Bookworm
Transcripts
Episodes
Search
About
218: The Catalyst by Jonah Berger
Show notes on bookworm.fm ↗
Scroll along with the audio
Click any line to jump to that moment.
00:00:00
All right, Mike. Welcome back. How was your conference?
00:00:03
It was great. I was at the newsletter marketing summit in Austin.
00:00:08
Pro-show listeners just heard me talk about my trip to the painted porch bookstore,
00:00:14
which is Ryan Holiday's bookstore in Bastrop, Texas.
00:00:17
I think that's the name of the town. It's not actually in Austin proper.
00:00:20
It's a bit of a drive to get there, but very cool bookstore.
00:00:24
And yeah, it was, it was a, a lot of fun.
00:00:28
It was a kind of a whirlwind 48 hours, but I learned lots more than I ever could have imagined
00:00:35
about newsletters and changes coming to mind shortly.
00:00:40
I'll mention that my newsletter, I sent it today as we record this.
00:00:45
And I shared a couple of the lessons that I learned from that, that conference.
00:00:49
And I, that I think are generally applicable to anybody who's interested in PKM
00:00:53
and wants to use it to be more productive or creative.
00:00:56
There were some really cool people, really cool sessions.
00:00:59
And in that newsletter, I also included my sketch notes from the conference.
00:01:03
So I published those, I mean, I send out the newsletter.
00:01:07
Obviously, they also publish them publicly.
00:01:09
So I'll include the link to the newsletter that people are interested in taking a look at that.
00:01:14
Yeah, Mike, as you're thinking about which of these conferences you go to
00:01:18
and what you engage in, how do you make your decisions?
00:01:21
Like what, what makes a conference rise to the level of like committing your time to it?
00:01:26
The travel, the cost, all of that stuff.
00:01:30
Good question.
00:01:31
I do not know other than like, I see something and I'm like, that looks interesting.
00:01:38
The newsletter marketing summit, I didn't actually go there because, you know,
00:01:42
I want to learn a bunch about newsletters.
00:01:45
It was more so I saw some of the people that were going to be there and they were my people.
00:01:50
So I got it.
00:01:52
I don't know how to say this without sounding a little bit precious,
00:01:55
but it's a little bit lonely being an internet creator in Wisconsin.
00:02:02
Yeah, that doesn't sound precious at all.
00:02:04
That seems very, very understandable.
00:02:06
Okay.
00:02:06
So yeah, every once in a while, I just got to get out of here and get around some people who are
00:02:11
doing the same sort of thing that I do.
00:02:14
And yeah, saw Jay Klaus, saw Nathan Berry, saw Chanel Basilio,
00:02:18
who are all some of my favorite creator people on the internet.
00:02:23
I'm in all of their communities and courses.
00:02:26
So yeah, it was really cool.
00:02:29
I actually got to get coffee with Jay Klaus one morning.
00:02:32
Picked his brain about community platforms.
00:02:35
So yeah, I met Stacey Harmon for the first time.
00:02:39
She's kind of the Evernote expert.
00:02:42
And Evernote, by the way, she's kind of filling me in because I was familiar with
00:02:45
the path and being acquired by bending spoons and didn't sound like it was going real great.
00:02:49
But kind of I've been noticing from the outside lately, it seems like they're doing
00:02:53
the right things and they're making a lot of improvements.
00:02:56
And she's like, oh, yeah, I'm part of the partner program.
00:02:58
And they've been including me on all of their roadmaps and stuff.
00:03:01
And she's like, they're really listening.
00:03:02
They're implementing a lot of this stuff.
00:03:04
She's like, every note's got a bright future.
00:03:05
I'm like, cool.
00:03:07
Never would have guessed it would turn out that way.
00:03:09
But yeah, I had no idea it even existed anymore.
00:03:12
Like I did not know that it was even a thing anymore.
00:03:16
Yeah, so yeah, I got to meet Stacey and a bunch of other people.
00:03:21
I actually met Stacey at impromptu dinner thing after the conference at Terry Blacks,
00:03:27
which is like one of the famous barbecue places in Texas, where you have to like get
00:03:31
there, stand in line and the line wraps, you know, all the way outside the restaurant,
00:03:35
around the restaurant, around the parking lot.
00:03:38
Just to get some meat.
00:03:40
And you just hope they still have what you want when you walk up to the door,
00:03:43
because they're probably one of those places where it's like, oh, we sold out of that 15
00:03:46
minutes ago and we only make as much as we need.
00:03:48
Well, they, I mean, I was there at 7 o'clock.
00:03:50
They just keep making it.
00:03:51
I mean, they've got a whole bunch of these smokers that are running all the time.
00:03:55
So yeah, it was delicious.
00:03:58
Yeah, awesome.
00:03:59
All righty.
00:04:00
Before we get into our book, let's do some follow up.
00:04:03
I will start.
00:04:05
I was supposed to think about the things I want to learn and how do I apply the
00:04:11
concepts from the last book into that? So that would be, you know, space repetition,
00:04:16
interleaving, varying what's in there.
00:04:20
I focused in on this one for this week in terms of it actually ties into some,
00:04:26
some things I'm doing in class and with my, with my students.
00:04:31
But I think I'm going to think about scripture and how do I develop my own app to do space
00:04:39
repetition to interleave different types of scripture and then to vary the,
00:04:43
the scripture that I'm trying to memorize.
00:04:45
So I'm going to hold it off for there because I don't want to like,
00:04:48
you know, it's still in the development.
00:04:49
But like, I'm thinking about how do I develop an app that allows me to, to do that stuff.
00:04:54
So I'm going to say green check mark on this one.
00:04:57
Like I think I've achieved a green check mark because while I didn't think about
00:05:01
all the things I want to learn, I would think about one.
00:05:04
And I, and I thought pretty hard about it.
00:05:05
So pretty cool about that. Yeah. How about you kudos to you.
00:05:10
So mine, I guess technically it's done because I did explore it.
00:05:15
That it's actually in the thing, exploration is the goal.
00:05:18
And that's the space repetition via read wise.
00:05:21
So I think I've come to the conclusion that I'm going to use read wise,
00:05:27
but I am not going to use it for book notes at all.
00:05:31
I'm going to use it as a place where I collect different feeds and things.
00:05:38
And as a like research type of thing, that's one of the things that I set out to me from the
00:05:44
newsletter marketing summit was like people are doing all this, this research and they're
00:05:48
kind of aggregating the things that are important and into a single place.
00:05:52
And it just makes sense that RSS would be a part of that for me.
00:05:55
And then from there using the highlights, piping those over to obsidian using something
00:06:02
like the obsidian web clipper, I think is going to be the workflow there.
00:06:07
I don't want everything, you know, in obsidian.
00:06:09
I just want like the bits and pieces that are really important from the stuff that I'm
00:06:13
I'm reading that I want to like take action on.
00:06:15
And this is the type of stuff where it's like, for example, every time I send a newsletter,
00:06:20
I've got a something cool section.
00:06:22
And one of the things in addition to the sketch notes this time,
00:06:25
was the announcement about obsidian being free for commercial use that that's cool.
00:06:30
So like I might highlight a section out of that clip it to obsidian or clip.
00:06:34
So that when I sit down to write my newsletter, I've got that, you know, that the piece of text
00:06:38
that's available.
00:06:39
None of that is implemented yet.
00:06:41
So there's still some work to be done there, but I do think that read wise is going to stick.
00:06:48
We'll see though.
00:06:50
Nice.
00:06:51
Awesome. Are you ready to bounce into today's book?
00:06:56
I am. Let's do it.
00:06:58
All right.
00:06:58
So today's book is called the catalyst how to change anyone's mind.
00:07:02
It's by Jonah Berger.
00:07:05
Jonah is a professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
00:07:10
He's written multiple different books.
00:07:13
So one's called contagious one called an invisible influence.
00:07:15
Then there's the catalyst. He does research and work on word of mouth,
00:07:22
social influence, customer behavior, consumer behavior.
00:07:26
The catalyst is all about changing people's minds and thinking about changing people's minds.
00:07:32
We thought this won't be a good one.
00:07:33
This is actually a recommendation from one of the bookworm listeners.
00:07:38
We took this as a recommendation and just to kind of throw a plug out here,
00:07:43
we actually have a link in the show notes that if you'd like to recommend a book for us to read
00:07:47
on bookworm, you can feel free to go hit that link, fill out the little form.
00:07:51
It'll recommend the book for us. Throw an Amazon link in there.
00:07:54
That way we know what version of the book that you're wanting us to read.
00:07:58
And then we'll take a look at it. We can't promise that we're going to read them all,
00:08:01
but we'll take a look at it and we'll evaluate whether or not we think
00:08:04
it makes sense for the bookworm audience.
00:08:06
We did get a couple of those and I think your next book actually is going to be a listener
00:08:11
recommendation. It is both a listener and a mic recommendation.
00:08:17
My favorite books are the ones I don't pick if I'm being very, very honest with you.
00:08:20
I don't know why. I just like reading books that other people suggest.
00:08:24
It makes it fun for me.
00:08:27
Back to the catalyst. We're going to think about basically changing people's minds.
00:08:31
First off, Mike, do you have any thoughts on the catalyst going into it?
00:08:38
Were you interested? Was it like, this is going to be okay?
00:08:42
Like what was your thought going into it?
00:08:45
I was a little bit apprehensive to tell you the truth because the subtitle,
00:08:50
"How to Change Anyone's Mind." This has shades of Robert Green to me.
00:08:57
The image is like a butterfly, but the wings are like a brain.
00:09:06
I mean, it's kind of cool artistic style, but just the whole communicated message there
00:09:15
is sort of free your mind. I don't know. It just kind of rubbed me the wrong way going into it.
00:09:22
I will say though that that's not accurate for the rest of the book.
00:09:26
So I don't want to set a picture here, which is going to paint a negative impression for me of
00:09:36
the rest of the book because I think there's a lot of really great stuff in here.
00:09:40
So maybe if it was up to me, I would redo the title, subtitle, and the cover.
00:09:47
So I went into it going, "Oh, this book sounds great. This sounds really interesting because I
00:09:51
like the idea of how to interact with people, how to change their mind, not in a manipulative way,
00:09:58
but in a convinced them, arguments, sell them type of a thing."
00:10:03
The thing that made me a little bit nervous about it is the reviews. I always like to look at the
00:10:07
reviews. And the reviews are really mixed on this book. So the Amazon reviews got it at 4.6
00:10:13
with a fairly high number of ratings, but the Goodreads review drops it below a 4.
