care, right?
00:41:26
Like why would anybody still actually, you know,
00:41:29
pay that much money and blah, blah, blah.
00:41:31
And this is, I think, he makes a really, really strong
00:41:33
argument for why you would go to university.
00:41:36
You get four years immersed.
00:41:38
If it's a good university and they're doing the right thing,
00:41:40
you get four years immersed in different mental models.
00:41:44
And you get the space and you get the time and the challenge,
00:41:48
if the faculty are doing a good job,
00:41:49
to really think through those models
00:41:51
and try to figure out what you believe
00:41:53
and how you think around these different areas.
00:41:56
So it's like his many models or multiple models kind of idea,
00:42:02
I think is a big proponent for the higher education system
00:42:05
or education in general to push us along forward.
00:42:10
Or else you become a really, really good technician
00:42:12
most of the time, I think.
00:42:13
And this lets you be a little bit more well-rounded.
00:42:15
So sorry, I had to, I had to because this is the first time
00:42:19
we got into the models in any depth.
00:42:22
- No, I agree with you.
00:42:25
All right, so ready to go into the next one?
00:42:26
- Yeah, let's go to three.
00:42:28
- Okay, so three is a lesson on elementary,
00:42:31
worldly wisdom as it relates to investment management
00:42:34
and business revisited.
00:42:36
This one was given April 19th, 1996.
00:42:39
It's Stanford Law School, basically talking about
00:42:42
if you want to be a good thinker,
00:42:44
you have to develop a mind that can jump
00:42:46
the jurisdictional boundaries.
00:42:48
You have to know how mental models interact
00:42:50
or you can't play the right hand.
00:42:52
He warns you to be wary of heavy ideology,
00:42:56
says each of us has to figure out his or her own lifestyle,
00:42:59
which I think is probably pretty good advice.
00:43:01
And then there's a quote here where I thought it was funny
00:43:03
'cause it was part of the talk.
00:43:05
He says, "I don't have much interest
00:43:06
in writing a book myself as we're reading a book,
00:43:10
which kind of he wrote, kind of not, I guess,
00:43:13
but yeah, basically it's his book."
00:43:16
- I don't think he wrote it though.
00:43:17
Like I don't think this was his idea.
00:43:18
I think the only part of this book that was his idea
00:43:21
was the last talk.
00:43:22
He was like, "I really want people to know
00:43:25
the big long one on human psychology.
00:43:27
The other one's absolutely great."
00:43:28
- Yeah, it's like, well, I guess if we're doing this.
00:43:30
(laughing)
00:43:33
- Okay, from this talk for me,
00:43:35
and if I say chapter, I apologize,
00:43:36
but from this talk for me,
00:43:38
he introduces this idea of what he calls
00:43:40
the lala-palooza effect.
00:43:42
And he uses the idea just like he used multidisciplinary
00:43:46
and many models and all that stuff
00:43:48
throughout this whole thing.
00:43:50
He talks about this lala-palooza effect.
00:43:52
And essentially the lala-palooza effect
00:43:53
is when you have multiple different forces,
00:43:57
ideas, models, all pointing in the same direction.
00:44:00
And because of that, it makes a larger effect on something.
00:44:04
And I had never heard of it, called this,
00:44:07
or I'd never heard it called this before.
00:44:09
Do you know of the concert lala-palooza,
00:44:12
like the weekend long concert in Chicago?
00:44:15
- I've heard of it, yeah, like I've never been,
00:44:18
and I've never heard of the lala-palooza effect before,
00:44:20
but interesting.
00:44:22
- I've gone the lala-palooza, right?
00:44:24
Like when we lived in Chicago,
00:44:25
but I had no, I don't know if these two things
00:44:27
are meant to connect with each other,
00:44:29
or if it's just a coincidence or what it is.
00:44:31
But I thought, you know, like, so he hits that key idea here.
00:44:37
And then he also talks about the fact of when you're,
00:44:40
when you're, I guess you're trying to teach somebody,
00:44:42
or you're trying to convince somebody,
00:44:43
or make an argument to use examples, right?
00:44:44
And that examples go a long way.
00:44:47
So I thought there's were a couple of different things
00:44:49
that sit out of this talk for me.
00:44:51
- Yeah, and hopefully you're kind of getting the idea
00:44:53
at this point that these are very well-done talks.
00:44:57
And there's a lot that you can glean from these.
00:45:00
It's just, what are you actually picking up
00:45:03
when you grab this 350 page?
00:45:05
Tell them at the beginning.
00:45:07
- I've listened to a lot of people give a lot of talks.
00:45:12
And all I can tell you is like,
00:45:14
almost all of these are better than most of the talks
00:45:17
that people give, you know,
00:45:18
at different commencements and different things.
00:45:21
It's just a really, it's a really creative way.
00:45:23
And he's quirky.
00:45:24
Like I said, he's really quirky.
00:45:26
So even if you don't love what he's saying,
00:45:28
the way he says it makes you laugh.
00:45:30
- Yeah, exactly.
00:45:32
So talk four is practical thought about practical thought.
00:45:37
Question mark.
00:45:38
- Yep, this is one of my favorite talks.
00:45:42
- Interesting, okay.
00:45:43
So this was an informal talk given July 20th in 1996.
00:45:47
And it's basically an exercise
00:45:50
of how would you take $2 million in capital
00:45:52
and build a business worth $2 trillion?
00:45:55
And then he goes on to use Coca-Cola as an example
00:45:59
and shares five different helpful notions
00:46:02
at the beginning, but then lays out basically
00:46:04
the 15 minute pitch that he would have given
00:46:06
to this guy back in, I forget the year, 18 something, right?
00:46:11
- Yeah, 18 something.
00:46:12
I forget what it was too, but yeah.
00:46:14
- On how he would plan to do this.
00:46:17
And this was interesting.
00:46:21
I don't know, like I didn't write down any notes
00:46:25
from his big pitch.
00:46:27
The things that stand out to me from that big pitch
00:46:29
are number one, holy cow,
00:46:31
he's really smart, at least when it comes to business.
00:46:35
If he's just sitting down giving this talk,
00:46:37
which I believe he could have done,
00:46:40
then that is a whole nother level of business understanding
00:46:44
which I can kind of grok how you could get to that
00:46:47
if he's constantly reading this stuff all the time.
00:46:50
If he's just like living in this world
00:46:52
and learning as much as he can about it,
00:46:54
that's how you become such a proficient business thinker.
00:46:59
But it is impressive nonetheless when he lays it all out there.
00:47:02
But the other thing is,
00:47:03
I got enough of that when I was in business school.
00:47:06
(laughing)
00:47:07
- Yeah, I didn't go to business school.
00:47:08
- So for me, there's a little bit of this balance
00:47:11
where the way that he does it is very,
00:47:14
I'll say academic, very traditional.
00:47:17
And that's different than the simple marketing
00:47:20
for smart people style stuff.
00:47:22
So it's not that I don't like the business thinking,
00:47:26
but it did have that flavor to it,
00:47:29
which I was a little bit like not my jam.
00:47:34
And I guess the reason that I have that sort of reaction
00:47:38
to it is when I think about business school,
00:47:44
I think about the things that I learned there,
00:47:47
the things that were valuable,
00:47:49
I don't know that a whole lot of it was textbook based.
00:47:54
I think it was really just from the conversations
00:48:00
with the people, which again, to your point,
00:48:02
if you're immersed in that environment, that has value.
00:48:05
I don't think you have to go to a business school
00:48:07
in order to learn that.
00:48:08
And Exhibit A is Charlie Munger, who went to law school
00:48:11
and didn't take a business class,
00:48:13
didn't take an economics class.
00:48:15
And here he is waxing poetic about those particular topics.
00:48:18
You can totally learn that stuff other ways.
00:48:23
And I don't know how valuable it is
00:48:27
to think about things in that lens.
00:48:31
Like it's sort of a fun exercise once in a while
00:48:35
when you can nerd out about stuff, certain ways.
00:48:39
I guess my version of this is sort of like
00:48:41
the practical PKM cohort where I can nerd out
00:48:43
about PKM workflows in obsidian, but to the average person,
00:48:46
it's kind of like, well, that has limited value.
00:48:48
And that's really like the only place
00:48:50
that I would really geek out about that kind of stuff.
00:48:52
The rest of the time is just like, well, you know this stuff.
00:48:54
Now, how do you actually apply it?
00:48:56
So I don't know.
00:48:57
This is a little bit too meta for me, I guess.
00:49:00
- See, and I'm a sucker for a good case study, right?
00:49:03
And essentially that's this whole chapter, right?
00:49:05
Is the case study turning $2 million into $2 trillion.
00:49:12
And I just thought that was,
00:49:15
I thought that was a lot of fun.
00:49:17
Hold on, I'm blanking, I didn't, yeah, okay.
00:49:19
This is the case study, it's 1884 Atlanta, right?
00:49:22
Okay, yeah, go lots in the cook, okay.
00:49:24
I was making sure I wasn't on the wrong chapter.
00:49:27
But then I like in this one too, the five helpful notions.
00:49:31
So he throws out there the five helpful notions.
