Bookworm
Transcripts
Episodes
Search
About
228: AI Snake Oil by Arvid Narayanan & Sayash Kapoor
Show notes on bookworm.fm ↗
Scroll along with the audio
Click any line to jump to that moment.
00:00:00
All right, Mike, welcome back.
00:00:01
Are you ready to talk about artificial intelligence,
00:00:06
large language models, prediction, generation,
00:00:10
all of the things related to technology?
00:00:13
To be honest, I'm not sure.
00:00:16
You know, I'm not either.
00:00:18
I was doing the outline for this one, and I was like, well,
00:00:21
do we want to go chapter by chapter?
00:00:23
Or do we think there's a better way
00:00:25
to have this conversation?
00:00:27
And I think we've got to, but yeah.
00:00:30
I think we're going to go chapter by chapter.
00:00:31
But before we get there, let's go into follow-up.
00:00:35
So I'll start with my follow-up items.
00:00:38
I was to brainstorm and create a mastermind group.
00:00:41
I'm going to give myself a yellow on this one.
00:00:44
My yellow is because I sent an email to an individual
00:00:50
that I would like to be in the mastermind group.
00:00:52
And this individual is key.
00:00:55
So I really want this individual to be in this group.
00:00:59
If he's not, then I don't know what happens to the group.
00:01:01
Like, I don't know if I am going to push the group forward
00:01:04
without this individual in it, because I think he and I
00:01:05
would partner really well and do that really well.
00:01:08
So he got back to me.
00:01:10
I need to schedule, and we need to think about it.
00:01:12
And we kind of need to talk about what the details of it
00:01:13
would look like.
00:01:14
And then he and I, I think, will figure out
00:01:16
if there's a bigger group and what the bigger group looks
00:01:18
like and how that bigger group works.
00:01:19
So I'm going to give myself a yellow on this.
00:01:21
So the group is not fully formed yet.
00:01:24
There's nothing on the calendar in terms of us meeting,
00:01:26
but the preparatory work is under underway.
00:01:29
The next thing I had was what scares me and excites me.
00:01:32
And then how can I develop a voluntary force function
00:01:36
for this thing?
00:01:37
And I did not do this at all.
00:01:39
I didn't even think about this once.
00:01:41
So I'm letting this one go.
00:01:43
I'm not going to come back to this one.
00:01:45
I'm just going to let it fly away and be totally OK with that.
00:01:49
The last one was do Pat's Personal Mission Statement
00:01:51
Activity, which I have done.
00:01:52
I had done that one prior to the episode
00:01:55
where we talked about lean learning.
00:01:58
So that one's completely done.
00:01:59
And I'm a big, big solid green on that one.
00:02:02
And I feel really good about that.
00:02:03
So those are my follow up items.
00:02:05
Mike, you had four.
00:02:07
Would you like to talk us through those?
00:02:09
I did.
00:02:10
And no, I would not like to talk you through those.
00:02:12
So let's go to the group.
00:02:13
OK, moving on now.
00:02:14
No, I'm just kidding.
00:02:16
So what about my work gives me energy?
00:02:19
I didn't really think about this,
00:02:21
but I think I have an answer to this anyways.
00:02:25
The thing about my work that gives me energy
00:02:27
is making connections with other people
00:02:31
and authentically helping them.
00:02:33
So the live streams that I've been doing and really anything
00:02:38
connected to the library, that is very energizing and life
00:02:43
giving to me.
00:02:47
There's a downside or a shadow side to this as well,
00:02:49
because if there is an event on the library calendar
00:02:53
and nobody shows up, I'll get super, super depressed.
00:02:57
Yeah, I can see that.
00:02:58
I would too.
00:02:59
Which honestly doesn't happen anymore,
00:03:01
but it definitely did at the beginning.
00:03:04
And it was enough for me to be like, I don't want to do this.
00:03:08
And I just wouldn't schedule things for months, which
00:03:10
is totally the wrong approach to that sort of thing.
00:03:14
But that definitely gives me energy.
00:03:15
And then I recognize that large editing projects
00:03:20
are the things that I tend to procrastinate on.
00:03:24
I'm good at them.
00:03:25
Like I do these modules for screencasts online every month
00:03:29
or so.
00:03:30
And they're like 40-minute screencasts walking through.
00:03:35
Like the last one I did was on Ecamm Live.
00:03:38
I think I've shared that story last time,
00:03:39
how it got released actually.
00:03:41
The day I was at Macstock talking to the Ecamm people,
00:03:43
and they found it and they're like, hey, your tutorial is great.
00:03:46
And I'm like, what are you talking about?
00:03:49
But when I'm working on those, it always
00:03:51
feels like a huge, heavy lift.
00:03:55
So I guess that's evidence that I should delegate as much video
00:04:00
editing as I can.
00:04:02
The one I did succeed on was sharing my work on social media.
00:04:06
I don't think I very clearly defined this, though.
00:04:11
I am basically--
00:04:14
well, I'll talk through my approach to this,
00:04:18
and it's going to be sloppy because I haven't really
00:04:20
codified this anywhere.
00:04:21
But in my mind, anyway, is it kind of connects.
00:04:24
So the thing that I'm really working backwards from
00:04:28
is I'm trying to get to the point where
00:04:30
I am releasing a new edited YouTube video every week.
00:04:37
So working backwards, I need topics
00:04:40
for all of those videos.
00:04:42
I need to figure out what I'm going to say about those topics,
00:04:46
and I need to script those, record them,
00:04:48
hand them off to the editor, add the screencast,
00:04:50
all the post-production stuff that takes far longer
00:04:52
than I want it to.
00:04:53
But basically, if I start with those topics,
00:04:58
that's really like the first bottleneck
00:05:00
is figuring out what are the next six YouTube videos
00:05:04
going to look like.
00:05:05
And then what I've been doing from there
00:05:07
is like, well, I have to figure this stuff out anyways,
00:05:10
what I'll do is I will actually just take that topic,
00:05:14
and I'll write about it for the newsletter,
00:05:16
because that will get me 60% of the way there
00:05:20
to making the video script.
00:05:22
And once I have some momentum, then I can take it and--
00:05:26
so there's consistency I feel like in the messaging
00:05:29
for the first time, which even that is a net win.
00:05:33
And then even further back from that,
00:05:36
the live streams that I've been experimenting
00:05:38
with on Wednesdays for practical PKM,
00:05:42
those are a way for me to kind of talk through things
00:05:47
before I know what I really want to say in the newsletter.
00:05:50
So I've done some on--
00:05:52
I think the last one I did was on the basis plug-in,
00:05:55
and I was talking through the On This Day feature thing
00:05:57
that I figured out for my daily note.
00:06:01
And being able to do that live, even though it's not truly
00:06:04
live like this, where people can talk back to you,
00:06:07
but they can chime in via the comments,
00:06:09
and then you can respond that way.
00:06:12
It helps me kind of explore the topic in a different way,
00:06:15
and then it helps me figure out kind of the direction
00:06:17
that I want to go.
00:06:18
So I start with that topic, and then it's like,
00:06:20
where do I want to go from this live stream about it?
00:06:22
That'll give me a direction from there, right about it.
00:06:25
That'll give me some momentum, and then finish it
00:06:28
by making the video script.
00:06:31
Once I do all that, then it's really just
00:06:34
take pieces of this and share it on social media.
00:06:38
The live stream is already on social media,
00:06:41
so I'm sharing--
00:06:42
I'm live now, come hang out.
00:06:44
And I've been getting consistently 20 people at a time
00:06:47
in those live streams, which I'm pretty happy with.
00:06:51
And then they stick around on the YouTube channel,
00:06:53
and they accumulate views and watch time and stuff like that.
00:06:56
So it's a win-win, I feel, for the channel.
00:07:02
I probably could do a little bit better job of taking
00:07:05
every bit of the things that I figure out
00:07:08
and making sure all of them get scheduled for social media.
00:07:10
That's the last part of this for me, I think.
00:07:13
And that I've just spent too busy to really codify,
00:07:16
but that's going to happen through,
00:07:18
thankfully.
00:07:19
And yeah, I have a clear path forward for that.
00:07:24
Just need a little bit of time to make it happen.
00:07:27
The other two that I had, which I failed miserably on,
00:07:29
check out the companion course.
00:07:31
I did not do this, Toby did this.
00:07:33
He told me it was free.
00:07:34
And once I heard a little bit about what it was,
00:07:40
I kind of feel like my curiosity was satisfied.
00:07:43
I didn't need to go look at it.
00:07:47
And then the mastermind groups for the library,
00:07:48
this is definitely something I want to do at some point,
00:07:52
but it's not something that I should be worrying about right
00:07:56
now, so just basically put that on the back burner.
00:08:00
Nice.
00:08:01
Nice, so what would you, I mean, overall, green, yellow, red?
00:08:06
I think the first one is yellow.
00:08:09
The second-- so what about my work gives me energy?
00:08:12
The second one, sharing the work on social media.
00:08:14
I'm willing to give myself a green,
00:08:15
even though it's not completely done, I feel like.
00:08:18
Yeah, and then the other two are red.
00:08:20
We're red.
00:08:20
But actively red, like you made a decision
00:08:23
to make those red.
00:08:24
Intentionally red.
00:08:25
Intentionally red, there you go.
00:08:26
Very actively, intentionally.
00:08:28
Yep, that's great.
00:08:30
All righty, are we ready to get into today's book
00:08:32
as best as we can?
00:08:36
Let's do it, let's do it.
00:08:37
All right, so our book today is called AI Snake Oil,
00:08:41
What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can't,
00:08:43
and How to Tell the Difference.
00:08:45
The book is authored by Arvind Nairayana.
00:08:50
Nah, I knew I was going to get it wrong.
00:08:52
Nairay Anan.
00:08:55
Yeah, OK, cool.
00:08:56
Mike shook his head.
00:08:57
And then Syash Kapoor, so Arvind,
00:09:00
I'm really sorry that I messed your name up
00:09:01
if you listen to this, where they are both at Princeton.
00:09:06
So Arvind is a faculty member at Princeton.
00:09:10
He's a computer science professor.
00:09:13
He runs a lab that is he's the director of the Center
00:09:16
for Information Technology Policy.
00:09:18
So that actually kind of makes sense in terms of the book.
00:09:20
If you read the book, or if you've already read the book,
00:09:22
that would actually kind of make a ton of sense.
00:09:25
And then Syash is a computer science PhD candidate.
00:09:29
So he's almost got his doctorate.
00:09:31
He works in the Center for Information Technology Policy.
00:09:35
He kind of co-authored this out of his work.
00:09:38
Mike, do you remember Syash is the one who
00:09:41
worked at Facebook, right?
00:09:43
Before he came back to grad school,
00:09:45
if I'm remembering correctly.
00:09:48
To be honest, I don't know.
00:09:51
And I don't think it really matters except for the one section
00:09:55
where they talk about AI with social media.
00:09:59
The only reason I brought it up was because it kind of
00:10:02
brings a little bit of the level of he
00:10:03
was in a world that was using this professionally
00:10:08
or in the workplace kind of setting, which I think
00:10:10
adds some flavor to it.
00:10:12
So the book's got an introduction, which they count as chapter
00:10:15
one, and then eight chapters after that.
00:10:17
It's got quite a bit of footnotes and booknotes
00:10:21
and then notes associated with it where they
00:10:23
reference different studies and different things.
00:10:26
The first chapter, Mike, if you're ready to roll into it?
00:10:29
Well, let's reel real quick on the format of the book.
00:10:33
I think this is kind of weird because it's what?
00:10:36
290 pages before you get to the end.
00:10:40
Yeah, something like that.
00:10:42
There's a ton of references, as you mentioned.
00:10:44
There's like 60 some citations in each chapter.
00:10:51
That last citation section in the book
00:10:54
is crazy long, which makes it actually kind of hard
00:10:56
to find what you're looking for.
00:10:57
So there's a ton of research, basically, or a ton of sources
00:11:01
that have gone into this book.
00:11:04
It's very long, though, and if you take out the introduction,
00:11:07
there are really seven different chapters.
00:11:09
I feel like it's laid out kind of weird.
00:11:12
Oh, yeah, I would agree with you.
00:11:13
And I don't think that does the book any favors
00:11:18
at the beginning.
00:11:20
And I think you probably could break it down
00:11:23
into different sections and have different chapters.
00:11:27
I'm not necessarily sure that's the right approach, either.
00:11:29
The chapters themselves do have a bunch of sub-chapters
00:11:32
that are listed.
00:11:34
So if you want to view the chapters in here,
00:11:36
kind of as sections, I feel like you could do that.
00:11:39
But yeah, it's kind of strange the way that this book is laid out.
00:11:46
It reads a lot like "Academics" wrote it,
00:11:50
which, as we're seeing this, this unroll.
00:11:54
Maybe that's why I was kind of like,
00:11:56
oh, this makes total sense to me.
00:11:57
I kind of understand where they're going.
00:11:59
I think you're right in saying that the seven legitimate
00:12:04
chapters, introduction, but then the seven other chapters,
00:12:08
they're not mapped out.