00:10:18
And anytime a book drops below a 4, if it's not really niche, I start to get worried because I'm
00:10:24
like, "Well, hold on." Below a 4, you've got as many 3s as you have 5s, and then you've got your
00:10:33
other situations, or you have more 3s, if you think on average. So I'm like, "Ah, I'm not sure
00:10:39
how I'm going to feel about this one." Overall, I have a similar sentiment to you. I got a good
00:10:45
bit of good stuff out of this one. So I'm excited to talk to you about it and see what else we can
00:10:49
dig out of it. All right. Let's do it. All right. So the introduction. So he starts off pretty
00:10:56
dramatic. And what I'll say is I think the examples he uses throughout the book are dramatic, but not
00:11:04
in a bad way. They're meant to have a purpose. They're meant to have an impact in terms of...
00:11:11
He doesn't pick just these real fluffy examples of how we're trying to change somebody's mind.
00:11:16
He goes into this first example when he's talking about a criminal negotiator and how that
00:11:21
negotiator approaches the situation. Well, there's a bunch of these different examples that he's
00:11:27
going to work through when he's working through his different points. So that was an interesting
00:11:30
idea from number one that started off right from the beginning of the book. But the important
00:11:35
thing that we need to get out of the introduction is his framework. So this book, for those of you
00:11:39
who are thinking about picking it up, this book is 100% driven by a framework. And the framework
00:11:44
is reduce. So he's saying, okay, well, we need to reduce essentially the negative aversion,
00:11:53
whatever it might be, to people actually changing their mind. To people doing what we want them to
00:11:58
do or thinking the way we want them to think. So reduce the six letters. The six letters
00:12:06
are reduced are reactants, endowment, distance, uncertainty, and then corroborating evidence.
00:12:11
And that's how he spells the word reduce. So the reason I got mixed up between five and six
00:12:15
there is because it's only five ideas. The last idea has two words in it. So it's corroborating
00:12:22
evidence. So I'm going to stop here. Mike, what was your thought on the introduction?
00:12:27
The introduction is fine, but that whole model slash framework is ridiculous.
00:12:35
Can we just agree? A six letter acronym for five points is just confusing.
00:12:43
And I got to the end of the book and I was like, there's one more like, there's one more point
00:12:46
that he needs to make. And I was like, Oh, no, there's not because the last point has two
00:12:51
has two letters. So yeah, and some of these are forced. So I actually don't like the framework.
00:12:57
Like I get why people do this sort of thing. But I wish we would just discuss the ideas
00:13:05
for what they are, as opposed to trying to crowbar them into an acrostic, which I don't think is
00:13:13
actually going to help me remember this any better, because it doesn't, it doesn't fit. My
00:13:19
initial thought, if I were to recall that reduce acronym is not a can't be right, because they're
00:13:26
only five points. Yeah. So the point of the reduce, right? So you might be wondering, like, well,
00:13:31
how does reduce get into here? So he starts it off and says, okay, inertia drives everything.
00:13:36
So people want to keep doing what they're what they're doing. You're trying to change their mind.
00:13:40
So what you're trying to do is you're trying to reduce their inertia. You're trying to reduce
00:13:44
their resistance to change. So how do we approach this entire problem, this universal problem of
00:13:51
people having this resistance to change? Oh, well, let's go through the go through the acronym
00:13:56
reduce. So that's essentially what he's trying to do. I agree with Mike here. I don't think that my
00:14:03
takeaway from this book is going to be reduced. I don't really think that I'm going to, you know,
00:14:07
in six months from now, if you're going to ask me, hey, you read the catalyst, like what's your
00:14:11
main takeaway from the catalyst? It's not going to be like, Oh, he had this, you know, cross the
00:14:15
like this reduced thing. And no, that's not going to be it. It's going to be some other other points
00:14:19
of it. So if you're good with it, we can move on to chapter one. Yeah, let's do it. Okay, so chapter
00:14:25
one is reactants. So in reactants, he defines it as the unpleasant state that occurs when people
00:14:30
feel their freedom is lost or threatened. So you're coming in, you're telling people to do or to not
00:14:37
do something to change or to not change, right? Like you're giving them this idea, you're trying
00:14:42
to be a catalyst. And they feel as though they've lost their freedom, they've lost their agency in
00:14:48
order to, you know, be part of this, this process. So he's going to say a catalyst in, in this situation,
00:14:56
a catalyst essentially incorporates agency into this process. He gives four different ways to do
00:15:03
that. So provide a menu, ask, don't tell, highlight a gap, and then start with understanding.
00:15:10
And then he's got this other stair step thing, which I'm sure we're probably going to talk about
00:15:14
before we leave the really the reactants chapter. So he's basically saying, okay, the first thing we
00:15:19
need to do is we need to think about the fact that people are going to have some essentially
00:15:23
negative reaction to what you want them to do. And then you have to figure out a way around that.
00:15:28
Yeah, essentially, if you ask, if you tell somebody to do something, they're more likely
00:15:32
not to do it. And they use the story of the tide pods at the beginning, which is just ridiculous.
00:15:39
But it illustrates the point clearly, I guess, you know, where basically tide pods are these
00:15:45
laundry detergent pods, you throw them in the washing machine, and you don't have to measure
00:15:49
things out. Well, apparently there was like a thing where people were eating these and
00:15:55
obviously they don't want to get in trouble. So they're telling people don't eat these,
00:16:00
you will get sick, you could die, whatever, you know, it's kind of like, whenever you see
00:16:05
something like on the McDonald's coffee cups, it's like caution hot. You know, that's there for a
00:16:11
reason. Yeah, because they got sued because someone spilled coffee all over themselves,
00:16:15
there's something the chainsaw blade is sharp. Don't touch. Okay, great. Like, yes, that would
00:16:19
make sense. Yeah, so you get tides response where it's like, we need to formally say,
00:16:25
don't eat these so that if anybody does, and they sue us, we've got it covered. But what happened
00:16:30
after they told people not to eat them is that people kept eating them, and actually they ate
00:16:36
them a lot more, and they paid a whole bunch of money. They had Rob Gronkowski, the Titan from the
00:16:40
Patriots do this advertising came, he's like, do not eat these. And people just kept eating them,
00:16:48
which is ridiculous. But also the point that they're hitting on here is that people have a need for
00:16:55
freedom and autonomy. And essentially, if you tell someone, hey, don't do this, or you can't do this,
00:16:59
that's kind of like, oh, yeah, well, watch me. And it seems weird to think that people would do that
00:17:05
when they could have such negative health consequences from that. That's the part that's a little hard
00:17:15
to grok, I guess. But yeah, the point is that people have this built on anti-persuasion radar,
00:17:23
which I think is a really effective visual. I think the principle here is spot on. If you're
00:17:30
going to come at me and you're going to tell me don't push the red button, the first thing I'm
00:17:33
going to think is, well, why? What happens when I push the red button? I want to push the red button.
00:17:37
Don't tell me not to push the red button. It's very natural to have this reaction. I'm going to move
00:17:44
us to these four key ways to overcome this. And what he would say is reduce reactants. So what
00:17:52
are the four ways to reduce your reactants? Provide menus, ask, don't tell, highlight the gap,
00:17:57
and then start with understanding. The one that I think resonates the most with me
00:18:02
is the ask, don't tell that if you get in there and you start talking to people about,
00:18:08
well, hold on, why do you eat tide pods? What benefit are you getting from tide pods
00:18:14
instead of me telling them? And I think why this one resonates with me so much right now is because
00:18:19
I have young children. And if I go to the young children and I say, child, don't jump off that
00:18:24
10-foot bridge onto the river. And they're going to be like, well, that I want to jump off the
00:18:30
10-foot bridge to the river. But if I go, son, what do you think is going to happen if you jump
00:18:34
off the 10-foot bridge? And he's like, oh, well, I'm going to land on the water. And I say,
00:18:37
how deep do you think the water is under the bridge? And if I ask these questions,
00:18:42
you could almost see the light click in his eyes. And he's like, oh, the water's probably not deep
00:18:49
enough. And I'm probably going to hurt my legs or break my ankles or something. And it's like,
00:18:54
yes, son, yes. But if you come out of the other way, it doesn't work, right? I mean,
00:18:58
so that's the one that resonates with me the most.
00:19:02
Yeah, I don't know that I have a particular one that resonates with me. I kind of feel like
00:19:11
these are different tactics that you could employ strategically. But yeah, I think the big takeaway
00:19:19
for me from this is highlighted. And the thing I have before this in my notes is the truth campaign,
00:19:24
which was a campaign to get kids to stop smoking. And they mentioned that the reason that it was
00:19:32
successful was because it didn't tell them to stop smoking. The way that you would tell, you know,
00:19:39
people not to or not tell them, you know, specifically to stop smoking would be, you know,
00:19:44
you could do it four different ways with those those different methods that you highlighted there.
00:19:49
But I guess if I had to pick one, it would be start with understanding and just kind of highlighting
00:19:57
why someone wants to do something or doesn't want to do something,
00:20:01
kind of being naturally curious. That's a kind of carryover from liminal thinking by
00:20:07
Dave Gray, which I guess ding the bell. I mentioned that one again. Yeah, but my big takeaway from
00:20:13
that was that we have these preconceived notions as bubble belief that we assemble based on our
00:20:20
limited experience. And I remember walking out of that book thinking I need to not resist
00:20:27
viewpoints that are contrary to mine, but actually be better if I was able to just seek them out
00:20:32
more more often. And I try to do that, you know, if you were to follow me around and chronicle how
00:20:38
I spend my day, you could probably point out all the places where I fail with that. But that reading
00:20:43
that book definitely did adjust my mindset to that. So I'd like to at least tell myself a little bit
00:20:49
more open minded. And I feel like this is probably my default now when I'm talking to somebody is,
00:20:56
I want to understand where they're coming from before I just say, well, no, you got to change
00:21:00
your mind about things. Again, you could probably point out a whole bunch of times when I've
00:21:04
failed at that. But I think that's the one that seems to me to really fit most, at least initially.
00:21:14
Yeah. So based building off of that understanding, he puts a diagram in here that basically says
00:21:19
understanding trust and change that they're the staircases. It's the staircase and the steps are
00:21:25
understanding. And once we understand each other, we can build trust with each other. And then once
00:21:29
we build trust with each other, then I can listen to you more and I'm more, I guess I'm less reactive
00:21:35
to a negative feeling towards towards changing for you. Now, one of the things he slides in here
00:21:41
is this idea of active listening. And I thought I'm interested to hear what your perspective is on
00:21:45
this because he really doesn't talk about active listening at all in the chapter, but he throws
00:21:51
it to an appendix at the end and says like, Oh, yeah, and if you want to learn more about active
00:21:55
listening, go see appendix A. And that's okay. But it feels very like disjointed or disconnected.
00:22:02
It's like, Oh, and by the way, active listening, like to see that at the end. It's not part of my
00:22:06
story right now. Yeah, it's a good point. So I don't know, I'm familiar with active listening.
00:22:14
And there have been books that have kind of hit on that super hard. I guess just for quick review
00:22:19
for people, that's kind of where you're, if I'm hearing you right, this is what you're saying.
