Bookworm
Transcripts
Episodes
Search
About
239: Proust and The Squid by Maryanne Wolf
Show notes on bookworm.fm ↗
Scroll along with the audio
Click any line to jump to that moment.
00:00:00
Well, before we get into the reading brain,
00:00:04
we have a couple of housekeeping things we have to talk about here, Corey.
00:00:08
So first of all, I want to just share with everybody that we completely changed
00:00:14
the technical plumbing of the podcast.
00:00:18
So if you had trouble getting this episode, I apologize.
00:00:23
I have tested everything and I think it is all working.
00:00:26
I got the feed redirected.
00:00:28
So with multiple people, I was able to verify that in different podcast players,
00:00:33
the new episode was showing up without having to resubscribe to the feed.
00:00:38
But yeah, we're on Transistor now and that gives us some new cool stuff.
00:00:45
Like if you go to bookroom.fm, it will redirect to that transistor page.
00:00:49
And if you click on the episodes button, you can actually search all of the episodes right there.
00:00:54
Corey pointed out that while you could do that on the desktop website previously,
00:00:58
it was really, really hard to find on mobile.
00:01:02
And yeah, I'm not enough of a developer to fix that sort of thing.
00:01:08
So we move the show over to Transistor.
00:01:10
That gives us a much better technical foundation for the show going forward.
00:01:16
If you go to bookroom.fm, you should be able to just see the new page.
00:01:20
And the episode numbering works the same.
00:01:22
So if you go to bookroom.fm/237, it'll take you directly to the page
00:01:27
for episode 237.
00:01:31
If it doesn't do that, then my redirects don't work.
00:01:33
But I spent a lot of time on those, even dove into the world of Regex, as I showed Corey.
00:01:39
And yeah, I think all the pipes are connected correctly.
00:01:43
But yeah, if you have any trouble, you can actually just go back to the bookroom.fm
00:01:47
and resubscribe to the page there.
00:01:50
Did you use AI to do your Regex stuff?
00:01:52
Oh, for sure.
00:01:53
Yes, OK, cool.
00:01:54
I was like, please tell me you used some AI to do Regex, because I was doing Regex
00:01:58
earlier today, actually, this morning.
00:02:00
And I was like, AI for the win.
00:02:02
Go ahead.
00:02:02
Yeah, so actually, I used Claude code.
00:02:05
Well, Claude, I guess I didn't actually use the terminal or anything like that.
00:02:08
But I said, I want to redirect this to this.
00:02:13
And how do I do that?
00:02:15
And then how do you do using Regex?
00:02:17
And then it's like, OK, well, that didn't work.
00:02:18
Oh, I forgot this piece.
00:02:20
Eventually, I got it to do exactly what I wanted it to do.
00:02:24
And there's no way I would have figured it out on my own.
00:02:28
AI for the win.
00:02:28
AI for the win.
00:02:31
I have one other thing I need to mention here, because this episode will go live
00:02:34
actually right before this starts.
00:02:36
But I am going to be doing a live practical PKM cohort in January.
00:02:40
It kicks off January 5th.
00:02:42
And I am trying to make this one as accessible as humanly possible.
00:02:48
So basically, there's two ways you can join.
00:02:50
You can either get the practical PKM hybrid cohort, which gives you lifetime
00:02:55
access to all of the videos and the custom AI agent and the monthly Q&A calls.
00:03:02
That is $497, which is still considerably less than a lot of other workshops.
00:03:08
But you can also-- I've decided if you join the library, so even if you join--
00:03:14
it's $49 a month for the Pro Tier, you pay quarterly.
00:03:17
So it would be $147.
00:03:19
As long as you are a member of the library, you can join this live cohort for free.
00:03:24
Which means if you want to join this cohort, which I charged $800 for last time that I did it,
00:03:30
you can pay $147 and join it live.
00:03:33
You won't get lifetime access to everything.
00:03:35
You'll basically have access to it for as long as you stick around.
00:03:38
So obviously, the goal here for me is to get people who are tire kickers to give it a shot,
00:03:46
join the cohort, which by the way, also gets you access to Life HQ, which I sell for $197.
00:03:51
So you won't get updates to that unless you're remaining a member, but you get it for significantly
00:03:58
less than I should mathematically be charging for this stuff, probably.
00:04:03
But I just want to get a bunch of people in this cohort.
00:04:05
It's been a while since I did this one live.
00:04:07
I've got a few ideas for how I want to change this based on when I went through the right
00:04:11
of passage cohort with David Perrell.
00:04:14
And I think this is going to be the best one.
00:04:15
That's also the most affordable one.
00:04:16
So basically, you can get access to the live one for $147.
00:04:20
But if you go to join.pricelpkm.com, that's the website for the hybrid cohort, and if you
00:04:25
buy either of those options, you will get access to this cohort as well when it's ready.
00:04:33
Nice.
00:04:34
Awesome.
00:04:35
Indeed.
00:04:36
So now, let's talk about action items.
00:04:37
Did you talk to Katie about crafting commerce?
00:04:39
I didn't.
00:04:40
I didn't.
00:04:41
I just want everybody in the audience to know that if Mike could punch me through the Internet,
00:04:47
he might punch me right now.
00:04:49
Because he wants me to do this so bad.
00:04:52
And I am not intentionally not doing it.
00:04:55
I just don't remember.
00:04:57
My memory is so bad when it comes to certain things.
00:05:01
And I just didn't remember.
00:05:02
But hold on one second.
00:05:03
I'm going to-- I feel like I wrote this down last time and then didn't do it.
00:05:07
You did.
00:05:08
So that's the only reason I left it down here, by the way.
00:05:09
I'm not trying to shame you into going.
00:05:11
Oh, no.
00:05:12
You literally last time, though, because I reviewed the episode and published it right
00:05:14
before we recorded this one.
00:05:16
Like you said, I'm going to put this in my reminders and I'm going to talk to Katie.
00:05:19
So follow up with me on this one.
00:05:21
That's the only reason I am.
00:05:26
It's OK.
00:05:27
I will have my spectacular moment of follow-up failure momentarily.
00:05:30
All right.
00:05:31
So I put it in my thing again.
00:05:34
And we'll see if this actually works.
00:05:36
I don't know if it's going to work or not, but at some point, we're going to work.
00:05:40
By the way, I'm playing around with Apple reminders and we'll see how that works.
00:05:44
And OK.
00:05:45
So my next one.
00:05:46
Apple reminders.
00:05:47
Apple podcast.
00:05:48
Just use all the Apple.
00:05:49
I know.
00:05:50
I know.
00:05:51
It's kind of hard to not because they're built into everything, which that's a whole
00:05:53
other conversation.
00:05:54
Yeah.
00:05:55
Apple podcast is very good, by the way.
00:05:56
And if you want to hear me talk about my experiment with it, that's in the Pro Show.
00:05:59
That is in the Pro Show.
00:06:01
OK.
00:06:02
So I was supposed to create a storyboard for the last book, which I did.
00:06:06
I'm really happy with that.
00:06:08
It was good.
00:06:09
I liked it.
00:06:11
I like doing that.
00:06:12
Now, here's what I'll tell you immediately.
00:06:14
I did not create one for this book.
00:06:19
You'll understand why as we talk about this book, but I did not create one for this book.
00:06:27
And this is an interesting part of our conversation because I was like gung ho.
00:06:31
This was like a cool new way to think about these things.
00:06:35
And I actively chose not to do that for this book.
00:06:38
Like 100% actively chose not to do that.
00:06:41
So I did not do it for this book, but I did it for the last book.
00:06:44
Cool.
00:06:45
And then create one for the Institute.
00:06:46
I haven't done that yet, but that's a plan for over the break.
00:06:49
So when I say break, so I'm a faculty member.
00:06:52
And that means we just took finals.
00:06:54
I'm in the process of finishing my grading.
00:06:57
And then I have like a couple weeks off before the spring semester starts.
00:07:00
So I'm prepping for next classes, but I have a little more time to do some thinking around
00:07:04
different things.
00:07:05
The Institute is a like mini seminary thing that I'm doing, so I'm trying to make connections
00:07:08
throughout the Bible and throughout scripture and theology and those type of things.
00:07:11
So I'm planning to do that one.
00:07:13
I just didn't have time because of finals, but that's still on the list.
00:07:16
Oh, I guess I had one more.
00:07:20
Develop my during questions.
00:07:21
Nope.
00:07:22
Nope.
00:07:23
Nope.
00:07:24
Nope.
00:07:25
Nope.
00:07:26
Nope.
00:07:27
Nope.
00:07:28
Nope.
00:07:29
Nope.
00:07:30
Didn't even think about that one.
00:07:31
Never even crossed the brain.
00:07:32
So that one's out.
00:07:33
All right.
00:07:34
How about you?
00:07:35
I don't like the term ID integration board still, but sublime is definitely the thing
00:07:41
I want to use for mixing ideas, shall we say?
00:07:45
Okay.
00:07:46
And I went all in with sublime.
00:07:49
I bought the lifetime.
00:07:51
Nice.
00:07:52
Yep.
00:07:53
So they're shipping me one of those deadline candles where it actually says deadline on
00:07:57
it.
00:07:58
And the goal is to like write your book before you get down to the bottom.
00:08:01
Okay.
00:08:02
Okay.
00:08:03
Yeah.
00:08:04
I'm a big fan of just the whole ethos of this, this company.
00:08:07
They have these zines that they publish periodically.
00:08:11
And the latest one was all about human creativity and AI.
00:08:17
And they pull in interviews with like Kevin Kelly and those types of people who are really
00:08:23
thinking about this stuff in in good ways, you know, good as subjective, I guess, but
00:08:28
people who I think are really thinking about this stuff the right way.
00:08:32
And yeah, I think this is going to, this is going to go places.
00:08:35
Maybe not.
00:08:36
You know, maybe I lose momentum and I walk away from it.
00:08:39
I did the same sort of thing with Rome back in the day.
00:08:41
I paid the five year thing and then I was like, these people creep me out.
00:08:44
I'm not going to do this anymore.
00:08:46
That was my, that was my question is, do you know anything about the people who make sublime?
00:08:50
Like, do they have a history?
00:08:52
Do you know anything?
00:08:53
Or I wouldn't have, I wouldn't have looked into it.
00:08:55
I'm just asking if you did.
00:08:56
No, no, I guess, you know, no news is good news on that front with Rome.
00:09:00
I kind of, kind of had an idea, but I can't be that bad.
00:09:03
It was that bad.
00:09:04
I'm sorry.
00:09:05
I'm sorry.
00:09:06
Yeah.
00:09:07
And it's subjective.
00:09:08
I mean, some people still use Rome, I think actually in lore use it.
00:09:11
The tool is actually pretty cool, but yeah.
00:09:14
Connor would say stuff and the insider calls, they called them like cult gatherings and
00:09:18
stuff.
00:09:19
And I'm just like, I don't want to be a part of this.
00:09:21
Just wasn't for me.
00:09:22
Got it.
00:09:23
Um, so yeah, that one is, uh, is, is good.
00:09:25
And that is kind of what instigated the Apple podcast experiment that we talked about in
00:09:29
the, the pro show, the next follow up item that I had here was to create the queries
00:09:36
for the light bulb, the key, et cetera.
00:09:38
I didn't do this yet.
00:09:40
Uh, I intended to, but, uh, I, it just fell through the cracks for me.
00:09:45
Uh, same with check out the workshop.
00:09:47
I actually went in there and poked around a little bit.
00:09:50
I do have access to that, that circle group and, uh, did not have time to watch any of
00:09:55
the videos.
00:09:57
Uh, I mean, just so I don't like to make excuses.
00:10:02
This these last two weeks though, Adelaide got pneumonia, Malachi broke his foot in addition
00:10:07
to all the other like end of the semester stuff.
00:10:10
It's just, it's enough.
00:10:11
Let it be over.
00:10:13
See.
00:10:14
So Mike, here's the difference between you and I, Mike doesn't like to make excuses.