00:12:10
We've read books before where it's like, here, this part one,
00:12:14
it's got three chapters underneath it.
00:12:15
Here's part two, it's got three chapters underneath it.
00:12:17
Here's part three, it's got three chapters underneath it.
00:12:19
And then there's a thread that ties part one,
00:12:20
part two, and part three together.
00:12:22
That really doesn't exist in this book.
00:12:26
I was looking real quick to see who the publisher was.
00:12:29
So it's Princeton University Press.
00:12:30
So this is an academic book written for academics.
00:12:34
It's like it's got academia written all through it.
00:12:36
And what I'll say is, I think that's
00:12:39
why you had said about like each chapter,
00:12:43
kind of being standalone and having a bunch of references,
00:12:46
that's a very academic style of writing is,
00:12:49
I'm going to write this chapter and it's kind of a self-contained
00:12:52
idea, and then we'll write this chapter and it's kind of a self-contained idea.
00:12:54
And I've read a bunch of books before where you'll
00:12:58
solicit different authors to write each of those chapters.
00:13:01
So you go out and you get the expert to write that chapter,
00:13:04
and you get the expert to write that chapter.
00:13:05
And then there's an editorial team
00:13:07
that'll write a front matter and a back matter
00:13:09
to kind of try to tie everything together.
00:13:11
It just so happens in this book, they both wrote the entire thing.
00:13:15
They didn't farm out any of the chapters
00:13:17
or get support for any of the chapters.
00:13:20
The one last thing I thought would be interesting to talk about
00:13:23
before we get into the introduction is,
00:13:25
this was listed as one of nature's top 10 books in 2024.
00:13:29
They've got a fairly significant sub stack associated with this.
00:13:33
So they've gained some pretty decent popularity in the AI space.
00:13:37
I would say in the more public policy and technical side
00:13:42
of the AI space, as opposed to the general, your grandma, your brother,
00:13:48
your dad, who is like, I just kind of want to know what's going on with AI.
00:13:52
I feel like I should make a disclaimer before we go any further.
00:13:56
I'm very into AI.
00:13:57
I've encouraged us for Bookworm to read Kevin Kelly's book about technologies
00:14:03
and now we're reading this AI book.
00:14:04
So if you really, really hated this book and you were like,
00:14:07
this book was terrible and I did not like any bit of it,
00:14:10
or if you listen to us talk about it and you think, nope, that's good.
00:14:14
It's all on me.
00:14:15
Don't put any of it on Mike.
00:14:16
It's all on me and--
00:14:18
Corey gets all the blame and the credit.
00:14:20
I get all the blame.
00:14:21
So just, yeah, no, you'll see where we're going with this.
00:14:24
So let's get into the--
00:14:25
Dude, you're foreshadowing your rating.
00:14:26
Oh, I'm totally--
00:14:27
I'm totally foreshadowing my rating, totally 100%.
00:14:31
The question, Mike, is--
00:14:33
Let me just share one other thing about the cover here
00:14:35
so that the subtitle is what artificial intelligence can do, what it can't,
00:14:40
and how to tell the difference.
00:14:42
And AI is changing so quickly.
00:14:45
This is the thing that made me leery of this.
00:14:49
I feel like even if it was able to deliver on those promises entirely,
00:14:55
it's a very short shelf life.
00:14:59
But that was just my first impressions
00:15:01
going into the book before we get into the discussion of a chapter by chapter.
00:15:06
OK.
00:15:07
All right, so let's go to the introduction.
00:15:08
In the introduction, they've got a couple different goals here
00:15:11
that are then going to bleed through to the rest of the book.
00:15:15
One of them is they're going to make a distinction between generative AI
00:15:17
and predictive AI.
00:15:19
And I'll say it at the very start.
00:15:23
They're for generative AI.
00:15:25
They are very against predictive AI.
00:15:27
Then they introduce this idea of snake oil.
00:15:30
And just like in the old West, where people would try to sell you the--
00:15:34
this tonicle save everything.
00:15:36
And it'll make you better.
00:15:37
And it'll heal all the diseases and all that stuff.
00:15:39
They're saying that predictive AI is snake oil at this point.
00:15:44
This is where I think the title of their book is a little bit--
00:15:48
not disingenuous because I don't think they were doing it intentionally.
00:15:51
But I would have wanted them to be more specific and then
00:15:54
say like predictive AI snake oil because they're very clear
00:15:59
that generative AI and chatbots and some of these things
00:16:02
are very valuable.
00:16:02
And image generation, they're doing a fine job.
00:16:06
There's really nothing wrong with those.
00:16:08
They're doing what people say they're going to do.
00:16:11
But when you get into the predictive side,
00:16:12
they don't have the evidence for it.
00:16:14
So let's get a little bit more detailed.
00:16:16
And basically, they say snake oil is something that doesn't do what
00:16:21
it's advertised to do.
00:16:22
Or it can't possibly do what it's advertised to do.
00:16:25
So that's why they've titled the book snake oils
00:16:27
because they say predictive AI can't do what people are saying it can do.
00:16:32
I'll stop here, Mike, and let you give us some thoughts on the introduction.
00:16:37
Yeah, well, I think that's true.
00:16:39
And the next couple of chapters are on predictive AI.
00:16:44
You can tell at this point in the book that really they've
00:16:48
got a vendetta against predictive AI, which I wouldn't--
00:16:52
I wouldn't say is unfounded.
00:16:56
It's just not necessarily the approach that I would have picked
00:17:01
for a book that I wanted to read about AI.
00:17:06
Maybe that's because I have more than an absolute beginner level
00:17:12
understanding of this stuff.
00:17:14
Like we have read some of those books.
00:17:16
The one that I continue to point people to is co-intelligence
00:17:19
by Ethan Mollack.
00:17:20
I feel like that's a great discussion about AI in general.
00:17:23
But I don't think he really even addressed predictive AI very specifically
00:17:30
in that book.
00:17:30
It was more about AI in general.
00:17:32
This one takes the opposite approach.
00:17:33
It's going to consider each type of AI under the microscope.
00:17:38
So very different feel.
00:17:41
I feel also that the formatting/editing of this book--
00:17:46
again, you mentioned it's a very academic book.
00:17:49
I don't really like academic books I have discovered.
00:17:54
One of the reasons I don't like the academic books
00:17:57
is that I feel there is a lot of focus on what they're saying
00:18:04
and not as much focus on how they're saying it.
00:18:09
So right away in this section, the big argument they're laying out here
00:18:13
are the three questions for determining whether describing something
00:18:17
as AI is appropriate.
00:18:20
Not all three of these are actually shared as questions.
00:18:24
The third one is a statement.
00:18:27
I didn't realize that when I read it, but yes.
00:18:29
And when I'm putting together the mind map for this,
00:18:32
I'm like, wait, I have to rewrite this as a question,
00:18:35
because it's the three questions.
00:18:37
And I'm going to go back and reference this later.
00:18:39
Most people, they're just going to keep cranking through the words
00:18:42
that keep appearing before their eyeballs.
00:18:44
But I was like, wait, no, that's wrong.
00:18:50
So little things like that definitely bug me.
00:18:54
Yeah, I don't know what else to really say
00:18:55
about the introduction section.
00:18:57
I think the questions are actually helpful.
00:18:59
The first one, does the task require creative effort or training
00:19:04
for a human to perform?
00:19:07
The second one, was the behavior of the system
00:19:09
directly specified in code by the developer
00:19:12
or did it indirectly emerge, and the third one,
00:19:14
does the system make decisions more or less autonomously
00:19:17
and possess some degree of flexibility and adaptability
00:19:20
to the environment?
00:19:20
And that's the one where they just said it as a statement.
00:19:25
Feels like something if you had an editor at a--
00:19:30
I can't even think of the big publishers now.
00:19:33
Penguin?
00:19:34
Yeah.
00:19:36
They would have been like, no, no, no, this doesn't make sense.
00:19:38
Let's clean this up a little bit.
00:19:39
And it's not that big a deal.
00:19:41
But it was a little bit of friction for me as I'm reading it
00:19:46
and priming the pump, I guess, for how
00:19:50
I'm going to engage with the rest of the chapters.
00:19:54
But not all AI, snake oil, they mentioned at the beginning,
00:19:57
and I think you'll definitely get that as we work
00:19:59
through the rest of this.
00:20:01
But they're definitely going to lead with guns
00:20:06
ablazing in chapters two and three.
00:20:09
Absolutely.
00:20:10
So you got at one of the things is there
00:20:12
way to try to define what AI is.
00:20:15
And even there, they say, if you can answer yes
00:20:19
to those three questions, then it might be AI.
00:20:22
They still don't even come out as strong and say,
00:20:24
then it is AI.
00:20:25
They just say, oh, it maybe is AI.
00:20:27
Like, it's in the wheelhouse of possibly being AI.
00:20:31
One of the things that I liked about this,
00:20:34
you know me at this point, tables and graphs make me happy.
00:20:37
So they throw a table out there.
00:20:39
The landscape of AI, snake oil, hype and harms.
00:20:42
They've got on the x-axis benign to harmful.
00:20:46
And then on the y-axis works up to snake oil.
00:20:51
And they throw different ideas or different ways
00:20:54
that AI is being used.
00:20:57
So for instance, like autocomplete.
00:20:59
They would say autocomplete is fairly benign and it works.
00:21:02
We can do that pretty well at this point.
00:21:04
And you think about that?
00:21:05
Well, that's been around since at least the T9 cell phone
00:21:08
days, right, where it was trying to autocomplete your words.
00:21:11
Then they go the whole way up to cheating detection,
00:21:14
video interviews, and hiring, and criminal risk detection.
00:21:19
And they say, that's basically really harmful
00:21:21
and it's snake oil, that it doesn't work at all.
00:21:24
And it really has a negative consequence.
00:21:25
So they do that.
00:21:27
I think they do a good job outlining who the book is for.
00:21:30
They throw these three different categories.
00:21:32
You want to get a sense of what's going on.
00:21:35
That's one category.
00:21:36
You need to make decisions about AI in your workplace.
00:21:39
That's another category.
00:21:40
You may be interested in AI because you
00:21:42
want to take action against the harms.
00:21:43
So that's more of a proactive or activist kind of standpoint.
00:21:47
I honestly think that this is why I wanted to read this book
00:21:51
is because I'm in that second camp.
00:21:53
That I need to make some decisions about AI at the university
00:21:57
and in life and think about that from that perspective.
00:22:01
So I'm not going to tell you that I love this book,
00:22:04
but I'm going to tell you that I think this book was
00:22:06
valuable for me bigger picture.
00:22:09
That it allowed me to see a different part of thinking
00:22:12
about AI that I don't often get everywhere else.
00:22:15
I get AI is going to ruin education,
00:22:18
and AI is going to do this, and AI is going to do that.
00:22:20
And they were a more tempered voice to say, well, hold on.
00:22:24
It's probably not, especially if it's in the predictive side.
00:22:26
So I think that's a good thing.
00:22:31
It's worth reading for me, even though, as you're going to see,
00:22:34
I'm not a huge fan of the rest of the book.
00:22:37
But chapter two, are you ready to go to chapter two?
00:22:41
- Let's do it.
00:22:42
- Okay, so chapter two is how predictive AI goes wrong.
00:22:46
And really what they're going to do here
00:22:48
is they're going to talk about a couple different ways
00:22:50
that AI goes wrong.
00:22:52
They think predictive AI falls short
00:22:54
of what people say it can do.
00:22:56
They think that over automation,
00:22:59
people are using it to make too many automated decisions.
00:23:03
They are specific in throwing out their thesis
00:23:07
that companies and governments have many misguided
00:23:11
commercial or bureaucratic reasons
00:23:12
for deploying predictive AI.
00:23:14
But it's faulty, and that's causing systematic issues
00:23:17
and systematic consequences.
00:23:19
They throw a table in there
00:23:20
that's the five reasons predictive AI fails.
00:23:24
It's a good prediction can result in a bad decision.
00:23:29
People can strategically game opaque AI.
00:23:32
Users over rely on AI without adequate oversight or recourse.
00:23:36
Data for training AI may come from different population.
00:23:40
Predictive AI can increase inequality.
00:23:43
Essentially that's what the whole chapter is.
00:23:46
It's summarized in that table.
00:23:47
So they wrote about all of that stuff
00:23:49
and they summarized in that table.
00:23:51
And the thing that gets me,
00:23:53
and this is where I told you,
00:23:55
I was good with the summary.
00:23:57
There was just too much in every one of those five sections
00:24:01
and I would just get bored
00:24:03
and I'd be like, okay, I get your point.
00:24:05
Okay, I get your point.
00:24:06
Okay, I get your point.
00:24:07
And then we got to the summary table.
00:24:08
I was like, man, if only you had given me this 30 pages ago,
00:24:14
I'd have been probably happy
00:24:15
and I'd have been able to make it through much faster.
00:24:17
So that's a new example of telling someone
00:24:21
what you're gonna tell them,
00:24:22
telling them and telling them what you told them.