00:22:24
Yes. Okay. Well, then at least the person that you're talking to feels heard. This is one of
00:22:30
my pet peeves, by the way, is not feeling like I've been heard. And I could totally identify a
00:22:34
whole bunch of situations where I'll say something. And then the person just responds with like,
00:22:39
Well, yeah. And I'm just like, no, you don't get it. Yeah. So I think that's a really valuable
00:22:46
technique. I don't know that it's, I guess a case could be made that it should belong as
00:22:54
material that's actually in this, this chapter. I didn't really think about it until you, you brought
00:23:00
it up, though, that, you know, why isn't, what does it go into more detail about that here? I guess,
00:23:06
maybe he feels like when you start with understanding that's essentially encapsulates the big takeaway
00:23:13
from the active listening process. I mean, obviously he's not talking about the specifics of it. But
00:23:18
there's a lot of stuff in this book where, you know, he talks, talks about some, some stories at the
00:23:23
beginning and some principles. And then, you know, what you can actually do about it's kind of the
00:23:27
formula, I guess, for these, these types of self help nonfiction books. But when he gets to the,
00:23:34
you know, what you can do about it, there's always a couple of, there's always like a list or something
00:23:39
like that. It's a big fan of this, you know, it's not just the reduced framework at the beginning,
00:23:44
where he's talking about the different chapters. So maybe it just didn't really fit very cleanly
00:23:49
with that, which, I mean, I guess I could could see that. I don't think you should determine the
00:23:55
content of the book that way. But maybe he did it. Well, it got, I actually noticed it more at the
00:24:02
very end of the book, because I felt like the book ended quickly. And then there were these like
00:24:07
additional 20 plus pages of like, you know, this appendix, appendix, appendix. But okay, so let's go
00:24:13
on to how he ends every chapter. So he ends every chapter with a case study. And I'm not going to
00:24:18
give my opinion yet. I'm going to ask Mike for his opinion first. Mike, what do you think of the
00:24:23
case studies in in general? Like, did you think they were valuable? Did you like them?
00:24:29
For the most part, I like them. I like the approach of the case studies at the end. And
00:24:35
the case studies are different than the stories he meant he shares at the beginning because
00:24:41
those are kind of like teeing up the the issue or the problem. And the case study is really highlighting
00:24:48
the solution. So I think the case study at the end of the chapter is actually an effective way
00:24:55
to close out the chapter. You could argue about the effectiveness of the specific case studies
00:25:01
that he chose. But for the most part, I thought those were really good too. And to be honest,
00:25:05
you know, there's nothing that was really new in those case studies by the time he got to them.
00:25:10
Agreed. So I don't think I have any notes on the case studies themselves. But I did think they
00:25:17
were really cool. So there was one in particular, and I forget even what chapter it's in, where he's
00:25:21
talking about moving people in terms of their opinion on the political spectrum. And he uses
00:25:27
two examples of someone who grew up very liberal and became conservative, and then someone who
00:25:32
grew up very conservative and became liberal. And they came from the places that you think
00:25:36
conservatives and liberals come from, and just kind of like, doesn't have a dog in this fight,
00:25:42
or a horse in this race, if you want a different metaphor, I guess, maybe that's a better one.
00:25:49
And I thought it was, I thought that was, that was pretty cool. Like there's no agenda here.
00:25:54
I feel like most of the books that we read, there is, if you really want to look for it,
00:25:59
you can find the agenda in some of the things that people are sharing. So I appreciated that.
00:26:05
Yeah, I couldn't agree with you more that I think by the time you hit the case studies,
00:26:08
the way he's constructed the book, the case that he is really doubling down on the points he was
00:26:14
trying to make, and for the most part, they're good, they're good examples of the points he was
00:26:19
trying to make. All right, let's move on to the chapter two endowment. So endowment was the hardest,
00:26:25
I think, chapter for me to like wrap my head around like what we were trying to do. But the idea is
00:26:32
basically like, oh, the thing that we have right now has higher value than whatever you want me to
00:26:40
pay attention to, right? Like, so if you want me to buy a new car, the car that I have right now is
00:26:48
above and beyond, and you're going to have to show me how the thing you want me to get is clearly
00:26:54
above and beyond better than than what I currently have. So it's like this idea of endowment is like,
00:27:00
you know, just what I'm already doing or what I already own, it's almost like the, you know,
00:27:05
you're trying to climb uphill, right? Like you're trying to push the boulder uphill because I'm
00:27:09
already like, okay, with what I'm doing. And he brings up a couple different ideas, you talked about
00:27:14
him like in the list, right, which so he's got him in every almost every chapter. He talks about
00:27:18
the surface, sorry, surface the cost of inaction, and then burn the ships, which I'm a big fan of
00:27:23
burn the ships, but we'll get there too. We'll get there in a little bit. So he's got these two
00:27:26
different ideas that he uses to drive home his key points for the kind of this endowment idea.
00:27:35
Yeah, I don't like the term endowment here that feels like a word chosen so that it fit the
00:27:41
framework that he's trying to to use. I mean, really what he's talking about here is the status
00:27:48
quo. So I feel like status quo would have been a much better chapter title. If you're just going
00:27:55
to take that chapter in isolation and really try to communicate a single specific idea,
00:28:00
which I would argue he's that's what he's doing with his approach to this book. There are no
00:28:05
sections. There's just five chapters introduction and an epilogue. So the content and the structure
00:28:13
of the book I actually really liked don't really like the term here, but in terms of the big ideas,
00:28:19
I think that status quo can be a very powerful influence on our decisions. And that's really
00:28:26
what he's talking about. He shares lots of studies where if you already have something, you value
00:28:32
it at this, if you're going to buy it new, you would value it at like one third of that. Actually,
00:28:37
it's 2.6 times. That's the multiplier for the value for something that we already own versus
00:28:45
something that we are looking to acquire. And I think that that is a really powerful idea.
00:28:54
It's very easy to just stick with something because it's familiar and mentions that at the end that
00:29:01
terrible things tend to get replaced, but the mediocre things tend to stick around. When things
00:29:06
are good, it's easy to just stick with the status quo and not consider any of the other options,
00:29:12
which I think is a fairly sad way to live your life. So you could characterize this as something
00:29:20
we should be pushing back against and trying to overcome. I don't think that's the framing or
00:29:27
the angle that he's coming at this with, because literally in the subtitles, how to change anyone's
00:29:31
mind. So this is really, I feel like when you're talking to other people, how to get them to change
00:29:36
from the status quo. But I don't know. I mean, my brain is naturally goes to how would I apply this
00:29:42
stuff? Yeah, me too. Yeah, me too. He references, you know, good to great. So Jim Collins is good to
00:29:52
great in here. And the fact that good is the animated great, we don't have great schools
00:29:57
principally because we have good schools. We don't have great government principally because we have
00:30:00
good government. And I think this might be, well, so this is definitely one of my action items. I
00:30:07
don't know if it's the only action item yet. I'll figure that out later. But this is definitely
00:30:11
one of mine is like, I need to look at essentially do a scan of life and say, what is a situation
00:30:16
where I'm settling for good, right? That I could be driving more towards great. But instead,
00:30:22
I'm settling for good because, you know, it's good enough, right? And I think there are going to be
00:30:28
areas where good enough is good enough. And I'm okay with that. And I don't need to push for great
00:30:33
in that situation. But I think there are areas where I'm going to say, you know what, I'm not happy
00:30:38
with the fact that this area is just good. I want this area to be great. And I want it to be better
00:30:43
than that. We'll get to the last section that I that I really liked. And this was it's the burn
00:30:48
the ships idea. So I had actually never heard of where burn the ships came from. So I really liked
00:30:54
that he went into the background Cortez, basically he's coming over and there's the potential mutiny.
00:31:01
And he's like, hold up. We're just going to take those 12 ships that are out there that people want
00:31:05
to like get back on and run away from. And where's burning those things down? Like, we're absolutely
00:31:10
going to give people no way out there. There's no exit door. And I was like, Oh, wow, I didn't
00:31:15
realize that that was the where the phrase came from. But I really do like the idea of burning the
00:31:20
ships basically making going back no longer an option. So like, what obstacles do you have to set
00:31:26
up that way forward is the only direction. And we can't, you know, crutch on the things that we've
00:31:32
been doing that are good enough. So I really, I liked that, that idea a lot.
00:31:38
Yeah, I love that visual and that story. But this is actually something that I've been fascinated
00:31:44
by for quite a while. So I've, it was interesting to me to see how he talked about this, because
00:31:52
that's the popular story. So that's the one that he tells at the beginning. And then you can get into,
00:31:59
if you find, if you want to find someone to argue with you online, just go say something about,
00:32:04
burn the boats came from this story. And they'll be like, actually,
00:32:09
because there's three or four other examples. And he hits on all of them. He tells the story
00:32:15
behind that one, because I think it's the most emotionally appealing. But then he covers his
00:32:20
historical bases and mentions there are other versions of this story other places. Yeah, that's
00:32:26
funny. Yeah, but the, the principle is the same. You know, if you give yourself a way back,
00:32:31
you're not going to go all in. All right, you're ready to move to three distance. Yeah, let's do
00:32:36
it. Okay, so distance. Basically what he's saying is that if the change you're trying to make
00:32:44
is too far away from where the person currently is or what they're currently thinking, then
00:32:52
that you're basically doomed for failure. Like you're never going to get that change because
00:32:56
you're in what he would call the zone of rejection or the region of rejection that like you're just
00:33:01
too far away. So he's, he's got a whole football field analogy where he brings up these football
00:33:04
fields in the book and then he shows you, you know, where people would be in the 20 yard line and
00:33:09
the other side of the field and all that stuff. But there's really there's two zones. There's the zone
00:33:12
of rejection, then there's the zone of acceptance. And essentially what you could think about is like
00:33:18
the further I am away from this idea, the more strongly I'm in the region of rejection or the
00:33:22
zone of rejection, as we get closer to my ability to accept the thing, then I would be in like the
00:33:28
middle, you know, what's the phrase? Like there's the something middle. I don't remember the term
00:33:36
for it and I don't have the book in front of me, but I do know what you're you're talking about.
00:33:41
There's like the the moveable middle is what he calls it. Yes, yes, that's it. So it's like there's
00:33:48
this section of the field where there's the moveable middle where I can convince you it's going to
00:33:52
take some work, but I actually have a chance of convincing you. And then there's the whole like zone
00:33:56
of acceptance where it's like, yeah, I'm already on board, like you didn't have to change like I'm
00:34:00
with you. And what he's basically saying is let's reduce the distance and if I can reduce the distance,
00:34:07
then I can I can bring you closer to changing your mind or I can bring you closer to coming
00:34:13
over to the thing that I that I want you to do or the thing the way that I want you to think.