00:10:17
I don't think that's an excuse.
00:10:18
I think that's an explanation.
00:10:19
I'm just going to throw that out there.
00:10:21
Like I think that's an explanation and I will gladly make an explanation.
00:10:25
What happened to me this week, finals done, like done.
00:10:29
It's an explanation of why things didn't get done finals.
00:10:32
So.
00:10:33
Yeah.
00:10:34
So, um, I still intend to do those.
00:10:36
Those aren't, you know, ones that I'm going to walk away from.
00:10:38
The create queries, that's actually something I think will be useful and I want to add that
00:10:42
actually probably to life HQ at some point.
00:10:45
And then, uh, the workshop, I, I want to go through it because I want to know what, what
00:10:49
is in there so I can reach out to Jolt and, and see if you would be willing to do, uh,
00:10:55
a presentation for the library, but yeah, I haven't had time to do that.
00:11:00
Well, there's always, so one out of three, I guess, hey, always put off today.
00:11:06
What could be done tomorrow?
00:11:07
Isn't that the saying?
00:11:08
Isn't it the way it is procrastinated on purpose?
00:11:11
Is that what you're saying?
00:11:12
You know, I don't know what you're talking about, I don't know what you're talking
00:11:16
about.
00:11:17
Okay.
00:11:18
Let's talk about the reading brain.
00:11:19
Today's book is Proust and the squid, which I have to apologize because for years, I've
00:11:25
been calling this the Proust and the squid is actually Proust and the squid, Proust as in
00:11:31
Marcel Proust and this is by Marianne Wolf.
00:11:35
I had read a book previously by her called reader come home, which is kind of the reason
00:11:42
that I picked this one for Corey because in that book, she kind of talks about how information
00:11:46
hits different from an analog book versus a digital screen and, uh, didn't really get
00:11:52
there in this one.
00:11:54
This was a deep dive into the science of reading, which when I was going through this, I was
00:11:58
like, this is fascinating.
00:12:01
And I wonder what Corey's going to think about this because in my mind, there are two extreme
00:12:05
options available.
00:12:07
One is I'm a university professor.
00:12:08
This is totally my jam.
00:12:10
Everyone in my class needs to know this stuff.
00:12:12
The other one is I do not care for those of you who can't see my head shaking because,
00:12:20
you know, you're listening to the audio version of this.
00:12:22
And he said, uh, this is great.
00:12:24
I'm a university professor, blah, blah, blah.
00:12:26
No, I was shaking my head hard.
00:12:27
No, like absolute hard.
00:12:29
No.
00:12:30
Now I respect her.
00:12:31
Like she knows her stuff.
00:12:33
I mean, she's doing it.
00:12:34
Like this is where the world she lives in.
00:12:36
She loves this.
00:12:37
I am really glad.
00:12:39
Like I'm really, really glad for her.
00:12:41
But the neuroscience of reading and like where reading developed from and all of those things,
00:12:48
like I could have cared less about like 90% of this book, like, like, I mean, there's
00:12:55
maybe 10% of this book that I'm like, yeah, like, okay, this was good.
00:12:59
But 90% of this book could have cared less.
00:13:01
I will.
00:13:02
I was going as far as to say because I think this is a good example for, for our listeners.
00:13:06
I would not have read this book.
00:13:08
I would have stopped reading this book had, had you and don't read that as like, it's
00:13:13
a poor quality book.
00:13:15
I just have zero interest in the subject matter.
00:13:18
And don't like, again, I don't want you to be offended by that either.
00:13:21
It's like, so hopefully you're not offended by that.
00:13:23
I'm not offended.
00:13:24
Okay.
00:13:25
Good.
00:13:26
Because it's like, you had no idea.
00:13:27
I got no idea.
00:13:28
I got like a chapter and a half.
00:13:29
I had a little bit of an idea.
00:13:30
I had like, I knew it was going to be science based.
00:13:32
I knew she was going to talk about like the neuroplasticity and stuff like that.
00:13:38
I guess I didn't know quite how deep she would.
00:13:40
She would go though.
00:13:41
I mean, I mean, we're talking, you know, Sumerians and we're talking the Egyptians and we're
00:13:46
talking about looking at images versus processing.
00:13:49
I know.
00:13:50
It's incredible, isn't it?
00:13:51
No.
00:13:52
I mean, sure.
00:13:53
Yeah.
00:13:54
It is incredible.
00:13:55
But I think it just like went too far into my interest level when it comes to reading.
00:14:01
I actually do think though, based on here in your description, reader come home, I think
00:14:05
is a much more interesting book to me than, than this one is.
00:14:11
Because I, that one would challenge me more.
00:14:14
This one was more of an information thing.
00:14:17
The other one I'll bring up and hopefully I'm not putting the cart before the horse for
00:14:20
you Mike.
00:14:21
But like the other one that's big in this one is dyslexia.
00:14:24
So if you are dyslexic or you're interested in dyslexia and like the science behind that
00:14:29
and kind of the application of that, this is a really cool book for folks who either
00:14:35
have dyslexia or teach folks with dyslexia.
00:14:38
Like that would be another really good engagement point for those of you who are in that world
00:14:44
and care about that world.
00:14:45
I'll say that too.
00:14:47
All right.
00:14:49
Well, this is going to be an interesting conversation.
00:14:53
Yeah.
00:14:54
Okay.
00:14:55
So a little bit of background on Marianne Wolf.
00:14:57
She's a professor, was at a university on the East Coast now works at UCLA, I believe.
00:15:05
Okay.
00:15:06
So I think she was at MIT then.
00:15:08
Because MIT is bringing in my brain that she had a colleague at MIT.
00:15:11
I remember her saying that in the book somewhere.
00:15:13
Yeah.
00:15:14
She said the name of the university, I didn't shut it down because honestly, just wasn't
00:15:18
important.
00:15:19
She doesn't work there anymore.
00:15:20
But we've talked to her for the Focus Podcast.
00:15:23
She's one of the kindest, smartest people you will ever meet.
00:15:28
And what was the context of the Focus Podcast?
00:15:31
Like what would you bring her on for?
00:15:34
David and I both read, read or come home and we're like, we got to talk.
00:15:37
Oh, you just wanted to talk to her about read or come home?
00:15:40
Yeah.
00:15:41
Because, I mean, one of the themes of Focus is analog, obviously.
00:15:46
And so I've been trying to get David to read analog books for a long time.
00:15:51
I mentioned this book.
00:15:52
He read it.
00:15:53
He's like, this is amazing.
00:15:54
I'm totally in.
00:15:55
We got to talk to this lady and he reached out to her and she came on the show.
00:15:59
And it was amazing.
00:16:00
It was awesome.
00:16:01
It was one of my favorite episodes, honestly.
00:16:04
That's my action item from this book.
00:16:05
Just so you know, I'm going to go listen to your favorite book.
00:16:08
Listen to that.
00:16:09
I didn't catch that episode.
00:16:10
So I'm going to go listen to the episode with her because that sounds great.
00:16:14
Yeah, it was, it was really cool.
00:16:15
And we recorded initially on video.
00:16:18
I remember it was about negative 30 that day in Wisconsin.
00:16:22
So my internet was flaking out.
00:16:24
Maybe that's not why the internet was flaking out.
00:16:25
But that's my, I was the only one home.
00:16:28
There was no one else using it.
00:16:29
Right.
00:16:30
Fairly extreme weather conditions.
00:16:32
And we had to turn off the video at one point.
00:16:34
But prior to that, she's taken her laptop around and showing us, look at this stack of
00:16:38
books over here in the kitchen and look at this stack of books over here in the, the
00:16:41
den, you know, it was, it was amazing.
00:16:43
She's your spirit.
00:16:44
Well, that's for sure.
00:16:46
Yeah.
00:16:47
Uh, probably.
00:16:48
And, um, yeah, so where was I going with that?
00:16:51
I, I like the approach that she takes with this.
00:16:53
I think actually, like her writing style, this is getting sound reading, I guess, but
00:16:57
it's, it's very, uh, narrative based.
00:17:00
So if you just are interested in the topic at all, I feel like you could just sit down
00:17:04
with this book.
00:17:05
She's going to share a whole bunch of stories.
00:17:06
She's done a whole bunch of research, and it's going to be told in a very compelling
00:17:09
fashion.
00:17:10
Yeah.
00:17:11
It's kind of interesting to me, you know, you mentioned, I'd not totally get this where
00:17:14
if you're just not interested in the science of reading at all, then yeah, you're not going
00:17:17
to, not going to like this.
00:17:20
And I guess that's the thing is like, if you find something that piques your interest,
00:17:24
this is the exact type of book that I would want to read to get into that stuff.
00:17:27
And I am fascinated by this stuff.
00:17:29
I've been fascinated with the, what's the, the term, um, study of the brain.
00:17:36
Yeah.
00:17:37
Neuroscience.
00:17:38
No, how neuroscience.
00:17:39
Yeah.
00:17:40
How like the amygdala is the emotional center and it hijacks the rational thinking process
00:17:44
and all those different pieces that connect.
00:17:46
I love that kind of stuff and I will even admit that she talks about it so much that it was
00:17:50
a little bit hard for even me to follow along with it.
00:17:54
But I think it's, I think it's really cool to understand how all the wires are connected.
00:17:58
And then as she goes through the book, there's three different parts, how the brain learned
00:18:02
to read, how the brain learns to read over time.
00:18:04
So kind of history and present.
00:18:05
And then when the brain can't learn to read, I feel like this is kind of the future based
00:18:08
part where even if you're not dealing with dyslexia specifically, it's sort of like,
00:18:13
well, everybody's different and here are some of the issues.
00:18:16
So how do you use all this historical context and these things that we've talked about previously
00:18:21
with these challenges that you may be facing right now in order to become the best version
00:18:26
of yourself, for lack of a better term, keep learning, keep going, keep growing that sort
00:18:34
of thing.
00:18:35
And it's not prescriptive, it's not a systems book.
00:18:38
It is definitely an information dump, but I loved every second of it.
00:18:41
Well, and what I'll tell you is, I mean, I've read a lot of academic writing, like a lot
00:18:46
of academic writing.
00:18:48
This is a really good example of taking heavy academic ideas and things that like are made
00:18:57
up in, you know, hundreds of academic journals and papers and were presented at conferences
00:19:02
and things and making it accessible to a whole other set of people.
00:19:06
So it's like from that standpoint, like she's, she's very, very skilled at taking complicated
00:19:13
ideas and translating them into something that like everybody, you know, like, 'cause I don't,
00:19:18
I know nothing about neuroscience really.
00:19:20
I know even less about the neuroscience of reading, like you, when you write the word
00:19:25
amygdala into a book, I stop caring for the most part, right?
00:19:29
Like, I mean, I just, it's like whatever, like, you're gonna talk about the amygdala,
00:19:32
I don't really care about the amygdala, but what I'll tell you is like, this was very,
00:19:37
very well done.
00:19:38
I'm going to say translated, like it's very well translated from academic speak to normal
00:19:43
people.
00:19:44
Normal person speak.
00:19:45
So that was, that was really cool to, to see and it was a good example for me if I ever
00:19:50
think about taking like really heavy academic things and trying to turn them into a more
00:19:54
popular text.
00:19:55
Yeah.
00:19:56
I, I'm surprised, I mean, really the neuroscience, I guess I can get why that isn't a thing,
00:20:03
but essentially it's how things work and yeah, I don't know, let's, let's get into it.
00:20:12
So part one is how the brain learned to read and there's three chapters in this, this part.
00:20:17
I think we'll actually tackle each chapter because he's got very specific ideas that
00:20:21
she's presenting in, in each of the chapters.
00:20:24
So chapter one, reading lessons from Protestant and the squid chapter two, how the brain adapted
00:20:28
itself to read and then chapter three, the birth of an alphabet and Socrates protest.
00:20:32
Those are all in this first section.
00:20:35
So let's start with chapter one, reading lessons from Protestant and the squid.