00:49:33
I will go through them all now,
00:49:34
but I thought those were a good kind of summary
00:49:37
of some of the things we get in a much more long-winded way
00:49:42
other places.
00:49:44
And then he's got a quote in here at the end
00:49:46
from an advertisement.
00:49:49
I jatted this down too, I love this.
00:49:50
He mentioned just multiple places.
00:49:52
- Yeah, I love this, it says,
00:49:54
the old time Warner and Swayze ad that was a favorite of mine.
00:49:58
The company that needs a new machine tool
00:50:00
and hasn't bought it is already paying for it.
00:50:02
And I was like, man, that is a great, great quote.
00:50:05
So, no, I just thought this one was a good,
00:50:10
fairly short kind of succinct version of his
00:50:14
with a wrapped in a really good case study.
00:50:16
- Yep, agreed.
00:50:18
All right, so talk five is the need
00:50:23
for more multidisciplinary skills
00:50:25
from professionals, educational implications.
00:50:29
I think I got that title, right?
00:50:30
- You did, yes.
00:50:31
- Okay, so this was given, it's a little bit clumsy,
00:50:33
but given April 24th, 1998 at the 50th reunion
00:50:37
of Harvard Law School, so to the class of 1948.
00:50:42
So this is where he introduces the idea
00:50:44
of Socratic solitaire, which is kind of interesting.
00:50:47
He broad-scale professionals do more multidisciplinary skill.
00:50:50
Was our education sufficiently multidisciplinary
00:50:52
in elite broad-scale soft science?
00:50:54
What is the essential nature of practical,
00:50:56
best-form multidisciplinary education?
00:50:59
In the last 50 years, how far has elite academia
00:51:02
progressed to our attainable, best-form multidisciplinary?
00:51:05
What educational practices would make progress faster?
00:51:08
And just in that, you can kind of get a tone for the grammar.
00:51:11
And if that's off-putting to you,
00:51:13
you're not gonna like this book.
00:51:14
- Yep, I agree.
00:51:15
- He uses a lot of big words
00:51:17
'cause he reads a lot of books.
00:51:19
There's a couple things that stood out to me
00:51:21
from this section.
00:51:22
One is, this is where you find out
00:51:24
that he never took a business or an economics class,
00:51:26
which is sort of astounding
00:51:27
'cause he's so smart when it comes to this stuff.
00:51:30
Another thing is that there's this two-part rule
00:51:32
that he talks about,
00:51:33
and this is actually on the back cover of the printed version.
00:51:36
This is pretty simple, but pretty brilliant
00:51:39
if used in the right context.
00:51:41
Take a simple basic idea, that's part one.
00:51:43
Part two is take it very seriously.
00:51:45
You can see how that could translate into success.
00:51:49
But the thing that I really wanted to just ask you,
00:51:52
'cause this whole thing is really
00:51:53
where he's starting to rail on
00:51:55
the way that things are taught in academia.
00:51:58
What do you think about his statement
00:52:00
that many more courses should be mandatory, not optional?
00:52:03
- Okay, so you have to understand
00:52:04
my background coming from this is,
00:52:06
I live in a world where we don't get many optional courses,
00:52:10
right?
00:52:10
So engineering, I mean, my students have zero electives.
00:52:14
You know, there's maybe like one class
00:52:16
where they can pick the version of the class that they want,
00:52:18
but like they don't have any electives.
00:52:20
And when I was in undergrad,
00:52:22
I barely got any electives at all,
00:52:25
and even then they were very, very tightly confined.
00:52:28
Like what I was allowed to take is an elective.
00:52:29
So I don't have any kind of rub on, you know,
00:52:33
what they should do.
00:52:34
I think one of the drivers of this,
00:52:36
and why he says is that they should be, you know,
00:52:38
more required courses is because
00:52:40
the courses he's talking about, people don't wanna take.
00:52:44
Like they won't wanna take.
00:52:45
So he's talking about this, you know,
00:52:46
multi-disciplinarity that's going to round people out
00:52:50
in a way that's going to make them uncomfortable
00:52:52
and it's gonna introduce them to models
00:52:54
that don't make sense for them.
00:52:55
So for instance, a communications major,
00:52:58
getting a basics physics class,
00:53:00
I can tell you right now,
00:53:01
communication majors want nothing to do with physics, right?
00:53:04
They want, like they don't wanna do the math,
00:53:06
they don't wanna do the science,
00:53:06
like they want nothing to do with that.
00:53:08
And there's nothing,
00:53:09
I'm not gonna tell you that there's anything wrong with that.
00:53:12
That's just the reality of the way it is.
00:53:14
Just like my engineering students,
00:53:17
when you give them an English literature class,
00:53:20
you know, or a rhetoric class,
00:53:22
they're like, this is the dumbest class I've ever taken.
00:53:24
And it's like they, some of them will see the bigger picture
00:53:28
either during that class or later on down the road,
00:53:30
they'll be like, oh yeah,
00:53:32
like that was a really powerful class for me.
00:53:34
So like one of the ones I took was logic, right?
00:53:37
I took like a basic logic class, you know,
00:53:39
philosophy, you know, kind of logic class.
00:53:41
And man, what a crazy powerful course
00:53:44
because it taught you the way people think
00:53:46
and the way people put things together
00:53:47
and then how people can mess that up.
00:53:49
And so I am a fan of this, right?
00:53:51
Like I think that our job as academia
00:53:55
is to make decisions to help educate people
00:54:00
in a certain way.
00:54:02
I think it's the students job to figure out,
00:54:05
do I like that form of education?
00:54:07
And is that something I'm going to buy into?
00:54:10
Now, where the engineering ed world and me, right?
00:54:13
Where my colleagues in the engineering ed
00:54:15
where would like get cranky, you know,
00:54:17
and start to debate me on it is like,
00:54:19
well, what about agency?
00:54:20
You know, like what about the students agency
00:54:22
in the whole learning process?
00:54:23
And I would say like, okay, they have agency.
00:54:26
They have agency in the degree that they pick.
00:54:27
So therefore they're going to focus
00:54:29
and specialize in certain ways.
00:54:30
And then we're going to be encouraging them
00:54:34
to push them out of their comfort zone
00:54:36
or push them away from it.
00:54:37
Where this all falls down though, is it done effectively?
00:54:41
Because if it's not done effectively,
00:54:43
you just throw it all out the window, right?
00:54:45
'Cause you're making them take courses
00:54:46
that actually don't matter.
00:54:48
And that's when everybody gets real cranky.
00:54:51
- Yeah, so that's kind of the frame of reference I had.
00:54:53
I went to a small liberal arts college
00:54:55
in Green Bay called St. Walt D. Pierre called St. Norbert.
00:54:59
And they make you take a whole bunch
00:55:02
of different classes, a bunch of different areas.
00:55:06
And there were some of those classes
00:55:08
that I was just like, I really resent the fact
00:55:11
that I am paying $30,000 a year.
00:55:13
And I'm sure it's much more now
00:55:15
to take this stupid class.
00:55:18
- I hear that all the time.
00:55:19
I hear that all the time.
00:55:20
It's like, I can't stay at this class.
00:55:22
Why do I have to take it?
00:55:23
So I teach up at this classes.
00:55:27
- I feel like there should be,
00:55:30
I think I can get on board with him
00:55:32
about more classes being mandatory instead of optional.
00:55:36
But I'm kind of curious what he means by that.
00:55:38
'Cause I don't think he's talking
00:55:39
about liberal arts education at this point.
00:55:41
I think he's talking about a bunch
00:55:43
of tangentially related classes,
00:55:45
which are sort of like, well, you could take this one
00:55:48
or this one.
00:55:49
I think he would probably be arguing
00:55:51
that night you should take both of them.
00:55:53
(laughs)
00:55:53
Not if you are a business economics major,
00:55:57
you should be taking religion classes,
00:55:59
which is what I did.
00:56:01
- Well, I think he's coming at it from a person
00:56:04
who has had to learn a lot of this stuff on his own.
00:56:08
And he's saying, what if we took these core ideas
00:56:13
and we made them do that in,
00:56:16
and I say made them, right?
00:56:17
Like we required them to do that
00:56:18
in basic undergraduate education.
00:56:21
- Yeah.
00:56:22
So I don't know, and there's probably like a big debate
00:56:27
to be had about the right way to do this.
00:56:29
I think there's probably an element of truth
00:56:31
in what he's arguing for.
00:56:32
But also, I wasn't a big fan of the liberal arts approach.
00:56:36
I kind of wish I had not gone to a school
00:56:40
that took that approach,
00:56:42
just because I went there, my wife went there.
00:56:45
We met a bunch of great people there.
00:56:47
We had a lot of great experiences there.
00:56:49
Also put us in a whole bunch of debt
00:56:51
that took us a really long time to pay off.
00:56:53
And I used almost none of it.
00:56:55
(laughs)
00:56:56
Same with her.
00:56:57
- I mean, my thing is the intangibles of that,
00:57:01
like how do you measure some of the intangibles of that?
00:57:04
Like, is there more of that thinking that you actually apply?
00:57:06
But what I'll tell you is I had the opposite experience
00:57:09
because I went to Penn State,
00:57:11
and I mean, it was engineering through and through.