00:34:19
And he calls out again this list of three, you know, find the moveable middle, ask for less,
00:34:25
and then switch the field, which I'm guessing will unpack something in this list at some point,
00:34:30
but I've I've droned on for a little while. So Mike hit me with your thoughts on chapter three.
00:34:34
Well, chapter three is interesting because he's talking about this in terms of convincing somebody
00:34:42
politically, this is probably the chapter, which has that case study that I was mentioning earlier.
00:34:47
But when he's talking about how you're not going to get somebody to convert to your way of thinking,
00:34:56
simply by sharing a whole bunch of facts or a whole bunch of evidence, in fact, he specifically
00:35:02
says that sharing evidence often blows up in our faces. He also mentions in here that people search
00:35:08
for interpret and favor information in a way that confirms or supports their existing beliefs.
00:35:12
I mean, this is liminal thinking in a nutshell, this chapter. But the thing that really stood
00:35:18
out to me as I was reflecting on what I read here is that if you want to change somebody's mind,
00:35:25
so that's the framing. And that's the one that I think I have a little bit of issue with,
00:35:29
not that it's wrong, but just kind of rubs me the wrong way. So if you want to change somebody's
00:35:33
mind, the way to do it is to make a whole bunch of small asks and get them to say, yes, a bunch
00:35:39
of times. And each time they say, yes, they're more likely to say yes again. And that rubbed me
00:35:44
the wrong way because that's exactly the yes ladder from marketing, which there's truth to that. I mean,
00:35:51
if you want to sell something, you want, I don't know, I don't know where exactly where I land on
00:35:57
this, because I think that there are elements of that that I incorporate into my stuff. But I'm not
00:36:04
just trying to get a sale. I'm trying to offer a solution to a problem that people are experiencing.
00:36:12
So going back to like the simple marketing for smart people that we read, I feel like that's a
00:36:19
much better approach than following this mechanical script. And if I could just get somebody to say,
00:36:24
yes, this many times, then regardless of who they are, and regardless of how much money they have,
00:36:29
and regardless of whether I'm the right person to solve their problem, they're more likely to buy
00:36:33
my thing. I actually sent an email when I launched Life HQ, said why I don't want everybody to buy
00:36:39
Life HQ. So I could see that the seeds of that. And that's the implementation of that yes ladder
00:36:49
that I've had experience with other places that I've worked. And yeah, I was like, this doesn't feel
00:37:00
great. So let me tell you the reason why this frustrates me is because in my idealistic mind,
00:37:07
what I'm not saying is right, I'm just saying my idealistic mind, we're settling for less of a
00:37:14
good solution. So it's like, when I ask for less, we're like making the joint agreement that like,
00:37:19
okay, there is a better solution out there. But what am I have to do? I'm going to have to do a
00:37:24
part of that. And then two years from now, I'm going to have to do the next part of that. And
00:37:27
like, in all I think about in my mind is this is the most efficient or inefficient way to get to
00:37:32
the change that we both know we need to do. But you're telling me that like, we can't do it right
00:37:37
now. And it makes me, it drives me crazy. But I don't disagree that human psychology says that,
00:37:43
that makes total sense. Like, I can get you to agree to a smaller change and then another smaller
00:37:47
change and another smaller change. I just don't understand why you like, if we can agree that this
00:37:53
is the way it needs to be, why, why does it need to be the way three years from now, why not now,
00:37:59
right? Like, we should just make that change now. I don't know. I mean, the whole, the whole thing
00:38:05
here is getting somebody to change their mind. And you get them to do or say or vote, you know,
00:38:14
the way that you want them to, it just feels a little bit manipulative. And I'm not saying that
00:38:23
there's never a place to use this kind of stuff. But I feel like if I were to summarize this,
00:38:32
my takeaways would be the, to try to find the middle ground, figure out what we can
00:38:40
agree on, but then kind of disconnect from, I gotta convince this person to do things my way.
00:38:48
Like, if it, I think there's an element of this, at least for me where you have to be okay with,
00:38:54
I may never actually change their mind. That's okay. But that's like kind of contrary to the whole
00:38:59
messaging of the book. So I don't know, at least I think it is. Do you think that's, that's accurate?
00:39:09
Is that the message that comes across in the, in the book?
00:39:12
Well, I think he's, he's presenting the, if you do these things, you will be effective at changing
00:39:17
anybody's mind, which I, so it's like, I think, I think my answer to you is yes. I think there's two
00:39:25
different ideas here that are, that are working. You're, you're saying like that, that shouldn't be
00:39:29
my goal. My, my goal shouldn't be necessarily to 100% change your mind. But he's saying if you do
00:39:34
these things, you'll be closer to changing someone's mind. And I think he goes strong on it in the
00:39:40
subtitle of the book, how to change anyone's mind. So it leads us to believe that, yeah.
00:39:44
So I get it, you know, if you're a political activist and you're canvassing for votes and you're
00:39:50
trying to get people to vote a certain way, I think in that scenario, and he uses that example in
00:39:55
this chapter, I can't fault you for this. But I, I really struggle with finding a scenario in
00:40:04
my everyday regular life where I would feel okay doing this, you know, just taking that approach.
00:40:14
I mean, even if I was a leader in an organization or preaching at my church or whatever, I feel like
00:40:21
you extend the invitation. And you, even as a leader, you say, this is where we're going,
00:40:28
and this is why, and would love to have you on board, but you're not trying to convince somebody
00:40:34
to say, okay, yeah, I'm going to do it your way. It's like, if this isn't for you, that's fine.
00:40:41
You can go somewhere else, you can do something else, no hard feelings. You don't have to be here.
00:40:50
I see your perspective more now that as you, as you talk about it, I understand your perspective
00:40:54
more now. Okay. So yeah, it just feels a little bit weird to me. And again, I probably do like
00:41:00
elements of this, but getting to the point where he's describing, you know, where you actually have
00:41:04
changed the way that somebody thinks, I don't know. And I don't have anybody in my life,
00:41:09
or this is really the thing that I'm trying to do. Like he's talking about interventions for
00:41:13
people who are drug addicts, you know, you have a loved one who doesn't understand the problems
00:41:21
that they're, that they're facing, like they think they're in control, but they're really not. So
00:41:26
privileged situation, I guess, where I don't have to deal with that sort of thing. But I just don't
00:41:32
have a situation like that where I feel like, yeah, that's a lever I got to pull.
00:41:37
Okay. Can I give you, can I give you an example of one where I do? Sure. So I'll get certain students
00:41:43
in class, and they just have this mindset of, Oh, I can't do X, right? And it's like, and I have to
00:41:52
be in a situation, because like giving them the like, well, you don't have to be here,
00:41:55
that's not a good option, right? Like, I mean, they want to be here, they want to get to the
00:41:58
degree, they want to then eventually go and do the type of work that we're training them to do.
00:42:02
So it's like, I don't want to pull that card because that's that defeats the purpose of everybody
00:42:07
involved. But I need to convince them, and I need to try to get them to understand you can do this,
00:42:14
you may not be able to do it the same way that your peer sitting across the table from you does
00:42:18
it. But that doesn't mean you can't do this. So it's like, I do have to push a little harder
00:42:24
in helping them get out of that situation where they're just so, you know, focused on the fact
00:42:30
that I can't, I can't, I can't, I can't. That's fair. And I think I can get on board with that. But
00:42:36
the natural extension of that, and one of the things that I've been wrestling through is like
00:42:40
parenting, because you can't just be like, okay, well, you don't like it, you don't have to be a
00:42:43
part of the family anymore. Yeah, I agree. So that's not a thing either. But also just the whole
00:42:48
approach of, I'm not trying to convince my two year old that it's time to go to bed.
00:42:58
Yeah, yeah, yeah. It is time to go to bed. We're not having a conversation about this.
00:43:04
So I'm trying to resolve this in my mind still. And maybe that's a terrible example of like the
00:43:14
two year old, because there is a point, especially with real little kids where you're the caregiver
00:43:19
and you understand things better than they do. So you're not going to let them, you know,
00:43:23
choose what the menu is, because you're going to have pizza and ice cream for dinner every
00:43:27
single night. And that's not healthy. You know, it's going to have long term damage and stuff
00:43:32
like that. So I don't know. But I feel like the approach that we try to take with with our kids
00:43:37
is, you know, this is the way that we do things as a family unit. This is the family is led by my
00:43:44
wife and I, you have input. Now I remember specifically, we had a conversation with our kids a while
00:43:48
back about managing screen time. And this was several years ago at the time, like our old was
00:43:53
probably 13 14. And they each had like a half hour video game time a day. And we talked about how
00:44:00
we can't, you know, keep managing this telling you it's time to wrap up because repeat that four
00:44:05
times five times. It's a lot. So, you know, we want to what do you guys think we should do?
00:44:11
And what do you think is we actually asked the question, what do you think is fair? And they threw
00:44:15
out an hour. So double the screen time that they were getting like, okay, well, we can try that,
00:44:21
but we're not going to have to manage it then. So we're going to get this time timer. And you're
00:44:25
going to be done by the time the time timer goes out. And if you aren't, you know, you're going to
00:44:30
lose it the next day. Because again, the goal here is that we don't have to micromanage this.
00:44:34
It's frustrating for you. It's frustrating for us. So we, you know, arrived at this mutual,
00:44:41
mutual outcome. But again, like I don't see where I would be trying to convince them
00:44:49
that this is the right thing to do. It's either, you know, as the leader, this is the decision
00:44:53
that has been made. And I will help you work through it. Yep. Yeah. Or the other one, you know,
00:44:58
kind of what you're talking about the beginning is I'm going to go into it curious and figure out
00:45:03
where you stand and we'll try to meet in the middle. But I'm not going to try to bring you back over
00:45:07
to my side necessarily. Yeah. Yeah, I can see that. I can see that. I think there are a bunch
00:45:14
of different contexts and some, some work better than others for, for especially this one, the idea
00:45:20
of distance and, you know, kind of getting people to come on board. All right, you ready for the
00:45:27
next one? Uncertainty? Yep. All right. So chapter four is uncertainty. I thought this book, or I
00:45:34
thought, sorry, I thought this chapter made a lot of sense in terms of, yeah, we do need to reduce
00:45:39
uncertainty because if we're trying to get somebody to change something, if there is a moderate level
00:45:46
of uncertainty on the other side of that, we're just putting up a big, a big wall. Part of the
00:45:51
reason why maybe this resonated so well with me is because I feel like this, you know, like, I
00:45:57
basically thought he was describing me in this book. I was like, or in this chapter, I was like,
00:46:00
Oh man, yes, like if there is uncertainty, my uncertainty tax is huge. I'm like, I know what I'm
00:46:06
getting right now. I don't know what I'm going to get with you. So I'm a little bit nervous for that.