00:24:24
- Exactly, exactly.
00:24:25
So that's chapter two,
00:24:27
how predictive AI goes wrong.
00:24:29
It's a big elaboration on those five.
00:24:31
Those five points.
00:24:33
- I think those five points are actually legit.
00:24:36
- Agreed.
00:24:37
- And the argument,
00:24:38
if you just take those arguments
00:24:40
and put them in sequential order,
00:24:42
I think they can lead you down a path
00:24:44
that maybe you haven't walked before.
00:24:46
Like one of the things that I jotted down,
00:24:48
which you mentioned that when predictive AI systems
00:24:51
are deployed,
00:24:51
the first people they harm are usually minorities
00:24:54
and those in poverty.
00:24:55
So what do you do with that?
00:24:57
I'm not about to deploy a predictive AI system.
00:25:00
So it's kind of just like a nice to know fact, I guess.
00:25:03
Like be on your guard for this sort of thing.
00:25:08
But the, yeah, the overall ideas that I think
00:25:13
are gonna stick with me from this chapter
00:25:15
are the definition of an algorithm,
00:25:17
which is a set of steps or rules used to make a decision.
00:25:21
And then they define predictive AI
00:25:23
as models used for decision-making
00:25:25
based on predictions about the future.
00:25:27
The problem with that, if I were to try to summarize this
00:25:33
based on the other notes that I've gathered here,
00:25:38
is that AI tends to be good at making predictions
00:25:42
if nothing else ever changes,
00:25:46
but that's not the world that we live in.
00:25:51
And so you should basically be skeptical
00:25:54
of any of these claims and the question you should be asking
00:25:58
is who was this AI tested on?
00:26:02
I think later on they unpack that a little bit further
00:26:04
and say that if you use it on just the data
00:26:09
that it was tested on, it has limited value.
00:26:13
I think they're talking about generative AI with that,
00:26:15
but I think it applies to this predictive AI as well.
00:26:19
You have to recognize the biases that are inherent
00:26:21
from the training data.
00:26:25
- I think that's, we're gonna highlight
00:26:27
probably multiple times throughout this book.
00:26:30
They said good things, I can't place it in the book at all.
00:26:34
Like normally I can make like this little map that says,
00:26:36
oh, it was this chapter, then they made this argument
00:26:39
and they moved on from there.
00:26:40
For this one, I have these ideas in my head.
00:26:44
I was like, oh, that was a good point.
00:26:45
I like that point.
00:26:45
But if I didn't have my notes right in front of me,
00:26:47
I have no idea where it was talked about in the book.
00:26:49
Like it just doesn't flow.
00:26:52
- Yeah, and that's why I made the comment about how
00:26:54
I guess I just don't like academic books
00:26:56
because I feel like every sentence is useful,
00:27:00
but not exciting.
00:27:01
And they're just one right after the other.
00:27:03
And you get to the end of them and you're like,
00:27:05
I probably heard some good things, but I don't care.
00:27:07
Whereas if you're writing a book to sell a bunch of copies,
00:27:11
not to plant your flag in the ground on the ideas themselves,
00:27:15
which I totally get, that's a valid use case
00:27:16
for writing a book, building a sub stack.
00:27:19
We want to be known as the AI guys, right?
00:27:23
You can do that.
00:27:24
But I think the other approach to this,
00:27:27
if you're trying to write a standard nonfiction book,
00:27:30
you're working with an editor,
00:27:31
it's like, how can we vary the sentence structure?
00:27:33
How can we set things up?
00:27:35
And we got this one banger sentence
00:27:37
that's really just gonna nail it home.
00:27:39
And this is the thing that people are gonna remember forever.
00:27:42
They're just kind of like, yeah,
00:27:42
the information's all there if you want it.
00:27:44
- Yeah. (laughs)
00:27:46
I wanna make, you know, one of the things that stood out to me
00:27:49
from the five failures of predictive AI
00:27:52
was the hiring one, where they talked about the bookshelves
00:27:55
in the background, or like the random stuff
00:27:57
that would make the person score high.
00:28:00
And I, like this just hurts my heart.
00:28:01
And it's probably because I work with students all the time
00:28:04
who are trying to go out there,
00:28:05
they're trying to get jobs.
00:28:06
And in getting the callback from a human
00:28:10
is the absolute hardest part of that process.
00:28:13
And they all struggle with it.
00:28:14
It doesn't matter how good they are.
00:28:16
It doesn't matter what their GPA is.
00:28:17
It doesn't matter anything like that.
00:28:18
Getting that callback, because I'm seeing more and more of this.
00:28:22
They submit their stuff.
00:28:23
It goes through an automated process.
00:28:24
They do a video interview that now I know,
00:28:27
I didn't actually realize this at first,
00:28:29
but now it goes through an automated screening.
00:28:31
And there's, you know, not causation, but correlation.
00:28:35
It's like, oh, the people we score well
00:28:37
tend to all have beautiful backgrounds,
00:28:39
or their walls are white, or whatever it is.
00:28:41
And it's like, that has nothing to do with the candidate.
00:28:43
Absolutely, like they were, they were traveling.
00:28:46
So they had to film in their hotel room.
00:28:47
Or, you know, they were visiting family
00:28:49
and they're in a weird space.
00:28:52
But that will trigger the automated systems.
00:28:55
And then I think what's scary about this is,
00:28:57
there's no human intervention,
00:28:59
or it's unlikely that there's human intervention
00:29:02
until something important enough arises
00:29:05
that requires human intervention to come in.
00:29:07
And I was like, man, we're just missing out
00:29:10
so much on important things,
00:29:12
because we're kicking this stuff to predictive AI
00:29:15
into these models and these algorithms.
00:29:17
And that made me, made me hurt a little bit.
00:29:20
I agree.
00:29:21
Well, they're based off of the data
00:29:25
that the humans treat them.
00:29:27
And so it's not a surprise to me
00:29:30
that the biases come over as well.
00:29:34
Yep, but.
00:29:36
Okay, so now we go into chapter three.
00:29:38
And chapter three is why can't AI predict the future?
00:29:42
I honestly, Mike, I don't remember
00:29:46
much of this chapter.
00:29:47
Meaning like it was not something
00:29:50
that really, really stood out to me in terms of,
00:29:54
we produce a lot of things.
00:29:56
They went on this tirade about social media.
00:29:58
This is kind of where they start
00:29:59
with the social media stuff.
00:30:01
And then they start to get into that.
00:30:05
There was the Fragile Families Challenge.
00:30:08
You know, a notable large scale study
00:30:10
that tried to predict children's outcomes using AI
00:30:12
and lots of data.
00:30:13
There was this idea of data that came into here.
00:30:16
I don't.
00:30:17
Can we talk about that, that Fragile Families
00:30:20
particularly?
00:30:20
Absolutely, because nothing really jumped out at me.
00:30:22
So I'm really glad you had something that jumped out.
00:30:25
Yeah, so, well, it's interesting to me
00:30:28
because my dad has told me stories
00:30:34
of his experience growing up.
00:30:37
He went to a Catholic grade school
00:30:43
and this was back in the day.
00:30:47
So he was left handed and that was considered wrong.
00:30:54
So like they tried to force him to write with his right hand.
00:30:57
Like that's how far back in the day, right?
00:31:00
But I remember him telling me
00:31:02
'cause he is a business owner.
00:31:05
He has a master's in assessment.
00:31:07
You know, he's successful by any stretch of the imagination.
00:31:12
And he told me that when he was in middle school
00:31:17
in high school, he didn't really care about school.
00:31:20
It wasn't until he was starting to think about
00:31:23
what he was gonna do after school
00:31:25
that he actually started caring.
00:31:27
And there was this thing that back in the day
00:31:30
called a predictor, which was essentially the range
00:31:35
for the highest grade that you were able to get
00:31:39
based on your previous performance.
00:31:42
And so going into his senior year,
00:31:44
he's like, I'm gonna try
00:31:45
because I really wanna get into Marquette University
00:31:48
in Milwaukee and he's acing all of his classes.
00:31:52
But they're like, well, your predictor says
00:31:53
you can't get above whatever.
00:31:54
So that's the grade you're gonna get.
00:31:56
And he's like, what?
00:31:59
So he took the long road.
00:32:03
He went to UWA first and crushed it there
00:32:06
and then got into Marquette.
00:32:08
But I remember that.
00:32:10
And I remember him telling me those stories.
00:32:11
I mean, me feeling like that is so incredibly wrong.
00:32:16
And we're basically a repeating history.
00:32:18
It sounds like with this predictive AI.
00:32:21
It's like if my dad were to read this,
00:32:23
he would probably get visibly upset
00:32:26
and like throw the book out the window.
00:32:28
He was like, what is wrong with you people?
00:32:30
It's worrying, isn't it?
00:32:32
I mean, when we came through school,
00:32:33
'cause you and I aren't too far apart in age,
00:32:36
do you remember that there would be like the honors track
00:32:38
and then there'd be like the normal track
00:32:40
and then there'd be the lower track
00:32:42
and you'd get tracked in like seventh grade
00:32:45
or whatever it was, junior high middle school.
00:32:48
And it was really hard, if not impossible, to jump tracks.
00:32:51
Once you were on a track, that was what you were gonna do
00:32:53
and you were gonna cap out at whatever math course
00:32:55
and cap out at whatever English course.
00:32:57
And at the time in high school,
00:32:59
I never really thought about it.
00:33:00
I was like, okay, whatever.
00:33:01
That's what they told me to do kind of a thing.
00:33:03
But now I think about it from an educational standpoint
00:33:06
and I'm like, what a terrible,
00:33:08
what a terrible, terrible way to do that
00:33:10
because if you just have a really bad sixth and seventh grade
00:33:13
year or something happens in your family
00:33:16
and it's just like really, you're really struggling socially
00:33:19
or emotional or whatever it is, you get tracked
00:33:22
and now essentially the next 10 years of your life
00:33:25
are all figured out.
00:33:26
I don't know, it just really rubs me the wrong way
00:33:29
and this brought up that, like you're saying
00:33:32
and I'm like, I wonder how we're doing this now
00:33:34
with predictive AI.
00:33:35
Like how many times have I been placed into a bucket
00:33:38
by some predictive algorithm and not even known it
00:33:41
and had no clue that I'm capped at my ability
00:33:45
to engage with your company or your organization
00:33:47
or whatever it is because I was automatically labeled
00:33:51
and put in some bucket.
00:33:53
It's wild.
00:33:55
- Yeah, history repeats itself.
00:33:58
But yeah, that's the big thing I had from this chapter.
00:34:01
I don't know that I really got a solid answer
00:34:04
for why AI can't predict the future.
00:34:09
- I would think the closest thing I got to it was,
00:34:13
where was it?
00:34:14
Basically it was about data and it was the fact that,
00:34:19
oh man, I'm trying to find it.
00:34:21
It was the fact that basically it's only good
00:34:23
on what it's trained on and then--
00:34:25
- Sure.
00:34:26
Man, there's another one here.
00:34:29
I've lost it though.
00:34:31
- Well, there's another thing from here
00:34:33
which I think is important based on one of the fundamental
00:34:36
reasons why AI can't predict the future.
00:34:38
It's not the reason but it's one of the things
00:34:40
that goes into this and I've actually heard some people
00:34:43
that I look up to mention this too,
00:34:45
that luck plays a larger role in success
00:34:47
than most people who are successful would care to admit.
00:34:51
And the point that they make in this book
00:34:53
is that luck plays a larger role in success
00:34:55
than it does in failure.
00:34:57
So you can do everything right
00:35:01
and you can still fail.
00:35:03
So if luck is a factor, you really can't build a model
00:35:10
successfully off of that, in the aggregate,
00:35:14
I guess you can because you can insert a certain number,
00:35:17
a certain amount of randomness to the system.
00:35:19
But when you're trying to determine
00:35:21
if this person is gonna be able to do something,
00:35:25
that's where all bets are off, I think.
00:35:28
- Yeah, you made me think of it.
00:35:30
- It was the idea of agency.
00:35:32
Luck agency, this idea of we actually have agency as humans
00:35:35
and we are not completely predictive or predictable,
00:35:40
I guess if you will, I mean, isn't that the premise of,
00:35:44
have you seen the last mission in possible movies?
00:35:47
Like that's kind of the whole premise
00:35:49
of the last mission in possible movies
00:35:50
is we aren't completely predictable humans
00:35:52
but I haven't seen the very last one.
00:35:55
- I predict they will continue
00:35:56
to make mission in possible movies.
00:35:57
- As long as they keep making money,
00:35:59
as long as they keep predicting they'll make money, right?
00:36:02
- Yeah.
00:36:03
- Are you ready for chapter four?
00:36:05
- Yeah, this one I'm excited to talk about.
00:36:06
- Me too, that's awesome that you and I
00:36:09
are on the same page, maybe it's bad for the show
00:36:11
but it's awesome that we're on the same page.
00:36:13
- Chapter four is the long road to generative AI.
