Bookworm
Transcripts
Episodes
Search
About
245: The Science of Storytelling by Will Storr
Show notes on bookworm.fm ↗
Scroll along with the audio
Click any line to jump to that moment.
00:00:00
This episode of Bookworm is brought to you by Vitalee, your co-pilot for AI-powered customer success.
00:00:04
Get a free pair of AirPods Pro when you book a qualified meeting at vitalee.io/bookworm.
00:00:11
Okay, a couple of items of follow-up here.
00:00:14
I've got two, which I guess I've been successful with, but start asking the
00:00:23
a question, which is really the "and what else?" I haven't had a whole lot of coaching opportunities in order to implement this,
00:00:30
but it is top of mind, and
00:00:34
I do find myself kind of digging a little bit deeper whenever I have
00:00:38
conversations with
00:00:40
with people. I don't know. It's kind of hard for me to describe the scenario where I've seen this come into play because like I said
00:00:47
It's not a true like one-on-one coaching scenario like we read about in the last book.
00:00:52
But there have been opportunities where like we're talking about things and I just
00:00:58
that's in the back of my mind
00:00:59
And you just kind of kind of keep digging and you figure out what the the actual issues are. The other one, Bandit's a good busy.
00:01:05
That one I've been successful with. That I feel like was pretty low-hanging fruit though.
00:01:10
Yeah, I still hate the fact that I am tempted to say it though.
00:01:17
It's hard to stop. It is hard to stop, and it has been busy.
00:01:24
Part of that is my crazy schedule. I went on vacation, then I went to a conference,
00:01:31
then I was back for basically two weeks, and as we record this I leave again on Sunday supposedly for another conference.
00:01:38
I say supposedly because we haven't had snow like all year here in the Midwest.
00:01:43
But we are forecasted to get 14 to 18 inches on Saturday night through Sunday.
00:01:49
And yeah, great timing. We'll see if I actually get out.
00:01:54
It's a weird time of the year because we've barely gotten any as well in Colorado.
00:02:00
And then we got like I think six or something the other day just like just got dumped on so it's a weird time of the year.
00:02:08
You've got one action item here posting the seven questions somewhere where you'll see them.
00:02:14
Did you do that?
00:02:15
I did. So for those of you who may not have listened to the last episode, the seven questions,
00:02:20
kickstart, awe, focus, foundation, lazy, strategic, and learning, those are the seven questions.
00:02:27
And what I did is I put those in my daily note because that made the most sense.
00:02:34
I was like, well, I could print this out and put it somewhere. I was like, or I could put it in my daily note.
00:02:38
And then I see them in my daily note when I when they come up.
00:02:40
So they're in my daily note. I don't know if they're going to have like a major impact.
00:02:44
I don't know if they are having a major impact or not.
00:02:46
I hopefully by just seeing them over and over again that will help me think about one or some of them more.
00:02:54
So yes, check Big Green Checkmark Gold Star for me.
00:03:01
Nice. We did pretty good on the follow up this time.
00:03:03
I know. I know. We don't do we don't do that great all the time, but this time we nailed it.
00:03:08
Yeah, I am curious why you think this was important enough to put in the daily note.
00:03:15
Like, do you really need to look at this every day as part of your daily note?
00:03:18
The daily note seems like prime real estate.
00:03:21
Yeah, you're probably right. It was the easiest place for me to put it where I knew I would see them.
00:03:28
Yeah, which is fine, but I guess I'm just kind of curious how often you're looking at that
00:03:33
and then how often you have opportunity to use that stuff. I'm sure it's actually pretty frequent.
00:03:39
Yeah, so this actually is and part of it goes into the conversation we had about the book for me.
00:03:47
Whereas I thought about like, okay, coaching yourself as I read that book,
00:03:50
not just coaching other people. So when I think about coaching myself, like for example,
00:03:55
the and what else question helps me. Like when I see that, you know, and I'm thinking about,
00:04:02
okay, I'm developing this talk or this lesson or the design of some, you know, whatever it is,
00:04:09
and what else? Like, what are we not thinking about? Like, what have we not considered here?
00:04:13
So that helps me out. The like another one would be the learning question.