00:57:14
Like we are teaching you to be an engineer through and through,
00:57:16
so it was 100% not a liberal arts education, right?
00:57:20
Like there were times when I was like,
00:57:22
"Man, I just wish I could take like a basic XYZ class," right?
00:57:26
Like to learn personal accounting or whatever,
00:57:29
you know, like whatever it was.
00:57:30
And it was like, nope, you got it, you know,
00:57:32
these types of classes.
00:57:33
And they tried, but they're just not a lot of room.
00:57:36
Okay, we should move on.
00:57:37
We should move on there.
00:57:38
'Cause I can nerd out on this all day.
00:57:39
- Well, I mean, the next talk,
00:57:42
I don't have a whole lot to say about this is
00:57:45
"Talk 6, Investment Practices of Leading Charitable Foundations."
00:57:49
Given October 14th, 1998,
00:57:51
as a speech to the Foundation Financial Officers Group
00:57:54
at the Miramar Sheraton Hotel in Santa Monica, California.
00:57:58
- I basically just shouted down that extra care
00:58:00
and thinking also introduces extra errors.
00:58:03
So you got to be aware of that.
00:58:05
And then two quotes.
00:58:06
"Would a man wishes he will believe by Demosthenes
00:58:09
and you must not fool yourself
00:58:11
and you're the easiest person to fool by Richard Feynman."
00:58:13
(laughs)
00:58:14
- The Feynman quote was all I had.
00:58:17
And Mike, I'll even go further.
00:58:19
And I would say, "Talk 6, talk 7, and talk 8.
00:58:21
I'm good," right?
00:58:22
Like we can tell what the titles are
00:58:24
and just keep on flying.
00:58:27
Because those talks just, they were interesting to read,
00:58:30
but I didn't just didn't get anything out of them.
00:58:32
- Okay, well, let's go to the next one then,
00:58:35
which is "Talk 7, Breakfast Meeting
00:58:37
of the Philanthropy Roundtable."
00:58:39
There is an idea here in an original term
00:58:43
that he comes up with, (laughs)
00:58:45
which we should probably talk a little bit about.
00:58:47
So this was given November 10th, 2000
00:58:49
in Pasadena, California.
00:58:51
And he takes the idea of bezel,
00:58:55
which is a contraction of the word embezzle,
00:58:58
coined by John Kenneth Galbraith,
00:58:59
described the amount of undisclosed embezzlement.
00:59:03
And he sort of creates this argument
00:59:06
that embezzlement that you're not aware of
00:59:10
isn't really stealing from a specific person.
00:59:14
So maybe it's not that big a deal.
00:59:16
That's a totally gross representation
00:59:18
of the well-articulated argument that he's making.
00:59:21
But basically, he's kind of talking about
00:59:23
how when you print new money
00:59:27
and you introduce it into the economy,
00:59:28
you're not taking it from somebody else.
00:59:30
So maybe that's not as bad as you think it is.
00:59:33
So he creates this term febezzle,
00:59:36
which is the functional equivalent for bezel.
00:59:41
Febezzle Mint is the process of creating febezzle.
00:59:44
And febezzlers are the persons engaged in febezzlement.
00:59:48
There is a whole big economic discussion
00:59:53
to be had on the relevance of this,
00:59:55
which is kind of interesting to me
00:59:58
because I was a business major and an economics minor.
01:00:01
So a lot of the things that he's talking about,
01:00:04
I remember from some of those economics classes,
01:00:07
I can tell you I used zero of it
01:00:09
in what I actually do, running my own business
01:00:13
and even working with other small businesses.
01:00:15
You know, there's, I don't know, micro versus macroeconomics.
01:00:19
Not a whole bunch of relevant application day to day
01:00:24
for that sort of stuff.
01:00:25
But it is important if you're trying to understand
01:00:27
how markets work and stuff like that.
01:00:28
So he's at a whole new level
01:00:29
where maybe that stuff is super important.
01:00:32
But I can still draw the curves and the charts
01:00:37
that he's talking about.
01:00:38
Like I recognize what those look like,
01:00:41
but I just, I have not had a single time
01:00:45
in my working existence since I graduated
01:00:49
where I have actually had cause to draw those
01:00:53
and talk about those.
01:00:54
Up until this point.
01:00:55
(laughs)
01:00:56
- Yeah.
01:00:57
I misspoke 'cause I guess I did get one interesting thing
01:01:00
out of these three chapters.
01:01:02
Samuel Johnson, I think I would like to read
01:01:05
more Samuel Johnson.
01:01:06
So in the, in talk seven,
01:01:08
there's an ethical rule from Samuel Johnson.
01:01:11
Basically, he believed that the maintenance
01:01:13
of an easily removable ignorance
01:01:16
by a responsible office holder was treacherous malfeasance
01:01:20
in meeting moral obligation.
01:01:21
And I was like, that's actually a really interesting idea.
01:01:24
Like if you essentially, if you like intentionally
01:01:27
don't get rid of the bad thing, you are to blame.
01:01:30
Like you are the cause of the blame.
01:01:32
And I'm like, I think I would like the Samuel Johnson guy.
01:01:35
I think he and I would be a resident.
01:01:37
If I could understand his structure,
01:01:40
his sentence structure and word choice,
01:01:42
I think I'd like him.
01:01:44
(laughs)
01:01:45
- That's cool.
01:01:46
Ready to go to the next one?
01:01:48
- Yes.
01:01:49
- We're gonna talk eight, I think.
01:01:50
- Yeah, yeah.
01:01:51
Talk eight is the great financial scandal of 2003.
01:01:56
What's interesting about this is that this was a handwritten
01:02:01
talk that Charlie wrote when he was vacationing
01:02:05
in the summer of 2000.
01:02:08
And it's sort of a prediction of what was going to happen
01:02:12
in terms of financial markets crashing.
01:02:16
And it's sort of a parable about a historical company
01:02:23
but under a fictional name.
01:02:25
And the specifics of everything again,
01:02:32
reminded me of my economic textbooks,
01:02:35
not necessarily a great thing.
01:02:37
But for some people, maybe that is really of interest to you.
01:02:41
There are a couple of things that I got from this.
01:02:44
One, there's a quote from this fictional account.
01:02:48
It's sort of like a parable kind of Patrick Lencioni style.
01:02:51
It's the best way to put it, I think.
01:02:54
Where he says it's hard for an empty sack
01:02:56
to stand upright.
01:02:58
- To stand upright.
01:02:59
- Sort of interesting.
01:03:00
And then he's talking about how this fictional
01:03:05
slash not fictional company after the founder died
01:03:08
and people came to take it over.
01:03:10
They wanted to maintain this level of growth
01:03:13
so they were kind of exploiting this economic loophole
01:03:17
in US law.
01:03:20
And eventually that just led to a whole big collapse.
01:03:23
But there's this quote, it says,
01:03:24
"If we mix only a moderate minority share of turds
01:03:27
"with the raisins each year,
01:03:28
"probably no one will recognize or will ultimately become
01:03:31
"a very large collection of turds."
01:03:33
- Yes.
01:03:34
- That's pretty funny.
01:03:36
- I'm telling you, he's just so quirky in the way he writes
01:03:40
and the examples that he uses.
01:03:42
But then the whole point of this whole thing
01:03:45
is employee stock options.
01:03:47
And he's going into actual,
01:03:50
I mean, you probably, I would assume you understood
01:03:53
this way better than I did because I was like,
01:03:56
"Okay, I get like somewhat gist of what's happening here."
01:03:59
I was like, but I don't really know anything
01:04:00
about employee stock options and all this stuff.
01:04:03
And like what they're actually doing
01:04:04
and how they're, I guess how they're hurting themselves
01:04:08
to where in a couple years they're gonna be,
01:04:10
they're gonna be hurting long-term financially.
01:04:13
So I kind of glazed over, right?
01:04:15
Like, so I'm reading this chapter going,
01:04:17
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,
01:04:18
'cause I kind of glazed over 'cause I was like,
01:04:20
I don't really understand the economic side
01:04:22
of what we're talking about here.
01:04:23
And he's going hard into the economic side.
01:04:25
- Yeah.
01:04:26
- Of what we're doing.
01:04:27
- Well, see, that's the thing, in my opinion,
01:04:31
there is a very limited application of this stuff.
01:04:38
So I went to, and I got a business degree,
01:04:43
the traditional path that you can follow from that
01:04:46
is to climb the business ladder.
01:04:50
So I had a bunch of friends that I graduated with
01:04:55
who went into commercial real estate
01:04:58
down in the Milwaukee area.
01:04:59
And they played the game and they climbed the ladder.
01:05:02
And I have one friend now who is president
01:05:05
of one of the companies down there
01:05:07
that leases out all of the big skyscrapers.
01:05:10
Those are his accounts.
01:05:12
I had zero interest in that ever.
01:05:16
So if you are trying to get to that level,
01:05:20
there is a ladder that you climb.
01:05:23
I think there has never been a better opportunity
01:05:28
for people who wanted to own their own small business
01:05:31
and are completely not interested in that particular world.
01:05:35
You don't need the MBA.
01:05:37
You don't need to jump through the hoops.