00:46:13
So he talks about uncertainty tax, which is basically the mental and or emotional or whatever it might
00:46:20
be like challenge that we would have to overcome this change and accept it. But then he goes quickly
00:46:28
into this idea of triability. Sorry, trial ability. Yeah, trial ability like how, how able am I to
00:46:35
try something and then decide whether I like it or not. And what I really liked about this
00:46:41
trial ability section is the four examples that he gives, basically the freemium model,
00:46:46
the reduce upfront cost, the drive discovery, and then to make it reversible. I thought these were
00:46:52
spot on in terms of like, Oh yeah, if you give me any of the four of those, that makes total sense
00:46:58
that it's going to reduce my uncertainty for a thing. And it's going to make me more likely to
00:47:04
consider yours. Now, one of the areas where I don't think he stressed it enough is it's also
00:47:09
going to give me the ability to throw yours away faster. So it's like, if I try yours and it doesn't
00:47:15
resonate with me or it doesn't do the thing you said it was going to do, I'm, I'm done. Like, I
00:47:19
made my decision and I'm not changing in your direction. So I think there's a whole side of this
00:47:24
that is possibly negative. But at the same time, it's these these four things also do apply to
00:47:31
reducing uncertainty. So I can't fold him on that. Yeah, so I liked this chapter the best.
00:47:39
And the reason is that it really got me thinking about how I can reduce uncertainty for the products
00:47:47
that I sell. Understood. Yep. So that's my action item. How do I make it easier for people to try
00:47:51
my products and services? And case and point is life HQ, where I did a whole bunch of research and
00:47:59
I saw what other people were doing with this sort of thing, because it's really a done for you obsidian
00:48:03
vault, you download it, you open it in obsidian, all the plugins are preconfigured, all the settings
00:48:10
are, you know, are, are set up for you. And you can just start using it. And once you have that file
00:48:15
and you've opened it on your computer, that's basically it. There's, there's no way to make sure
00:48:20
that someone deletes that from your, their system. So you can't turn off access to it. Which means
00:48:26
that the best practice from all the different other, all the other people I've seen who've done
00:48:30
this sort of thing is like, there is no 30 day money back guarantee for this sort of thing.
00:48:36
That's always kind of bugged me, you know, that I haven't been able to, to offer that. And I'm not
00:48:40
really to ready to, you know, make a commitment that that's something I'm gonna, gonna add. But
00:48:44
it's got me thinking like, how would I add that to life HQ? But then I'm also in the middle of
00:48:48
redoing all the other stuff on my website. And the one that I'm really thinking about now is the
00:48:53
library, my private community. Because I really want to include with that the cohort stuff and
00:48:59
the workshops. And if you want to follow along with your personal retreat and join an accountability
00:49:03
group, so you actually follow through and take action on your goals. Like all of that is there,
00:49:09
I'm getting ready to relaunch that you can't join it right now. But I'm working on the page and
00:49:13
I'm thinking, thinking through the, the offer. And I think what I want to figure out a way to do is
00:49:19
to incorporate some of this stuff where people can kind of try it out. And I don't know exactly
00:49:24
what that means. I don't know if it's like a free trial for two weeks. Or if it's a light version
00:49:30
that has some of this stuff, but not all of this stuff, you know, where like you could show up and
00:49:35
talk about PKM and maybe join a live call. But then like the bigger one is the, the one where you are,
00:49:44
you're, you're actually doing the stuff. So you're joining the groups and you've got the
00:49:48
accountability built in there. I don't know. But it's got my wheels turning. And I think this is
00:49:54
something that is kind of piggybacks off of everything that I was learning at the newsletter
00:49:58
marketing summit too. Like this is something that's missing for me right now. It's really like if
00:50:03
you have listened to every episode of bookworm and you've gone through one of my cohorts before,
00:50:08
yeah, you're a raving fan. Like you speak highly, you leave the testimonials, but everybody else
00:50:14
who has no idea who I am, that's a big ask to drop that much money on a product or
00:50:22
on a subscription. And I get that and I want to figure out a way to to reduce that. But I have no
00:50:29
idea what it looks like. It's probably a combination of some of those things that you were talking
00:50:33
about, you know, the freemium, free trial, all that kind of stuff. Yeah, not to take us too far
00:50:40
into this topic, but like as you're talking about it, a couple of things that popped into my head
00:50:44
and Sean Blanc did the iPad journaling, right? If you're if you remember, he created the iPad
00:50:52
journal that worked with which one? Good notes. I think it worked with good notes. One good planner
00:51:00
thing that he was talking about. Yep. Yep. Yep. So so he would do a free trial on that. Well,
00:51:04
I bought it and it did not fit with me. Like it just did 100% did not resonate with me.
00:51:10
But he he gave you a money back guarantee. Like if you if you tried it and didn't like it and
00:51:16
what I'll say is I realized I didn't like it, right? I submitted for the refund on it because it wasn't
00:51:22
it wasn't a zero, you know, it was a decent amount of money on it. But I never looked at it again.
00:51:28
You know, like, so so if you think about like life HQ for like that product, if it doesn't
00:51:32
resonate with people, they're like the bigger worry that you have going into that is that they
00:51:37
somehow post it somewhere. And then other people can download it for free. Like that is the problem.
00:51:43
It's I don't think it's people trying to like scam you on like, Oh, I'm just going to tell
00:51:48
you I didn't like it. And then I got a free copy of this. Because I really think that people either
00:51:52
they either like it or they don't. I think it's more that they posted somewhere else for the for
00:51:56
the community membership. Man, that one's that was a harder one. Like, how do you give them a,
00:52:01
you know, a seven day thing into the community? Because that's a lot of that's a lot to manage,
00:52:05
you know, like, then you got to kick them out when they're seven days doesn't come up. So
00:52:09
yeah, that's that's the hard thing. So like what up, but I get that it's a it's a big
00:52:17
ask to just join a community that costs multiple hundreds of dollars per year. You've got to be
00:52:25
able to putting myself in the issues of someone who's joined multiple communities like that. It would
00:52:30
be cool to have like a light version of that where I can spend, you know, 50 bucks a year or something.
00:52:39
And I can join an occasional live call and I can just talk with other people who are interested in
00:52:45
the thing, you know, kind of getting back to the newsletter marketing summit. One of the things
00:52:50
that they were talking about was building communities. And they aren't talking about circle communities
00:52:54
necessarily. A lot of their communities are, you know, discord servers or whatever. And there are
00:53:00
lots of people who have free communities and there are lots of people who have paid communities.
00:53:04
And there are values for both. And as I was thinking through like, what do I want practical
00:53:08
PKM in the library to become, you know, I really want it to be the place to hang out and talk about
00:53:12
PKM for serious sense makers who want to learn, share, grow together. So I feel like there's probably
00:53:20
multiple tiers here for people who want different levels of support on there, their PKM and creative
00:53:28
productive journeys. And I don't know exactly what the product offering looks like there. I just
00:53:33
know that I've got to diversify that a little bit, I think. Yeah, but I think this whole idea of
00:53:41
uncertainty, you know, thinking through, why do I do what I do as an internet creator, you know,
00:53:48
going all the way back to my life theme, I want to help people multiply their time in town,
00:53:52
save a bigger dent in the universe. There's no single way that I do that. There's multiple ways
00:54:01
and really there's unlimited ways. And I got to figure out which ones are the ones that really
00:54:06
are fit for me. But then I don't think it's as simple as, well, I'm just going to do this one
00:54:13
thing and that's going to be, you know, the way that I help people do the thing. Maybe if I do this
00:54:19
long enough and I build a big enough audience, I do get to that point. But I'm certainly not there,
00:54:25
not there yet. And I know that there are a whole bunch of people, even in, you know,
00:54:29
the less than 8,000 people that are on my newsletter list right now, that I could better serve them
00:54:37
in ways that are currently not being offered. And so I'm just trying to consider all of the
00:54:44
options right now. Yeah. Well, in, in, I mean, direct application of this book to you is,
00:54:50
so you're thinking about all that stuff, uncertainty is only one of the things because it's like,
00:54:53
I may have the way that I think I, oh, I'm really good at this. I don't need your, I don't need your
00:54:58
tool. When your tool's significantly better than what I'm doing right now. It's just like, I just
00:55:02
have that quote, unquote, endowed idea that I'm like, I don't, I don't need your thing. Or like,
00:55:08
I'm, I've got a negative reaction. Why would I do it your way? Like, I can do it my own, you know,
00:55:11
so the funny thing about this book is for as much as I don't like, reduce it, like, it actually
00:55:19
applies, right? Like the, the reactants endowment distance. I'm sorry, like, it applies really,
00:55:23
really well and really, really, valuably, I think, when you, when you look through this.
00:55:29
Before we move to the next chapter, I have a question for you. Have you read "Defusion of Innovations"
00:55:34
by Everett M. Rogers? I've never even heard of it. No. Okay. So this, this book is anybody who's in
00:55:41
the like, wanting to make change, transformation, innovation, like those kind of things. Defusion
00:55:48
of innovations is a really interesting book. I've not read all of it in its entirety, but I've like,
00:55:55
picked out different sections of it and have read different sections of it for different things
00:55:59
I've done in my, kind of my engineering ed research work. But it gets put on the level of like,
00:56:07
crossing the chasm and the innovators, the lemma and like anybody who's thinking about this idea of
00:56:12
like, creating things and making, transforming, innovating, like those kinds of things. It's at
00:56:18
the same level. I just didn't know where it came from. So it was cool to hear, it was cool to hear
00:56:23
the story about like, oh, you know, he was trying to figure out how to get people to use different
00:56:26
farming techniques. And I was like, oh, that's a, that's a pretty neat, you know, background story
00:56:31
to, to that book. So I just thought that was interesting. Nice. Are you ready to go to corroborating
00:56:37
evidence? Our only one with two words. Yeah, let's go to the last two chapters. I mean chapter.
00:56:42
I get mixed up on this one because I, the way my brain works is we're going to reduce reactants.
00:56:49
We're going to reduce endowment. We're going to reduce distance. We're going to reduce uncertainty.
00:56:54
We're going to reduce corroborating. So, so it's like, this one kind of breaks,
00:57:01
breaks my brain a little bit. Now he says in here that a lot of times we just try to throw
00:57:06
more evidence at people. And it's almost like we don't listen to what they're saying. We just
00:57:11
keep throwing evidence at them and expecting it to at some point, you know, turn it over. So I get,
00:57:16
what he, I get that aspect of it. But I don't think that was the driver of, of his, of his chapter.