00:04:18
I get students that come in all the time and they'll say something and that helps me
00:04:22
remember to ask them like, well, what was most useful? Like, what did you get out of this kind
00:04:25
of a thing? So should it stay in there all the time? No. Is it the wrong place to put it? I don't
00:04:34
think so. You're right though, like prime real estate is is, you know, that daily note is prime
00:04:41
real estate and I don't like the idea of having to scroll the daily note. Like, I want the daily
00:04:47
note to be like the normal size of not my phone because you can't really, you always have to scroll
00:04:53
your phone. But like on a normal computer screen, I want that daily note to be full, full page. If
00:04:59
that makes sense, I don't have to scroll. So will they get reduced down? Probably. Are they too big
00:05:05
right now? Probably. But that's okay. I'm all right with that right now. So have you heard the good
00:05:09
news, Corey, about collapsible call outs? No. Do you know, you know how to use call outs in obsidian?
00:05:17
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Okay. So you can have the different types of different colors, that kind of stuff.
00:05:21
The first line of the call out at the end of the end of the bracket, basically. So what you
00:05:30
actually use to determine what type of call out it's going to be outside of the last like right
00:05:35
bracket, you can either do a plus or a minus, which makes that a collapsible call out. The plus
00:05:39
means that it is expanded by default. The minus means it is collapsed by default. So when you
00:05:45
collapse it by default, you've got this colored box with your questions that potentially you could
00:05:49
click the carrot and then see them. If you really wanted to tighten things up, that's the way you do
00:05:54
it. Adding to my omnifocus right now. Look into collapsible call outs. Yeah, collapsible call outs
00:06:03
are great. Call outs in general are great. That's all of the stuff on my daily note now is inside of
00:06:10
those those call outs. So I've got like the daily Bible reading plan. I've got my tasks. I've got
00:06:15
my affirmations that I say every day. I've got my memento mori code snippet. I've got a bases view
00:06:22
of all the other daily notes from that particular day kind of day one style. And they're all inside
00:06:28
of those those call outs. It's very rare that you can that you find something that is not going to
00:06:34
work inside of a call out like even the task queries. The thing is if you're going to have those
00:06:38
multi line code blocks, you got to have the greater than sign and then a space for each line. Okay,
00:06:43
inside the the call out. But if you're just doing, you know, text or bullets, it's really easy.
00:06:49
Perfect. I will have to explore that more. Like it just helped my daily note. Good work.
00:06:55
Give you another action item too. I know you do. We're not putting that in the action items.
00:06:59
We're not putting that in the action items. All right. Cool. Let's talk about today's book,
00:07:05
which is the science of storytelling by Will Store. This is an interesting book. It is based off of
00:07:14
a storytelling class. You've got a physical book in your head. I just wanted to make sure
00:07:21
until you saw that I was going to hold it up there until you saw it. I read a book again.
00:07:25
Okay. It's a little bit shiny. It looks like maybe you got it from the library.
00:07:28
I yeah, I love the library, right? We go to the library like seven times a week. So I just look
00:07:34
and say like is the book at the library and I check it out. And then if it's worth it. So you
00:07:38
have the philosophy of you buy it right away. I have the philosophy. It has to earn its way into
00:07:42
my house, right? Both, both digitally and physically. Like it's got to earn its way. And then I will
00:07:48
buy it. We just have different philosophies on this. Okay, I'm trying to become a library. I think
00:07:53
we've got about eighteen hundred books in our house. Yeah, the the Mike Schmidt's family library.
00:07:58
Like that's like, I mean, it's coming. You're going to donate all these to the Mike Schmidt's
00:08:02
family library. Yep, someday, someday. So yeah, this is a book that is actually based on a
00:08:09
science-based storytelling course. There is an introduction. There's an appendix at the end,
00:08:16
which actually is like a specific sacred flaw approach that they talk about throughout the
00:08:23
the rest of the book. But there are really only four chapters. There's a whole bunch of like
00:08:29
1.0, 1.1, 1.2 sections. But there's a lot of those in each one of the chapters. And there's
00:08:35
not enough in some of those to pull out ideas from every single one of them. That would actually
00:08:40
probably make for like a 12 hour episode. So what we're going to do is we're going to break this
00:08:44
down by chapter. The chapters basically contain all those those points around central themes. So
00:08:51
like chapter one is creating a world. Chapter two is the flawed self. Chapter three is the dramatic
00:08:57
question. And then chapter four is plot sendings and meaning. So they're grouped pretty nicely
00:09:01
together. I guess you could have made these these sections. It's a pretty dense book, I would argue
00:09:08
that covers a lot of ground. It is a lot of information, which if you are a writer is going
00:09:14
to be insanely valuable. I'm kind of curious what your first impressions of this book
00:09:22
were when you when you picked it up. Okay, so the the first question I have is I want to know
00:09:27
your motivation for picking this book because like, okay, and here's and here's the background
00:09:32
context in case anybody's anybody's new. Mike really isn't known as being the fiction guy,
00:09:38
right? We've that is fair. That is worked on him. And we've gotten him to start reading some fiction
00:09:43
books, which he said he's enjoying and we're doing okay on that. But like, this is about writing fiction.