01:05:39
So if you were to take the average business student
01:05:42
at this point, which path are they taking?
01:05:45
It's probably a lot more 50/50 than it was even back then.
01:05:48
But I've always kind of taken the untraditional path.
01:05:52
I guess you can blame my dad for that.
01:05:54
He did the same sort of thing.
01:05:57
Plays on his terms.
01:06:00
So yeah, that's not...
01:06:05
I remember that sort of discussion
01:06:09
from my economics classes.
01:06:11
And I could study enough to talk about
01:06:14
that stuff intelligently,
01:06:16
but have had zero real world application of that since then.
01:06:21
And there probably is a place where you can do that.
01:06:23
And for the person who is looking for resources
01:06:27
in that particular area,
01:06:28
they're probably already familiar
01:06:29
with Port Charlie's Almanac.
01:06:30
And for the people who aren't,
01:06:31
there are sections of this book,
01:06:32
just know that you're not gonna need
01:06:35
to really engage with this.
01:06:38
It's fine that it's over your head.
01:06:40
- Exactly, exactly.
01:06:41
Can I introduce chapter nine?
01:06:43
'Cause I have a point that I wanna make with chapter nine.
01:06:45
- Yes, but one other thing from chapter eight,
01:06:48
the other note I have here,
01:06:50
it's very clear he is not a fan of accounts.
01:06:53
- Oh, not at all.
01:06:55
Oh yeah, yeah, not at all.
01:06:57
- There's somebody else he's really not a fan of.
01:06:59
He rips him, oh, chiropractors.
01:07:02
Why does he rip chiropractors so bad?
01:07:04
Because he rips him like a bunch of times.
01:07:07
- Well, I think I have extended family members
01:07:13
that I think just from family conversations
01:07:17
at Christmas growing up, stuff like that,
01:07:19
where we would get together with a whole extended family.
01:07:21
I maybe have a little bit of insight into this
01:07:24
where chiropractors, that I could be completely wrong,
01:07:28
and I actually wanted to be a chiropractor at one point.
01:07:30
I was trying to get into a Palmer chiropractic college
01:07:33
in Iowa, I think, but biology, chemistry, not for me.
01:07:39
So I switched to business.
01:07:42
But that was what I went into originally.
01:07:45
And yeah, just was not my thing.
01:07:48
But I remember people saying things
01:07:50
about quack doctors and things like that.
01:07:52
So my only guess is that maybe that's a newer medicine
01:07:56
and people who are just really traditional
01:07:58
view it as not valid.
01:08:00
But I would think at this point,
01:08:03
most people know chiropractic care is a real thing.
01:08:07
- Yeah, exactly, right?
01:08:08
And the other thing I would think is
01:08:10
he talks about this later on
01:08:11
when he talks about the different tendencies in psychology,
01:08:15
but about the fact that I think a lot of times
01:08:19
a chiropractor is like, okay, I'm gonna fix you
01:08:21
and then we're gonna come back later
01:08:22
and I'm gonna fix you again.
01:08:23
And this is a continual thing.
01:08:24
And that just seems something like Munger's like,
01:08:26
no, no, no, no, we don't buy into that thing
01:08:29
where your fix leads to more of you fixing me.
01:08:33
That's just not his style.
01:08:35
- That's probably part of it too, yeah.
01:08:38
- Okay, can I do chapter, sorry, talk nine.
01:08:40
I wanna call it chapter nine, but can I do talk nine?
01:08:42
- Yep, go for it.
01:08:43
- Okay, so talk nine, academic economics,
01:08:46
strengths and faults after considering
01:08:49
interdisciplinary needs.
01:08:51
So this talk was 2003.
01:08:55
It's one of the longer talks that he gives.
01:08:59
He gives it to the Herb K Undergraduate,
01:09:02
it's the Herb K Undergraduate Lecture
01:09:04
at the University of California Santa Barbara
01:09:06
in the Economics Department.
01:09:07
And the reason why I wanted to introduce this
01:09:09
is because it's almost like people want him
01:09:14
to talk about economics.
01:09:16
And all he wants to do is talk about
01:09:18
interdisciplinarity and education and psychology.
01:09:22
And people keep saying, please talk about economics.
01:09:24
And he's like, no, I wanna talk about these other things.
01:09:27
And they're like, but I really want you to tell me
01:09:29
how to make a million dollars and a billion dollars.
01:09:31
I mean, he's like, no, I wanna talk about psychology
01:09:35
and education and it's like, I felt that tension,
01:09:39
the entire book, right?
01:09:40
Because it's like, you'll get these chapters
01:09:42
and he'll like go on this tirade about some, you know,
01:09:45
employee stock options or some economic principle.
01:09:48
And then there's these other ones where it's like,
01:09:50
okay, I got to write this one.
01:09:51
Like this one was mine.
01:09:52
Like nobody told me what to do.
01:09:53
And it's all about, it's all about like education
01:09:56
and thinking and mental models.
01:09:59
And then, oh, by the way, he'll say economics enough.
01:10:01
That way people were like, this is why you invited us.
01:10:03
- He basically was like, this is the problem
01:10:06
with your economics department.
01:10:07
It's kind of interesting that he was invited
01:10:10
to give the talk there.
01:10:11
- Yes, like it's crazy.
01:10:14
So he's really a guy who's speaking with nothing to lose.
01:10:18
Right, absolutely nothing to lose, you know what I mean?
01:10:21
But they, somebody at some point,
01:10:24
I think it's in the intro by Kaufman.
01:10:26
He says, this is the grand unified theory
01:10:29
of the Munger approach, right?
01:10:30
Like, so if you're looking for his ideas
01:10:34
around this interdisciplinarity concept,
01:10:38
it's really here.
01:10:39
Here he talks about the fact that, you know,
01:10:41
appeal to interest and he gets into the fact
01:10:43
that opportunity cost is a superpower,
01:10:45
incentives are a superpower.
01:10:47
He's talked multiple times up to this point
01:10:49
about the tragedy of the commons,
01:10:51
which Mike, are you familiar with the tragedy of the commons?
01:10:54
- Yes, I don't remember the specific details of it,
01:10:57
but it's basically a model, yeah.
01:10:59
- Yeah, so we, there's a good example of fish in a pond
01:11:04
that will run to teach students how to use Excel
01:11:06
and how to think about tragedy of commons,
01:11:09
which basically you can fish out of this pond.
01:11:11
And then, but everybody gets to fish out of the same pond,
01:11:14
so as a group we have to control the resources in that pond,
01:11:18
'cause if we use up all the fish, everybody dies.
01:11:21
But at the same time, there's personal stake in it
01:11:24
because I wanna get more fish than you do.
01:11:26
And it's this really fun game that we play
01:11:28
because students will start competing with each other.
01:11:31
And then you'll get student teams that'll group up
01:11:33
and they'll form little sub-clans,
01:11:36
and then they'll hoard the fish for themselves,
01:11:38
and then they'll try to offer the fish to the other teams
01:11:41
to buy and stuff.
01:11:42
So it's like the tragedy of commons is really interesting
01:11:44
if you've never explored that or not,
01:11:45
but he's talked to it about it a bunch of times
01:11:47
up until this point.
01:11:49
He goes through a lot of different things, right?
01:11:53
There's a, I'm looking at how many are there are, nine.
01:11:56
So there's nine different points he has
01:11:58
on what's wrong with academic economics, right?
01:12:01
And he basically just goes on this tirade
01:12:03
of all the things that are wrong with economic economics.
01:12:07
Some of them are more interesting than others.
01:12:09
And then, so let's hit a couple of the ones
01:12:12
that we think are interesting.
01:12:13
So the first one I think was interesting is
01:12:17
too little is paid attention to the second
01:12:20
and higher order effects that essentially we only look
01:12:22
at what the immediate impact is gonna be of something.
01:12:25
We don't look at the second and third order effects.
01:12:27
I thought that was an interesting one
01:12:29
to take away from here.
01:12:31
Another one is that fairness and unfairness,
01:12:34
and I really like what he says here is,
01:12:37
and I'm gonna read it
01:12:37
because he says it's so much better than I can.
01:12:40
Morality should sometimes appear unfair
01:12:42
like most worldly outcomes.
01:12:44
The craving for perfect fairness
01:12:45
causes a lot of terrible problems in system function.
01:12:48
Some systems should be made deliberately unfair
01:12:51
to the individuals because they'll be fair
01:12:54
on average to all of us and it goes on further.
01:12:57
But like what a different concept
01:12:58
than we have right now.
01:12:59
It's like, oh no, it should be fair across everything
01:13:01
and it should be completely egalitarian and blah, blah, blah.
01:13:04
And it's like, well, hold on, maybe not, right?
01:13:06
Maybe when we do that, we actually break the larger system
01:13:09
and he's got a few of these
01:13:12
and everybody who reads it'll get different stuff out of it,
01:13:14
but those are a couple of the ones I took out.
01:13:16
Mike, what did you take?
01:13:17
- Is that related to the last one,
01:13:18
the not enough attention to virtue and vice effects?
01:13:20
- Yeah, yep, that's the last one.
01:13:21
- So there's a quote associated with that,
01:13:24
which I think is interesting.