00:57:22
I actually think the driver of the chapter was reduce translation problems, like reduce these
00:57:29
ideas to where it's like you and I aren't talking the same level here. You're like,
00:57:32
I have one idea. You have another idea. I want you to come over to my idea. We aren't translating
00:57:37
that well. And we need to reduce the friction between our translation. But I'm going to do that
00:57:43
with evidence. But I don't want to reduce the evidence. I want to use the right evidence in order
00:57:47
to do that. So the whole like structure of the framework, like I would, my brain went,
00:57:53
what do I do? Like what do I do with the structure of the framework? That said, as we've said many
00:57:58
times, I think this is a good, like the good idea. If I look at it from the translation side,
00:58:03
I've got weak attitudes. I've got strong attitudes. So he calls out these different types of attitudes.
00:58:07
Weak are the ones where essentially it's easy to change. Like I'm not super strong on the way I
00:58:13
feel about this thing. You know, like if you asked me, let's see what's one. If you asked me,
00:58:19
Domino's pizza versus Little Caesars, right? Like I don't have a strong attitude about either of
00:58:25
those. It's like, it's pizza and it's like cheap pizza. So cool. Like I'm in, right? Like whatever
00:58:29
you want. You know, if you asked you about one type of coffee versus Starbucks coffee, you know,
00:58:34
like one of your fruit fruit coffees versus Starbucks coffee, you're probably going to have a strong
00:58:38
attitude about that. So getting you to change over to Starbucks is probably not going to go that
00:58:42
well. So it's those ones where you need more evidence in order to change. He does the same thing
00:58:47
with the lists here. He says, consider who you're asking to change, consider when you're asking
00:58:52
them to change, consider when you're giving them the evidence and then consider how you're deploying
00:58:57
those evidence, those pieces of evidence, because you only have scarce resources to do it. So that's
00:59:02
essentially the essence of the chapter. Mike, what do you think?
00:59:08
I hate this title corroborating evidence makes no sense. You know what this really is? This is
00:59:17
social proof. Yeah. And there really isn't another term for that. The other term, I guess, which is
00:59:24
negative. So I don't think I would use this one would be like herd mentality. Oh, yeah. Okay,
00:59:29
I can see that. But corroborating evidence makes zero sense, at least from a label perspective.
00:59:35
Now he does a great job of explaining it in the chapter. But I feel like if you really want this
00:59:41
point to stick, social proof is the term that should be used here. So these notes that I have,
00:59:49
where you're trying to overcome the translation problem that you were talking about. And just,
00:59:54
you know, I've got a couple other things jotted down here. I want you to just kind of picture the
00:59:59
term social proof instead of corroborating evidence as I read through these. Okay, multiple sources
01:00:04
saying you're doing doing something solves the translation problem. The sources contribute more
01:00:09
when they're varied. The closer information is received together, the more valuable it becomes
01:00:13
an instigating change. Concentrating resources becomes important when when is required, you know,
01:00:19
fill in the blank there. Okay, as you think about that, to terms of social proof, does that not paint
01:00:25
a more specific vivid picture that you can do more with than corroborating evidence?
01:00:33
So in my, in my note system, I just changed the title. And in the print in parentheses,
01:00:38
I put should be social proof, because like everything you said there makes so much more
01:00:43
sense if we think social proof, everything you said. Yeah, exactly. So missed opportunity, I guess.
01:00:49
But I get why he's corroborating evidence because it fits with the the acrostic. I just think it's
01:00:55
the wrong choice. I think this is the right concept, like the last part of the five step framework.
01:01:00
This is definitely it like that fits all of the material in the chapter fits. But this is social
01:01:09
proof. And as I was thinking about that, once I got that revelation, basically, oh, this is social
01:01:14
proof. That's where this gets a lot more applicable to me. And this is where, you know, for
01:01:21
and I'm approaching this from the products and services, as I talked about in the last
01:01:26
chapter. And how do I better meet the needs of the people that I serve? I realize I've got to have
01:01:35
way more conversations. I've got to ask for feedback. Again, all this stuff is like kind of
01:01:40
highlighted to me from my takeaways from the newsletter marketing summit that I just got back
01:01:43
from too. So you can actually see like there were six lessons that I kind of solidified on for the
01:01:50
the newsletter. Then there were a couple of things in there that were uncomfortable for me. You know,
01:01:54
I want to solicit feedback from people. I want to hear from people. You know, this is the specific
01:02:01
question I have. This is the problem that I'm facing. This is the point where I'm getting stuck.
01:02:06
Now, if I'm going to do that, obviously, it's on me to develop the the solutions to those problems.
01:02:12
But as I do that, that's where social proof really comes in. So as I'm thinking through this,
01:02:17
like social proof, the most effective way to sell my product, whatever that product is,
01:02:23
library life, HQ, whatever, is to have a whole bunch of testimonials, but not just a whole bunch
01:02:28
of testimonials from a whole bunch of white dudes who have used a Mac for 30 years, right? It's
01:02:36
different people in different scenarios, different backgrounds who I was able to help. And if you
01:02:43
see on those testimonial walls, people who aren't just, you know, they're not saying the same
01:02:53
thing. They're not coming from the same perspective. The most effective testimonials, I think, are the
01:02:58
ones from that kind of created a tapestry of the types of people and problems that can be solved
01:03:06
by using the product. That's really what he's talking about here, where if the sources are more
01:03:14
varied, then they're more valuable. That's something I'm kind of aspiring to. I don't think I have
01:03:20
that. I've got a whole bunch of testimonials for my products, but I haven't been real intentional
01:03:25
about the way that I've gone about collecting these things. So I don't have a specific action
01:03:29
item with this chapter in particular, other than, you know, if I really want to convince somebody
01:03:36
that I have a solution to their problem. And again, I don't want everybody to buy a life HQ. If you
01:03:42
are not that interested in obsidian, this is not the thing for you. But I do want to figure out a way
01:03:49
that I can solve the right problem for the right people more often, if that makes sense.
01:03:56
And I feel like I got to pay a little bit more attention to this and not just, you know,
01:03:59
well, I got another testimonial that's great, but really, you know, where are the holes
01:04:05
in my marketing messaging? But again, marketing, not in terms of how do I get you to
01:04:11
pull the slot machine lever and make the transaction, but enter into a relationship where I can actually
01:04:18
help you take obsidian to the next level. Like that's exciting to me when I think about that.
01:04:23
So maybe that's the wrong way to think about, you know, the catalyst. We're getting into the
01:04:28
the epilogue next. And so we're kind of rounding the corner here. But I'm not thinking through my
01:04:35
perspective as a reading this book is not how do I convince somebody in an argument or conversation
01:04:40
to adopt my point of view. But how do I communicate my message so that educated people can make the
01:04:47
right decision for them more effectively? Yeah. Yeah. You're you're much more on the side of
01:04:54
Billy Broaz than you are. I guess. Yeah. That book really really is coming coming through, I guess,
01:05:01
in my my reaction to this one. Yeah. Okay. So let's roll to the epilogue. So the epilogue
01:05:10
basically is a gigantic. This is all the stuff I just told you. And here's some really
01:05:17
concise tables and some really, you know, bullet point items for for each one of them.
01:05:23
I don't believe, Mike, you can correct me where I'm wrong. I don't believe there was anything new
01:05:29
in the epilogue. I think it's all a regurgitation of what was talked about before.
01:05:35
In terms of general ideas, yes. I think there are a couple of things that kind of stand out to me
01:05:40
from this epilogue though. One is that the media often uses a broad brush to pick to each side
01:05:45
in a conflict. And then the story that they really talk about at the beginning of the epilogue
01:05:49
is this organization, Seeds of Change. Do you remember this story? Yeah, I do. Yeah. Yeah,
01:05:55
which is fascinating to me and probably is even more relevant now than when this book was written.
01:06:01
But it's essentially like a summer camp for Israeli and Palestinian kids. Actually,
01:06:12
Israeli, Palestinian and Egyptian. Okay, any Egyptian. Yeah, but basically they're getting
01:06:17
people who typically do not see eye to eye on things. And they put them in a place where they
01:06:24
have to learn to coexist. And then they do things like ropes courses and trust falls. And it's like
01:06:30
this person that I hate, I have to trust now. And little by little, they kind of chip away at these
01:06:36
stereotypes and prejudices that people typically have. And it changes their perspective for their
01:06:44
entire lives. So I think that's pretty cool. First of all, it's a, it's a cool story. He's got,
01:06:54
you know, specific reasons why this organization is successful that back up what he just told us
01:07:00
in the rest of the book. But I think that's a really powerful way to tie it all together.
01:07:08
And then yeah, there are the tables and all that kind of stuff. I didn't get much out of the
01:07:14
tables. But I guess, you know, often we're, we're blindly, we are so blinded by the belief that
01:07:23
we're right, that we tend to believe more evidence is enough to convince and change people. And it's
01:07:29
not. And then there's a quote that I really liked by Kurt Lewin, who said that if you want to truly
01:07:35
understand something, try to change it. So I was thinking about that, you know, there are a lot of
01:07:41
things where I can understand my tendency. And I feel like I don't often just launch into verbally,
01:07:47
well, I'm just going to convince people any anymore. Like I understand that that's not going to work.
01:07:51
And I've just kind of ain't nobody got time for that, you know. But I want to consider that quote
01:08:01
in terms of like the the things that I see, I guess the place where this is probably most
01:08:06
applicable is at home, because my wife would probably say that I launched into problem solving
01:08:11
mode a little too quickly, where it's just like, Oh, well, we got to do this, we got to do that.
01:08:15
And you got to do this, and you got to do that. And she's like, No, you just need to listen.
01:08:22
So I think maybe my default can be, well, I understand this stuff. But I jump to that
01:08:31
conclusion a little bit too quickly. And so I want to, there's no action items specifically
01:08:38
associated with this other than try to really understand what is going on here. And if you
01:08:44
haven't, you know, dug into it and gotten your hands dirty, you probably don't understand it yet.
01:08:48
Yeah. Yeah. All right. So before we go into action items, there are, there's an appendix,
01:08:55
or there are three appendices, right? So one appendix with three sections, I don't know if
01:08:58
it's three appendices or whatever it is. But like one is for active listening, which we talked about
01:09:02
already, one is for applying freemium. And then one is for force field analysis. And the only
01:09:07
reason I'm bringing these three up isn't because of like how amazing they were or anything like that.