00:09:51
Now he does talk about, I think at one point where he's interviewing or writing a, you know,
00:09:56
ghost writing a book for somebody's about about their real life. But this is primarily a book
00:10:00
about writing fiction. So Mike, I'm interested in your motivation for why we're looking at a fiction
00:10:06
writing book. Yeah, well, it's the science of storytelling. I didn't really know it was a fiction
00:10:12
writing book. Okay, there we go. That's a good answer. Storytelling feels like a pretty broad
00:10:19
topic. Yeah. And I think there's there's some stuff that's useful here, even if you're not
00:10:23
trying to write a fiction book. But this is definitely from a fiction perspective. In fact,
00:10:27
in the first section, first chapter that the creating a world, you see a whole bunch of examples,
00:10:34
one right after the other of like famous first lines from different stories to illustrate the
00:10:38
points that the author's making here. So yeah, I kind of thought it would be more along the lines
00:10:45
of like story worthy by Matthew Dix. But I don't think that that's a bad thing that it wasn't
00:10:53
exactly what I expected. Okay, so then you and I came in on the same page. Like when I saw the title
00:10:57
of this book, the science of storytelling, I did not think writing a fiction book. I thought
00:11:03
telling interesting stories. When I went to science, I also didn't think neuroscience,
00:11:10
human psychology, like I didn't think those things either. I thought like, oh, it's a very, very
00:11:17
applied approach, a research approach to telling stories, yada, yada, yada. Like we've looked at
00:11:22
all the stories that have been told. And here are the, which he does some of that. But I did not
00:11:27
think it was going to tie into like human psychology and neuroscience and all of these other things
00:11:32
as much as it did. I don't think that's a negative necessarily. Like I did not come out of this
00:11:38
going like, oh man, guy really missed the mark on adding value, you know, from a storytelling
00:11:43
standpoint. It's just this is one of those books where I don't think the title tells you what's
00:11:51
in the book. You know, like it's not a direct relation. Well, I could see that argument. I think
00:11:58
it actually, I didn't really know what to expect. But I think it's pretty close to,
00:12:06
I don't know, it's a little bit different angle, but it's, I wouldn't say it's, it's
00:12:10
vastly different than than what I, what I anticipated. So the only other science of book that we've
00:12:16
read is the science of scaling. There's way more science in this one. Yeah. And I think that it's
00:12:23
interesting. Like the storytelling aspect here, I don't think it just applies to writers, but that's
00:12:28
obviously the, the context or the perspective that the author's coming from. And I was going
00:12:37
into it hoping that it, okay, so first of all, this book was recommended to me by somebody,
00:12:42
and I can't remember because I have that rule about when someone I respect recommends a book,
00:12:46
you just buy it. So I bought it and it's sitting on the shelf and I'm like, oh, actually that
00:12:50
looks interesting. And didn't really know what I was getting myself into, but was hoping that it
00:12:55
would help me craft better stories and narratives around some of the creative writing projects that
00:13:00
I do, whether that's YouTube scripts, big long newsletters. I do actually want to write a book,
00:13:06
and there should be a story element. I think with that, it's not just an information dump.
00:13:11
So I just figured it would help me become a better internet communicator.
00:13:17
And I think that's true. Like, I don't, I don't think that's wrong after having read the book.
00:13:22
I think, I think it will serve that purpose. I'm intrigued to hear if you thought it served
00:13:26
that purpose when we get to the end, but like, I think it'll serve that purpose. So yeah, I mean,
00:13:31
I, like, it's different than what I expected, but that's okay.
00:13:35
Yep. Well, there's only one way to find out. So let's dive in.
00:13:40
The first chapter or first section of the book is the introduction. This one's pretty short.