01:13:25
The cash register did more for human morality
01:13:27
than the Congregational church.
01:13:30
Basically just eliminating the ability to steal money
01:13:36
is what caused people to act right,
01:13:38
not educating them on the right way to act.
01:13:43
One of the nine objections he has,
01:13:45
which I thought was kind of funny,
01:13:47
not enough attention to the concept of the bezel mitt,
01:13:49
which he made up.
01:13:53
Let me see, oh, the first one too,
01:13:55
fatal unconnected is leading
01:13:56
to man with a hammer syndrome.
01:13:58
He talks about man with a hammer syndrome throughout
01:14:02
and that is basically when you,
01:14:04
all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail
01:14:07
and makes sense that that would be something
01:14:10
that he would key in on since he is advocating
01:14:14
for having all these mental models
01:14:15
and being able to use them.
01:14:17
So I can totally see having been in economics classes
01:14:22
how like the micro and macro economics specifically,
01:14:27
you kind of get funneled into this way of thinking
01:14:29
about things and this is the way that markets behave.
01:14:31
And so obviously this is the cause
01:14:33
and maybe it's not that simple.
01:14:35
So I think that's probably a pretty fair one.
01:14:40
Yeah, I mean, every single one of these objections,
01:14:43
he's probably accurate in sharing it.
01:14:47
Kind of weird that he's doing this
01:14:49
to an economics undergraduate class though.
01:14:53
Yeah. So, I don't know.
01:14:56
Also, he like basically calls out the way
01:14:59
that they teach economics at the beginning
01:15:01
when he shares a story about how he asks someone
01:15:04
at the Julius Stein I Institute in UCLA.
01:15:06
Why are you treating cataracts only
01:15:08
with this totally obsolete cataract operation?
01:15:10
And the response was, but Charlie,
01:15:12
it's such a wonderful operation to teach.
01:15:15
He's like, so what, it's useless.
01:15:18
Yup, yup, yup, yup, yup, yup, yup.
01:15:20
Unfortunately, that's all too real.
01:15:23
Yup. All right, ready for the next one?
01:15:25
I am ready for the next one.
01:15:26
Okay, so the next one,
01:15:29
talk 10 USC Gould School of Law Commencement Dress.
01:15:33
This was given May 13th, 1997 is the date
01:15:37
that I wrote down, is that correct?
01:15:39
No, it's 2007.
01:15:40
2007, okay.
01:15:42
Actually, it was 20, 90,
01:15:44
29, 97, I'm like, that can't be right.
01:15:46
29, 97.
01:15:47
Yup, okay, so May 13th, 2007,
01:15:50
the safest way to try and get what you want
01:15:53
is to try and deserve what you want.
01:15:54
I like that quote.
01:15:55
Mm-hmm.
01:15:56
Mm-hmm.
01:15:57
It mentions how the acquisition of wisdom
01:15:58
is a moral duty, I like that.
01:16:00
He hits on this thought about,
01:16:02
you need to be a lifelong learner.
01:16:04
Without that, you're not gonna get very far.
01:16:06
There's a quote associated with that.
01:16:08
It says you're not gonna get very far in life
01:16:10
based on what you already know.
01:16:12
That's a really interesting thing to say
01:16:14
at a commencement address for a law school.
01:16:18
I kind of wonder how that went over,
01:16:20
but I completely agree with it.
01:16:23
Yeah, there's a bunch of just like random tidbits
01:16:25
from this that I jotted down.
01:16:28
One thing was, he mentions that about half a warm buffet's
01:16:31
waking time is spent reading.
01:16:33
That's a lot of time to be reading.
01:16:35
I don't think I could do that.
01:16:37
I thought I read a lot, but I guess I got further to go.
01:16:42
Okay, I wanna hear your comment on this,
01:16:45
so I wanna prep you, or I wanna beat you to it.
01:16:49
Do you remember the wooden, the wooden comment?
01:16:53
The non-egality, John Wooden.
01:16:55
No, what was that?
01:16:56
Okay, so there's a section in here
01:16:58
where he talks about maximizing non-egality,
01:17:01
and basically he refers to John Wooden,
01:17:03
and John Wooden would say, like, listen,
01:17:05
the best players are gonna play.
01:17:08
And if you want playing time,
01:17:09
you have to be one of the best players, right?
01:17:11
Because that's the way it works.
01:17:14
And you get into this idea of meritocracy
01:17:17
and stuff like that, but I really like,
01:17:20
just that he's not afraid to just throw that out there
01:17:23
and say, listen, we can lower the quality,
01:17:26
we can lower the quality of the overall product,
01:17:29
or we can say, come up, rise up to the level
01:17:34
of the people who are really out there and really performing,
01:17:37
and I thought that was a really interesting one
01:17:39
from this commencement speech.
01:17:41
Yeah, so I do like that a lot,
01:17:43
and I like that concept, and I have lots of thoughts on that.
01:17:46
I guess I just kinda glossed over that,
01:17:49
but didn't really jump out to me
01:17:50
when I was reading this particular book.
01:17:52
But I agree with that.
01:17:54
I mean, John Wooden is one of the most successful coaches ever.
01:18:00
You really can't knock what he was able to achieve
01:18:07
in terms of his success as a coach,
01:18:08
and I would argue in his leadership and development
01:18:11
of people as well.
01:18:13
So I think that that is a completely accurate and fair
01:18:18
and right way to approach things.
01:18:21
I think there's a caveat with that though,
01:18:24
where if you are going to say
01:18:27
only the best people are going to play, that's fine.
01:18:31
If you are a good coach, you will then make clear
01:18:34
what are the criteria for becoming the best.
01:18:39
And unfortunately, that doesn't happen very much.
01:18:44
Like I've got kids who are going through that stuff currently
01:18:48
with coaches on the teams that they're on,
01:18:50
they're frustrated with their lack of playing time,
01:18:52
and I would agree if they're better than some of the kids
01:18:55
that are playing, and you can say,
01:18:56
well, life's not fair, you just gotta learn to deal with it.
01:18:59
Part of it is you gotta speak up
01:19:02
and have conversations with your coach.
01:19:04
One particular instance that has happened in the coach,
01:19:07
just as a terrible communicator,
01:19:09
so they don't even know what to tell them.
01:19:11
And at that point, you gotta figure it out for yourself,
01:19:14
but the ideal scenario would be the coach who is responsible
01:19:19
for putting the best team on the field
01:19:21
or on the court, whatever, has made it clear
01:19:24
to everybody on the team, this is what I am looking for.
01:19:27
This is the definition of success.
01:19:30
Do these things better than anybody else, and you will play.
01:19:35
- Did you wrestle, did you ever wrestle in your life
01:19:37
for like a, so this is a, there's two ideas here,
01:19:41
so I'll get to the wrestling one in a second.
01:19:42
But this also works really well with competitive leagues
01:19:45
as opposed to developmental leagues.
01:19:47
Like I think if you're in a developmental league,
01:19:49
this kind of goes out the window
01:19:50
'cause it's like, no, you're trying to develop your players
01:19:52
as you go, so maybe you don't just play the best or whatever.
01:19:57
But wrestling was really, really interesting for that
01:19:59
because you would have essentially wrestle-offs,
01:20:03
and you could do those as many times as you needed
01:20:07
to do 'em, so it's like if you were in a weight class
01:20:09
and there were three other people in your weight class
01:20:11
on the team, at any given time, somebody could be like,
01:20:14
"Hey, I wanna do a wrestle-off for whatever it is."
01:20:17
Or the coach would say, like every so many weeks,
01:20:19
"We're gonna give you the chance to do wrestle-offs."
01:20:22
And you had to do it.
01:20:23
Like you had to prove that you were still the best wrestler
01:20:27
to start at that weight class.
01:20:29
And what an interesting good way to establish
01:20:33
your starting lineup is based on the wrestle-offs.
01:20:35
- Yeah, so I didn't have that,
01:20:37
but I did play tennis, and I played college tennis.
01:20:39
So I was pretty good, but not great.
01:20:42
And with tennis, you'd have challenge matches.
01:20:44
- Yep. - So, yeah.
01:20:45
If you lose, then someone takes your spot.
01:20:49
Yeah, and it was the latter, you know,
01:20:51
so you could challenge the person above you
01:20:53
and you work your way up and it just kind of
01:20:54
starts itself out by the end.
01:20:56
If you wanna be number one, you gotta beat number one.
01:20:58
- Exactly, yeah, exactly.
01:21:01
- Yeah, a little bit differently team sports, unfortunately.
01:21:04
- And personalities, right?
01:21:05
And humans are called too.
01:21:06
- Yeah, yeah, I mean, you never wanna default to excuses
01:21:10
and politics, but the truth is that it's real.
01:21:14
And you gotta figure out how to navigate that stuff.
01:21:16
That's something that my kids are working through right now.
01:21:21
I do think that, you know, my approach to that
01:21:25
would be be a squeaky wheel, right?
01:21:30
Keep asking the coach, become annoying to the coach.
01:21:32
Like, hey, I wanna know what I can do to get better.