00:20:42
Now, as mentioned earlier, Prowst refers to Marcel Prowst, who once described a reading
00:20:47
sanctuary, that sounded amazing.
00:20:51
And then the squid is an analogy to understand how neurons fire and transmit to each other.
00:20:56
Kind of the idea here is, you know, how squid learn to, to swim.
00:21:02
And I think that's interesting. I like the pyramid of reading that she describes here
00:21:07
where there's like the different levels, there's the surface behavior, there's the cognitive
00:21:11
level, the neurological structures, the neurons and then the genes at the very bottom.
00:21:18
I'm not sure I'm, I'm scared to go all the way down there because I feel like the further
00:21:21
down you go, the more maybe understanding you have of why something is, but the less practical
00:21:27
stuff becomes.
00:21:28
There's an 80/20 with this for sure. But the, the major point she makes, which is fascinating
00:21:33
to me is that reading is a great example of the brain's plasticity and ability to learn
00:21:37
a new skill because we were never born to read huge point, huge point that we weren't
00:21:42
born to read is like, I was like, Oh, shoot, we weren't born to read like that makes total
00:21:46
sense.
00:21:47
Yep. And the other thing I really like in here is the three principles to help the brain
00:21:52
learn to read, which is the capacity to make new connections from older structures, the
00:21:56
capacity to form areas of exquisitely precise specialization for recognizing patterns and
00:22:01
information. And the ability to learn to recruit and connect information from these
00:22:06
areas automatically. There's some cool quotes in this section. One in particular, I jotted
00:22:12
down, which really has nothing to do with the topic of the book. But Edward tenor says it
00:22:17
would be a shame if brilliant technology were to end up threatening the kind of intellect
00:22:21
that produced it. And I feel like that's exactly what we're at with the AI right now. Although
00:22:26
I don't think it's really the existential threat that some other people think, but you
00:22:29
know, whatever.
00:22:30
I think you talked about those three principles. I think one of the cool things to do is to
00:22:35
take those three principles and apply them to our world today. So the capacity to make
00:22:40
connections among older among older structures. Okay, so how do we take traditional learning
00:22:45
and traditional reading and apply that into our world today? You know, like how do we
00:22:49
make those connections between those the capacity to form areas of exquisitely precise specialization
00:22:56
for recognizing patterns of information? So that's changing right now. Like there are
00:23:00
people who are better at that in the short form media and there are people who are better
00:23:03
that than the long form media. And I'm by no means saying I'm going for the short form
00:23:10
media stuff. I'm just saying that we have to look at this and go, this can be applied
00:23:13
to what what exists today as well. And we need to pay attention to that. And then the
00:23:17
ability to learn to recruit and connect information from from these areas automatically. And this
00:23:21
is the one that is like, Oh man, this automatic connection is strange to me. And I don't know
00:23:27
what to I don't know what to do or unpack that one. The the big quote that stood out for me
00:23:31
in this one would be Joseph Epstein's, a biography of any literary person ought to do at length
00:23:39
with what he read and when for in some sense, we are what we read. And I don't I mean, I
00:23:46
completely completely 100% agree with this. I think we are what we read. I think we are
00:23:50
what we expose ourselves to. There's this idea of good in, good out garbage in garbage
00:23:56
out. And I think this is a real thing that we need to be paying more attention to in
00:24:01
society that like a lot of our young people forgive me like for making this generalized
00:24:07
statement. I don't like to do this. But at the same time, a lot of our young people are
00:24:10
putting a lot of garbage in all the time. And it's over and over and over again. And they
00:24:16
get frustrated when we ask them to put someone say it's different garbage, right? And others
00:24:23
would say it's actually good stuff. So like you can debate that all day long. But like
00:24:26
these ideas that are time tested and true that have made it into a book that people
00:24:31
will say like we've been reading this for hundreds of years, we should continue to read
00:24:34
this for hundreds of years. Like that is in my mind, the stuff that's held the test of
00:24:38
time, that's the good stuff. And we need to be putting more good stuff into into people.
00:24:42
And this is where I'm like a big fan of like liberal arts education, because it helps
00:24:45
us put that good stuff into our brains and expose ourselves to those good ideas. So
00:24:50
I do get an action item out of here. And I don't remember where it was in the book and
00:24:56
I'm almost positive it was in this first chapter. So forgive me if it wasn't. She references
00:25:01
a book called I'm almost positive. Maybe I might be getting it mixed up with something
00:25:06
I saw online. But there's a book called Bandersnatch. And it's a book about like, you know, Narnia
00:25:13
and Tolkien and, and those type of things. And I want to read that book and it tied in
00:25:19
like it. I don't know if it came out of this book or not, but it melted mine melded between
00:25:23
this book and in, you know, what I was looking at online, because she talks about in one
00:25:27
here, Middle Earth and Narnia and those type of things in chapter one. So that's really
00:25:32
what I got out of this first one, other than, you know, she tells you what the goal of the
00:25:36
book is and, and kind of what she's trying to do. And this is part of why I lost it is
00:25:40
she told me what the goal of the book was. And I was like, I don't really care about
00:25:44
the goal of the book. So, so that's kind of where I lost it. But we're gonna, we're gonna
00:25:49
do well. This is gonna be good. So I'm ready to move to. All right. Okay, so chapter two,
00:25:57
how the brain adapted itself to read. This is really where she introduces three big epiphanies.
00:26:07
The first one is a new form of symbolic representation. The second one is a system of symbols that
00:26:13
can be used to communicate across time and space. And the third one is sound symbol correspondence,
00:26:19
representing the realization that all words are composed of tiny individual sounds and
00:26:22
that symbols can physically signify each of these sounds in every word. That's the gist
00:26:28
of it. And then she gets into the history, which I didn't jot down all of the statistics
00:26:34
and all that kind of stuff. But it was fascinating. So you mentioned the Sumerians, you know,
00:26:41
the first written languages she mentions came from the Sumerian cuneiform, but also mentions
00:26:46
later that there was another first in the Egyptian hieroglyphics, but they weren't connected.
00:26:52
They kind of evolved separately in their own parts of the world, which is kind of interesting
00:26:58
because it wasn't like something that built on something else. These were two totally separate,
00:27:04
what's the term I'm looking for when you have a study and you have people into the different
00:27:11
groups, like experiments groups. So two, like, there was no cross-pollination here. And they
00:27:18
still ended up in the same place, which is interesting. But a couple of things that just
00:27:24
minor things that kind of were interesting to me. One was that their first encyclopedia
00:27:31
was named All Things Known About the Universe. What a great name. That actually would be
00:27:37
a great podcast name. All things known about the universe. Yeah, I'd have trouble using
00:27:42
using that title, but it reminded me of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. And then
00:27:48
the other one was that going back to the first languages being Sumerian cuneiform that Sumerian
00:27:53
women had their own dialects called Emissal, which was translated, fine tongue. So yeah,
00:28:02
not anything that you're going to do specifically with this stuff. It's just interesting anecdotes
00:28:08
there. But I think it is helpful to understand how we got here. And then the other thing here,
00:28:17
kind of going back to the point about the Sumerians and the Egyptians and these processes happening
00:28:22
at the same time, but at different places, she actually said that evidence suggests that
00:28:25
writing was invented, quote unquote, at least three times in the last part of the fourth
00:28:31
millennium BC, which is awesome. So if you're going to extrapolate that, you know, the brain
00:28:41
is never meant to read. Why did we learn to read? You know, it's to make us bigger, better,
00:28:49
faster, stronger. I don't know. Like it's a superpower. This is this is one of the coolest
00:28:56
points of the first step, the first part of her book is the idea of like, we weren't meant
00:29:00
to do this. If you look at it biologically, we weren't meant to do this yet. What I've
00:29:04
just told you is in three different places or in four different, you know, times or whatever
00:29:09
it is, humans did it. Like they did that like there was something in there that something
00:29:15
that drove this. Now I have my reasons why I think that's true, right? Like I have my
00:29:20
like internal explanations for this, but just pondering on that idea of like, Oh, physically,
00:29:27
I'm physically is the wrong word, like brain wise, body wise, right? Like this isn't something
00:29:32
we're much better off drawing pictures and just talking to each other. Like why would
00:29:37
we need to actually make this word code system that has syllables and letters and all this
00:29:42
stuff? Like that just doesn't make any sense. It seems like it makes everything harder.
00:29:46
And what's cool is she's going to tie this in at the very end about why this mattered
00:29:49
and how it helped us. Right. Well, I guess she's going to tie it in a couple of different
00:29:52
times, but I remember it at the very end. So I think that's that's really, really neat.
00:29:55
I like her idea here of mental representations of information being re presentations, which
00:30:03
I've heard this before that like a representation is a representation. And I really like the
00:30:08
idea of that because what are we doing when we do writing? And then we're taking this
00:30:13
idea. Well, I guess visuals too. When we take visuals, we're taking an idea and we're representing
00:30:18
it as a visual. When we write, we're taking an idea and we're representing it as words
00:30:23
and sentences and paragraphs. And then we can adjust the way we represent that. And you
00:30:28
see this in terms of the way people do it. Like some people write a paragraph and you're
00:30:32
like, man, I know exactly what you're talking about. That makes total sense. And some people
00:30:35
write the exact or about the exact same topic, but they write a different paragraph and you're
00:30:39
like, no idea. Like what what words did you just say? Like that doesn't make any sense
00:30:44
to me. And it's a really cool thing to this is why I think you have said this before to
00:30:50
me. And I've heard you say this to other people as well. There is space for you to do the thing.
00:30:56
So if you're if you're passionate about something and you want to tell that story, you want to
00:30:59
communicate that idea, you want to teach that thing, there's space for you to do that because
00:31:03
you may represent that in a way that connects with a group of people that it is never connected
00:31:09
with before like they've been trying to do this their whole life and they've just never
00:31:12
got it. And I think that's a that's a really cool thing. I actually think it's a really
00:31:15
cool feature of AI is it gives us the ability for something to represent something in a
00:31:22
bunch of different ways. And the human doesn't get tired because the system just does it.
00:31:27
Now it may do it wrong. So that's a problem. But so so so many humans. So there you go.
00:31:33
Like I think I do think this is a really cool chapter and I and the flow as it goes down
00:31:37
is really cool to think about. We weren't supposed to do this, but we've done it a bunch
00:31:41
of times, which is kind of a neat idea. Yeah. So let's go to the next chapter because you're
00:31:49
kind of hitting on why would we want to create an alphabet and there's a cool story in chapter
00:31:57
three about that chapter three is the birth of an alphabet and Socrates protests and mentions
00:32:03
a story by Thomas Mann who said that in and he refers to the event of Moses going up the
00:32:14
mountain to get the 10 commandments from God as kind of the birthplace of an alphabet,
00:32:20
which is interesting to think about it that way because the point he makes is that in
00:32:23
response to God, asking Moses to carve the 10 commandments on two stone tablets in a
00:32:28
way that everyone could understand them. Moses had to create an alphabetic language and I
00:32:37
never thought about that before, but it makes sense. You know, if you want to communicate
00:32:41
something to somebody else in a specific way, you have to have a baseline understanding
00:32:48
of these are the boundaries within which we're playing, I guess. And it makes sense as she's
00:32:55
going through this that an alphabet would do that because an alphabet basically takes
00:33:01
all of the possible options and shrinks it down into these tiny elements that you can
00:33:06
put together a lot like the atomic ideas that we were talking about in the last book. There's
00:33:13
the criteria of an alphabet from Eric Havelock, which I liked here. There's three criteria.