00:13:48
And basically the argument for why storytelling is important is made here. It says that story is
00:13:54
what makes us human. There's simply no way to understand the human world without stories,
00:13:58
which is a pretty strong point to make, but I think it's probably accurate.
00:14:03
Talks about how this book is based on that science-based storytelling course and starts to talk about
00:14:10
why plot can never work in isolation. So we should really focus on character instead.
00:14:14
That sort of sets up the first chapter. And there's one other thing which I found useful in this
00:14:19
introduction, which is that knowing why the rules are the rules means we know how to break
00:14:23
them intelligently and successfully. I think that is broadly applicable to just about anything.
00:14:29
That's why you want to know what the rules are so that you can figure out when and where you can
00:14:36
break them. It's interesting because like, when you're just starting out with something,
00:14:41
like, you don't want to maybe struggle with, like, I got to figure all this stuff out before I actually
00:14:46
get started. You don't want to know that. But then once you do just like, put yourself out there
00:14:51
and start making something, that's where the rules then come in handy, I feel like. So it's not,
00:14:57
you know, you got to figure all this stuff out before you would actually sit down and write anything,
00:15:01
start writing things. But then once you start writing things, that's where I feel like this
00:15:05
approach really provides the most value. Do you agree? Yeah. One of the things I thought was really
00:15:10
cool about this book is how I immediately started to think through what I consider good stories
00:15:16
and say like, are they doing this? Are they doing this? Are they doing this? Right? So he makes a
00:15:20
comment in this introduction. The challenge of any of us faces to grab and hold the attention
00:15:24
of people's brains. And I think like, oh man, I totally understand that because the number of
00:15:29
things I start to do or the number of stories I start to be told and I'm like, okay, you lost me,
00:15:34
like, and I'm done. Like, will you ever get me back? Right? Kind of a thing. I like it. The other
00:15:40
one is, and Katie, like, so my wife makes fun of me about this, but it's like, I love stories.
00:15:45
Like, I absolutely love stories. I tell a lot of stories. I like it when people tell me stories.
00:15:53
Like, my chill out downtime is a good story. Whether it's through reading, whether it's through an
00:16:01
audio book, whether it's through watching a movie or a show or whatever it is, like, I like to be
00:16:06
immersed in the story world. And I've always been like that. 100% always been like that. So from a,
00:16:13
does this book check out? And like, am I even engaged in what he's going to start talking about?
00:16:18
Like, he had me from, you know, from the intro. I was like, yeah, okay. Like, this aligns with my
00:16:23
thinking as well. Nice. Yeah, I think you don't have to be a writer or someone who wants to write a
00:16:30
book in order to benefit from that. I'm sure we'll talk about that as we go through. But if you're,
00:16:35
like, kicking the tires on this episode, is this really for me? I would encourage you to stick with
00:16:41
it. And I think actually even read this book, spoiler alert, I guess, I think it's, there's a
00:16:46
lot of stuff in here for people who just want to tell better stories. And that should be just
00:16:51
about everybody, I think. Yep. All right. Chapter one, chapter one, creating a world.
00:16:57
Okay. So chapter one is, as Corey just alluded to, creating a world in the introduction, we got
00:17:05
encouraged to focus on our characters rather than the plot. I feel like there's a couple
00:17:11
spiky points of view throughout the book, that's going to be one of them. And this is actually
00:17:19
kind of tough to figure out what specifically we're going to talk about in each one of these
00:17:24
chapters. So I'm just going to share, I think there's a couple lists of things, like in this one,
00:17:29
it's the four ways to involuntarily induce curiosity in humans. So I'll kind of call out those, but
00:17:34
then I have no idea where the conversation will actually end up going. So with creating a world,
00:17:41
that the big point he makes in the first section of this is that change is fascinating to our
00:17:50
brains and that many stories begin with a moment of unexpected change. And the neuroscience part of
00:17:58
this is kind of interesting because he talks about how when you experience a change, it registers as
00:18:03
a surge of neural activity. So there's a natural inclination by the human brain to resolve these
00:18:11
information gaps, even for questions of no importance. Anytime there's a change, it's like, well,
00:18:16
how is this different? Why is this different? What about all of this? Right? So if you're going to
00:18:21
tell a good story, you should lean into that. And there's four ways to involuntarily induce
00:18:26
curiosity in humans. So this is kind of interesting, because I don't want to get into like the,
00:18:33
I guess, like the the 48 laws of power, and even influenced by Robert Chialdini,
00:18:38
kind of is this area where some people just swear by those books. And I feel like the
00:18:43
information that's in those books is actually really good. But there is a whole nother camp is
00:18:47
like, that's just manipulating humans. And I get where that they're coming from to. So when you read
00:18:56
that, this is sort of what that feels like to me is like involuntarily induced curiosity humans.