01:09:12
It's because one of my action items comes from this. So force field analysis, right, we would call
01:09:16
this in my engineering world, we would call this root cause analysis, except for this is more specific
01:09:21
to change, right? So when you're doing your, your force field analysis, you're trying to figure out
01:09:26
what are the drivers for change? And then what are the, the he calls them restrainers, or what are
01:09:30
the resistance mechanisms for change? And then can you figure out what the change is, identify the
01:09:36
drivers, identify the strainers, and then develop an action plan along those lines? So how do we,
01:09:42
you know, accentuate the drivers and overcome the restrainers? So I have an action item related
01:09:48
to this. So now we can move into into action items. So I'll start because it's my book. So what are my
01:09:55
action items? One is where am I settling for good instead of great? So I want to think about just
01:10:00
kind of a broad landscape of my life and saying, Hey, am I settling for good instead of great in any
01:10:06
areas? And am I okay with that? The key aspect of that is, am I okay with it? Because I think there's
01:10:11
going to be areas where I settle for good. And I'm totally fine. Like I am not upset about that at
01:10:17
all. I think there's going to be some areas where I don't as well. Yeah, that's an important
01:10:22
difference there. It's, it's not, you know, is, is changer improvement possible, but given my limited
01:10:29
resources, where do I want to focus my efforts? Exactly. Exactly. Okay. So the my second one is I
01:10:35
want to do a force field analysis on something. I don't really care what it is. And I'm also,
01:10:40
if this one doesn't get a green check mark, I will be totally fine. But it's like, I want to
01:10:44
figure out like, Oh, here's something. Let's just do a force field analysis, just because I think
01:10:48
it'd be fun to do. I think it'd be an interesting thing, thought exercise for me. So Mike, what are
01:10:53
your action items? Cool. Well, I just have the, the one official one, which is how can I make
01:10:59
it easier for people to, to trial my products and services and trial being the trial ability,
01:11:05
reducing the uncertainty, reducing the, the risk associated with something. I recognize that, you know,
01:11:14
life HQ is almost $300. The library is a premium membership. So it's going to be expensive. And
01:11:26
I totally get why people would be reluctant to just drop that much money. The tricky part for me is,
01:11:34
you know, I think just lowering the cost is not the appropriate solution either, because the thing
01:11:41
is that valuable, especially with the feedback that I've got with life HQ, it's kind of like the
01:11:49
majority of it is I can't believe everything that's in here. So how do I, you know, find the balance
01:11:56
between charging what something is, is actually worth to the marketplace, and then making things
01:12:05
more approachable for, for people, essentially, you know, finding the right mix, which allows me to
01:12:13
help as many people as I can in the most effective way as I can. That's really the encapsulation of
01:12:22
what all my business stuff is. And I don't think I've really got clarity on that yet.
01:12:29
Okay. All right. We'll move to style and rating. I'll start us off. I am torn on this one. So
01:12:36
normally I just come out and I'm like, I know what my rating is right away. And I'm torn on this one
01:12:41
because I can't tell you that I love the style. Like I didn't mind the, the stories that were told
01:12:50
in between. I didn't mind the case studies that were done afterwards. I thought the content was
01:12:55
valuable. And it was, it was an easy read. It wasn't a difficult read. But there is just something
01:13:02
about the book that I'm just left going like, you know, like, okay, like it was, it was an okay book.
01:13:10
I actually think I'll remember some of the stuff that came out of the book like, oh, reduce the
01:13:15
following things to help, you know, if you want to get changed. But I also, again, I just wasn't
01:13:21
wowed by anything about the book. Like, so then then I go with the, what I recommend this to other
01:13:27
people. I don't know, like, I don't know if I would recommend this to other people. If somebody
01:13:32
tells me like, Oh, there's this thing happening in my organization or, you know, my work or whatever
01:13:39
it is. And it's like, and I really need this change. I really think we would be better if this change
01:13:43
thing could happen. Then I might say like, Hey, I read this book once called the catalyst. You
01:13:48
might want to like look through it. But I don't think I'm just going to randomly go around and be
01:13:52
like, Hey, I read this book called called the catalyst. And it's amazing. And like, you should
01:13:55
definitely go go look at it. So so like, I'm torn on this one. Because I think the rating I want to
01:14:03
give it for some reason just feels too low. But I don't think it's the wrong rating. So all of
01:14:09
that being said, I know this doesn't make sense. Or I guess I'm kind of waffling back and forth as
01:14:14
I'm trying to make my final decision. I'm going to give it three stars. And like, the three stars
01:14:20
are completely like, I think the information in the book is fairly good. It's high quality. The
01:14:28
packaging of it was give or take. And I probably wouldn't recommend it to too many people. After
01:14:35
having read it to it, that being said, last thing I'll say, and I'll turn it to you, Mike. It's a
01:14:40
short book. Like, I mean, you can read this in a weekend. Like, I mean, it's not a long book. And
01:14:45
especially if you like are willing to like not go into as much detail on some of the stories that
01:14:50
he tells, and just kind of skim through those and get the gist of them. It is not a very challenging
01:14:55
or long book to read. So three stars is my rating. Mike will move to you.
01:15:02
All right. Well, I think this is more than a three star book. So I'll tell you right now.
01:15:09
It's a, I'm going to give it four. I don't think it's, you know, the best book I ever read. It could
01:15:15
be the best book on changing someone's mind that I've ever read. I think reading, thinking back to
01:15:22
influence by Robert Chialdini. So that's kind of how we landed here. So this was recommended
01:15:26
by Mark. And Mark mentioned this is the best book on, I forget the term he used, but basically,
01:15:34
like if you don't want to read influence because it's 600 pages, you should read this one because
01:15:37
it's better anyways. And I do think it's better than what I, what I remember of influence by Robert
01:15:43
Chialdini, even though that's kind of the industry standard, like the gold standard, the one that
01:15:49
everybody holds up as the, the definitive work on the subject. Now this isn't a strictly marketing
01:15:59
book. Like, that's the vibe I remember getting from influence by Robert Chialdini. And I don't
01:16:07
think that that book and the 48 Laws of Power, for example, Robert Greene, I think they get a little
01:16:15
bit of a bad rap, because it's really just talking about principles of human behavior. And yeah,
01:16:25
you can use them for, for nefarious purposes. But it's really not, you know, a manipulation manual
01:16:32
per se. That's just the vibe I remember getting from, from reading those. And that's totally absent
01:16:40
from this particular book. So I think there are instances where I would probably recommend
01:16:48
this. I don't think they're going to be all that often. I don't know, maybe in some of the,
01:16:57
some of the creator circles that I, I run in, I shared, you know, that what got my wheels turning
01:17:03
was how do I use this in my creator business from a marketing perspective, not sleazy marketing,
01:17:08
but just, you know, effective marketing. And it could be the fact that we simply read, or we read
01:17:13
simple marketing for smart people, not not too long ago. And that sort of primed the pump here.
01:17:19
I definitely had takeaways from this book in areas that it didn't speak to necessarily,
01:17:26
at least not directly. So as we talked through this, you know, maybe my interpretation of this
01:17:34
book and the concepts in it is going to be unique and different from just about anybody else who,
01:17:41
who picks this up. I think there's a non zero chance that that is actually the case.
01:17:46
That being said, I thought this was a really good book. I really liked the stories at the
01:17:52
beginning of the chapters. I liked the presentation of the information and the concepts. I could give
01:17:59
or take the the listicles and the framework, I thought was ineffective for me, but I get why
01:18:06
somebody would do that. And I don't think that necessarily like downgrades. I'm not knocking down
01:18:11
the, you know, the rating for the book because of that. I like the case studies a lot at the end.
01:18:18
You know, most of the time when people text stuff on at the end of a chapter like that,
01:18:22
I get to it and I'm like, I have to fight real hard not to skim it. That didn't happen this time.
01:18:27
Like I read all those case studies. See, I skimmed multiple of them. I didn't think they were
01:18:34
that interesting. Yeah. Well, I didn't think the appendices were all that interesting. I didn't
01:18:38
even really look at those to tell you what I did. I thought the appendices are interesting.
01:18:43
So yeah, I'm really glad that we read this one. Thank you to Mark for recommending it.
01:18:49
But I don't think it's a holy life changing book for me either at this point. So that's why I'm
01:18:55
going to give it four stars and instead of five. I think if you and I say all this because I think
01:19:01
there are situations where this absolutely would be a five star life changing book.
01:19:10
They just aren't for me, at least not right now.
01:19:14
I agree. I can see a scenario where I read this book at the right time and it's a five star book
01:19:19
for me. Yes. Exactly. Now it's a three star book for me. Sure. Can I make a disclaimer here?
01:19:27
I hope Mark doesn't think that it's like, oh, that was a bad suggestion. No, no, no, no.
01:19:31
I love reading books. I love being exposed to new knowledge. So it's like, Mark,
01:19:34
I'm totally happy that they read it. It just doesn't get a good rating for me.
01:19:39
Well, I think I would consider four stars a good rating. And I feel like that's a general
01:19:44
encapsulation of the value of the book for most people in most situations. But yeah,
01:19:49
I think four, but it could definitely skew higher for me. I think I have trouble thinking
01:19:55
how it could possibly be lower for me because I feel like this is the sort of information where
01:20:02
even if you don't have use for it right now, this specific moment, you will at some point in your
01:20:09
life. So if you were to, if I were to make a list of these are the 100 books that you should read
01:20:17
before you die because people have done stuff like that. I think this is probably on it,
01:20:22
to be honest, like, or something like this, that this topic is important to understand, I feel.
01:20:29
And I don't confess to have a comprehensive knowledge of it just because I read this,
01:20:35
this one book. But, you know, why do we read books? I think part of it is, you know,
01:20:43
sometimes I'll tell people if you are looking for a book to read, just consider whatever problem
01:20:48
you're wrestling with and find a book that you think could solve that problem and chances are
01:20:53
you'll get a lot out of it. And that, you know, I wouldn't say that that was the, the case for me
01:20:58
with, with this one, but, but even, you know, taking that aside, I feel like there's stuff here that
01:21:03
I'm going to continue to use for years. I may not recall, you know, it was the catalyst that
01:21:10
I read that triggered this thing in me. But my gut feel from having read this is that
01:21:20
there's some stuff in this, this book where even though it's short, even though my mind map isn't
01:21:25
crazy huge, like some of the other ones that I've, I've made, there's, there's going to be some
01:21:31
stuff here that's going to stick for a while. I think you and I have different levels on
01:21:37
because like, what, everything you're describing, I'm like, yeah, I agree. Like, I'm, I'm like,
01:21:41
and it, but I'm like, it's still a three. Like, I, I, maybe it's a three and a half. Maybe your
01:21:46
four is my three and a half. Like, I think that's kind of where we're. So that's the other thing
01:21:50
here is like calibrating the scales, because I, people will look at my daily question stuff that
01:21:56
I do. And they're like, this is completely useless. You rate everything like six and above. And that's
01:22:01
because, you know, I've been doing this stuff long enough. And it's based on my intention. I have a
01:22:05
picture in my mind of what a zero or a one looks like. And every day I do something that, you know,
01:22:11
means it's, it's not that. So most of my ratings do tend to be three and above. Does that mean
01:22:20
that I love every book that we've, we've covered? No, but I don't think I've ever given a bookworm
01:22:26
book, a single star, I've been able to find something in there that's valuable. And just my
01:22:32
personal interpretation means that that's at least a two star, two star book. Maybe Zen in the art
01:22:38
of more, more cycle maintenance was the exception. That was the book I like viscerally hated.