00:33:17
The first is a limited number of letters or characters. The second is a comprehensive
00:33:23
set of characters capable of conveying the minimal sound units of the language. And then
00:33:30
the third is a complete correspondence between each phoneme. I don't know how to say that
00:33:35
in language and each visual sign or letter. So if you have those three things, you have
00:33:42
the foundations of an alphabet and the 26 letters that are in the English alphabet, she
00:33:47
mentions as kind of the sweet spot, but they don't have to have exactly 26. Basically,
00:33:53
if you have thousands and thousands, you may as well not even have an alphabet in which
00:33:59
case that activates a totally different part of your brain. If you're learning to read
00:34:02
Chinese characters, although there is a foundational part of the Chinese language, I forget the
00:34:07
name of it starts with a P that is sort of like an alphabet for those characters that
00:34:15
when kids are in school, they learn that first. The big thing I want to talk about here, but
00:34:21
I'll let you kind of share whatever you want to first, is the Socrates objections to the
00:34:26
written language. So pause that for a second. Yeah, it's a little bit of a tangent. So
00:34:31
for everybody, I mean, I teach at Colorado Christian University. So therefore, you know,
00:34:37
you made the connection to Moses and the tablets. And this is a really interesting thing if
00:34:42
you think about it contextually. So earlier in the Bible, right, and whether you believe
00:34:45
in the Bible or not, that's not the point of this. But like for somebody who reads the
00:34:49
Bible and does, earlier in the Bible, there was the Tower of Babel. And the people tried
00:34:53
to create the technology and the technology was created in essence to be like God. Like
00:34:59
that was the reason why they did it. So God said, okay, no, we're going to split you up
00:35:02
and we're going to give you all a bunch of different languages. And that was where like
00:35:05
the Tower of Babel came from. So the idea that we then tie back into, oh, and then Moses
00:35:11
from God creates the alphabet, which is like the one universal thing to like tell everybody
00:35:17
what I want to tell them. It's just really cool. Like I'm going to say that again, I
00:35:21
don't care about the neuroscience of this book. It's just a really cool idea. That is a really
00:35:27
cool thought experiment to go, wow, I had never thought about like they got scattered
00:35:32
and they're all speaking different languages. And then he's saying, you know, God's saying
00:35:36
Moses, write this one thing down. And it's what everybody's going to look at. Like it's
00:35:39
a really cool idea. Before we get to Socrates, another one I want to say is she makes three
00:35:44
claims about the unique contributions of the alphabet. The alphabet's increased efficiency
00:35:50
over other systems. The alphabet's facilitation of novel thoughts never before articulated.
00:35:53
And the novice readers ease in acquiring an alphabetic system through their awareness
00:35:58
of the sounds of speech. And it's like, I like those three ideas when they tie into the
00:36:03
three that you talked about, right? Like in terms of what makes up an alphabet. And you
00:36:07
say like, okay, does it increase my efficiency in doing things? She's going to drive that
00:36:11
home later in the book that it does increase our efficiency at kind of gaining information
00:36:15
and communicating information. The alphabet's facilitation of novel thoughts. Writing is
00:36:22
thinking, right? And we've talked about this before, like when we write something down,
00:36:26
it changes the way we think about it, whether we like it or not. So writing is thinking.
00:36:31
And then you get in this idea that the novice readers ease of acquiring the system. And really,
00:36:37
I mean, we're teaching our kids to read right now, like, and we've done it, we're on number
00:36:40
four. And it's crazy. Like, wow, it's complicated. And you have to teach them the difference
00:36:45
between there and there and why they're spelled different and why they mean different things.
00:36:49
When you think about it, it's actually not that hard. Like it really isn't that complicated.
00:36:55
And then some of you who are who speak more of a Latin based language, I think it's even
00:36:59
easier in that, right? Like, so the ones where the root meanings actually stay consistent
00:37:04
and then you change the ends and things like that. I think English actually makes it more
00:37:07
complicated. What is it, Mike? I think German makes it even more complicated. Like, you
00:37:12
know, the Germanic languages do just crazy stuff. And I think she calls this out here
00:37:16
as that finishes like the craziest one. It just does absolutely wonky, wonky things.
00:37:22
At this point, let's talk about Socrates. Well, the other thing I want to mention with
00:37:28
what you just just shared there. So I, our youngest Adelaide is learning, learning to
00:37:37
read. And we've learned from previous experience because she's our fifth. Some of our kids like
00:37:45
picked it up really quick. Some of them took a while. They all got it. They all read great.
00:37:50
So never really worried about it. But last night, after reading this book, I'm sitting
00:37:55
there on the living room floor reading with Adelaide. And like, well, let's read this
00:38:00
book together. You do the voice for this character. I'll do the voice for this other character.
00:38:05
And seeing her sound out the words and actually read, I had this context of all this stuff
00:38:11
that was going on in her tiny little brain. And I was like, this is amazing. I agree with
00:38:16
you there, right? Like, I, because I've thought about my children as I've read this book and
00:38:19
like the way they learn to read and things they mess up and things they get right and
00:38:23
all that. It is amazing. Like I agree with you. Yeah. Okay, so Socrates, Socrates was
00:38:29
against the spread of written language. And why was he against the spread of written language?
00:38:35
Well, there were three specific objections, but really it ties back to the fact that ancient
00:38:39
Greeks had amazing ability to recall information. And so personally, I just think he was really
00:38:44
good at something. And something came along that made that thing not as important. And
00:38:49
he was not happy about it. The three objections were the inflexibility of the written award,
00:38:59
the destruction of memory and the loss of control over a language. I think there's actually
00:39:07
a little bit of validity to some of this stuff, specifically the destruction of memory, because
00:39:12
when you have to memorize all these things, you are able to do it. Your brain adapts to
00:39:20
absorb information a certain way and recall a certain way when you can just write it down
00:39:25
and you have a record and you can go look it up. It's different. And that is exponentially
00:39:30
more the case in our digital world today, where lots of people don't know things because
00:39:40
they can go look them up. And that's contributed to the fact that we can only remember six characters
00:39:46
of a phone number instead of the whole thing, stuff like that. So I do think there's something
00:39:52
to this, but it's definitely a bit of an old man yells at cloud. And it's interesting because
00:39:57
Socrates was against it. His mentee Plato was kind of ambivalent like, I could take
00:40:03
it to leave it whatever I see both sides. His mentee Aristotle love to read. So Socrates
00:40:10
was never going to win this fight. I'm not sure why he would pick this hill to die on,
00:40:16
but he did. Yeah, the hardest one I have for him is she says later here that his concerns
00:40:23
are disarming, but they're really not. It's the third one that he calls out is this he
00:40:29
passionately advocated the unique role that oral language plays in the development of
00:40:32
morality and virtue. And I like that one just doesn't I don't understand why like oral
00:40:39
language and speech plays so much more in morality and virtue in his mind. Like I would
00:40:44
love to, you know, if I cared more, I would love to understand that more because I just
00:40:49
don't see, I don't see the difference there, but I think it's interesting how against
00:40:55
it was. And I agree with you that I think a big part of this was, I mean, we're speculating
00:41:02
on somebody that's, you know, thousands of years old at this point, but you know, I
00:41:07
think there's a lot of like, I'm really steeped in this culture of the oral tradition and
00:41:13
we debate and we discuss and we do all this stuff. And then you're bringing this new technology
00:41:18
in and we see this all the time. Oh, this new technology is going to change everything.
00:41:22
I don't want it to do that, right? Like it's going to it's going to mess with my oral tradition.
00:41:26
It's going to mess with our debate. It's going to mess with what we're going to do. And instead
00:41:29
of us going to a room in dialoguing and having that debate, we're now going to go and sit
00:41:35
in the library and read books and we're not going to dialogue anymore. And that like just
00:41:39
blew his mind in terms of in terms of that. So that was the same argument that the clergy
00:41:45
had with the printing press too. It's like, well, we have the Bible in Latin. We're the
00:41:49
only ones who understand it. We're the experts. Now everybody's got it. Everybody's an expert.
00:41:54
This isn't good. Yeah, I think one of the areas where I don't know if he articulated
00:41:58
it this well, but it comes into my mind is the idea of I do think we as a society don't
00:42:05
memorize enough. Yeah, we don't try to put enough into our brains and keep it there.
00:42:11
Whereas the oral tradition would require you to do that. Oh, if I want to go talk elegantly
00:42:16
about this, I have to know the stuff. And I mean, I fall victim to this all the time.
00:42:20
Well, I don't need to know it. It's it's in my obsidian vault. Like I don't need to know
00:42:23
it. I can go look it up. I can Google it. I can ask AI. I can do whatever it is. That
00:42:28
does us a disservice. I think that if we were able to know more and have it memorize, I
00:42:35
think that we better better for us. 100% agree. All right. Ready to go to the next section?
00:42:43
Part two. All right. So part two is how the brain learns to read over time. And the first
00:42:52
chapter here is chapter four, the beginnings of reading development or not. The reason for
00:42:57
the or not is that there is a huge gap between kids who come from homes where they are encouraged
00:43:04
to read and kids who come from homes where they are not encouraged to read the gap. She
00:43:09
said at one point is somewhere something like 32 million words. By the time the kids are
00:43:17
in kindergarten, which is a that's a lot. And this chapter kind of explains why that's
00:43:24
a big deal. A lot of science in this one, just a couple of things, I guess, to kind of pick
00:43:32
out here, reading to your child at an early age makes the connection between reading stories
00:43:37
and feeling loves. So if you want to instill love for reading, do it early around 18 months,
00:43:43
there's a major breakthrough. And that's when children learn that everything has a name.
00:43:47
Never really thought about that before. That was kind of interesting. Learning about the
00:43:50
feelings of others is not simple, even for a lot of adults, but reading stories actually
00:43:56
is a big boost to that. And the ability to learn is tied to the brain's ability to produce
00:44:03
myelin. Now, are you familiar with myelin? Have you heard that before? Okay. So I first
00:44:08
came across this concept when I read deep work by Kale Newport, because he talked about
00:44:13
how when you're doing deep focused work, your brain produces more of the myelin, which is
00:44:17
what helps the neurons fire faster and cleaner. So that's the process that's going on in the
00:44:23
brain that helps you learn. So more myelin is good. Now, your brain may not produce it
00:44:32
as well as other brains. And like, you really can't do anything with that. But well, I guess,
00:44:39
you know, not to get to part three of the book anyways. But the big thing here for me is that
00:44:45
the areas of the brain associated with the integration, divisional, verbal, and auditory
00:44:48
information. And that part of the brain is called the angular gyrus. That doesn't get
00:44:53
sufficiently myelinated until between five and seven years old. So before five and seven,
00:44:59
all of the stuff that happens in the brain, which allows you to read because it is a combination
00:45:05
of all of those different skills, the visual, the verbal and the auditory. All of that has
00:45:10
to come together in order for you to learn how to read. And that happens somewhere between
00:45:15
five and seven years old. So if your kids not reading any kindergarten, don't forget about
00:45:18
it. Yeah, exactly. This is one of those places where when she gets into logistic or sorry,
00:45:26
phonological development, semantic development, syntactic development, morph morphological
00:45:31
development, these are interesting to me. But this is where she went into like academic
00:45:37
mode a little bit too strong for me. And I just wasn't, I wasn't that interested. So
00:45:41
I kind of, I guess there was another one, pragmatic development. But like, these are,
00:45:46
interesting to me to reflect on my children and what they're getting out of the fact that
00:45:52
we are reading to them and those kinds of things. But my bigger interest in this chapter was
00:45:56
the overall idea of, I've always heard that it's good to read to your kids. I've always
00:46:02
heard that you should read to your kids, right? And there's a bunch of different reasons why
00:46:06
you should do that. This gave it like the boost. It was like, oh, like here, here's why
00:46:11
you should read to your end. And it's like, she's built the developer, the trust with me,
00:46:16
that I'm like, okay, I'm gonna actually pay attention to what she's saying here. And I'm
00:46:19
gonna actually care about why I should read, I should read to my kids. So like that was,
00:46:25
that was good for me. It also made me like sad. You know, when I think about this chapter,
00:46:31
and then I think about the, the kids who grew up and they don't have books and the kids
00:46:35
who grew up and they're not read to and, you know, she makes a statement here, when words
00:46:40
are not heard, concepts are not learned. When syntactic forms are never encountered, there
00:46:45
is less knowledge about the relationship of the events of a story. And like, this is just
00:46:50
on the sheer, you know, you talked about the 30 with 32 million words or whatever it is,
00:46:54
right? Like, so there's, there's that idea in itself, but then there's also the creativity
00:46:59
side of it. Like, I think about like, you know, we read, read to our kids, and then they come
00:47:03
back and they're, they're acting like the knight, or they're acting like the, the monster
00:47:08
or they're doing whatever. And there's this whole creativity side of it that those, that
00:47:11
exposure gives them. And if you're not read to, like, I think, how do I say this? It forces
00:47:18
you to make a mind picture. Like, I don't care whether you're three years old, or whether
00:47:22
you're 37, or whether you're 104. It forces you to make a mind picture of what's happening
00:47:27
in the book. And if you're not forced to make that mind picture, you don't make the
00:47:31
mind picture. So like, I think it just made me a little bit sad when I'm, when I'm reading
00:47:37
this and thinking to myself, man, like, there's a whole group of young people out there by
00:47:42
no fault of their own. They're not exposed to books. They're not read to. They just don't
00:47:47
have this development that I think is critical. And I think we see the latent effects of this
00:47:53
as they, as they grow up. So she did a really good job convincing me of, of the need for
00:48:01
this, even though I was, I was a captive audience at the start of it. So I thought chapter four
00:48:06
was hit hard. Yeah, and just to extend that a little bit, you know, if you were from a
00:48:15
disadvantaged position, you can be upset about that and say that's not fair, or you can take
00:48:22
control of your situation where you're at. I mean, yeah, this does paint a picture of
00:48:28
this, this gap that exists at the beginning. But she ends the book and when she talks about
00:48:33
dyslexia, with some of the most successful people in the world who weren't able to read
00:48:40
until much later. So just because you had a bad start doesn't mean that you have to finish
00:48:45
poorly. So if you feel like you're, you're in that position, it's, it's not all all doom
00:48:50
and gloom, you have more agency there, maybe than you, you realize, but as a parent, yeah,
00:48:54
you want to set your kids up for success and do whatever you can for them. And she makes
00:48:58
a really compelling case that one of the best things you can do for your kids is to read
00:49:02
to them. Yep, absolutely.