00:19:00
What if I don't want to be curious? But I think everybody is curious in some way. So really what
00:19:07
this is, if I were to restate this, it's four ways to create open loops. And then you just let the
00:19:13
brain do the rest. Okay, that maybe makes it a little bit more palatable. So first, you can pose
00:19:16
a question or present a puzzle. Second, you can expose a sequence of events with an anticipated
00:19:21
but unknown resolution. Third, you can violate expectations in a way that triggers a search
00:19:27
for an explanation. Or fourth, you can make it clear that knowledge is possessed by someone else.
00:19:36
I don't know specifically, like, nothing when I read those jumped out to be like, Oh, I totally
00:19:41
gonna apply this the next time I have to write, you know, that. But I think these are actually
00:19:46
pretty useful. And I like the idea of triggering those open loops. I feel like this is broadly
00:19:53
applicable. Like I said, not just if you're trying to write a write a write a book. Like,
00:19:57
occasionally I get asked to preach at my church. And I feel like opening a curiosity, it would be
00:20:04
valuable when you're starting a sermon, you know, just as an example of something that you wouldn't
00:20:09
really think about being being influenced in a positive way by reading something like the science
00:20:16
of storytelling, but is. Yeah, I think this applies to so many different domains, right? And it's
00:20:22
listed as psychology of curiosity. So you think about it in any situation. But I think about the
00:20:28
way I use these in teaching classes, right? Or the way I use these in trying to talk to the boys,
00:20:33
like my kids. And it's like, I can see myself using and applying these all over the place where you
00:20:39
pose a question. And they go, huh? Like, like, okay, guys, how would you start to, you know,
00:20:46
whatever this is? And then they think of it as a puzzle and they think of it as a, as a thing.
00:20:49
So by no means you had mentioned like, you know, the 48 laws of power and those kinds of things.
00:20:54
Like, I got no negatives, you know, like no negative feeling out of this on any level,
00:21:00
because these are just a way for me to engage with somebody else. And where I think this is
00:21:07
different, a little bit, and I'm not putting words in your mouth saying that you said any
00:21:11
different, but it's like, where I think this is different is I often as the receiver of the
00:21:16
conversation or the receiver of the story want to be curious as well. Like, like, it's more fun.
00:21:20
If I'm curious, I don't feel like you're taking advantage of me. I don't feel like you're doing
00:21:24
anything negative. It's like, Oh, no, like, this is it. This is better if you instill curiosity. And
00:21:30
it's for better for both of us. So no, I like these a lot. Like, I thought these were, were good.
00:21:34
And one of the things I think about is, okay, how can I incorporate more of these without being
00:21:41
fake artificial? Yeah, like, that's where I think you go a little too far is when you like,
00:21:45
you force it, if that makes sense, you know, like somebody starts out the presentation and they're
00:21:49
like, here's the stat. That's the most ridiculous stat ever and marginally aligns with the story I
00:21:55
want to tell you. And it's like, come on, like, you really forced that one. Yeah, well, that actually
00:21:59
gets into some of the other stuff at the end of this, the section where he says, don't over explain
00:22:05
things or curiosity will be extinguished and readers will become bored. Yep. So essentially,
00:22:11
like, that's one of the themes that happens throughout the book is you got to figure out
00:22:17
where the line is in terms of sharing and don't overshare. I think that's probably
00:22:25
a trap I fall into fairly frequently because my logical analytical brain
00:22:31
wants to connect all of that. It's like, oh, well, you need to know this and you need to know this
00:22:34
and you need to know this. No, they don't need to know that they need to feel a specific thing.
00:22:39
And almost the more information that you share, it gets in the way. It kind of, you can make
00:22:46
somebody feel something and it can, it can achieve your objective much better that they've had that
00:22:53
feeling. And then, like, when you share information, yes, maybe it's a little bit more accurate now.