00:36:16
So I'm a big fan of thinking about generative AI.
00:36:19
I like generative AI.
00:36:21
I wanna use it more and more every day.
00:36:24
But they basically, for as hard as they go
00:36:28
against predictive AI,
00:36:32
they seem to be for generative AI
00:36:34
and they see the value of it
00:36:36
but they kind of temper with like,
00:36:39
okay, well, how did it work and where is it coming?
00:36:42
Now they still will throw out ideas of,
00:36:44
we need to be careful of, we need to,
00:36:46
cautious on how we're getting the data to train it.
00:36:49
So they talk about the fact that there's the common crawl
00:36:51
and scraping the entire internet and stealing.
00:36:54
Basically everybody's thoughts and ideas and words
00:36:57
and then regurgitating those.
00:36:59
They talk about how there are like organizations
00:37:05
or advocacy groups that are trying to think about these things.
00:37:09
Is this where they talked about,
00:37:12
man, there was the letter, Mike.
00:37:14
The big letter they put out to all the AI people
00:37:18
and they had them sign it that basically it was like,
00:37:19
we need to slow down, we need to really pump the brakes
00:37:22
and it was at the chapter.
00:37:23
No, that was the general AI, the existential threat one.
00:37:28
Okay.
00:37:29
So that's next chapter.
00:37:30
But this one's all about basically just using it
00:37:32
for image generation, for text generation
00:37:35
and boy, do I have thoughts on this.
00:37:38
Let me begin with a story.
00:37:41
So a long time ago we were working
00:37:43
with a digital marketing agency.
00:37:45
They were helping us with some blog posts.
00:37:47
They put together these blog posts,
00:37:49
published them on our site
00:37:51
and they used stock photos when they put together the blog posts.
00:37:57
We stopped working with the agency
00:37:59
and I think like five, six years later,
00:38:02
we're getting emails from Getty images saying,
00:38:09
you need to take this down right now
00:38:11
and we're suing you for $25,000 for each one of these posts.
00:38:15
- Oh wow.
00:38:16
- Unless you can provide the license
00:38:18
for these images that you used.
00:38:20
And we're like, well, the agency did it.
00:38:22
Let me reach out to them.
00:38:23
They had an intern or something working on it.
00:38:26
So they didn't have the receipts for the files
00:38:29
that they had.
00:38:30
So we were on the hook for it
00:38:32
because we couldn't produce the license for the stock photo
00:38:34
that we paid somebody who did it legit,
00:38:37
but didn't have the receipt trails.
00:38:40
So not only is this extremely expensive
00:38:42
from a financial perspective,
00:38:44
but it's also a complete waste of time.
00:38:46
- Yeah.
00:38:48
There are literally companies, lawyers, firms, whatever.
00:38:54
All they do is they scrape the web
00:38:55
that find these copyrighted images
00:38:57
and they go after people who maybe have used this incorrectly.
00:39:01
And in our case, we did it correctly,
00:39:03
but we didn't have the proof to show
00:39:06
that we had done it correctly.
00:39:08
So I guess, you know, don't work with digital marketing agencies.
00:39:11
Is that the solution?
00:39:12
Like no.
00:39:13
- Yeah.
00:39:14
- So I will be the first one to applaud
00:39:17
the death of the stock photo industry.
00:39:20
- Okay.
00:39:21
- I apologize to every artist, every photographer,
00:39:26
every videographer that that's how they make their living,
00:39:29
but I do not care at all for any
00:39:33
of these stock photo video sites.
00:39:35
They are a bunch of parasites, in my opinion,
00:39:38
and they should be gotten rid of.
00:39:41
The quicker that AI can do this, the better.
00:39:44
Now that's separate from the argument
00:39:46
about they're trained on all this copy-related material.
00:39:51
And so as a content creator myself,
00:39:54
I understand that side of it too.
00:39:57
I don't want people slurping up everything
00:40:01
that I've ever written,
00:40:01
everything that I've ever made,
00:40:03
and just creating new stuff in my style.
00:40:07
Looks like me, sounds like me, you know,
00:40:10
and then using that to make money,
00:40:13
which is essentially what these large language models
00:40:16
are doing, that's trained on all this copy-related data.
00:40:19
So here's where I land on this.
00:40:22
I do not think this is a battle that should be resolved
00:40:29
with the AI companies.
00:40:31
I don't think it should be resolved
00:40:32
with the independent creators.
00:40:34
I think the place to get it resolved
00:40:37
where it actually is gonna make a difference
00:40:39
is in the courts.
00:40:41
And the thing that sucks about this
00:40:43
is how slow that system is
00:40:46
to what is happening right now.
00:40:49
Like New York Times, I know, was suing OpenAI,
00:40:53
I think back in the day,
00:40:54
because they had slurped up a bunch of articles
00:40:56
that were behind the paywall.
00:40:58
Like, if we could just resolve that issue
00:41:01
in a matter of weeks instead of years,
00:41:04
then that sets a precedent.
00:41:05
And then all these other models
00:41:09
aren't just training on everything that they can find.
00:41:11
At this point, it's almost like too late.
00:41:15
It's all in there anyways.
00:41:16
You can't retroactively go back.
00:41:19
So it sucks.
00:41:21
But also that opens up another question is like,
00:41:23
where do we go from here?
00:41:25
You know, if you're an independent creator,
00:41:27
I think you have to just accept
00:41:29
that this is the world that we live in.
00:41:31
The AI models are going to consume all of my stuff.
00:41:37
And I can get mad at that and be like,
00:41:39
no, I want this behind a paywall.
00:41:41
Or I can actually think about,
00:41:44
you know, how could this actually be good for me?
00:41:46
And I think there are benefits to this.
00:41:48
I think it's kind of coming around
00:41:51
where a lot of the AI models now will have the citations
00:41:54
at the bottom of the thing that they spit back
00:41:57
because people don't just trust it
00:41:58
when it gives them a blanket answer.
00:42:00
They want to see where AI got this.
00:42:02
You know, I feel like that's kind of
00:42:03
the natural evolution of this process.
00:42:05
And so that's SEO 2.0 in a way.
00:42:09
You know, people are going to go look at, look at my stuff
00:42:11
that way and it's not the same.
00:42:13
And I can get upset because it's not the same
00:42:15
or I could just be like, oh, this is the way it is.
00:42:16
You know, what are the advantages of doing things this way?
00:42:19
'Cause I think there are some advantages to it as well.
00:42:23
But, and rant.
00:42:26
- I can't disagree with you on anything you said.
00:42:29
The thing that I think is really interesting about this
00:42:31
is a lot of these companies are like,
00:42:33
we're just going to do it because nobody's governing it
00:42:38
right now and nobody's regulating it right now.
00:42:39
And we'll deal with the court stuff on the back end.
00:42:42
Oh, but by the way, we made so much progress
00:42:46
and we've become the, you know, the household name
00:42:49
and we've become the brand that everybody goes to
00:42:51
that's like, yeah, we'll resolve that all later
00:42:53
down the road because what we're trying to do
00:42:54
is we're trying to be first to market right now.
00:42:56
We're trying to be the place that everybody goes.
00:42:59
And I think that's just the nature of kind of the,
00:43:02
you know, they say it's about the Wild West.
00:43:04
That's the nature of the Wild West of AI right now
00:43:06
is in less, yeah, unless, and they have a whole chapter
00:43:10
on this which Mike and I are going to get to later.
00:43:13
Unless the regulators come in and try to get faster than them,
00:43:16
but I don't even know if they can get faster than them
00:43:18
with the way the system works and the way the courts work
00:43:21
and all of that, I don't think you can do that.
00:43:25
I think about this too.
00:43:26
You talked about it from your creator business.
00:43:29
I think about it from an education business as well
00:43:31
or for the education side as well.
00:43:33
I'm up against the AI tool, the LLM tool
00:43:38
that's in every kid's pocket when they walk into my classroom.
00:43:42
So instead of them asking me, the first place they'll go
00:43:45
is they'll go to their AI tool and ask the AI tool.
00:43:48
And then after that, they'll ask me,
00:43:51
but I can't tell you that I think
00:43:52
that's a completely horrible, no good system.
00:43:56
I think that, one, I think it over import,
00:44:00
makes me overly important, right?
00:44:01
Which I don't agree with that at all.
00:44:03
It's more a matter of it just changes the way I teach.
00:44:06
Like I have to teach in a different way
00:44:07
and I have to present information in a different way
00:44:10
and I have to kind of lean into that and say,
00:44:12
there's gonna be some of this stuff
00:44:13
that you're gonna go to the AI tool
00:44:15
and learn it through there because it's more efficient
00:44:17
and it's faster and that's good.
00:44:18
And then there's gonna be some of the stuff
00:44:19
you're gonna engage with me, engage with me with.
00:44:21
Where I get, the one that actually makes me
00:44:24
the most nervous, I think is the audio video.
00:44:26
And they talk about this towards the end of this is
00:44:28
how quickly and readily and well
00:44:32
these tools can replicate your voice
00:44:35
and then how quickly and well they can actually physically
00:44:39
make it look like you are doing something that you didn't do.
00:44:44
And I think that is a very scary world
00:44:49
until we figure out detection
00:44:52
and then we start playing the dance game of,
00:44:54
well, we figured out better ways to detect it.
00:44:56
Oh, they figured out better ways to trick that.
00:44:58
Oh, we figured out better ways to detect it.
00:44:59
They figured out better ways to trick it.
00:45:00
And once we get into that dance game,
00:45:02
I actually think things level out a little bit.
00:45:05
'Cause you're really only gonna have the fringe,
00:45:07
the front-end of that be an issue.
00:45:09
But right now, I think it can be an issue for anybody.
00:45:12
We're still in that world where,
00:45:14
somebody could make a video of you saying anything crazy
00:45:19
and there's really very little we can do to detect that
00:45:22
other than you coming out and being like, that wasn't me.
00:45:24
It's completely AI-generated.
00:45:26
And that's really the recourse you have at this point.
00:45:28
And that's a scary world to me right now.
00:45:31
- Dude, people are doing that intentionally.
00:45:33
I was at Crafty Commerce this year.
00:45:34
One of the sponsors was a company called Delphi,
00:45:36
where you literally make an AI version of yourself.
00:45:40
They demoed on stage somebody calling and getting
00:45:43
workout advice from an Arnold Schwarzenegger AI voice bot.
00:45:51
So it is scary and they talk a little bit
00:45:55
about the deep fake stuff and how that can be bad.
00:45:59
But I also think that there are people
00:46:00
who are just leaning into this technology
00:46:02
be like, yeah, I don't growl trick people.
00:46:04
They'll think it's me.
00:46:04
Not that they actually think it's you, but I don't know.
00:46:10
The thing to remember about all of this technology,
00:46:12
I think, and we'll get into this I think
00:46:14
as we go further down the book is that these are tools
00:46:19
and they have no intrinsic moral value.
00:46:22
They are not good.
00:46:23
They are not bad.
00:46:24
They can be used for both good and bad.
00:46:28
- Do you think they are, so what I would say,
00:46:32
there's a book that we read in with my seniors every year,
00:46:36
but there's an inherent bias
00:46:38
and/or an inherent value built into things.
00:46:40
So we would say they are value-laden designs.
00:46:43
And value-laden designs, they're neither good nor bad.
00:46:46
You can't say they're all one thing or all the other,
00:46:48
but you can say that the way they were designed,
00:46:51
they lean more one way or they lean more another way.
00:46:54
So my question to you, Mike, put you in the spot.
00:46:56
Would you say it's value-laden in a way
00:46:58
that it leans a different way,
00:47:02
one of the ways or another?
00:47:04
- No, because fundamentally what it does
00:47:06
is it just tries to predict the next thing in the chain.
00:47:09
So it needs data to be trained on
00:47:12
and the data you can argue about
00:47:14
whether that was sourced ethically,
00:47:15
I would argue that it's not.
00:47:17
Maybe it wasn't illegal, but it certainly wasn't ethical.
00:47:20
- Agreed.
00:47:21
- But that data now that is in there,
00:47:23
the LLMs, the way that they function,
00:47:25
they're just going to try and fill in the next blank.
00:47:28
And it's going to use tokens to do that.
00:47:31
They mentioned a single token,
00:47:32
requires one quadrillion calculations,
00:47:36
which is a million trillion, I think, or a million billion?
00:47:41
I forget.
00:47:42
- I have to think hard about it.
00:47:44
- One, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero,
00:47:48
zero, zero, zero, zero calculations.
00:47:50
And that's why they say the long road to Generative AI
00:47:53
because those calculations,
00:47:55
that computers have been a long time coming
00:47:58
and they keep getting more powerful
00:47:59
and they can do more of these calculations.
00:48:01
And so this is kind of just like the next step
00:48:03
in the chain for that.
00:48:05
And the thing to recognize with these models
00:48:08
is that they are trained to produce
00:48:11
plausible text, not true statements.
00:48:13
So you can't get mad at an LLM
00:48:15
because it hallucinates, in my opinion.
00:48:17
That's part of the deal.