00:49:04
All right, so the next chapter is chapter five, the natural history of reading development.
00:49:13
And this one talks about the different types of readers. There are five emerging pre readers,
00:49:18
novice readers, decoding readers, fluent comprehending readers and expert readers. She talks about
00:49:22
the first couple in this chapter and then the next chapter talks about the, the others.
00:49:27
And I don't know that I really want to go into all of the different characteristics of
00:49:30
these different, different, uh, classifications of readers, but a couple of interesting points
00:49:36
here. Fluency is being able to utilize all the special knowledge a child has about a word,
00:49:42
its letters, letter patterns, meanings, grammatical functions, roots and endings, fast enough
00:49:46
to have time to think and comprehend. That is a great definition of the word fluency,
00:49:52
though she says in the book, I think that there's no like standard agreed upon definition.
00:49:57
She shows a couple of different ones. This is the one I jotted down that because I think
00:50:00
this is really good. The goal of learning to read is to understand what message the author
00:50:07
is communicating and then have the time to think about it, understand what they're saying
00:50:12
and then respond to it. So this is like a book and book in my opinion to what's the name
00:50:19
of it? How to read a book? Mortimer Adler. Okay. Link for a second. Mortimer Adler. I hated
00:50:24
that book when I read it. I was Corey Hicks in reading Preston the Squid when I read how
00:50:28
to read a book and I was like, I never want to pick this up again. It is so boring. It's
00:50:32
300 pages. I already know how to read a book, leave me alone old man. And as I went on from
00:50:38
that book years later, I was like, that was actually really profound. Those four levels
00:50:42
of reading that he talked about, that made a lot of sense. And the more I read, the more
00:50:45
I understood the importance of being able to work a book like that. And that has definitely
00:50:52
influenced how much I've been able to get out of the books that I read from that point
00:50:57
on. Now, I don't think Preston the Squid is going to have that same level of effect, but
00:51:03
you can see that it is laying the foundation for like, if how to read a book is the tactical,
00:51:10
this is how you argue with the author and make it your own. Preston the Squid is the science
00:51:15
behind why that works. So I guess, having read how to read a book that gave me context
00:51:20
for the what was actually happening. And then in this section specifically, she's talking
00:51:26
about the science behind it. Oh, I get it now. Like another thing she talked about here,
00:51:31
which I thought was fascinating. And I totally thought of you when when I read this is comprehension
00:51:35
monitoring, I would wager to guess that there are a few students where you if you could
00:51:40
open up their brains and download some knowledge into the matrix style, you would inject into
00:51:45
them comprehension monitoring, which is knowing when you need to reread a text in order to
00:51:50
comprehend it, because then you will do well on the test. This is one of the things that
00:51:56
it actually made me think about the way I read is it's not just words flying past.
00:52:02
It's do I actually understand this? Do I actually understand this? And what I'll tell you is
00:52:06
I was not effective at standardized testing when I was coming up through young grades
00:52:14
in middle school and high school, because I was not good at this. Like I could read a
00:52:19
passage, but I couldn't retain it and apply it then like in comprehend it in a way like
00:52:26
I had to go back and reread it. I had to go back and reread it. So I now know that's
00:52:30
like I needed to know the question that way I was actively reading, because I'm not the
00:52:34
most active reader in the world. So like, but I did no idea of that when I was young,
00:52:40
I just knew that like I don't like the English part of this like the English part of the exam
00:52:44
is terrible when I wish I didn't have to take it. I'm more of a math guy, right? Like that
00:52:48
was the way I had always lumped it in, but it was really that idea of I didn't have that
00:52:53
comprehension idea of am I actually picking up on this am I actually picking up on this
00:52:58
and it's just a it's if I wish I knew then what I knew now, you know, kind of a thing
00:53:05
because I would change that I would I would actually do some things differently. Other
00:53:09
than that, I didn't really get a ton of stuff out of this chapter. So I mean, it was it
00:53:16
was fine, but nothing really much came out of this one for me.
00:53:19
All right. Let's go on to the next one then. So chapter six is the unending story of readings
00:53:29
development. And this talks about the timeline of the of reading that has the the different
00:53:39
milliseconds on the the timeline and the different brain modes. That's interesting, but I don't
00:53:45
know that there's a whole lot I do with that prior to the the next section, I guess. But
00:53:52
the three major jobs of the reading brain, I feel like are fairly important. And that
00:53:55
is recognizing patterns, planning, strategy, and feeling. So this is interesting because
00:54:04
you don't really think of when I am reading a book like Prowston the squid, this is helping
00:54:09
me develop the ability to plan strategy and feel more deeply. Yeah. And I I guess, you
00:54:20
know, the the takeaway from this is if you really want to do the most with what you've
00:54:28
got to work with, readings got to be a part of the equation. It's it's easy to see for
00:54:34
me anyways, understanding this why that old adage readers are leaders or I came across
00:54:40
a statistic, which is actually the genesis of the bookworm podcast that the most successful
00:54:45
CEOs, one of the common traits they had was that they read 24 books a year. So basically
00:54:50
two books a month and do the math. Well, if we read a book every two weeks, that's probably
00:54:56
two a month. Yep. So you want to show up on a podcast and talk to me about this? Well,
00:55:01
is an accountability mechanism? Well, that's great. That's great. I mean, I think that's
00:55:05
that's so that's part of the reason why I do this. You think about those recognizing
00:55:09
patterns, planning, strategy, and feeling. If I think about the books that we read on
00:55:14
here and the reason why I listened to bookworm before I became, you know, cohost on this on
00:55:18
the show is because I was trying to figure out what are the patterns across people that
00:55:23
I don't know if I respected is too strong of a word, but that had done good things before
00:55:28
me. Okay, so you've done these good things before me. Like are there patterns I can pick
00:55:31
up across these books? Then I'm thinking about what am I going to do in the future? That's
00:55:35
your planning strategy part. And then we read whole, whole books that are really about like
00:55:39
go get them at a boy, like, you know, climb the mountain kind of a thing. So it's like
00:55:44
these three things connect directly to to what we do and how we try to apply these things
00:55:50
to our life. So I'm I'm good on that. She makes a statement in here that I think changes.
00:55:57
It's like the the core component of the book. And I know it's I she probably wouldn't say
00:56:01
that. But for me, it's the core component of the book. The fluent comprehending reader's
00:56:04
brain is on the threshold of attaining the single most essential gift of the evolved
00:56:08
reading brain time. And I think about that and I go, what on earth does that mean? And
00:56:13
then she unpacks it as we as we go through this that like you're trying to read quickly.
00:56:21
So that's your fluent comprehending read quickly with understanding. So you have the
00:56:26
time milliseconds might not it's not a minute. It's not a hundred years. It's not anything
00:56:31
like it's milliseconds to then apply that and recognize a pattern and do do do do do.
00:56:37
And this is a really interesting idea to me. Like why do why do we read? Why do we want
00:56:42
to be a good reader? Why do we want to be a fluent reader? It's because then I can make
00:56:45
the connections that I need to make. Then I can actually apply this and I can do things
00:56:49
like recognize pattern playing strategy and feel. It's such a interesting idea. Like I
00:56:57
just think it's such a cool a cool idea that I had never thought about when I thought about,
00:57:01
you know, why why do I want to become a good reader? Oh, so I have that time to make connections.
00:57:06
I have that time to play and I have that time to feel it's a it's a really cool idea.
00:57:10
Yeah, and that's that's kind of what's explained on that timeline of reading with the different
00:57:13
milliseconds and she's got a visual in the book of the different areas of the brain that light
00:57:17
up at different points along that that timeline. But ultimately how that gets expressed. I think
00:57:24
she has a single sentence which beautifully encapsulates this. We bring our life experiences
00:57:30
to the text and the text changes our experience of life. So what you read changes who you are
00:57:37
and who you are influences what you read, which is why I think everybody should choose books like
00:57:45
this to wrestle with even if it's uncomfortable. And I can say that because I've had to do the
00:57:50
same thing myself without a read a book. Yeah, I hated that book when we read it. I was like,
00:57:56
why in the world are we reading this? We've read 41 books already. We know how to read.
00:58:03
It was the driest, most boring book I have ever read. It's probably also one of the most
00:58:07
influential. But it wasn't until months and years after I read that that I realized what it did to
00:58:13
me. And I was like, Oh, wait, I think I've heard about this before. Oh, yeah, those four levels
00:58:18
are reading. I see how that's getting played out in my life now. Yeah, so she she ties back
00:58:23
into something else, Mike, that I want to have a direct confrontation with you with about. So
00:58:28
okay, are you ready for this? I mean, just gear up. I'm giving you the I have no idea, but sure.
00:58:33
She talks about Middle Earth, Narnia Hogwarts, and developing metaphor, inference, analogy,
00:58:40
right? All these things. Mike, you don't like to read fiction. You are an anti fiction person,
00:58:48
just like I am an anti physical book person. Right. And while we can exist on this earth
00:58:55
and in harmony, we should have this conversation. Why don't you read fiction books? That's a great
00:59:05
question. And I think at this point, actually, I'm not anti fiction. It's just the fiction books are
00:59:11
never the ones that I'm excited to pick up and read. I have several fiction books that I want to read.