00:22:58
They have a little bit more context, but it sort of waters things down to a certain degree. So,
00:23:04
I got to figure out for myself, like, where that line is. Oh, okay. So I think this breaks at some
00:23:09
point, though, right? Yes. And here's what I mean. Have you seen Lost? Did you watch Lost? Yeah.
00:23:15
Okay. So for anybody out there that's listening that didn't watch Lost,
00:23:18
Lost is about a plane crash. These people were on this island. Does he mention that in this book?
00:23:23
He does. Yeah. He references Lost as well. Okay. Because they're on this island,
00:23:26
they don't know why there's this thing they got to keep resetting the timer on. Yeah.
00:23:30
Okay. So I'm going to, I'm going to intentionally slow play the next, like, 10 seconds. If you don't
00:23:37
want to hear about Lost, and you don't want me to spoil Lost for you, fast forward, fast forward
00:23:43
right now, please fast forward. Anyhow, Lost ends in a terrible way, in my mind. And it's this idea
00:23:49
of like, we didn't just water it down and give you all the details of like how everything resolved.
00:23:53
And I'm like, no, that's the worst ending ever. So he says it here. He says it later in the book
00:24:00
about like, intentionally withholding things in the story, helps people engage with the story and
00:24:06
like drives them forward. And there is a breaking point in that, like without clearly, in my mind,
00:24:11
there's a breaking point in that like, yes, withholding things for a period of time is valuable.
00:24:17
But then there are certain things. Dag on it. You don't withhold those things, right? Like you need
00:24:21
to tell the audience those things. So I mean, I'm, I'm just, you know, like, I think there's a,
00:24:26
there's a balance here. And that's where this gets to the idea of, I found myself wanting to like,
00:24:34
put myself in the, in the seat of somebody writing, you know, I'm writing a fiction book. And I say,
00:24:39
this is my manual. I'm going to follow this manual to write my fiction book. And I thought to myself,
00:24:44
yeah, but this stuff breaks down. Like, and this is where, you know, we've talked about it before,
00:24:48
writing groups or mastermind groups or whatever it is where people can give you feedback. And I
00:24:53
think that's where like this as a guide, plus experienced and wise other people really come into
00:25:01
play and like become very, very valuable. Because if I just followed this, it's really easy for me
00:25:07
to do things wrong. But if I follow this and Mike, you're an experienced writer who also is thinking
00:25:12
about these things. And you come back to me and you're like, Corey, you took it too far. Like,
00:25:16
it just doesn't work, you know, and an editor and those kinds of things. I think it's a balance. So,
00:25:21
and that is why we have a book that shares everything that's in the course.
00:25:26
Yeah. I mean, this is a, there's a lot of valuable stuff in here. But to your point,
00:25:31
you can't just know that. And then you're done. This is not a, a knowledge problem. It's an
00:25:38
implementation problem. Absolutely. I'm curious of what you thought. So he, he states at one
00:25:43
point here, vividness and immersion require and then you list four things. I'm guessing you outlined
00:25:49
these four as well. But it's not okay. So it's not three section, three specific details about a
00:25:54
thing that you evoke the senses that you name and create things and then that things get unpredictable.
00:26:02
And he said, those are what make vividness and immersion in. And I'm curious at what you think
00:26:09
about like, do any of those stand out to you? We like, I think about vividness. I think about
00:26:14
immersion. Like, and I like the idea of immersion better than, than vividness really. But it's like,
00:26:18
how do I get lost in the story? Is it the details? Is it the senses? Is it the naming and creating?
00:26:24
Or is it the unpredictableness? Do any of those stand out to you when you're reading a fiction?
00:26:28
It's all of the above, I think. Okay. Like one of the examples that he mentions later in terms of
00:26:36
the like getting involved in the the story is you want to feel like you're part of the world,
00:26:43
even if you don't understand all of the things that they're talking about. So for example, in Star Wars,
00:26:49
when Luke sees the Millennium Falcon, he's like, what a piece of junk. And Han Solo is like,
00:26:54
it ran, it made the the Kessel run in 12 parsecs or whatever. Like, what the heck is a parsec?
00:26:59
What the heck is a Kessel run? You don't know. But like, obviously you understand the way that
00:27:06
he's explaining it. Like, no, actually, it's, it's a fast ship. And it did this impressive thing.