01:22:44
I was going to say, you love that book, didn't you? You just, but I think, I think even that one,
01:22:47
you know, I tend to, I tend to think more positively when I'm, when I'm assigning these ratings. And
01:22:52
I don't, I think that's just personality. I don't think there's anything wrong with saying, you know,
01:22:57
what was it that you gave one star to? Was it radical candor?
01:23:00
I don't remember, but it was recent. I, I all I remember is there was a book we read recently
01:23:04
that I just did not. Yeah. But that's, that's cool. Like, I don't fault you for that. I don't
01:23:08
think you're wrong for that. I just, yeah, I, I recognize that my internal, my internal scale,
01:23:14
you know, is, is kind of calibrated to be a little bit nicer. Maybe.
01:23:18
So it was, it was 101 essays that will change the way you think.
01:23:21
Oh, yeah, that's right. That's right. Yeah. I just, no, I had nothing for that one.
01:23:26
Okay. So let's, let's move on. Um, so we're going to go ahead and put cat, the catalyst,
01:23:32
on the shelf. Mike, tell us about our next book that we're reading.
01:23:36
The next book is Tiny Experiments by Ann Lore LeCouff. And, uh, I just now discovered,
01:23:44
since I am back from Austin, that she was actually in Austin while I was there.
01:23:51
I believe she's got like a, a book signing thing that she's, she's doing, which, uh, you know,
01:23:58
this is a, the magic of podcasting. We're recording this, you know, roughly two weeks before it,
01:24:04
it comes out. So, uh, you know, by time you have heard this, you know, it's already happened, but,
01:24:10
uh, kind of bummed that I couldn't hang out in Austin another couple days and actually go meet her.
01:24:15
I could see that. I could see that. But this is, this is a good book. Uh, I got a pretty
01:24:19
released copy of this. Um, by the time that this comes out, my interview with her for the focus
01:24:24
podcast will be, uh, be available. So I'll put a link to that in, uh, in the show notes. And, uh,
01:24:30
yeah, I'm really looking forward to talking to you about this. Have you started reading this yet?
01:24:35
I haven't started, I haven't started reading yet, but I'm, I will tonight. I'll start reading it
01:24:38
today. Okay. Cool. What's after that? Uh, so after that, we are going to do a listener recommendation.
01:24:46
Okay. Uh, this, this book is called Inner Excellence. Train your mind for extraordinary
01:24:50
performance and the best possible life. And it's by Jim Murphy. I can tell you right now that I'm
01:24:55
excited to read this book and it's mainly for in the subtitle and the best possible life, right?
01:25:03
Like we have set the bar really high on this book because I'm just really intrigued if this, uh,
01:25:10
if this book can help me get to my best possible life. But, uh, we're gonna, we're gonna take a
01:25:15
look at this one. This one got popular. Uh, Mike reminded me of this. I didn't remember it when,
01:25:19
when we were first talking about it, Mike reminded me that this got popular because one of the Eagles
01:25:24
receivers, was it a receiver? Yeah. He would, he would read this on the sideline.
01:25:28
Yeah. So the, the story here is, uh, it was a playoff game. Uh, I think it might have been the NFC
01:25:35
championship game. Okay. And I believe the receiver's name is A.J. Brown. I'm terrible with NFL names,
01:25:41
but he's like an all pro receiver. And, uh, you know, he had just come off the field. I don't know,
01:25:48
remember if it was like a touchdown that he had scored or, um, they, you know, they punted or
01:25:54
whatever, but he, uh, apparently does this all the time. He reads on the sideline. So he comes off
01:26:00
the field and because it was a high profile game, he's a high profile player. The camera
01:26:05
happens to, to capture him reading a book on the sideline, which in and of itself, you know, the
01:26:11
announcers are having a heyday with that. And like, oh my gosh, look at A.J. Brown. He's
01:26:15
not invested in the game. He's reading, uh, a book on the sideline. And then afterwards,
01:26:20
he's like, no, I do that all the time. And the book that he happened to be reading was this book
01:26:24
Inter excellence. And so immediately once that book was identified, it jumps to the top of the
01:26:30
Amazon bestsellers list. And apparently, you know, it's been around for a, for a while, a lot of the
01:26:35
blurbs that are associated with this book are from like PGA tour pros where something, something
01:26:42
where, you know, engulf the distance between the very best in the world and people who barely make
01:26:48
the cut is not the, the physical tools. It's the, the mental toughness. And so, um, I feel like
01:26:56
that's a pretty cool topic. But by the way, this was a recommendation. So thank you to,
01:27:02
to Carol for recommending this one via the, the form, which will be in the, the show notes. If
01:27:06
you want to recommend a book for a bookworm, please go do that. By the way, regarding blurbs,
01:27:10
I forgot to mention this when we were in the actual episode, you were talking about Good to
01:27:15
Great by Jim Collins. Um, Jim Collins actually blurb this book. Did you notice that on which one,
01:27:22
the catalyst? The catalyst. Yeah. Yeah. I remember reading that. Yeah. Yeah. So the blurbs for this
01:27:27
book are crazy. There's, uh, Jim Collins, there's Robert Childini, uh, Daniel Pink, Charles Doohig,
01:27:35
you know, so, uh, kind of interesting who has recommended that the catalyst, I have to admit,
01:27:43
most of the time the blurbs do nothing for me, uh, because I know how the system works. You get
01:27:48
your buddies to, to blurb your book and then they blurb and then you blurb their book and
01:27:53
it's kind of a virtuous cycle of social proof. But, uh, this one, I'm looking at the list. I'm like,
01:27:59
okay, that's actually impressive. Awesome. All right. Uh, let's move on to gap books. Mike,
01:28:05
do you have any gap books right now? Uh, not officially. Um, well, I'll share this one because
01:28:14
this might have been a gap book previously. Um, but I, I just picked it up as I was looking for
01:28:20
something in, in between. Uh, I don't know that I'm actually going to finish this, but I am currently
01:28:26
reading Million Dollar Weekend by Noah Kagan. Okay. Noah Kagan is the guy behind AppSumo and he
01:28:33
was like employee number six, I think at Facebook. Um, this is a book not about starting a business
01:28:40
that is going to make a million dollars in a weekend, but really how to, how to create a solid
01:28:49
business plan for a business that will grow to be a million dollar business in a weekend. So really,
01:28:57
it's like putting a timeframe around, you know, just getting started with something,
01:29:04
but not promising that you're going to get this incredible result. You know, it sounds kind of
01:29:08
clickbaity. It's clickbaity. Listen, it was clickbaity. I was going to call you out on it, but go ahead.
01:29:13
Yeah. Yeah. So that I tend to, I tend to just kind of push back on that kind of stuff, but I've had
01:29:19
enough people telling me that this is actually a good book that I'm, I want to poke around in it
01:29:23
at least and see what it's all about. Had it for a while, just haven't really picked it up and read
01:29:28
it yet. So how about you? Uh, no, I am going another round with no, uh, gap book. Uh, my,
01:29:36
my challenge here, Mike, and I was going to bring this up to you. I actually sent you a picture of
01:29:39
me reading the physical copy of the catalyst, which by the way, that lasted for about a chapter. And I
01:29:46
then put down the physical copy and I picked back up the digital copy and I read the digital version
01:29:51
of it. I don't like physical books. Anyhow, moving forward. Um, I may, you'd be wrong, but that's
01:29:58
okay. Right. Uh, me and Ryan holiday, both disagree. I love the idea of physical books. I like the
01:30:04
feel of them. I just don't like to read them. Like I, I, they're not that interesting to me to read.
01:30:09
Um, but I will probably listen to a book, like while I'm like running or at the gym or something,
01:30:16
I don't, I don't count that as a gap book though. Like I, I mean, that's information
01:30:22
being forced into my ear canal. Like I don't really think of that as reading a book. So
01:30:27
I don't count those as my gap books, but I will probably do something like that between now and
01:30:31
the next episode. Yeah, you are spot on with that, by the way. Um, a while back, I did a, uh, three
01:30:39
hour workshop that I called the reading masterclass. Uh-huh. I remember this.
01:30:45
And I get into the science behind how you read different with a physical medium as opposed to
01:30:52
a screen, even something like an Amazon Kindle coming from a conversation that I had with Marianne
01:30:56
Wolf, who's like literally a scientist who studies this sort of stuff. So, um, I'm guessing that most
01:31:04
people listening to this and have listened to this point in the episode don't really care. So
01:31:11
if that's you, that's normal, no problem. If you are one of the weird ones like me who wants to
01:31:19
understand this stuff in greater detail. Um, I do have a replay of that workshop available.
01:31:26
I will put that in the show notes. So for people who are interested. Oh, that's awesome. That's
01:31:31
awesome. All right. So let's, uh, let's close this thing down. Let's pick up, uh, tiny experiments by
01:31:37
and, and Lori Lecunff. Did I say that right? And Lohr Lecunff. And Lohr Lecunff. Okay. So
01:31:44
and Lohr Lecunff. Um, we'll pick up tiny experiments. Um, if you are interested in, um, a little bit
01:31:50
more of what we do. Uh, we record a pro show. So the pro show, uh, for this episode was about Mike's
01:31:56
trip to, uh, the painted painted porch. Yep. Ryan Holliday's bookstore. Uh, so if you're interested
01:32:03
in that, you can pick up the pro show. You can go to, uh, patreon.com/bookwormfm. Um, you'll get
01:32:09
access to the pro show. You'll get access to, um, the bootleg version of the show, which is basically
01:32:14
the moment we turn. Um, we start to zoom call microphones start and they run the whole way till
01:32:19
the end till we, till we end the zoom call. Uh, there's a bookworm wallpaper there. Um,
01:32:23
it just, just some perks. Really it helps us kind of run the, the background of the show, um,
01:32:27
and run the, um, the hosting and, and things like that. So, uh, if you're interested in doing that,
01:32:32
you can feel free to go to, uh, patreon.com/bookwormfm, uh, and, and sign up there for us. So
01:32:39
there's, there's also a link in the, the show notes for, uh, if you want to support the show,
01:32:43
it's seven bucks a month. And as Cory said, it really helps us keep the, the show going. So
01:32:47
appreciate you doing that. Um, the other thing with the bootleg is that it normally gets uploaded
01:32:55
the moment that we get done. So usually it's about, uh, two weeks ahead of time. Um, so if you want,
01:33:01
you know, the early access to the, the bookworm episodes, that, uh, that's what the, the bootleg gets
01:33:07
you. Wonderful. The last thing I'll mention is if you're interested in recommending a book for
01:33:12
us to read, don't forget to check out the link, uh, in the, in the show notes. And we'll take a look
01:33:16
at those. And as we're thinking about the next books, we're going to pick up. So, uh, pick up tiny
01:33:19
experiments. And thanks for listening.