00:48:19
But hallucinations aren't all bad either.
00:48:21
It's kind of interesting because I literally just did
00:48:23
a talk at max-stock on AI.
00:48:26
(laughs)
00:48:27
And I talked about using it as a creative collaborator.
00:48:30
You know, when you're in the creative process,
00:48:32
you have a divergence of ideas
00:48:35
where you consider all the options
00:48:36
and then a convergence when you bring it back together.
00:48:39
During the divergence piece,
00:48:40
I mean, that's where hallucinations can be good.
00:48:42
You want to consider every off the wall possibility
00:48:45
that you possibly can.
00:48:47
But then at some point you have to be like,
00:48:48
okay, you know, I have what I need.
00:48:50
Now I'm gonna actually do something with it.
00:48:53
So yeah, I honestly believe that this doesn't lean
00:48:57
one way or the other.
00:48:58
It's just a technological tool.
00:48:59
Just like a computer is a technological tool.
00:49:01
And how you use it really is where the morality
00:49:06
of the technology comes from.
00:49:08
- I think it's well said.
00:49:10
Let's go on to five if you're ready.
00:49:14
- Yes, natural extension of what we're just talking about
00:49:17
in my opinion.
00:49:18
Is advanced AI and existential threat?
00:49:20
They set up the argument here that a lot of people,
00:49:23
so we get into the new term
00:49:25
of artificial general intelligence now.
00:49:28
So AGI, so they add more to it.
00:49:32
But that they say a lot of experts in the field
00:49:34
say that AGI is an imminent existential threat.
00:49:38
They then immediately, or not immediately,
00:49:40
but they unpack their argument that say,
00:49:42
we actually should be more worried
00:49:43
about what people will do with AI
00:49:46
than AI doing things on its own.
00:49:48
Like they're not as worried about AI
00:49:50
kind of running a muck and doing things on its own.
00:49:54
And they say that there are two options for safety.
00:49:58
There's a line AI with humanity's interests
00:50:00
and then stop powerful AI from being built at all.
00:50:03
And they basically say, and neither of these
00:50:05
are gonna work because we've already either
00:50:08
let the cat out of the bag or we already
00:50:10
haven't aligned the AI or whatever it is.
00:50:13
So it's just really funny to me like how,
00:50:17
here's what we should do.
00:50:18
And here's the way we should address this
00:50:19
and none of that's gonna work, so moving on.
00:50:22
And it's just like a weird feel for the book.
00:50:24
It's like very information-based,
00:50:28
not very story or not very my opinion kind of a thing.
00:50:34
I mean, I guess maybe they do give their opinion,
00:50:36
but they give it in a very factual way,
00:50:38
like in a very information-based way.
00:50:40
And it just reads very, very differently.
00:50:44
So they come in kind of at the very end of this
00:50:47
and they say, so how should we go about
00:50:49
defending against bad actors who wanna use it?
00:50:51
Well, we can defend against their specific threats
00:50:53
or we can strengthen democracy.
00:50:55
And like, I like all of this, these are all good ideas.
00:50:59
And maybe this is where we need to be
00:51:01
at this point in the discussion.
00:51:02
In September of 2024, when they're writing this,
00:51:05
but I kind of feel like we're just painting
00:51:07
like gigantic broad strokes
00:51:09
and we're not getting to like things
00:51:11
that can actually help people.
00:51:13
So what should we do?
00:51:14
We should defend against specific threats.
00:51:16
Okay, great, great.
00:51:18
Like cyber security, great.
00:51:19
Okay, fantastic.
00:51:21
And then what should we do?
00:51:21
We should strengthen democracy.
00:51:23
Oh yeah, 'cause that's easy, right?
00:51:24
Like let's just strengthen democracy.
00:51:26
Here we go.
00:51:27
So I mean, I know I'm being like kind of tongue in cheek
00:51:29
as I talk about it, but I just get this feel for it
00:51:32
that it's the point of this book isn't to,
00:51:37
or it's not as much to solve problems.
00:51:39
It's more a matter of to call out something
00:51:42
that I think these authors don't think
00:51:44
is being discussed enough in the industry
00:51:47
and in the policy section surrounding the industry.
00:51:50
So it's just a very different feel
00:51:51
and a very different read for the book,
00:51:53
at least for me, anyhow.
00:51:56
- Yeah, so I had a maybe different perspective
00:52:00
on this chapter, but I love this chapter, to be honest.
00:52:03
So artificial general intelligence,
00:52:06
they define that as AI that can perform most
00:52:09
or all economically relevant tasks
00:52:10
as effectively as any human.
00:52:12
And at that point, that's where they lay out the argument
00:52:17
that most people have this Terminator style picture of AI
00:52:21
once it gets beyond the capabilities of humans,
00:52:24
but that's not necessarily the case.
00:52:26
I kind of feel like that's irrelevant
00:52:29
to the discussion, to be honest.
00:52:31
And they kind of mentioned how that is probably
00:52:35
a very, very tiny chance of actually happening.
00:52:39
But you mentioned this when you were,
00:52:42
at the beginning of your introduction to this chapter,
00:52:44
we should be far more worried about what humans will do
00:52:46
with AI than what AI will do on its own.
00:52:48
Going back to the previous chapter's discussion
00:52:50
on like the morality of the tool.
00:52:53
Okay, and then they say that we should assume
00:52:55
that bad actors will have access to state of the art AI.
00:52:59
I read a book back in the day called Tools and Weapons
00:53:03
by Brad Smith, who was the president of Microsoft
00:53:06
forward by Bill Gates.
00:53:09
And the subtitle of this book is The Promise
00:53:11
and the Peril of the Digital Age.
00:53:12
It was written in 2019.
00:53:14
It came on my radar because Brad Smith
00:53:17
was actually in Appleton, the town that I live.
00:53:20
So he went to Appleton, West, and Microsoft
00:53:22
is actually invested in a local up in Green Bay,
00:53:27
what do they call it?
00:53:28
It's like an accelerator.
00:53:32
They call it Title Town Tech, basically,
00:53:34
where they are investing in helping get technology companies
00:53:40
funded.
00:53:41
- Yeah, like an incubator accelerator kind of thing.
00:53:43
- Yes, yes, exactly, in Wisconsin, right?
00:53:47
So this book, 2019.
00:53:50
So this was before a lot of this AI stuff.
00:53:53
But I remember he was in Appleton.
00:53:55
He was giving a talk at the local college university.
00:54:00
So I went and attended it.
00:54:02
And there were a lot of questions in that session
00:54:08
about things that bad actors were trying to do
00:54:13
with technology because he's at Microsoft.
00:54:16
They're trying to build all these crazy technological tools.
00:54:19
So he's sharing stories about how,
00:54:22
what's the term that he used dictator governments
00:54:26
or something like that?
00:54:28
Examples of surveillance states and stuff like that.
00:54:33
And he's like, they reach out to us all the time.
00:54:35
They want us to unlock these things for him.
00:54:37
And we're just like, no, we're not gonna do that.
00:54:38
He's like, this is a very fine line that you are trying
00:54:44
to walk here because on the one hand,
00:54:46
like the technology can save lives,
00:54:47
it can improve people's existence.
00:54:50
It can do a lot of good for humanity,
00:54:53
but then you have to recognize that there are always people
00:54:54
who are going to use it for various purposes.
00:54:59
And I feel like AI is simply that, you know?
00:55:02
And yeah, maybe at some point it gained sentience
00:55:06
and it didn't slaves humanity.
00:55:09
I mean, that sounds ridiculous, but is it a possibility?
00:55:14
Like no one really knows whether that could be or not,
00:55:19
but it's also not worth worrying about,
00:55:22
what you should be worrying about is how people are using
00:55:25
the tools that are available now to steal your credit card
00:55:29
numbers and ruin your life right now
00:55:31
because they're actively trying to do that
00:55:34
and figuring out what you can do to protect yourself
00:55:37
in the digital culture that we live in.
00:55:41
So yeah, if I were to just answer this,
00:55:44
is advanced AI an existential threat?
00:55:46
Question mark, I don't really care.
00:55:49
Not relevant, at least not right now.
00:55:51
So I listened to a couple of different things,
00:55:54
I was probably a year and a half ago,
00:55:55
maybe two years ago around this.
00:55:58
And there were people that were very much the way
00:56:00
they described them that, you know,
00:56:02
saying AI is an existential threat.
00:56:06
And in the talk, I mean, it was a podcast
00:56:09
and there were three, I don't know,
00:56:11
three hours into the podcast or whatever,
00:56:12
two and a half hours, three hours in the podcast.
00:56:14
And they were like, okay, there were like four or five things
00:56:17
we can't do with AI.
00:56:18
One was give it access to internet.
00:56:20
Two was teach it had a program and they listened off
00:56:24
and they were like, and we've done them all.
00:56:26
So yeah, and like that was kind of the end
00:56:30
of the conversation, it was like,
00:56:31
so we've already let the cat out of the bag.
00:56:34
I mean, what are we gonna do now?
00:56:35
But I agree with you in the sense of,
00:56:39
I think we need to be thinking,
00:56:41
well, so I agree with you in the times of,
00:56:43
we need to focus on what's happening right now.
00:56:45
But I also do think we need to be thinking about like,
00:56:47
what is the general trajectory of where we're going?
00:56:52
And do we like that general trajectory?
00:56:54
I don't necessarily think we can fully define
00:56:57
where it's going, you know, those would be futurists,
00:56:59
people who think about this stuff professionally.
00:57:01
But like, I think we just need to make sure
00:57:04
we know where it's pointing or where we think it's pointing
00:57:06
and be like, are we okay with that?
00:57:07
Are we okay with it pointing that way?
00:57:08
Because we have no idea, Mike, if in like a year,
00:57:12
some other companies are gonna come out
00:57:14
and they're gonna drop another bombshell.
00:57:16
And like, I mean, it's gonna take a hard left
00:57:18
and we're gonna be like, oh, no,
00:57:20
we weren't ready for that at all.
00:57:22
And that's-
00:57:23
- Correct, correct.
00:57:25
So they do mention at one point,
00:57:27
I think it was in this chapter about how like,
00:57:29
there was push for pausing the advancement
00:57:31
of these large language models.
00:57:34
I, okay, so is the cat out of the bag?
00:57:38
Maybe, maybe not.
00:57:40
I think we are still very, very early stages
00:57:44
when it comes to what actually is AI
00:57:47
and how does it get implemented into our lives.
00:57:50
With AI, just like any technology,
00:57:54
there's always a large rate of growth
00:57:59
at the beginning.
00:58:00
And I wish I had the link to the podcast
00:58:03
that I had listened to that shared this,
00:58:05
but basically that six month pause has come and gone.
00:58:11
And there's no GPT-5.
00:58:14
Do you know why there's no GPT-5?
00:58:15
It's because they're not getting the same rate of advancement.
00:58:18
You can't just throw more compute power at this
00:58:22
and get the same returns.
00:58:24
So if they were to release GPT-5,
00:58:26
then it's, people are gonna be like, meh.
00:58:30
It's not that much better than the previous one.
00:58:33
And so I think with large language models
00:58:36
is probably the tail end of the curve
00:58:38
and things are flattening out a little bit.
00:58:41
And there will be something else that will come after that.
00:58:44
But that's just, that's the way technology advances.
00:58:49
It's not surprising to me.
00:58:52
And I kind of think you kind of don't know
00:58:54
where this is going to end up.
00:58:56
I think it's foolish to say,
00:59:02
how do I say this?
00:59:02
I don't wanna say something that I'll regret.
00:59:04
I get it.
00:59:06
I personally though think it's a little bit foolish
00:59:09
to say, no, this is inherently bad
00:59:12
and we just shouldn't touch this with a 39 and a half foot pole.
00:59:16
And instead we should be thinking about
00:59:17
how do we actually do good with this?
00:59:20
There's probably specific things where it's like,
00:59:22
eh, no, that's where I would draw the line.
00:59:26
But I don't see that with AI yet.
00:59:29
I'm personally not comfortable with OpenAI
00:59:33
and the other company's goal of creating
00:59:36
this artificial general intelligence.
00:59:38
But I also think the fact that they wanna do that
00:59:40
is not make them inherently evil
00:59:44
and this is guaranteed doomsday.
00:59:49
I don't know, I feel like the larger question to be asked
00:59:51
and really something that society needs to ask.
00:59:54
So kind of like when I say, don't worry about it,
00:59:56
it's because me as an individual,
00:59:58
what am I really able to,
01:00:01
I cannot, Mike Schmitt's, stop the AI avalanche.
01:00:09
So I'm not gonna worry about that,
01:00:11
but I am going to ask how can I use the tools
01:00:15
that are available to me to do more
01:00:17
of what actually matters, to make a bigger impact,
01:00:20
positive impact in the lives of the people around me.
01:00:24
And I do think AI is useful for that.
01:00:28
- All right, you ready to go to social media, chapter six?
01:00:31
- Great segue into social media.
01:00:33
- Yeah.
01:00:34
- So chapter six is why can't AI fix social media?