01:21:35
And then when you do that, over and over and over again,
01:21:37
and you build up a body of work,
01:21:38
become so good they can't ignore you,
01:21:39
and be like, hey, I deserve to be out there.
01:21:41
- Exactly.
01:21:42
- No one wants to have to do that.
01:21:44
- And it's the presentation of it, right?
01:21:46
Like, what can I do to get better?
01:21:47
What can I do to get better?
01:21:48
Not, I should be starting, I should be starting,
01:21:50
I should be starting, right?
01:21:51
'Cause those are two very different messages
01:21:52
you send to the coach, right?
01:21:53
It's like, yeah, so.
01:21:56
- Yeah, but if they can't tell you, you know,
01:21:58
and you are one of the better players,
01:22:00
I think you can get to the point
01:22:02
where you do have to tell the coach,
01:22:03
okay, so I think I should be starting.
01:22:05
- Yeah, exactly, yeah.
01:22:06
- Why am I not starting?
01:22:08
Just tell me, that's completely fair.
01:22:11
You don't have to do it in front of the rest of the team.
01:22:13
You know, you can do it one on one,
01:22:14
but people, am I right?
01:22:17
- People, yep.
01:22:18
- Well, we're gonna get into people in talk 11.
01:22:21
- Yeah, so actually, I do need to call out in talk number 10,
01:22:25
this is where my one action item comes from.
01:22:30
So it's not really related to the topic
01:22:34
of the talk necessarily,
01:22:36
but he is a big fan of checklists.
01:22:39
And at this point, I'm reading this,
01:22:40
and he's talking about how we need to have more checklists,
01:22:43
good doctors have checklists,
01:22:44
we should have these checklists.
01:22:46
And I was like, I should build more checklists.
01:22:48
So that is my action item, more checklists.
01:22:52
- My issue with his checklist is
01:22:54
I'm not exactly sure what's on his checklist
01:22:57
and like how that works out,
01:22:59
because it's like, it wasn't very clear.
01:23:01
I know he's got a lot of checklists,
01:23:02
I know he works down through the checklists,
01:23:04
but I'm not really sure how they're constructed, so.
01:23:06
- Well, so I'm just building more checklists.
01:23:08
I'm not building more monger style checklists.
01:23:10
- Ah, okay.
01:23:11
- Okay, that's good, yeah, that's good.
01:23:13
- All right, so the last one is talk 11,
01:23:17
and this is the big Kahuna, I don't know.
01:23:21
This is a whole bunch of psychology based tendencies
01:23:24
that often mislead, he's got a list,
01:23:27
I think there's like 26 of them.
01:23:29
I don't even know how many pages,
01:23:30
this is the one that you sent me a message about,
01:23:32
that was like, hey, just so you know,
01:23:35
this is a big one, it's a combination
01:23:40
of three different talks that were,
01:23:43
so it's selections from three of his talks
01:23:45
that were combined into one that he never made,
01:23:47
and those three talks were the Bray Lecture
01:23:49
at the Caltech Faculty Club in February 2nd, 1992,
01:23:52
a talk under the sponsorship of the Cambridge Center
01:23:54
for Behavioral Studies at the Harvard Faculty Club
01:23:56
on October 6th, 1994, and the talk under the sponsorship
01:23:59
of the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies
01:24:01
at the Boston Harbor Hotel, April 24th, 1995.
01:24:05
So he combined these into one big long talk,
01:24:07
revised in 2005, and I don't even know
01:24:11
how to talk about this one.
01:24:12
- I don't either, I honestly don't either,
01:24:14
this one's a really hard one, I mean it's 25 tendencies,
01:24:19
and it's just his thoughts on these 25 psychological
01:24:22
tendencies.
01:24:23
- Yeah, it's ginormous, there's a couple of things
01:24:29
that I guess just random tidbits I'll pull out here,
01:24:32
but really have nothing to do with the messages
01:24:36
trying to get across with this big long talk.
01:24:40
I do think the tendencies are interesting
01:24:42
if you wanted to jump into them,
01:24:45
but it's not even worth going through the list.
01:24:48
They're basically psychology-based tendencies
01:24:50
that can often mislead, and he does say at one point
01:24:53
in this talk that they can mislead,
01:24:56
but they're not necessarily bad,
01:24:58
they're tendencies for a reason.
01:25:01
So tendencies are generally positive,
01:25:05
but he does mention that it's easier to prevent a habit
01:25:09
than to change it, and he mentions
01:25:11
that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
01:25:15
I had heard that before, and I liked that phrase.
01:25:19
He talks about the Tolstoy effect,
01:25:22
which is when man makes excuses for fixable poor performance
01:25:26
instead of providing the fix,
01:25:28
which is kind of interesting.
01:25:30
He mentions that we should learn
01:25:31
how to ignore the examples of others when they're wrong.
01:25:34
Sounds great.
01:25:35
How do you necessarily know when they're wrong?
01:25:38
Introduces Granny's rule, which is eat the vegetables first,
01:25:42
generally good advice,
01:25:45
and he mentions influenced by Robert Chaldini
01:25:50
as a great book to read.
01:25:51
That one has come up as a recommendation for Bookworm a lot,
01:25:55
and there's a new and revised version,
01:25:58
which I think is like 400 pages.
01:25:59
I don't want to read it for the podcast because it's so long.
01:26:02
- We looked at it.
01:26:03
- Yeah.
01:26:04
- We looked at it before, and it was way too long.
01:26:06
We were just like, nah, it's too long.
01:26:08
- It would be an interesting conversation,
01:26:10
and it's also kind of interesting
01:26:12
that he's sort of railing against psychology,
01:26:18
but then also exalting influence by Robert Chaldini.
01:26:23
And I think really he's talking about really the way
01:26:26
that psychology is taught.
01:26:30
He does mention, by the way,
01:26:31
that psychology can be used for good or evil
01:26:36
and how you can use it to manipulate people
01:26:39
and how cult leaders will do this sort of thing.
01:26:43
So I think that's an important caveat
01:26:45
for not just relevant to this discussion,
01:26:48
but with a lot of the books that we read for Bookworm,
01:26:52
that came up a lot with like the 48 Laws of Power.
01:26:56
And it really made me uncomfortable reading that
01:26:58
because it's a very direct connection.
01:27:01
He's not necessarily, Robert Greene isn't necessarily saying,
01:27:04
like use it this way, but this is how people can use it,
01:27:06
sort of a thing, I don't know.
01:27:09
So that's important to recognize with all of this stuff,
01:27:12
but yeah, this is a big talk and it's exhausting to read.
01:27:18
- I agree, I mean, as Mike's put it,
01:27:21
we could go through the different 25 things
01:27:23
and what we got out of it,
01:27:25
but I think you're gonna go through it when you read it
01:27:28
and you're gonna pull different pieces out of it.
01:27:30
What I think is interesting is,
01:27:31
if you've never thought about these tendencies before
01:27:34
or if there are a handful of them
01:27:36
that you've never thought about before,
01:27:38
they're compelling to read
01:27:40
and they're compelling to think about, right?
01:27:42
So not having taken a bunch of psychology classes,
01:27:46
these were enjoyable, it's probably the wrong word,
01:27:49
but they were informative, right?
01:27:50
Like they were informative to read
01:27:51
and informative to work through.
01:27:54
What I'll say is, you know, it's just a,
01:27:59
it's a long, like it's a,
01:28:00
I almost wanted to take this one and separate it out
01:28:05
and like do it on its own because, you know,
01:28:07
I felt like at one point I was just trying to get through it,
01:28:10
you know, and I wasn't like taking it in anymore, so.
01:28:13
- Well, see, this is where he's not in his element
01:28:17
talking about this type of stuff
01:28:19
'cause basically the psychology-based tendencies
01:28:21
that often mislead, it's a different framing,
01:28:23
but it's sort of like the 48 Laws of Power.
01:28:26
And he's not the guy to talk about that,
01:28:30
that's Robert Greene.
01:28:31
- But I think this is, I truly think,
01:28:33
this is why he wanted this book to be published
01:28:36
is for this last section.
01:28:37
- Could be, I mean, he definitely,
01:28:39
this one is definitely one that he wanted
01:28:41
to get off of his chest.
01:28:42
This is also the one that he has the biggest,
01:28:44
like revisited thing at the end.
01:28:47
And the most interesting thing
01:28:50
out of this particular talk for me is the way
01:28:52
that he ends that and ends the book.
01:28:54
It's like, and with that, I have nothing more to say.
01:28:56
- Exactly, what a great way,
01:28:58
what a great way to end the book.
01:28:59
- It's like, mic drop, I'm out.
01:29:01
- Yup, yup, yup, yup, yup.
01:29:05
- All right, anything else from the book
01:29:07
before we get into action items?
01:29:09
- Nope, I'm good.
01:29:09
I'm good to get into the zero action items
01:29:12
that I have on this book.
01:29:13
- Okay, so I have the one action item
01:29:17
which I mentioned from the last talk,
01:29:20
and that is simply to create more checklists.
01:29:24
And I guess I'll report back on this being successful
01:29:29
if I have created at least one more checklist,
01:29:32
which I think is gonna happen
01:29:34
because I have a call this week
01:29:35
with someone that I'm working with
01:29:37
as a kind of executive assistant role.