00:27:12
So that kind of gets into, I think maybe the idea of metaphor in this first section,
00:27:17
where he actually says metaphor is the dominant way we understand abstract concepts. But then also,
00:27:23
the more familiar the metaphor is the less effective it is. I know that was that was surprising to me.
00:27:28
Yeah. So I thought about that with that Star Wars example, like, yeah, well, if it did it in,
00:27:32
you know, in 23 minutes. Okay, now I have context for how long it actually took. I still have no
00:27:37
idea what it is. And the more details that you put around that, the less impressive it becomes,
00:27:42
because we want to get immersed in that that world, we want to understand what the Kessel run
00:27:47
is. We want to understand what a parsec is or although, you know, monetary terms they use in
00:27:52
Star Wars. And think and think about what this does, right? Like, this creates all of your fan
00:27:57
fiction, your wikis, all of these things. And it's like, if there is no better form of immersion to me,
00:28:04
then when I go, what the heck is a parsec? And then like, go on to, you know, the online and next
00:28:10
thing I know, I've lost an hour and a half of my life trying to like, you know, after I've read
00:28:14
all the debates about what people think a parsec is, right? Like, you know, or what unit of time it is.
00:28:18
And it's explained in this canon, seven books away or whatever it is.
00:28:22
Yeah, I was actually thinking a lot about like the best version of this. And I think probably the
00:28:28
best version that I can possibly think of is something like the Lord of the Rings, right? Where
00:28:33
there are all of these different races, there's all these different languages, like, Toby will,
00:28:42
will probably cringe as he hears me talk about this, because he knows way more about it than I do,
00:28:46
but my understanding, Jarrod Tolkien, like, created these languages for the Lord of the Rings.
00:28:54
And doesn't share all of the details about why the languages are the way that they are. You just
00:29:01
encounter the languages throughout the story. Like, the lore is there, I guess, if you really want to
00:29:08
dig into it, but the effectiveness of the story itself is that he doesn't share all that stuff.
00:29:13
He put in all the work and then doesn't share it. That feels like that would be really hard for me
00:29:20
to do. Yeah. And you end up getting it. So mine is because of my generation and like,
00:29:27
kind of want to grow up, mine's the Harry Potter series. Well, it's the exact same thing, right?
00:29:32
Like, there's so much backstory that isn't expressed in the canonical, you know, books that everybody
00:29:41
thinks about as the Harry Potter series. So what do you do? Then you've got these extra supplemental
00:29:45
books that were made after the fact or, you know, as part of it. And the same thing with Lord of the
00:29:51
Rings, right? Like, I mean, there's these extra maps and these extra atlases and describing these
00:29:56
different things. And Toby has them all. Yep, exactly. Okay, so I'm going to move us to the
00:30:01
to the next point that comes out of this first chapter is this idea cause and effect. And I resonated
00:30:06
with this idea, but basically he says you should show it rather than tell it like and actually help
00:30:13
people see or experience, I guess, if you will, is probably a better word. Experience like this
00:30:19
happened because of this, this happened because of this. So he later on, he's going to describe this,
00:30:23
you know, when he talks about the flawed character, this origin story that causes the flaw. So like,
00:30:29
the effect is the flaw. And then there's this origin story that causes the and if you can show
00:30:33
the reader that thing, but he says, you know, this cause and effect idea is what essentially
00:30:39
will drive the story forward and keep things moving. And I thought that was a really, really good,
00:30:45
good point that I can see when I think through a lot of stories that I've that I've read and
00:30:48
enjoyed. Yeah, and it kind of sets up the next section. So you ready to go there? I am. Yeah.
00:30:54
Okay, so chapter two is the flawed self. And the main point here is that who we are is how we're
00:31:05
broken. Nobody's ever right about everything. So if you're going to have an awesome character
00:31:11
in your story, they have to have some flaws. And to your point, the the origin of those flaws
00:31:21
is is important. Actually, that gets called out in the appendix, the sacred flaw approach,
00:31:28
specifically. What do they call that? The they call that the not the dramatic question.
00:31:37
I forget the damage. Yeah, yeah, that's it. The origin damage.
00:31:43
So when it comes to the flawed self, though, there's five big personality traits, and there's
00:31:50
kind of high and low on each of these. And they give examples of real characters from real stories
00:31:56
that fit all these there's neuroticism, there's extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and
00:32:01
conscientiousness. I this part, honestly, like I've not really done any sort of character development.