01:00:38
I do not like the title of this chapter.
01:00:40
I understand why they did it,
01:00:42
but I don't like the title of the chapter because really,
01:00:44
I think this chapter is less about social media
01:00:47
and it's more about content moderation.
01:00:48
I think they should have called this
01:00:50
the content moderation chapter
01:00:52
because that's more accurate to what they're talking about.
01:00:54
Now, granted, where does most content moderation happen?
01:00:57
Probably on the internet right now,
01:00:58
it happens in social media
01:01:00
because there are currently humans
01:01:04
that are paid a very, very low wage
01:01:06
to sit there and look at content and flag it
01:01:08
for whatever it needs to be flagged as.
01:01:11
I personally think this is the worst job
01:01:16
or it was probably the worst job on the planet,
01:01:18
like one of the worst jobs on the planet.
01:01:19
I mean, the filth that is thrown out there
01:01:23
and just scours the internet and your job all day
01:01:25
is to identify and block and identify and shut down
01:01:28
and identify and shut down.
01:01:30
It's like you, it's akin to being the remote drone pilot
01:01:36
in the military and like dealing
01:01:38
with the psychological effects of that
01:01:39
just in a different scale, right?
01:01:41
Like, so I feel 100% for these people,
01:01:45
it hurts me to think about that.
01:01:48
Let's get to the idea of AI doing content moderation.
01:01:51
Basically, their whole premise of this chapter is
01:01:53
it can't do it.
01:01:55
One, does it even translate it correctly?
01:01:57
They're like, can it do that?
01:01:59
Translation's gotten better,
01:02:00
but can it translate it correctly?
01:02:01
Two, humans are really good
01:02:03
at getting around content moderation.
01:02:05
There's nuance. They throw in different like phrases
01:02:08
that say a certain thing without using the words
01:02:11
that get flagged automatically.
01:02:14
Like, so their whole point I think are around here
01:02:17
are how people evade this content.
01:02:18
They throw out ideas about how people evade it.
01:02:21
They give you examples of that.
01:02:23
They talk about like algo speak
01:02:25
where you figure out how to speak in these algorithms
01:02:27
that the algorithm then won't pick up
01:02:29
or these like pseudo algorithms, whatever it might be.
01:02:32
I, did you know of the Overton window
01:02:34
before you read this chapter?
01:02:36
Like, that was interesting to me.
01:02:37
I'd never heard of the Overton window.
01:02:38
So basically the Overton window is a horizontal scale
01:02:42
from right to left, basically arrows on either side
01:02:46
and it goes from unthinkable, radical, acceptable, popular.
01:02:49
And then on the other side of that scale
01:02:51
is the acceptable, radical, and unthinkable.
01:02:54
And I just never heard of that, right?
01:02:56
So that's a thing in the content moderation world.
01:02:59
They give a table of the seven reasons
01:03:01
why content moderation is hard.
01:03:03
I will spare you reading all of those.
01:03:05
I think it's really interesting though.
01:03:07
And then they tell you what, you know,
01:03:09
there's current limitations, there's inherent limitations,
01:03:11
whether it's cost prohibitive
01:03:13
or whether it's inherent to social media.
01:03:16
I think there's a lot of really interesting things
01:03:19
in this chapter, but like my overall idea is
01:03:23
I think it kind of comes out of nowhere.
01:03:25
Really, I just don't know like in the flow of everything
01:03:29
we just came from existential threat.
01:03:30
And now we go into content moderation.
01:03:32
And it's like, okay, cool, like this is good
01:03:37
and I'm happy that we're talking about this,
01:03:39
but where, where did it come from?
01:03:40
So that's just kind of my general take on it.
01:03:43
- Yeah, so I think I see how we get there.
01:03:48
I mean, one of the things that they mentioned earlier
01:03:51
about bolstering democracy, so one of the arguments
01:03:53
that you hear people make is all the election was rigged
01:03:56
because of all the Russian interference
01:03:57
and they actually share statistics that really was not a thing.
01:04:02
But people think it was.
01:04:03
So hard to argue with what people think in their heads
01:04:07
because the internet is a grocery store for facts
01:04:10
and you can find whatever facts you want
01:04:11
to support whatever crackpot beliefs you want to hold.
01:04:13
- Yes, you can.
01:04:14
Yes, you can.
01:04:15
- And I'm not saying that that one specifically,
01:04:16
although maybe, you know, it's been proven otherwise.
01:04:22
Anyways, so like I think it's interesting to go from,
01:04:27
is AI and existential threat to social media
01:04:31
because that's the argument, I think,
01:04:34
is like what appears on social media influences society.
01:04:38
And I think it influences individuals much more
01:04:42
than it does societies as a whole.
01:04:47
I guess you could say that that stuff in aggregate,
01:04:50
you know, has an effect, but I would be more concerned
01:04:54
about what the content that the algorithm is surfacing
01:04:59
to any individual is causing to that person
01:05:03
than I would be, you know, the election is actually being rigged
01:05:08
because of Russian troll farms,
01:05:11
the term that they used in this particular chapter.
01:05:14
So I think this is an interesting problem
01:05:18
without a good solution.
01:05:20
You know, you mentioned that it's been done by humans
01:05:22
and that job kind of sucks, and I think I would agree with that.
01:05:26
But also content moderation in general is sort of something
01:05:30
I feel like social networks do because they have to,
01:05:34
not because they actually care,
01:05:36
not because they want to.
01:05:38
It's in direct contrast to their business interests
01:05:43
because they share in here that content that is closer
01:05:46
to violating content moderation policies
01:05:49
is actually more likely to be engaged with.
01:05:51
So that creates this incentive to get it as close
01:05:55
to the edge as you can without it going over.
01:05:58
So if they were really concerned about this
01:06:01
the closer that it got to that point,
01:06:03
the more they would moderate it,
01:06:05
the more they would clamp down on it.
01:06:06
And the demand curve would not, you know,
01:06:09
trickle up at that point.
01:06:10
It would be flattened at that point.
01:06:12
It's like, ah, you're getting to a point
01:06:14
where this is dangerous.
01:06:15
Now, people in the US don't like that
01:06:19
because of the First Amendment.
01:06:21
And that's kind of the argument that people always have
01:06:24
is like, well, I could say whatever the heck I want.
01:06:27
I think with social media,
01:06:28
you should not be able to say whatever the heck you want.
01:06:30
- I agree.
01:06:31
- I think you want to go out into the streets
01:06:32
and yell in a megaphone,
01:06:34
go ahead and say whatever the heck you want.
01:06:37
But when you are using these tools
01:06:41
that give people platforms,
01:06:43
I think there does need to be some sort of,
01:06:46
some sort of moderation on this.
01:06:53
So yeah, I get why AI isn't able to fix this
01:06:58
because even if it was doing
01:07:00
what the jobs of the humans were doing,
01:07:03
it's not able to do it perfectly
01:07:06
and it's gonna have all of the biases
01:07:08
that are inherent with the things
01:07:09
that they're trying to moderate.
01:07:11
So the real problem with social media
01:07:14
is the algorithms, in my opinion.
01:07:16
- And the humans.
01:07:17
- I'm not, yeah, yeah.
01:07:19
I'm not a fan of algorithm-based social media.
01:07:23
Now, I need to temper that
01:07:25
because I have also said that YouTube
01:07:27
is the one quote unquote social media platform
01:07:29
that I like to engage on.
01:07:33
And that is because as a creator
01:07:35
who's trying to build a business,
01:07:37
I feel like YouTube is the one where
01:07:39
I can reach the people that I want to reach
01:07:40
and I can have a positive impact
01:07:42
if that's what I want to do with my videos,
01:07:44
which is in fact what I want to do with my videos.
01:07:46
And the algorithm is going to help the people
01:07:48
who want to see what I make.
01:07:50
It's gonna help me get in front of them.
01:07:52
It's gonna help us get connected.
01:07:53
And so it's gonna help my channel grow.
01:07:56
But in the back of my mind is this existential threat
01:08:01
for my YouTube channel.
01:08:03
They mentioned that you get three copyright strikes,
01:08:05
which is automated based on the AI,
01:08:09
then your YouTube channel gets banned.
01:08:11
And I know a lot of people who have succumbed to that,
01:08:13
not they fell into it, like it was their fault or anything,
01:08:16
but just for whatever reason, YouTube decided,
01:08:19
you use copyrighted material and they don't have...
01:08:23
There's no one at YouTube that they can reach out to
01:08:26
to argue with.
01:08:28
And so that's kind of scary.
01:08:32
But overall, recognize what these algorithms
01:08:36
are doing to you.
01:08:38
They're trying to feed you more and more extreme content
01:08:44
to get you more and more emotionally invested,
01:08:47
usually negatively, get you more upset
01:08:50
so that you continue to scroll,
01:08:52
so that you continue to engage with the platform.
01:08:54
You don't put the phone down and take the tech-free week
01:08:57
that Corey and I talked about in the pro show.
01:09:02
And there's a great documentary, The Social Dilemma,
01:09:05
which is older now, but I think speaks to this very clearly.
01:09:09
And I'm not one who would say,
01:09:12
just don't use social media,
01:09:14
but do use it intentionally and go into it with your eyes open.
01:09:18
These aren't benevolent dictators who are looking out for you
01:09:23
because they have a digital well-being feature
01:09:25
or they're investing all this money in content moderation.
01:09:28
No, they're doing that because it is literally
01:09:30
the bare minimum that they can do
01:09:34
to not be held responsible for what happens on their platform.
01:09:38
- Exactly, I'm gonna make a prediction here, Mike.
01:09:40
And I'm intrigued to see if this comes true.
01:09:44
Hold me accountable to it if your memory serves you so well.
01:09:48
I think AI and automated content generation
01:09:54
is going to destroy social media.
01:09:56
And I think it's going to push us into,
01:09:59
you're already starting to see it.
01:10:01
It's gonna push us more into communities
01:10:03
where there is more moderation,
01:10:05
but it's appropriate moderation
01:10:07
and we choose to be involved in that.
01:10:08
So for instance, I wanna be in the productivity space,
01:10:13
like I wanna learn about that,
01:10:14
where I used to go to all of the social media platforms
01:10:18
and I would follow the creators that I wanted to follow.
01:10:20
Well, now I joined the four or five creators
01:10:23
that I really wanna be part of their communities
01:10:26
and that's where I get those things.
01:10:28
And I don't worry about the broader completely,
01:10:31
well, not completely, but 90% automated social media stuff anymore.
01:10:36
It's just not, as you would say,
01:10:39
'cause you like to say this,
01:10:40
there's too much noise and not enough signal.
01:10:43
So I'm going to put myself in the place
01:10:45
where there's more signal and less noise.
01:10:47
I think we're gonna see that continue to increase
01:10:49
over the next five, 10 years.
01:10:52
I mean, I hope so, because I'm building a community.
01:10:56
But I think you've already seen it.
01:10:57
Like I think you've already seen people
01:10:58
who are willing to do that.
01:10:59
They're willing to join, invest,
01:11:03
whether it's invest in time, attention, money,
01:11:06
whatever it is.
01:11:07
They're willing to do that to get out of that environment
01:11:10
that's just so noisy and you know
01:11:12
that every second, third, fifth, 10th thing
01:11:16
that you're seeing is just completely artificial and made up.
01:11:19
So hopefully that's true.
01:11:20
- Yeah, I agree.
01:11:21
- I think it would make a better internet.
01:11:23
- Agreed.
01:11:25
- All right, chapter seven,
01:11:26
why do myths about AI persist?
01:11:29
So in chapter seven, we get into this idea of hype.
01:11:34
There are major sources of hype.
01:11:35
There are companies, researchers, journalists,
01:11:38
public figures.
01:11:40
They basically are very aggressive.
01:11:43
The authors are very aggressive in saying
01:11:45
how they exploit cognitive biases to misinform the public.
01:11:50
And I was like, well, that's a stance
01:11:53
that they showed this Gartner hype cycle,
01:11:56
which I had heard of this before,
01:11:57
but I'd never seen it graphed out before.
01:11:59
So if you're listening to us,
01:12:02
there's visibility on the y-axis.
01:12:03
There's time on the x-axis.
01:12:06
The new technology happens
01:12:08
and you get this peak upward.
01:12:11
It's not perfectly straight, but it's a peak upward.
01:12:14
And that's when there's all these inflated expectations.
01:12:17
AI's gonna save the world.
01:12:18
AI's gonna do this thing.
01:12:19
And it's gonna make you not have to do your job.
01:12:21
And you're only gonna have to work 10 hours a week
01:12:22
and all this stuff.
01:12:24
And then you get into the traffic disillusionment
01:12:26
so you go down hard.
01:12:28
You get to the slope of enlightenment,
01:12:29
which is basically where everybody's like, calm down.
01:12:33
Let's figure out what this thing will actually do.
01:12:35
And then you get to the plateau of productivity.
01:12:37
And they're saying that technologies
01:12:39
go through this Gartner hype cycle.
01:12:42
So they're making a claim that AI is in this hype cycle.