00:59:18
Toby, Joshua, Rachel, they all love fiction books. And I see them reading them and they talk
00:59:25
about how great the stories are. And I pick them up and I'm like, I'm going to read this one. And
00:59:29
then I start reading it. And it just isn't isn't doing it for me. And the argument, you can't make
00:59:35
the argument that I should be reading those fiction books because of the empathy that it's going to
00:59:39
develop in me. We talked, I even made the argument earlier about how it helps kids understand things
00:59:45
from other people's perspectives. So if you want to give me an action item for that, you can. I will
00:59:50
probably fail at it, but I am willing to try again. I can't, I can't, I don't think it's fair to give
00:59:55
you an action to read a fiction book. I think though, no, no, no, I think it is. Do it. Do it. Mike,
01:00:01
read a fiction book. It's going in the oven. My big thing is like, don't read a whole fiction book,
01:00:06
read a fiction short story. Like find, find sure. Like, have you ever, do you know, did you ever hear
01:00:12
of a book called The Velt? All right, I'll send it to you. I'll send it. It's a book from a long
01:00:17
time ago. It actually is very timely today. And you'll understand why, why we do it. But it's a short
01:00:23
story. And it's a really interesting take on the world at the time. And then it's very applicable
01:00:30
to right now. But I just think there's a both and here, right? Like, in what I struggle with,
01:00:37
she talks about metaphor, inference, and analogy. And what I, what it made me do is it made me go,
01:00:43
do I read fiction books to actually think about metaphor, inference, and analogy? Or do I just
01:00:48
read them to be entertained? Like, do I, do I just want to go into another world and like kind of
01:00:53
escape what we're doing? And I think most of the time, that's what I do. And this is where I've
01:00:58
always, you know, for lack of a better way to put it, like poo-pooed, you know, literary analysis.
01:01:06
And like these lit classes where it's like, we're going to take this person's work and we're
01:01:09
going to study the in-depth meaning of this work. And I've been like, why? Like, let's just be,
01:01:14
let's just have fun. Like, let's just entertain this. And, and, but I think there's something there.
01:01:18
And I, and I think it happens more than we realize is you're reading this, this fiction book.
01:01:25
And you're really comparing, oh, well, how does that relate to my life? Or, oh, how does that relate
01:01:30
to the way somebody else handled this in a different context or in a different book? And
01:01:34
how did he develop this world versus this world? And I think, like, so one of the books that really
01:01:40
kind of just wrecked my, why world in terms of doing this is have you, have you read Ready Player
01:01:45
One? Okay, so Ready Player One, you'd get a kick out of it because you're a child of the 80s,
01:01:51
like I am. So, so you'd get a kick out of Ready Player One. I think, I think it'd be one for you.
01:01:57
Don't watch the movie first. Read, read, read the book first. I promise you. But it's a, you really
01:02:04
kind of place yourself in the world, at least I did. And you're like, what would it be like
01:02:09
to be in this world? Like, what would it be like to be in this world and kind of go from there?
01:02:13
So, the short story would be the, the long story would be Ready Player One. It's, it's nerdy enough
01:02:18
that I think you'd like it. And I'll get off my, my fiction soapbox now. Okay. So, you'll have to
01:02:27
send me the links for those so I can put them in the, the show notes. I will, for sure. But Ready Player
01:02:33
One, I, that one I have. And you know what, Corey, I'm going to buy this right now. It will be
01:02:43
here Sunday, December 21st. As we record this, that will be before the episode comes out.
01:02:48
But there's my Christmas fiction book. And if, if you hate it, blame it on the audience,
01:02:54
not me. Not sure that's how that works, but okay. All right. Ready to move on to the next one?
01:03:04
I am. Okay. So let's talk about dyslexia. Actually, it's not just dyslexia. Chapter, or part three
01:03:11
is when the brain can't learn to read. Chapter seven is dyslexia's puzzle and the brain's design.
01:03:18
So this one does talk a bit about dyslexia. And I find it fascinating how she talks about this.
01:03:28
Mentiones that dyslexia is not a reading disorder since the brain was never intended to read. Very
01:03:33
interesting point. Never thought about it that way before. And there's lots of potential sources
01:03:38
of dyslexia. So some of the ones she mentions here are a flaw in the older structures of the,
01:03:43
of the brain, a failure to achieve automaticity. So that's basically the efficiency on the timeline
01:03:49
that she talked about in the last chapter, an impediment in the circuit connections among the
01:03:54
structures, a completely different circuit being formed for reading, or the hard one, multiple
01:04:00
structures, multiple deficits, and multiple subtypes. So basically, you're never going to find a single
01:04:07
cause for this, but kind of hears, you know, what, what happens. I liked the definition of
01:04:16
disconnection syndrome, which is when the different parts of the brain necessary for a given function
01:04:21
are cut off from one another, causing the function to break down. So this is really at the heart of
01:04:26
what she's talking about mentioned earlier, you've got the visual, you've got the auditory,
01:04:31
all these different parts coming together when you learn to read. So if one of those
01:04:36
isn't functioning correctly, it can cause the whole system to not work. And that's basically what
01:04:42
happens with with dyslexia and brain scans of children with dyslexia show that the brain actually
01:04:48
creates a completely different reading circuit. And she's got lots of examples of those
01:04:54
potential circuits that could be created based on the different deficiencies inside the book,
01:04:58
which is really interesting. I think the larger point she alludes to here, which is kind of fast
01:05:06
and fascinating, is that readers with dyslexia use far more right brain structures. So the larger
01:05:12
point she kind of drives at in the next chapter specifically is the right side of the brain is
01:05:18
the one that is more creative. So dyslexia in a way can just kind of push you in a different
01:05:25
direction and you develop strengths in other areas, which is really cool. And I love one other
01:05:31
phrase here, learning to read. So this is kind of like, what could go wrong, right? This specific
01:05:37
sentence is awesome. Learning to read like Red Sox baseball is a wonderful thing that
01:05:42
can go wrong any number of reasons. And that's a great taste of her writing style.
01:05:50
So Mike, help me remember, right brain is creative, left brain is analytical. Am I
01:05:56
thinking about that right? Okay, I was trying to remember that. I think one of the important
01:06:02
parts is when you get into part three of this book is she has a kid with dyslexia and it's part
01:06:09
of her family as well. Like, and she describes how dyslexia has, you know, been part of her
01:06:16
great grandfather and then it kind of moved down through her thing. So she's passionate about this.
01:06:21
The other one is like, you can very much see how she's trying to apply this in her academic
01:06:27
work now. So she's done all this work on writing. She's in all this work on reading. She's done all
01:06:32
of this work on alphabets and all that stuff. And now you can see where she's moved into. She's
01:06:37
moved into this idea of like, let's apply this to understanding dyslexia and understanding and
01:06:42
trying to help people who struggle with dyslexia to overcome this. And she's, I love authenticity.
01:06:53
I love the fact that people are intellectually honest about certain things. She talks about it
01:06:57
at one point time that only time and more evidence will tell the truth, right? Like, so she's not
01:07:01
trying to come out with this book and say, we figured it out. Here you go, done, which if you can do
01:07:07
that, that's great. But she's just saying, we understand this is a problem. And here are the
01:07:11
connections we're trying to make and we're trying to understand this. And this is what we know so
01:07:15
far and time's going to tell the truth. I actually think this stuff while it really has no direct
01:07:23
impact on my life, you know, kind of thing. I mean, I may have students who struggle with dyslexia.
01:07:29
That's probably the closest connection that I have to this. This is like the most interesting
01:07:33
section of the book to me is like, this is just cool to think about like, Oh, because of all this
01:07:39
stuff I told you before, there can be challenges with this. And look what it does. Like, it impacts
01:07:45
in this way and like it challenges in this way. And then here are all the like latent effects on this.
01:07:50
And I think the reason why I like this so much is because it makes me think in systems. It's like,
01:07:54
there's all these systems, the late effects and not the late effects and all that stuff that comes
01:07:59
through here. So she talks about it in one situation. There's a there's a gap in time or an
01:08:04
asynchrony between their visual and auditory processes and how that like plays out in their
01:08:09
information processing and how it plays out into the implications. I just think she does a really
01:08:14
good job talking about dyslexia and then she goes into into a section there and that's where you
01:08:20
got the Red Sox baseball quote. If I had five minutes to talk to parents, teachers and parents
01:08:25
everywhere and then blah and like she just unpacks she just like unloads and I was like, man, we found
01:08:32
her. We found her thing. Like, we found her thing that she's super passionate about. It's just a
01:08:37
really it's a really good section on kind of the the background of dyslexia. Yeah, well, that
01:08:43
actually leads into the next chapter. So let's let's go there and continue this conversation.
01:08:48
Chapter eight is jeans, gifts and dyslexia. And one of the reasons that I think this is personal
01:08:54
is not just that she has a child with dyslexia, but also she identifies some of these traits in
01:09:03
herself, even though she doesn't have dyslexia. So she mentions in chapter eight, the left hemisphere
01:09:10
tends to be more precise and time efficient, which makes reading easier, but creativity harder.
01:09:16
Okay, and that time efficiency, if you don't have that, she talks about how it influenced her ability
01:09:22
to maintain tempo in music. This, okay, so I'm obviously left brained at this point because
01:09:29
one of the things that drives me crazy is when people just cannot keep a beat. And I'm not a drummer,
01:09:36
you know, that's that's not how I'm wired. But I know people who, you know, if they play guitar
01:09:42
and sing by themselves, they sound amazing. But when you try to sit down and jam with them,
01:09:45
they cannot walk in and it's like, dude, I don't even know where to go with you.
01:09:52
And I never made the connection that was a heightened right brain, decreased left brain,
01:09:58
sort of a thing. But I think that those, the things that contribute to dyslexia, like you,
01:10:06
you can kind of see, you know, the letters are scrambled or not, you know, that's oversimplifying
01:10:11
it. It's not that simple. But you can, you know, you can clarify, I think, with enough testing,
01:10:18
if somebody has dyslexia. But at what point do you cross that threshold? And it's not just
01:10:24
dyslexia that this shows up in this influences everything in your entire world. So I think it's
01:10:30
really important to understand yourself, to understand the way that you're wired. And then
01:10:38
what do you do with that? You don't try to minimize your weaknesses. You, because that's one of the
01:10:47
the, I think natural reactions is, well, this is a weakness. I'm just going to work on this
01:10:53
until it's not a weakness anymore. And then you just become kind of average at everything.
01:10:59
I think the better approach is to recognize where your strengths are, figure out how you can
01:11:02
leverage those doesn't mean you don't work on your, your weaknesses at all. But what are you
01:11:08
optimizing for here? And some of the most successful people in history have had dyslexia. Thomas Edison,
01:11:17
Leonardo da Vinci, Albert Einstein, she said, we're all considered to have had dyslexia. And I never
01:11:24
heard that before. There were lots of other examples. And there was one story specifically she mentioned
01:11:29
about the race car driver, I forget the person's name. But yeah, the point was they had a hard time
01:11:38
learning to read, but they were very successful in other ways, because they learned to lean into
01:11:42
the, the things that actually worked for them. And I feel like that is a great strategy for
01:11:49
absolutely everybody. She doesn't frame it as that. But that's how I read this section. And I'm
01:11:54
like, Oh, this is totally applicable to everybody everywhere. It's not just, you know, what do you
01:11:58
do with if you know somebody with with dyslexia? I feel like this is a very, it's not cleanly
01:12:04
generalizable because of the way that it's packaged. But there's definitely a lot of, a lot of stuff
01:12:10
that, that we can apply to our own lives from this. And this is consistent with, you know, you think
01:12:15
about somebody who's blind or deaf or something like that, where a lot of times that their inability
01:12:22
to see gives them a heightened sense of hearing, you know, or, you know, like, like those kind of
01:12:27
things, it's, it's, it's a very similar idea to hear to me is, Oh, my brain doesn't make connections
01:12:32
in terms of reading and writing, you know, like yours might, or like understanding that alphabet,
01:12:37
or whatever it might be. But I've, I can account for that in other ways. And it's allowed me to
01:12:42
develop these things in this other way. And I think it's just really, really cool to see
01:12:48
how this applies or that same idea applies in the, the brain of a reader who doesn't read like
01:12:55
everybody else does or makes connections differently or whatever. I think that's a really neat point.
01:13:01
I'm ready to go to nine. All right. The last chapter of the book,
01:13:09
which is titled conclusions. It's not a true conclusion, but really it's a subtitle here from
01:13:17
from the reading brain to what comes next. And I'm not quite sure how to, how to summarize this,
01:13:26
this chapter, but this is where she starts to get into some of the digital stuff.