01:29:40
So I'm gonna have to make checklists for them.
01:29:44
That's gonna be the forcing function,
01:29:45
but yeah, that's all I got.
01:29:49
I have an action item that isn't related to the book.
01:29:51
It's related to-- - Oh yeah, from the beginning.
01:29:53
- From the pre-show and all that stuff.
01:29:55
So I have an action item,
01:29:57
but it has nothing to do with the book.
01:29:58
It's more about, you know, a co-working sessions
01:30:00
for, you know, different things.
01:30:02
So yeah, I just don't have any real action item
01:30:05
takeaways from this.
01:30:06
I will tell you that it's not,
01:30:09
that's not an indication of like lack of interesting content.
01:30:13
It's just more of a,
01:30:14
there wasn't really anything tangible to act on
01:30:16
coming out of this one.
01:30:18
- Yep, it's fair.
01:30:20
All right, styling rating.
01:30:23
- Give it to us, Mike, come on.
01:30:24
- You hear the dread in my voice, not just kidding.
01:30:28
This is a difficult one to rate.
01:30:30
Like I said, I think I've not done a great job
01:30:33
picking books for bookworm lately.
01:30:37
I do really like this book
01:30:39
and I am really glad that I read it.
01:30:42
Am I gonna pick this up and go through it again?
01:30:44
I'm not sure.
01:30:46
I think I probably would like to go through it again
01:30:50
at a slower pace.
01:30:52
The audio book is also included with the online version.
01:30:56
So I could definitely see going back
01:30:57
and listening to this again as an audio book.
01:31:01
But cranking through this in two weeks
01:31:03
is not the right way to approach this book.
01:31:06
- I agree.
01:31:08
- It's one of those that you kind of dip in
01:31:10
and out of periodically and you do so
01:31:15
with an open fascination about what made this guy tick.
01:31:20
And if you are interested at all
01:31:22
in the life of Charlie Munger, which I am,
01:31:26
then this is a good one.
01:31:29
I kind of made a joke earlier about this
01:31:32
is sort of like a modern meditations by Charlie Munger.
01:31:38
I think that is kind of accurate.
01:31:42
Like if Marcus was just writing all this stuff down
01:31:44
and it was written and combined into these different books.
01:31:48
So substitute books with talks
01:31:51
and adds some historical stuff at the beginning.
01:31:53
And if you do the online version,
01:31:55
a bunch of cool old photographs to really give you a picture
01:31:59
for the life of one of the most successful business people
01:32:02
who has ever lived.
01:32:04
I get that the whole topic of business
01:32:06
is not gonna be interesting
01:32:08
to the entire book or audience.
01:32:10
If that's you and you've listened this far,
01:32:13
thank you and I'm sorry, I don't know.
01:32:17
Some people who just have no interest whatsoever
01:32:20
in the topic of economics and all that kind of stuff.
01:32:24
You kind of can self-identify whether that's you.
01:32:28
I would say probably you don't need to pick this one up.
01:32:31
But on the other hand, there's the free one online.
01:32:33
You can poke around in that a little bit
01:32:34
and at least see if it piques your curiosity
01:32:37
and decide if you wanna read it that way.
01:32:40
So it's sorta hard to recommend this one
01:32:45
because number one, it's like, who is this for?
01:32:47
Number two, which version do you recommend?
01:32:49
I generally recommend people go by the physical book
01:32:53
and read that and I'm glad I own that version of it.
01:32:56
But I think this is the one book in the history of bookworm.
01:33:00
I would say, don't buy that first.
01:33:03
- I'm vigorously shaking my head, everyone.
01:33:06
I agree with you completely, yes.
01:33:08
- Yeah, so there's absolutely no risk
01:33:11
in loading up the website and poking around on that
01:33:15
and seeing if this is of interest to you.
01:33:19
I have trouble reading through
01:33:23
like the totality of the material in that format.
01:33:27
There's just something about reading on a digital screen.
01:33:29
It's not the same.
01:33:31
So I'm still not a fan of that format.
01:33:34
And honestly, if I had to read the book that way,
01:33:37
I wouldn't have finished it.
01:33:39
Wouldn't have happened.
01:33:40
But I'm also probably not the ideal customer for this
01:33:48
which is kind of weird.
01:33:51
I feel like a lot of the things that made him tick
01:33:56
are not the things that make me tick.
01:33:59
It was a little bit surprising to discover that.
01:34:03
But the people who are absolutely gonna love this
01:34:07
are the business bros.
01:34:09
That's the best way to describe it.
01:34:13
Does that mean that people who have an affinity
01:34:17
for like how business processes and systems are put together
01:34:22
won't get anything out of it?
01:34:23
No.
01:34:24
But also, if that's you and you've got enough time
01:34:28
to invest reading a 350 page book,
01:34:30
I could probably give you a bunch of other ones
01:34:33
that you're gonna get a higher return
01:34:35
on your time, attention and energy investment.
01:34:38
So I'm not sure that this is one that I'd necessarily
01:34:42
recommend it.
01:34:43
Like I said, at the beginning to solve a problem
01:34:45
that you are currently facing.
01:34:48
It's one of those ones that you just kinda gotta dip your toes
01:34:51
in every once in a while because it's fun.
01:34:55
And that's gonna sound weird to some people.
01:34:58
Like reading a business book by Charlie Munger.
01:35:00
That's fun for some people, yeah.
01:35:04
So I do think it's really well written.
01:35:07
I think Charlie Munger is brilliant.
01:35:10
And I know these talks are edited.
01:35:12
I did not go back and find like a video or an audio
01:35:16
of him giving these talks.
01:35:18
But I have no doubt that he's not stumbling over his words
01:35:23
and kinda to the point that you made earlier,
01:35:25
he's a much better speaker than most speakers
01:35:29
that you would hear.
01:35:31
I feel like just the quality of the thinking
01:35:34
that is evidenced in the talks that he shares
01:35:38
is very aspirational for me.
01:35:42
I feel like I've learned a lot
01:35:44
through the years doing bookworm.
01:35:46
I've learned to think on my feet.
01:35:47
I feel like I do a pretty good job
01:35:49
of fairly concisely communicating.
01:35:54
Some people will laugh at that
01:35:55
because we're approaching two hours
01:35:57
as we're talking about this.
01:35:58
But I think that that has been a big takeaway
01:36:01
from bookworm for me is I've gotten a lot better.
01:36:07
I still have a long ways to go.
01:36:09
But I don't throw out nearly as many
01:36:12
just jumbled word salads as I used to.
01:36:16
But if you want an example of what perfection looks like,
01:36:19
I mean, this is it.
01:36:23
I'm gonna rate it four stars.
01:36:25
And I guess that there's a caveat there
01:36:28
just for some people, they're absolutely gonna love this.
01:36:31
And this is a five star and even more if it was possible.
01:36:36
There are some people who, you know,
01:36:37
this is just totally not the right thing for them.
01:36:41
I feel like I'm kinda in between.
01:36:43
And so for me personally, it's a four star book.
01:36:46
- Okay.
01:36:47
Well, I could not disagree with you more
01:36:49
about the online version of this book.
01:36:52
I loved every second of that.
01:36:54
And if I could have every book written in this format,
01:36:58
I would read every book in this format.
01:37:01
I 100% loved the stripe.press version of this book.
01:37:06
It gave some visuals that I thought may add a value to it.
01:37:11
It had the audio right in there, like in line.
01:37:15
So you could listen to it if, you know,
01:37:16
you got tired or bored or whatever it was
01:37:18
and you wanna just change it up a little bit,
01:37:20
which I'm a big fan of.
01:37:21
So I, Mike, I love you, but I could not disagree
01:37:25
with you more on that.
01:37:27
- That's fair, that's fair.
01:37:29
- Okay.
01:37:30
In terms of the nature of this book,
01:37:33
the big caveat to this book is do you care
01:37:37
about Charlie Munger's opinion?
01:37:39
Because if you care about Charlie Munger's opinion,
01:37:42
read the book.
01:37:43
If you don't care about Charlie Munger's opinion,
01:37:45
or if you are definitely negative
01:37:48
towards Charlie Munger's opinion,
01:37:50
you may not wanna read this book.
01:37:51
I mean, like you're getting one individual's opinion
01:37:54
on a bunch of different things.
01:37:57
I think the thing that I maybe would disagree with you
01:38:01
a little bit on, but I don't remember
01:38:02
how exactly you phrased it, but it's like,
01:38:04
I actually don't think this is that much of a business book
01:38:07
or that much of an economics book.
01:38:08
I actually think it's much more of a human psychology
01:38:12
applied in economics, human psychology applied investing,
01:38:16
or a mental model is applied.
01:38:18
I think this is a different education style book, right?
01:38:24
I don't know exactly what word to put on it right now,
01:38:27
but because of that, I actually liked it better.
01:38:31
Like the parts of this book that I didn't get as much out of
01:38:34
and wasn't as interested in were capital investing,
01:38:38
and you know, sorry, not capital investing,
01:38:41
but the investing stuff and the economics talks
01:38:45
and stuff like that.
01:38:46
I just wasn't as interested in that.