01:12:47
Although they say it's not a good way
01:12:50
to track the adoption and usefulness of AI
01:12:52
because it actually doesn't work that well.
01:12:55
So I think it's really interesting.
01:12:56
They present this Gartner hype cycle
01:12:58
to try to explain it to us and they're basically like,
01:13:00
"But wait, it actually doesn't work that well."
01:13:05
So I was kind of taken back as I'm reading this,
01:13:08
I was like, well, you just presented this hype cycle
01:13:09
and then you just told me that it doesn't really work.
01:13:12
Anyhow, so I don't really know what to do with that.
01:13:15
I don't know if you wanna go anywhere with that.
01:13:17
Do you have thoughts on it or?
01:13:20
- Well, I think the hype cycle is important to understand.
01:13:27
I don't know that I have a whole lot to discuss about this.
01:13:30
The one thing that stood out to me from this chapter
01:13:32
was that the difference between the crypto hype
01:13:36
and the AI hype is socially beneficial uses,
01:13:38
which I thought was interesting.
01:13:40
(laughs)
01:13:41
Basically said that there are no socially beneficial uses
01:13:43
for the crypto hype.
01:13:46
Yeah, but AI hype, I agree that it can be socially beneficial,
01:13:50
but also, yeah, recognize that there's a bunch
01:13:52
of really big companies that are funding this hype.
01:13:58
I also thought it was interesting,
01:14:00
the curve that you mentioned,
01:14:02
how it goes back and forth between winters and springs.
01:14:05
There's not just one winter, there's not just one spring,
01:14:09
but it's constantly fluctuating.
01:14:10
I think that's kind of interesting.
01:14:14
Yeah, I don't know that I have really any big takeaway
01:14:20
from this, other than don't believe the hype
01:14:25
and don't believe the news sources
01:14:26
when they talk about AI, (laughs)
01:14:29
recognize where the hype is coming from.
01:14:32
It mentioned that AI research relies on corporate funding,
01:14:35
so literally the people who are paying
01:14:37
for all the research being done
01:14:39
on the effectiveness of all this stuff
01:14:41
are the people who are trying to sell it.
01:14:44
Regardless of the name, open AI,
01:14:45
it's not a non-profit organization.
01:14:48
It's a for-profit company.
01:14:49
It reminds me a lot of the nutrition industry
01:14:53
to where a lot of the nutrition research that gets done
01:14:56
are by the companies that want to sell you
01:14:58
the latest protein or the latest weight loss
01:15:02
or whatever it might be.
01:15:04
And it's really interesting to me
01:15:05
that that popped into my head about these two connections.
01:15:10
It's like, oh, we found this new thing
01:15:11
and it's gonna revolutionize whatever it might be.
01:15:14
And is it really?
01:15:15
And do we take a temper and step back
01:15:18
and do we let that play itself out?
01:15:21
I think it's really interesting that time,
01:15:26
it seems to be a factor here
01:15:27
that they didn't really bring up,
01:15:29
but if we just wait a little bit and don't go crazy,
01:15:34
it'll pan out.
01:15:35
We'll know how things are gonna work out
01:15:37
or what's gonna stay around and what's not.
01:15:39
Now, the people who invested in Bitcoin and a dollar
01:15:43
and went up to 50, whatever, however many thousands of dollars,
01:15:47
they're like, oh yeah, but if you'd have waited,
01:15:50
it's like, yeah, but you're like the 1% of people
01:15:51
who made money on it.
01:15:52
Like the other 99% of people lost their shirt on that.
01:15:58
So I think it's really,
01:16:00
I think it's an interesting chapter to think about hype
01:16:03
and think about the way the media
01:16:06
and the popular figures and the researchers
01:16:09
and these companies all play into this.
01:16:12
They state their take-home message here,
01:16:15
results from AI-based science should be treated
01:16:17
with extreme caution.
01:16:19
So be aware, be careful of that.
01:16:22
They say the most important questions about AI
01:16:24
aren't about the internals.
01:16:26
They're not about the way it works
01:16:27
and how efficiently it works and any of that stuff.
01:16:29
It's really more about the ethics and the use cases
01:16:33
and those type of things, policies around them.
01:16:36
I mean, I just, I think it's an interesting chapter.
01:16:40
They hit biases again here,
01:16:41
which I feel like this is like the 10th time
01:16:43
they've hit these cognitive biases
01:16:45
that's been all through the book.
01:16:46
So many biases.
01:16:48
- Yep.
01:16:49
So I don't really know if I have much else on this chapter,
01:16:52
so I'm ready to move if you are.
01:16:54
- Yeah, let's do it.
01:16:55
- Okay.
01:16:55
All right, so the eighth and final chapter,
01:16:58
where do we go from here?
01:16:59
So this is their kind of launch off,
01:17:01
trying to wrap up the book.
01:17:03
So they started with the introduction
01:17:04
to lay the foundation of essentially predictive AI bad
01:17:08
and then they've unpacked some things
01:17:10
and now we're, where do we go?
01:17:13
They're gonna say that generative AI
01:17:15
is going to continue to improve, you know, chat GPT educators.
01:17:20
They introduced this idea of partial lotteries,
01:17:23
which Mike, I'd never thought about this,
01:17:25
but this is a really interesting concept.
01:17:27
So essentially, if you meet a bar,
01:17:31
you're then entered into a lottery
01:17:33
and the rest of the decision making
01:17:36
isn't trying to be predictive.
01:17:37
It's just putting you in the lottery
01:17:38
and said you met the bar, here you go.
01:17:40
And then from there, it'll let down people's cognitive,
01:17:47
I want to say cognitive intensity, but that's not right.
01:17:49
Like my attachment to like, oh, there's something wrong
01:17:52
with me because I didn't make it into the club
01:17:55
or the university or whatever it might be.
01:17:57
It's like, no, I hit the bar and the lottery weeded me out.
01:18:01
And okay, so they make this idea
01:18:03
that these partial lotteries could help.
01:18:08
What else?
01:18:09
Coming out of here, regulatory capture,
01:18:11
this idea that, you know, the companies
01:18:14
are going to continue to try to influence lobbying
01:18:16
and influence regulations.
01:18:18
So they're going to keep playing into that
01:18:20
and we need to think about how that happens.
01:18:24
Regulation was a big part of this chapter
01:18:26
'cause they are pro-regulation.
01:18:29
They think we need to be regulating this,
01:18:32
that more regulation is better, not less regulation.
01:18:38
And what else did you get out of this one, Mike?
01:18:40
- Which I think is true, by the way,
01:18:43
but that's a tricky thing to unpack.
01:18:50
Yeah, so this last chapter,
01:18:52
they have the two worlds that they describe,
01:18:55
between the two people at the end,
01:18:57
which is kind of interesting.
01:18:58
Yeah, and that, so that's interesting to me
01:19:02
because it's kind of, you know,
01:19:03
if we're going to really clamp down
01:19:04
and we're going to be scared of AI versus we're going to
01:19:07
just embrace it and figure out how to use it.
01:19:10
Rachel is struggling with this right now
01:19:12
with her classical conversations campus.
01:19:15
She's a director this year and someone floated the idea
01:19:19
of having in the policy handbook statement about AI
01:19:23
and then she was gone for something for a couple of days
01:19:26
who didn't respond right away
01:19:27
and someone tried to jump in and create an AI statement
01:19:30
to add to the handbook.
01:19:31
And I was like, I disagree with every word of this.
01:19:33
- Okay, okay.
01:19:34
(laughing)
01:19:36
They're basically just saying like completely, you know,
01:19:38
cut it out, you can't use it at all.
01:19:40
And that's, you know, one of the worlds and the other one,
01:19:43
which is painted a lot more positively is the one
01:19:45
that's, you know, let's figure out what to do with this.
01:19:47
I don't know, that's a effective way to end it.
01:19:49
I think it illustrates their point,
01:19:51
which is really, you don't need to be scared of this stuff.
01:19:55
One of the interesting facts that they shared here,
01:19:57
which, you know, I guess I'd have to look at the one
01:20:00
of many citations they have behind the things
01:20:03
that they added in this book.
01:20:04
But they mentioned that the only job category
01:20:07
to be completely replaced by technology
01:20:09
was the elevator operator.
01:20:10
- Yep, yep.
01:20:12
- Which kind of tempers the fears about AI
01:20:19
causing massive joblessness.
01:20:21
You know, they mentioned that the,
01:20:23
while AI will impact many jobs,
01:20:25
the fears of massive joblessness are overblown.
01:20:27
And I think they're probably right about that.
01:20:30
I think it's real hard from a bookworm perspective
01:20:35
to grab onto something specific
01:20:38
that you're going to do as a result of this last chapter
01:20:42
or even this book.
01:20:43
- I agree to you.
01:20:46
- But it's good information, I guess.
01:20:49
- Yeah, yeah, I couldn't agree with you more, right?
01:20:52
I was thinking about where we're gonna go
01:20:54
and next part of the conversation.
01:20:55
I was like, action items.
01:20:56
I was like, I don't have any action items,
01:20:57
but we'll get there, we'll get there later.
01:21:01
- Yeah, oh, one other thing.
01:21:02
They did mention that generative AI will fade
01:21:04
into the background meaning we'll use it all the time,
01:21:06
not just for specific tasks.
01:21:08
I think that's true.
01:21:10
And so that's the thing specifically
01:21:12
with the statement in the student handbook about,
01:21:15
you can't use AI because you're probably cheating.
01:21:18
I don't, yes, you can use it for creating a report,
01:21:25
you know, and you'll get a bad grade on it, whatever,
01:21:27
'cause it's not very good.
01:21:28
And AI tools are gonna continue to get better,
01:21:31
but I think this is gonna become part of everyday life.
01:21:34
And so we really need to figure out
01:21:36
where to use this appropriately and productively.
01:21:41
And I don't have a simple answer for this.
01:21:44
I think if you were to try to lay something out,
01:21:47
honestly, this is where you really have no idea.
01:21:49
You can't predict the future
01:21:50
and how this is gonna change and improve
01:21:53
and what it's gonna, next version of this
01:21:55
is gonna look like, but it is something
01:21:58
that we need to pay attention to.
01:22:00
- Yeah, I think, I don't wanna go too hard
01:22:03
on my educator wing of my life.
01:22:07
They make a statement here that tools
01:22:08
for detecting AI generated texts don't work.
01:22:11
And basically it leads to false accusations.
01:22:13
And you talked about that, you know,
01:22:15
saying people were cheating when they really weren't.
01:22:18
It gets really, I don't know,
01:22:22
I think we lose the force through the trees
01:22:24
when we try to get too intense about this, right?
01:22:30
I mean, students are gonna use it.
01:22:31
Like they're gonna want to use it
01:22:33
'cause it's a very effective tool to increase efficiency.
01:22:37
But at the same time, we have to still teach them
01:22:40
the core things that we have to teach them.
01:22:42
So it's a really big balance.
01:22:44
And I don't know if we know the answer to it.
01:22:46
I don't know if we're gonna know the answer to it.
01:22:47
I think we're gonna have to feel this out over time.
01:22:52
I don't know where to go, like you had mentioned it, Mike.
01:22:55
It's like, I don't know what to do.
01:22:57
I don't know where to go other than it's hard
01:22:59
and we need to keep thinking about it
01:23:00
and regulation needs to happen.
01:23:02
But companies are gonna keep trying to skirt the regulation.
01:23:05
And you know, it's like you get into this mind spiral of,
01:23:08
okay, I just ran on a treadmill, but I got nowhere.
01:23:11
So what do I do, what do I do with this?
01:23:13
So that's my end of the book.
01:23:15
That's my kind of wrap up.
01:23:17
I don't know if you have anything else you wanna say
01:23:18
before we move to action items.
01:23:21
- Nah, let's do action items.
01:23:24
- Okay.
01:23:25
Oh, there is one more, there is one more thing.
01:23:28
You had said about the jobs disappearing.
01:23:30
I had always been heard and it had always been told,
01:23:33
oh, radiologists, radiologists are gone, right?
01:23:36
Like radiologists are gone.
01:23:37
And they were like super clear on the fact
01:23:39
that radiologists aren't going away.
01:23:40
Everybody thinks radiologists are going away,
01:23:41
radiologists aren't going away.
01:23:42
And I was like, well, I was wrong
01:23:45
and everybody that I've ever listened to say that was wrong.
01:23:47
So I knew there was one other thing I wanted to mention.
01:23:49
- Interesting.
01:23:50
- Now we'll move into action items.
01:23:51
I will start off Mike.
01:23:53
So hopefully if you were in the same boat as I am,
01:23:55
you don't feel bad.
01:23:56
I have zero action items and I don't even feel bad about it.
01:24:00
Like I thought hard, I considered,
01:24:04
there are no action items that come out of this book for me.
01:24:07
I'm glad I read it, but there are no action items.
01:24:10
Done.
01:24:11
- Likewise, yeah.
01:24:15
I don't even think this book was written in a way
01:24:19
that they wanted you to actually do something with it.