01:13:31
There were a couple of things in here that she mentioned, which got me thinking, but this book
01:13:35
was written so long ago that it doesn't cleanly map to where we are right now. She mentions that
01:13:41
as technology advances, our capacity for good or bad will be accidentally increased. I mean,
01:13:47
could totally understand and see that playing out. And she asks the question, well, the next
01:13:52
generation's capacity to find insights be altered. And I think absolutely it will be the technology
01:13:59
that we use, not just the, you know, what we read, but how we read it influences who we are. And
01:14:06
then it's gone beyond just reading now. It's, you know, the video and the audio and the TikToks
01:14:11
that you were mentioning earlier in garbage in garbage out, which I think, you know, this is
01:14:15
where you start to see the genesis of the idea she's turning around in her head and leading into
01:14:20
reader come home, the next book that she read, which is really, really good. I liked how she talks
01:14:26
about reading is an example of how the brain can go beyond itself, you know, the neuroplasticity,
01:14:30
who knows what we're actually capable of. New thoughts come more readily to a brain that has
01:14:35
already learned how to rearrange itself. And that I think I've seen evidence of in my own life too,
01:14:41
the more books I read, even if it's not related to the content that I read, the more ideas I'm able
01:14:46
to have, the better those ideas tend to be. Online literacy challenges, the traditional roles of author
01:14:51
and reader. And the point she's kind of making there is when everybody can just throw up a blog
01:14:56
post, the barrier to entry is pretty low. I actually don't think this is all bad, but I get the point
01:15:03
that she's talking about here. I would not be a writer if I had to go through a traditional
01:15:11
publishing route. I would not be a video producer if I did not have YouTube. I would not be a
01:15:15
podcaster if tools like transistor did not exist. You know, and I think that's actually a good thing
01:15:22
that people can unleash their creativity in those different ways. There's a bunch of stuff in here.
01:15:29
I guess the other thing here, the internet may cause people to not think for themselves. Yes,
01:15:34
absolutely. The digital world makes us used to getting information immediately. Absolutely,
01:15:39
we're not not patient anymore. And there's a quote here I like. I fear that many of our children
01:15:46
are in danger of becoming just what Socrates warned us against, a society of decoders of
01:15:50
information whose false sense of knowing distracts them from a deeper development of their intellectual
01:15:54
potential. I kind of feel like at this point, what do you do with that? You worry about yourself,
01:15:59
not everybody else. Do the best you can with what you've got. And then humans today don't need to
01:16:05
be binary thinkers. If two choices appear before you, there's usually a third. I love that idea.
01:16:10
I hate the whole binary model. This is my issue with goals. You either achieve it or you don't.
01:16:15
If you can get beyond there's just these two options. I feel like there's a whole
01:16:18
other world of possibilities there. Yeah, I'm going to start with your decoders of information
01:16:24
and not critical thinkers. And I worry that they're not even worried about being decoders
01:16:30
of information anymore. They're not even trying to get to that far where they try to understand.
01:16:35
And this is where I think media literacy matters so much. So you have that idea.
01:16:41
She calls out in a series of questions earlier, unguided information lead to an illusion of knowledge
01:16:47
and curtail us from the more difficult time consuming critical thought processes that lead to
01:16:50
knowledge itself. And I think this is something we're seeing with AI. This is something we're
01:16:55
seeing with all these models. We're letting it try to do the difficult time consuming process
01:17:02
to connect the dots and make make these different connections and we're not doing that. And I think
01:17:06
that's a worry. Now, I am pro AI when it comes to certain things. So I'll give you an example of this.
01:17:13
Mike and I are talking about red jacks. I don't think you going to AI and saying, hey,
01:17:19
here's what I want to do in red jacks. Help me with the syntax of this. I don't think you're doing
01:17:24
yourself a major disservice there. Like, I really just don't think you're doing it. Because what are
01:17:28
you going to do? Otherwise, you're going to go to a forum, you're going to look up the red jacks
01:17:31
syntax and you're going to figure it out from there. Or you're going to go read a manual and
01:17:35
you're going to because really what you're looking for is you're looking for the syntax.
01:17:38
And if you do that and you keep doing that and you keep doing it, whether it's AI, whether it's
01:17:42
the manual, whether it's a forum, whatever it is, you're going to learn how you need to write the
01:17:47
red jacks. It's a very formulaic process. That's very different than me reading your blog posts
01:17:53
in Marion Wolf's blog posts and reading somebody else's blog post and somebody else's blog post
01:17:58
and then making ideas that thread through that and connect, connect through that. That's a very
01:18:02
different thing. When you combine this with the idea that there's a worry, and I can't remember
01:18:08
if you and I've talked about this before or not. So if we have, I'm sorry, there's an idea that as
01:18:12
these AI tools continue to condense information, they're condensing wrong information. And then
01:18:21
they're essentially going to make themselves dumber that we're not like training them like,
01:18:26
Hey, what you just bit back there is wrong. The next AI model is then built on the wrong model.
01:18:33
And we continue to perpetuate this idea of or sorry, these wrong ideas or just this stuff that's
01:18:38
factually incorrect. And there's there's a chance that these AI models actually don't give us the
01:18:44
right thing a generation or two generations or three generations from now and they continue
01:18:48
to lose trust because they're not giving us the information. And I think this is something that
01:18:52
humans can easily identify, like, especially if you're an expert in the field or you're knowledgeable
01:18:57
about the field, you'll be like, wait, that's just way wrong. Like Mike doesn't make a show
01:19:02
about baking sourdough bread. Like he just doesn't do that. Like, and I know that because I follow
01:19:06
Mike, right? And he would talk about sourdough bread all the time. If you bake, if you made a
01:19:09
show about that. Whereas it, it gets this wrong information and then perpetuates it down. And I
01:19:14
think so I think even though this book was kind of pre the AI, you know, transition and all and
01:19:21
all that all those things, I think there's a lot of stuff in here that's really applicable to right
01:19:27
now. And that we can, we can think about these, these things right now in terms of how they,
01:19:33
how they impact us. I like then that she gets into the idea of how do we use this and how do we
01:19:39
apply this right in the transmission of knowledge, the children and the teachers of the future
01:19:43
should not be faced with that choice between the two. Like I like, like you said, it's not this
01:19:47
binary. It's we live in this world. How do we make the most of this world? This is what we live in.
01:19:53
We don't get to control that. We got to make the most of it. We got to do what's right,
01:19:56
right? For this. So for instance, you know, we shouldn't like should we listen to everything
01:20:02
with smart speed? This is what we talked about in the in the in the pressure, right? So this is
01:20:06
everything with smart speed and with, you know, silence removed or should I do everything through
01:20:12
a filter of somebody else that's filtering it for me? Or should I actually go and really wrestle
01:20:16
with the information and really like dig into that thing? And I think that the answer is some stuff.
01:20:22
Do they do the smart speed? Do the skip silence? Do do the summarized version of that other stuff?
01:20:27
Don't you need you need to dig into that and you have to make that choice. And are we teaching
01:20:32
people to make that choice? And so I think she ends the book really, really well in terms of
01:20:37
wrapping it up and tying back into to other things. And then she she doubles down,
01:20:43
triples down quadruples down. I don't know what it is. This gift of time to think beyond
01:20:48
just the text on the page and actually to make those connections and develop those thoughts.
01:20:52
I mean, I think she does a really good job, you know, wrapping it up.
01:20:57
Yeah, she asked the question in this chapter, how will technology change our neural pathways
01:21:01
in the future? So I think the important thing to recognize is that it is changing our neural
01:21:07
pathways. And then deciding for yourself, is this important or not? If it is important,
01:21:12
then don't shortcut. Put in the effort and force yourself to make sense of it. Don't just ask AI
01:21:20
for the the summary and make all these connections for me. And so with the regex thing, if I really
01:21:27
wanted to know regex, I should be reading the forms. I should be figuring it out. I'm not a web
01:21:34
developer. I will never need to know regex again, most likely. So just give me the answer. And then
01:21:41
I'll move on to what I am actually optimizing for the thing to be aware of, though, is that just
01:21:47
because I created this regex, I don't know regex. Okay, just because I can retrieve an answer does
01:21:53
not mean I am a knower of things. So decide for yourself what is actually worth knowing and chase
01:22:00
that with curiosity and don't shortcut that it's it's not a problem to be solved. And then you just
01:22:06
check the box and you move on to the next thing. It's something to be wrestled with as you develop
01:22:12
what you actually think about something beautiful, beautiful, well said. All right, well,
01:22:21
anything else from this book before we go to action items? Nope, I'm ready to go to action items.
01:22:27
All right, so other than the fiction book that you gave me, reading Ready Player One,
01:22:37
I have no action items from this book. And I think that's appropriate.
01:22:44
You don't either. That doesn't bother me at all. And again, I can't I don't even remember if my
01:22:49
action item comes from this book or something else that I saw. But I agree, like I don't have
01:22:55
many or any action items from this. So and I'm okay with that. All right. Well, let's go to
01:23:03
style and rating then. And I think the style of this book is amazing. I can totally understand
01:23:12
why if neuroscience isn't your thing, you probably aren't interested in this this topic. If you are
01:23:19
even vaguely interested in neuroscience and how it relates to the ability to read, I don't think
01:23:25
you could pick a better package. So Marianne Wolf is a phenomenal writer. You mentioned the
01:23:33
Bander Snatch previously, and like the tying together of the the worlds. So you mentioned,
01:23:40
let's see, Lord of the Rings, Narnia, and Harry Potter, right? And so she'll use like those three
01:23:47
things in a list. And then the next sentence she'll use she'll write a sentence in a way to
01:23:53
prove her point, where she'll reference like main characters from each of those three stories.
01:23:58
And the way that she does it, it doesn't add a whole bunch of length to the book. It doesn't
01:24:03
feel like just get to the point already. It's brilliantly woven together. It's a nonfiction book
01:24:11
that almost reads like a fiction narrative. It's interesting to read if you're interested at all
01:24:19
in the topic and the story that she is telling. And she says right at the beginning what it's about.
01:24:23
So I don't blame people who are like, nah, this isn't for me. But that's the difference I think
01:24:27
there is like she's not she's not holding the the powder until until the end. I agree. This is what
01:24:32
this is about. Now I'm going to tell you why I think this. So if you're interested in it all,
01:24:37
I think it's a I think it's a really, really good book. There is so much science in this book. If
01:24:42
you look at the back and all of the references, I mean, she has put in the work, she has a whole
01:24:47
bunch of colleagues. She's worked at places where they have whole programs devoted to this stuff.
01:24:53
She is the world's expert in this. If you had to pick one person, she's the she's the source.
01:25:01
And unlike a lot of other people that I have read, you know, they are the source for this
01:25:07
particular thing. And while I guess about a read what they wrote about it, very dry, very boring,
01:25:12
that's not Marianne Wolf at all. There's a lot of personality that comes through in the way that
01:25:17
she writes. And honestly, like, I can't think of a better author at like weaving together these
01:25:25
historical narratives with modern research with personal stories. I think it's interesting that,
01:25:34
you know, we go through this book and there are zero action items associated with it.
01:25:40
But like I said, I do view this as a book into how to read a book. Yeah, the how to read a book
01:25:45
is the how. Pressed in the squid is the why. And if you don't care about the why, you're going to
01:25:53
want to skip this one. If you are at all interested in the why, this book is amazing. The story and
01:25:59
science of the reading brain that it's exactly what it what it says on the on the tin. I am going
01:26:07
to give this book five stars. I was hesitating. I was kind of going back as I was reading it between
01:26:12
four and five. But having to wrestle with the fact that I think anyways, you didn't really like this.
01:26:19
I kind of clarified for me what this book was intended to do. And I recognize that it's not
01:26:26
going to be for everybody. So it's sort of like a five with an asterisk. But I, I really enjoy this
01:26:33
book. I really like Marianne Wolf. It's sort of the best version of what I expected from this.