01:38:48
But when he talked about the multidisciplinarity,
01:38:50
the lattice work, the different psychology topics
01:38:53
and how they applied in context
01:38:55
and that we should be lifelong learners,
01:38:56
like I was in for that, like that was interesting to me.
01:39:00
The other part is I didn't know a ton about Charlie Munger,
01:39:03
so it was interesting to me from a biography-type standpoint.
01:39:08
So if that sounds interesting to you
01:39:11
and you're willing to dip your toe in,
01:39:13
I completely agree with Mike, go online,
01:39:17
look at the titles of the talks and pick one of the ones
01:39:21
you think would be the most interesting to you.
01:39:23
Or based on our discussion,
01:39:25
pick one of the ones that would be the most interesting to you
01:39:27
and read that one first.
01:39:28
I do not think if you're on the fence,
01:39:31
I would invest the 350 pages
01:39:33
and the amount of time into this.
01:39:35
I don't think you're gonna get your bang
01:39:36
for your buck out of it.
01:39:38
But that said, I don't think it was a terrible book.
01:39:44
Like I don't walk away from this going like oh man,
01:39:46
I wasted a whole bunch of time, you know,
01:39:47
regardless of the show and whatever.
01:39:49
But I don't think I wasted a whole bunch of time.
01:39:51
I think there were some still really good nuggets out of there.
01:39:54
And one of those nuggets would be like other people to read.
01:39:56
So, you know, like I think there's more in Ben Franklin
01:40:01
that I could get out of.
01:40:02
Samuel Johnson that I could get out of.
01:40:04
Keynes, I didn't know what's talking about Keynes,
01:40:06
but he quotes Keynes a bunch of different times
01:40:08
that like would be interesting to go and read some of that work.
01:40:12
So I got a lot of those like places I could dip my toe in as well.
01:40:17
So, by the way, that name, I pronounced,
01:40:22
I mispronounced Feynman earlier, I think.
01:40:25
You pronounce it the right way.
01:40:27
I pronounced it the wrong way.
01:40:28
That person you're talking about is Keynes.
01:40:32
Keynesian economics.
01:40:33
Yeah, Keynes, yeah, thank you, thank you, yep.
01:40:36
Okay, so all of that being said,
01:40:38
what is my ranking for this book?
01:40:41
I'm gonna rank it a four as well with the idea though
01:40:46
that like I was interested in Munger.
01:40:49
So it's like we could have read any book on Munger
01:40:52
and I'm going to move that rating up a little bit.
01:40:56
If somebody read this book and they were like,
01:40:59
nope, that book's a two or a three,
01:41:01
I couldn't really fight you on that
01:41:03
because you're either interested in what he talks about
01:41:07
or you're not and I don't think there's gonna be a lot
01:41:09
of in between there.
01:41:10
So because I was interested in what he talked about
01:41:13
and I wanted to read a book,
01:41:14
like I like the idea of reading a book about Munger,
01:41:16
it bounces it up to a four.
01:41:18
The thing that knocks it down from like a five to me,
01:41:21
like the big draw that knocks it down from a five
01:41:23
is the investing in economic side of it
01:41:27
because that's just less interesting to me.
01:41:29
So four stars for me on this one.
01:41:33
All right, well let's put poor Charlie's Almanac
01:41:37
on the shelf, what's next, Corey?
01:41:39
The next book we're gonna read is called
01:41:41
The Courage to Be Dislighted by Ichiro Kishimi
01:41:45
and Fumitake Koga.
01:41:48
And this book is kind of an interesting book
01:41:53
in terms of it takes the work of a psychologist
01:41:57
named Alfred Adler and basically kind of puts it
01:42:01
into this different package.
01:42:04
So it's dialogue between a philosopher and a young man
01:42:07
and like how they're gonna have these conversations
01:42:09
and we're gonna learn some things about
01:42:11
life direction and past burdens and those type of things.
01:42:15
Really the thing that drove me to this one
01:42:17
was it was talked about in another book that we've read,
01:42:19
a previous book that we read.
01:42:21
And then just the concept in itself,
01:42:23
the courage to be disliked because there's a little bit
01:42:26
about me, like there's a little bit of me personally
01:42:28
that's like, well hold on, I don't like to be disliked.
01:42:31
Like I want to be liked by other people.
01:42:33
So I think this book is gonna challenge me
01:42:36
in terms of that.
01:42:37
So hopefully you'll come along for the ride with us.
01:42:40
If you are gonna come along for the ride,
01:42:43
the courage to be disliked by Ichiro Kishimi
01:42:46
and Fumitake Koga.
01:42:48
- Yes.
01:42:49
- How about you, Mike?
01:42:50
What's the one after that?
01:42:52
- I'm having trouble picking one yet again.
01:42:55
I have one here as the default option,
01:43:02
but I've heard from people in my community
01:43:08
that make it stick by Peter Brown, Henry Rotiger,
01:43:12
and Mark McDaniel is a great book on learning.
01:43:16
They actually tagged you and I and said,
01:43:18
you should totally cover this one.
01:43:20
So I'm willing to do that if you want to,
01:43:22
otherwise I've got the backup listed in the notes.
01:43:26
What do you think?
01:43:28
- So I, because of that comment in the community,
01:43:32
was like, okay, make it six, gotta go on there.
01:43:34
We just gotta figure out when to do it.
01:43:36
So I'm up for make it stick
01:43:38
or I don't know anything about the long game.
01:43:40
So you tell me if that's the one
01:43:43
that you're really jazzed about.
01:43:44
- All right, well, people can help us pick this book
01:43:48
together then.
01:43:49
So make it stick is another fairly long book.
01:43:52
It's 336 pages.
01:43:54
So I don't wanna pick another book
01:43:57
that is just impossible to get through.
01:44:00
You're picking the easy ones lately.
01:44:04
The long game is by Dory Clark and this one,
01:44:08
the subtitle, how to be a long-term thinker
01:44:11
in a short-term world.
01:44:13
I've had this one for a while.
01:44:14
I feel like this would be very applicable
01:44:16
for the bookworm audience.
01:44:17
This one's 256 pages.
01:44:20
Yeah, I don't know.
01:44:21
So I'm gonna give you the choice.
01:44:23
- Me?
01:44:24
You're gonna give me the choice.
01:44:26
- Yes.
01:44:26
Do you wanna read another?
01:44:29
Another long book which Ward had recommended
01:44:32
that we both read and it's probably great fodder
01:44:34
for bookworm but would be another heavy lift, I think.
01:44:39
Or something a little bit easier.
01:44:41
- Mike, have you ever turned it to the audience
01:44:44
and had them provide feedback and pick the book?
01:44:50
- I think we've done that once or twice before
01:44:53
but we don't really have a mechanism for people to do that.
01:44:58
And also I'm afraid of,
01:45:01
we're definitely gonna get influence
01:45:03
recommended to us a bunch if we do something like that.
01:45:07
So I'm trying to do a smaller version of that
01:45:10
and give two options and let my co-host pick.
01:45:13
- No, so that's what I'm saying is,
01:45:14
what if my choice is you have the long game
01:45:18
or you have make it stick and they have to go to blue sky
01:45:21
and they have to tell me what they want
01:45:23
and then I can pick it that way.
01:45:25
- All right, yeah.
01:45:25
So you create a poll and we'll link to it in the show notes
01:45:31
and people can pick one.
01:45:34
- So it's either gonna be the long game
01:45:35
or it's gonna be make it stick.
01:45:37
We'll get it out there, we'll put in the show notes
01:45:39
and you all can help tell us which book to do.
01:45:44
That's gonna be fun.
01:45:45
Yeah, this is good, I like this.
01:45:47
- All right, got any gap books?
01:45:50
- No, I do not have any gap books.
01:45:52
My gap books are the academic subjects
01:45:56
that I'm teaching right now, so no gap books.
01:45:59
- Yeah, I don't have any gap books either.
01:46:01
And maybe I'll have a gap book,
01:46:03
depending on what the audience picks, we'll see.
01:46:06
- Awesome.
01:46:07
- All right, well, thank you for listening.
01:46:09
If you are a Bookworm Pro supporter,
01:46:13
thank you specifically for helping us keep the lights on.
01:46:17
We really appreciate that.
01:46:18
You can become a Bookworm Pro supporter
01:46:21
by going to patreon.com/bookwormfm.
01:46:25
Seven bucks a month, you get access
01:46:27
to a couple additional feeds,
01:46:29
one of which is the bootleg episode
01:46:31
where you get the complete unedited version
01:46:33
as soon as we're done recording it,
01:46:35
is also a profeed which has an ad-free version of the show
01:46:41
with an extended segment where today we talked about
01:46:44
my shiny new object and Bookworm wallpaper,
01:46:49
a couple of other things that'll be coming to that shortly,
01:46:52
but we'll have details hopefully to share
01:46:54
in the next episode or two.
01:46:56
But again, if you wanna support the show,
01:46:58
financially, we would love to have your support.
01:47:01
You can do so at patreon.com/bookwormfm.
01:47:05
- And if you were reading along with us,
01:47:07
pick up the courage to be disliked,
01:47:09
and we'll talk to you next time.