01:24:24
It was just, here's the information.
01:24:26
Here's all the citations.
01:24:28
Hopefully we get tenure.
01:24:29
- Yeah, the closest action item I would have
01:24:31
is that reference is kind of interesting.
01:24:34
Maybe I should go find it, but it was too hard to then,
01:24:37
like you had to go search for it.
01:24:38
I was like, nah, I'm done, I'm done.
01:24:41
- There were a couple of those I tried to look up,
01:24:43
but you know, the content that they're,
01:24:45
like one of them specifically was a New York Times article
01:24:48
and I tried to access it and it's behind a pay wall.
01:24:50
And like, okay, fine, I won't look at this article.
01:24:56
- Exactly.
01:24:57
- I hate it when people do that.
01:24:58
- All right, so let's move on to style
01:24:59
I'm rating with zero action items.
01:25:01
Mike, is that a bookworm first?
01:25:03
Have you ever had a book where there are zero action items
01:25:05
coming out of the book?
01:25:07
- Good question.
01:25:09
I know that there have been books
01:25:10
where I've had no action items,
01:25:11
but I don't know that there's been a double no action item book.
01:25:15
I think that's a sign of what we're gonna talk about now
01:25:18
in style and rating.
01:25:19
So, style and rating, I will start, it is my book.
01:25:24
Mike, the rating on this one's hard.
01:25:26
I mean, it provided information
01:25:29
and what I think is good information.
01:25:32
It told a story that you don't often hear.
01:25:35
It told a data-driven story that you don't often hear.
01:25:38
They have analyzed it well.
01:25:40
I trust their thought process through things
01:25:45
and their experience through things
01:25:46
and the fact that they've researched
01:25:48
and they've thought critically about these things.
01:25:50
I liked all of that.
01:25:51
I feel as though I am more well-rounded
01:25:55
in my understanding of AI.
01:25:56
I feel as though I understand
01:25:58
some of the technical pieces better.
01:26:00
I definitely have a better perspective on the biases
01:26:03
and the potential implications of things.
01:26:06
I didn't care for the book very much at all.
01:26:11
If the information wouldn't have been really good,
01:26:14
I mean, this would maybe be in the one territory for me.
01:26:18
So, the fact that the information is pretty good
01:26:22
and I feel, I don't feel like I wasted my time.
01:26:24
So, I wanna make sure that that's clear.
01:26:25
Like, I don't feel like I wasted my time reading the book.
01:26:28
I would, I do feel a little bad
01:26:31
for the bookworm audience if they read along with us
01:26:33
because I was like, man, if they weren't into,
01:26:35
if they weren't into the AI scene,
01:26:37
I mean, this was a really tough read
01:26:39
and they probably stopped at some point through this.
01:26:42
So, I'm trying to get to my rating
01:26:45
and I'm trying to debate whether I think it's a two or a three.
01:26:48
I don't wanna do a half.
01:26:50
I'm going to give it the benefit of the doubt
01:26:53
and I'm going to rank it a three
01:26:55
even though my gut kind of feels like it's a two
01:26:57
but I'm gonna give it the benefit of the doubt
01:26:58
because it did have good information
01:27:01
that I think rounded out my picture of AI
01:27:04
and predictive AI in the industry.
01:27:07
So, I'm going to rank this a three.
01:27:09
Mike, what's yours?
01:27:10
All right, well, okay.
01:27:13
So, I actually, I think I liked the book
01:27:17
maybe better than you did.
01:27:19
I don't have a ton of notes from this book
01:27:22
because I quickly gave up trying to keep up
01:27:26
with every single argument that they were making
01:27:29
and just relied on the things that actually resonated
01:27:32
and there were definitely some things
01:27:35
from things that they shared that triggered some other things
01:27:38
which led to great conversation.
01:27:40
I don't think this book in isolation is great
01:27:45
but I do think it is good
01:27:47
and I think the arguments that they make are effective.
01:27:50
I think I kind of wish they would have skipped
01:27:56
chapters two and three altogether
01:27:59
and just said trust us predictive AI isn't a thing right now.
01:28:02
We'll revisit this in the future.
01:28:05
I don't, so I really don't care about the vendetta
01:28:08
that they have against predictive AI to be honest.
01:28:11
So, the AI snake oil, I don't like that framing.
01:28:13
I don't like that perspective necessarily
01:28:18
but I did enjoy several of the chapters specifically
01:28:21
and I think they have some interesting things
01:28:23
to add to the conversation
01:28:25
and I definitely walk out of this
01:28:27
with a better understanding,
01:28:28
not just because of the arguments in this book
01:28:30
but they fit in alongside the other things
01:28:32
that I'm aware of that are happening in the AI space
01:28:35
and the other books that we've read on AI in general.
01:28:38
So, like I'm trying to separate this
01:28:40
between like in an isolation read
01:28:43
and the Mortimer Adler, how does this contribute?
01:28:47
And I think that way it's actually more valuable.
01:28:51
So definitely not a five star book
01:28:53
but maybe a four star book.
01:28:55
The thing that's gonna keep me from giving it four stars though
01:28:57
is I don't think this age is very well.
01:29:01
- Yeah, okay.
01:29:01
This book was good right now as we read it
01:29:05
in July, August of 2025.
01:29:09
By the time January 1st, 2026 comes,
01:29:13
I'd really think there are gonna be parts of this
01:29:16
that are completely out of date
01:29:19
where not just, oh, that's old information
01:29:22
but no, it's changed since then.
01:29:25
And that's not necessarily their fault
01:29:29
but that's just my own feel for where things are at
01:29:32
currently with AI.
01:29:34
I was listening to, there's a podcast called AI
01:29:37
and I by Dan Shipper.
01:29:39
He's one of the people behind every.2.
01:29:43
And they're the ones that I think are one of the better voices
01:29:48
to listen to right now in terms of like where our AI is
01:29:52
and where it's going.
01:29:53
And there was an episode that I listened to.
01:29:54
I can't remember who it was with.
01:29:55
He was interviewing somebody
01:29:56
and they've worked with AI and they were at Stripe
01:30:01
and Google and all these different places.
01:30:03
And at the end of that episode,
01:30:04
they mentioned that people, they made a comment
01:30:07
about how people think that where we're at right now
01:30:11
with the LLMs is the end game.
01:30:15
He's like, this isn't even the end of the first inning.
01:30:18
He's like, this is going to change so incredibly much.
01:30:22
People have no idea.
01:30:25
And I feel like just the whole snake oil perspective
01:30:29
is sort of putting a stamp on, yeah, I can't ever do that.
01:30:34
You know, it can't do that right now.
01:30:36
And I think they would probably admit that.
01:30:38
But I don't believe that we're at a point
01:30:41
where the predictive AI stuff is just never, ever, ever,
01:30:44
ever going to work regardless of how much they leaned into this
01:30:47
about why I can't AI predict the future.
01:30:49
You give something enough data
01:30:51
that's going to be useful enough in some situations.
01:30:55
And we're not there yet, but I think we will be.
01:30:57
So I'm going to give this three stars
01:30:59
just because I don't want to come back to this rating
01:31:02
a year from now and be like, yeah, no.
01:31:05
- Yeah, you make a really, really good point
01:31:08
in terms of what it made me think of as this book say,
01:31:13
it's a dangerous book to write.
01:31:17
Right now you plant your flag really well
01:31:19
and you can get kind of popular with that.
01:31:22
But in 2026, everybody looks back and they're like,
01:31:25
hey, do you remember when those two guys were at that book
01:31:28
and how wrong they were about all this?
01:31:30
And it's like, that's a dangerous thing.
01:31:32
You don't know if that's going to happen or not.
01:31:33
And that's what, you know, when you were describing
01:31:35
your perspective on it or your view on it, it's like,
01:31:39
wow, I didn't think about, it's good for now.
01:31:41
It seems to have gotten popularity right now.
01:31:44
Hopefully that stays true.
01:31:46
Now the other option is you look back on it
01:31:47
and you're like, look how right they were.
01:31:49
They look how right they were the entire time.
01:31:50
And it's just a, it's a risk.
01:31:51
I mean, you're putting your flag in the ground
01:31:54
and you see where it goes, so.
01:31:56
- Which is not to say that they should not have written
01:31:59
this book or they should not have taken that approach.
01:32:01
It's just not the one that I would have chosen to read
01:32:05
from a book or in perspective.
01:32:07
I think as academics, they have alternate goals
01:32:11
with publishing their thoughts, beliefs.
01:32:14
- Without a doubt.
01:32:15
- Research around these things, which isn't, you know,
01:32:18
how do we make the best, most informative book
01:32:22
for a bookworm listener who's coming to this
01:32:26
and they want to know how they can actually use AI
01:32:28
in a positive way.
01:32:30
I think it was a great conversation.
01:32:32
I think it, you know, one of my,
01:32:34
probably one of my more, it's gotta be up there
01:32:37
in terms of like my favorite conversations that we've had
01:32:40
just 'cause there were so many topics in here
01:32:41
was like I have very strong opinions and feelings about this.
01:32:45
So hopefully it was entertaining for the listeners,
01:32:48
but yeah, that's the thing that causes me to say that
01:32:53
and you're right, you know, maybe come back to this
01:32:55
and, you know, all those arguments hold up,
01:32:57
but I kind of have this feeling that it's not gonna age
01:33:02
well and that's not their fault,
01:33:03
but it's gonna weigh into my decision.
01:33:05
- Got it.
01:33:06
All right, so let's put AI snake oil on the shelf.
01:33:09
What's next, Mike?
01:33:12
- Next is From Strength to Strength
01:33:14
by Arthur Brooks, which I have a couple of copies of.
01:33:19
So if you really need one, I could set you one.
01:33:22
I bought this and then my brother gave it to me
01:33:24
for Christmas, I think,
01:33:25
and it's been on my list for a while.
01:33:28
Looks really interesting and I'm looking forward
01:33:30
to going through this one with you.
01:33:32
- Nice.
01:33:33
After that, we're gonna do the Science of Scaling.
01:33:36
It's a business book by Benjamin Hardy and Blake Erickson.
01:33:41
So I'm looking forward to that one.
01:33:42
It's a new one that comes out
01:33:44
according to Amazon tomorrow.
01:33:46
So it's a brand new one on scaling your business.
01:33:50
- Well, tomorrow is we record this.
01:33:51
- Yeah, tomorrow is we record it.
01:33:52
- Most people who are listening to this.
01:33:54
- It will be out.
01:33:54
- It's available, so.
01:33:55
- Yes, tomorrow is we record, yep.
01:33:58
Mike, do you have any gap books right now?
01:34:02
- Good question.
01:34:03
I don't think, yeah, I didn't put anything in here,
01:34:06
but I actually do have one that I want to read.
01:34:09
I picked this book up in person at Craft & Commerce last year.
01:34:14
I have been kicking around the idea
01:34:16
of doing a coaching program
01:34:19
and John Meese is basically the guy for setting this up
01:34:24
and he wrote a book called Serve to Sell
01:34:27
and he gave it away at Craft & Commerce last year.
01:34:30
So I have a copy of it, it's fairly short
01:34:33
and I'm gonna try and get that one done
01:34:36
before from strength to strength.
01:34:38
- Although that one has a little bit shorter window
01:34:41
because we will actually be recording that one in person.
01:34:44
So yes.
01:34:45
- We will be recording in person,
01:34:46
which is gonna be an exciting adventure for us,
01:34:48
although Mike understands how to record in person,
01:34:50
so I feel good about that.
01:34:53
- Yeah.
01:34:54
- Mine is the same as it was before.
01:34:57
I kind of got into this AI book
01:35:00
and then didn't have tech for the week.
01:35:04
So I didn't have my head, my nose and anything else,
01:35:08
but I'm gonna finish scrolling ourselves to death,
01:35:10
which is a book about technology
01:35:12
and Christianity and the impact there,
01:35:15
the intersection there.
01:35:15
So that's the one I'm gonna finish as my gap book
01:35:19
before strength to strength.
01:35:21
- Nice.
01:35:22
- All righty, well, thank you all very much for listening.
01:35:26
If you are interested in more content that we make,
01:35:28
we do a pro show, it's a longer ad-free show.
01:35:33
You also will get the bootleg version of the show,
01:35:36
which releases fairly quickly after recording,
01:35:38
usually get it about a week or two early.
01:35:40
There's a live stream, so if you become a pro member,
01:35:43
you can get access to the live stream through Patreon.
01:35:48
We have a wallpaper there, it's $7 a month,
01:35:51
and it just helps us with the admin cost to run the show.
01:35:55
So for all the Patreon members,
01:35:57
we thank you so much for being Patreon members,
01:35:59
for anybody who's interested in kind of getting the perks
01:36:02
and just supporting the show,
01:36:04
we really would appreciate if you do that,
01:36:05
if you go to patreon.com/bookwormfm.
01:36:09
- All right, if you are reading along with us,
01:36:11
pick up from strength to strength by Arthur Brooks,
01:36:14
and we'll talk to you in a couple of weeks.