01:26:42
I guess I feel a little bad because I didn't even consider the fact that maybe you wouldn't.
01:26:47
No, no, I'm better for having read it. So don't do that at all. Yeah, don't do that.
01:26:51
Okay, okay, good. So if you're if you're interested at all, especially in like the the neuroscience
01:26:57
behind reading and how this impacts how you read what you read. I don't think it's, you know,
01:27:04
very tactical, but it's it's really interesting. And I would recommend for that type of person,
01:27:11
you pick this one up. If you if the topic doesn't resonate with you, if you've read if you listen
01:27:16
to this episode, you got to this point, you're like, yeah, I know everything that I care to know
01:27:20
about reading in the brain, then skip this one. But if this is a topic of interest, this is a
01:27:26
great book. Yeah. All right, so I am so, so, so, so torn on this. Okay, so I'm going to address
01:27:35
a couple of things that you said. And then I have to try to work my way into a rating because as of
01:27:42
me talking right now, I don't know what I'm going to rate this book. So Bookworm, our tagline for
01:27:48
the for the show. Bookworm is dedicated to doing more than reading just just reading books. Mike
01:27:52
and Corey read a book every two weeks and discuss the ways the authors lessons apply to the rest.
01:27:56
Okay. We don't say that we read books that we like. You know, we just say we read a book and we apply
01:28:03
it to our lives, right? So I think about this and I say, okay, I read a book and I apply it to my life.
01:28:09
Having talked to you about this, this is an interesting book. It's an incredibly well-written
01:28:15
book. I could not this I could not agree with you more that like there is no qualm about the fact
01:28:21
that she is a great writer. There's no qualm about the fact that she is an expert in her field.
01:28:25
I've already said earlier that she takes complex academic topics that I'm sure she's written
01:28:33
tens of hundreds of however many papers on these complex academic topics in her research group,
01:28:38
and she's had grad students write a one and she takes it and she makes it packageable
01:28:42
to everyday people, non-academics, people that are just interested in neuroscience and reading
01:28:48
and all of these things dyslexia and all this stuff. She does a fantastic job. Absolutely
01:28:53
fantastic job. There's no way I'd read this book again. Absolutely zero way like you I mean you
01:29:00
have to pay me a decent amount of money for me to read this book again. And it's just because
01:29:07
I don't care. I'm not that interested in most of what she wrote. That's not a slide on her.
01:29:15
That's not even a slide on the book. That is a that is a thing that is acknowledging the
01:29:19
disconnection between my interest and this topic and what she wrote about. It's nobody's fault.
01:29:26
That's totally fine. I have nothing negative to say about what she did. And you've heard me
01:29:33
in the past. I will say negative things. I have no problem saying saying something negative like
01:29:38
I didn't like this section. I didn't like the way the author did this. I didn't like the structure.
01:29:41
I didn't like whatever it is. I have none of that. I have none of that. It was just a pure
01:29:46
disconnect between what I'm interested in and what she wrote about. Now one of the things you'll
01:29:52
acknowledge having listened to the episode is like I still got stuff out of this book.
01:29:56
Like I still got a decent amount of this book. And then what's important here too is I got a lot
01:30:01
out of the conversation that Mike and I could have around this book and like trying to make
01:30:06
connections here and trying to do you know the the application to life and those kind of things.
01:30:10
So that was important for me as well. So do I walk away from this book being like this was a
01:30:15
gigantic waste of my time and I wish I wouldn't have done it? No. Would I read the book again?
01:30:21
No. Absolutely not. I have no interest in reading the book again. Did I make my
01:30:26
idea integration board or my book on a page for this? No. Am I going to make an idea integration
01:30:31
board or book on a page for this? Absolutely not. Like I'm just not going to do it because
01:30:36
I don't see what's in this book connecting to the knowledge management or the knowledge
01:30:43
graph that I want to build in my life. I think there will be a summary page for this that says
01:30:49
this is what this book talks about. It was cool. Reddit for bookworm. Kind of a thing right? But
01:30:52
I'm not going to take the time that the you know I would do for other books or that I'm going to
01:30:57
do for other books. So this is where I get into a problem. Like I don't feel that it's fair
01:31:03
to give this book a low rating because it was a disconnect with what I'm interested in.
01:31:09
I really don't. But if you listen to this episode and then you see that I rate this
01:31:13
book like a four and a half you're going to be like wait what? Like this doesn't make any sense.
01:31:18
So I actually started to think about should we change the rating system of the show? And I was
01:31:23
like Corey you can't do that. We're on episode 239. But you can't you know you can't change the
01:31:29
rating system. But I was like there needs to be a rating system that says bra rating
01:31:35
based on Corey and then rating for the intended audience. Because I think if you rate this for
01:31:41
the intended audience it's easily a five star book. Like for the intended audience who is who
01:31:45
cares about neuroscience who cares about reading who cares about dyslexia like this is without
01:31:50
a doubt clearly a five star book. Hands down 100% five star book. But then what do I rate it Mike?
01:31:56
Like and this is an actual question. This is not me like buying time before I give it a number.
01:32:02
Mike what what should I rate this book because okay so so let's let's clarify the rating. I'm
01:32:07
glad you actually mentioned that because I just moved everything over to transistor and I was
01:32:10
thinking through like we've stuck to the numbers in the past. But my I think the best version of
01:32:17
these ratings is if you were to go on Amazon and leave a review how many stars would you give it.
01:32:24
So I actually think in transistor we should we should force ourselves to choose one two three four
01:32:29
or five stars and I'll just put the number of star emoji under the mics rating. So this is purely
01:32:35
Corey's rating. Okay so we can all of the the audio the hour and a half of talking that's the
01:32:41
justification for who it's for. Now go ahead and stamp it with whatever you think this book is
01:32:47
in your personal tier list. My problem is I would never do that. Like I would never stamp it with
01:32:52
just five stars. I would stamp it with five stars and then the asterisk is for the intended audience.
01:32:59
Like that's the I would have to do it that way because if you didn't let me do it that way I
01:33:03
can't stamp it five stars because then if you ask me about the book I'm not going to say it's a
01:33:07
five star book for me for me personally. So I don't know what to do. I mean my gut would say
01:33:13
out of respect for what she's done and her and like it's a five star book. Like I don't want anybody.
01:33:20
It's Corey's rating and we know that you don't like this so it can't be a five star book.
01:33:25
Yeah but like I it's just me like it's not you it's me right like this is purely one of those
01:33:30
it's not you it's me thing to where like for me to rate this like I mean it's definitely it's
01:33:35
definitely higher than a three. You know I mean I got to go four and like the only reason it's
01:33:41
getting the one star knock is because it didn't resonate with me and what I care about. So I'm
01:33:45
gonna go for I don't feel good about it. I'd feel much better about a five with an asterisk
01:33:50
and we took way too long for me to tell my rating so far.
01:33:55
No I think it's I think it's totally fine to say this is a great book for certain types of people
01:33:59
and it's not for me and to rate it lower. In fact I will probably do that at some point in the near
01:34:04
future. Okay that took time. All right. No no that's fine. Okay so let's put Prostin the Squid
01:34:12
on the shelf. What is next Corey? All right so the next book I don't know a ton about this book.
01:34:19
I looked at it online and thought it sounded cool. I read the description. I looked up the
01:34:24
people and said okay let's give it a shot. It's called hacking the human mind the behavioral
01:34:29
science secrets behind 17 of the world's best brands. I'm just intrigued with you know branding
01:34:36
and how those things lead to I don't know like how they how they mess with other people's minds and
01:34:44
can what we can apply to the things that we're doing in life Mike and just how we can take good
01:34:50
ideas and keep making them good. So this book is by Richard Schotten and then Michael Aaron Flicker.
01:34:58
So it's called hacking the human mind if you are reading along with us pick that one up that's
01:35:02
gonna be our next episode. Mike what's after that? So I have a question about that name by the way
01:35:07
because Michael Aaron Flicker on the Amazon page. Michael Aaron is all one word but the first A and
01:35:14
Aaron is capitalized like it's a second name. Is that correct? So on the actual cover of the book
01:35:21
Michael Aaron is the name and it doesn't it doesn't do but they use that like in all caps font.
01:35:27
So yes it's it's Michael Aaron. Right so in the Amazon listing okay yeah so it's all one word it's
01:35:34
kind of weird that it's capitalized in the middle kind of camel case in in the bio in the bio it's
01:35:41
all one word again with the capital A. So yeah I mean that's that's just a it's a nature of it.
01:35:47
Interesting okay so after that we're gonna read my gap book from last time and that is intentional
01:35:57
by Chris Bailey. Now I'm going to tell you right now Corey because I've read this book and I like
01:36:04
this book and there will be other podcasts coming out before this one probably where I talk about
01:36:08
this book. There is no pressure for you to rate this highly simply because I might. I'm picking this
01:36:17
one because it's timely. It's about to be released as we record this it will be released by the time
01:36:24
this episode I believe goes live or right before yeah I can't remember math is hard.
01:36:32
It's coming out at the beginning of January and I want to start to try to pick more timely books
01:36:41
that way. I feel like if people are gonna listen to the bookworm because they need a filter for
01:36:46
like which books are actually worth reading and it makes sense to do that kind of thing and
01:36:51
yeah I guess spoiler alert I've read this and and I like it and I think it's going to be a really
01:36:55
cool conversation so. Does this connect with the course he just put out? Oh you mean the course that
01:37:00
I helped him create? Yes it does. It does okay I assume so but I didn't want to I didn't want to
01:37:05
over assume but I assumed it connected. So the course the course talks about some of the models
01:37:09
and things that he talks about in this this book. It's not a just a different version of the the
01:37:15
book. The course includes a an assessment and then like a whole bunch of tactics for actually
01:37:22
applying the concepts that he'll talk about in the the book but it's a book about goal setting
01:37:28
that I don't hate. Okay that's that's uh my one sentence summary. There you go. I should put
01:37:34
that on the uh on the Amazon page. No he's got like Charles Duhigg and some many more fancy lads.
01:37:41
Yeah but he doesn't have the mind map guy right. Like that's what he does. Right okay you got any
01:37:49
gap books? No absolutely not. No I'm not. What about Bandersnatch? I thought you don't read that.
01:37:53
I said I'm going to read it. I didn't say I was going to read it as a gap book between now and
01:37:57
now and then to know no gap books intention. Well my gap book is going to be uh Ready Player One
01:38:03
which is on its way. There you go. I might read that with you just because it's fun and I want
01:38:07
to read it again. Okay I know nothing about this. I just know it was a big deal back in the back
01:38:13
in the day and everybody talked about it but I never I never read it. I hope you're gonna like it.
01:38:17
I think I will. All right well thanks for listening. Uh if you want to recommend a book by the way
01:38:24
you can do that much more easily now by going to bookworm.fm/recommend it'll take you to the form.
01:38:30
You can put in the book the author um the link if you've got it so it's easier for us to find
01:38:37
but uh we'd love to get some recommendations. If you want to support the show that would be amazing.
01:38:45
We have a pro show which has an extended ad-free episode in a private feed. So today the pro show
01:38:54
we talked about my switch to the Apple Podcast app and how I surprisingly enjoyed it. Uh there's uh
01:39:03
also a bootleg feed which gets released right after we record this so usually that's about two
01:39:08
weeks before the episode goes live so if you want it hot off the press join the join the the membership
01:39:15
and you'll get access to the the pro pro feed and the bootleg feed you'll also get access to a
01:39:20
bookworm wallpaper and the video replay of the reading masterclass that I did uh two and a half
01:39:27
hour workshop on uh on how to read better and all of that is seven dollars a month you can go to
01:39:36
patreon.com/bookworm.fm or just bookworm.fm/pro and uh if you would love to support the show that
01:39:44
is a great way to do it. Thank you to all the pro members who are willing to throw some money
01:39:49
our way to help us keep this show going. If you're reading along with us pick up hacking the human
01:39:55
mind and we look forward to talking to you soon.