00:32:09
The closest I get is like ideal customer profile. Same. Yeah, I'm in the same boat.
00:32:14
I have not developed any characters. But I think this is fascinating. I kind of don't know
00:32:22
how this benefits the work that I do right now, but I'm sure it does.
00:32:30
One of the things that stands out to me from this is the fact that storytellers can show
00:32:35
personality of their characters and almost everything that they do. So if I am using story
00:32:42
in my videos or the book that I'm writing, all that kind of stuff, I have to be
00:32:49
pretty intentional about the details that I'm actually going to share. It can't just be, I did
00:32:54
this or the person did this and then did this and then did this. They actually talked about that
00:33:00
in this first section that your scenes should have a because between them, not an and then.
00:33:05
So I think that's the big takeaway for me is all those details that you're going to share.
00:33:09
There should be like a through line and you should be able to see looking back why those
00:33:15
details were shared that way. And then also, I think with this, a big point is that there's a
00:33:25
difference between Western culture and Eastern culture in terms of what the character is supposed
00:33:32
to do by the end of the story. Our brain is trying to figure out what comes next and it does that
00:33:43
by building these mental models. At some point, our brain goes from a model builder to a model
00:33:50
defender and that's where the cultural stuff comes in. So like the Western culture, we've got this
00:33:54
individualist propaganda, the rugged, you know, American individualism. I can do it on my own,
00:34:01
you know, rags to riches, all that kind of stuff. But in Eastern tales, they don't actually give
00:34:04
you an answer at the end of the story. He is at the kind of decide what happens from there
00:34:08
by yourself, which I can I can totally see how that makes that would make me just based on the
00:34:14
culture that I live in a little bit uncomfortable. So yeah, we make up our minds about whether this
00:34:23
is right or wrong. We make up memories of events that never happened. We've got this hero maker
00:34:29
bias, they talk about where we try to justify everything. And then meaning is created by the
00:34:38
right change event happening to the right person at the right moment. It's interesting, you know,
00:34:44
just from from the starting to move in this direction in this section, but it's really not
00:34:49
the focus where like talks later on in the book about meaning and purpose and all that kind of
00:34:56
stuff. And obviously, that's like a big thing with what I do with the life theme stuff,
00:35:01
your personal mission statement, personal core values, stuff like that. I've actually encountered
00:35:05
a lot of material lately, read some books where it's kind of pushing back against that idea,
00:35:10
sort of like everything is meaningless. And he's basically saying like, no, actually,
00:35:13
it's it's really important, which I kind of like, even if it is from a fictional storytelling
00:35:19
perspective, the fact that these are the the narratives that we tell. And he makes the point
00:35:23
that we're all fictional fictional characters, the world that we live in is made up. The pain
00:35:29
that we experience, it's not actually pain, it's just our brain telling us it's pain, the colors
00:35:33
that we see like nothing has color in the essence of the atom. That's just how our brain interprets
00:35:38
it. So I don't know kind of kind of interesting, but also no big solid, like this is what I'm
00:35:44
gonna do with this. This is this chapter. There's a couple different ways where he and I diverge
00:35:53
in our, in our thinking. So first you described it at some level. I'm not thinking in terms of,
00:36:01
you know, novel fiction novel writing. So therefore the idea of like, okay, this person's got a flaw,
00:36:08
and then we're going to develop that flaw and we're going to wrestle around with that flaw for the
00:36:11
next, you know, couple hundred pages. I'm thinking more of like, okay, this story is going to last
00:36:18
a max of like three minutes, and I'm going to use it for some other utility, right? Like it's not
00:36:24
just entertainment. It's like to communicate a message, teach a point, sell a product, you know,
00:36:30
whatever it might be, like that's where my brain's at. So I had to go, okay, hold on, this flawed
00:36:35
self thing, like I think of it mostly as like a pain point. Like, like the flaw is you're trying
00:36:41
to do a thing, but you're doing it the wrong way. Like there's this flaw. Now the other one that
00:36:46
came out of this to me and this, it's here and in the, in the appendix is my inherent gut reaction
00:36:52
goes to it's a moral flaw within the character. And he calls out no, it does not have to be a moral
00:36:59
flaw within the character. It is a flaw in the character's thinking or a moral flaw, right? Like
00:37:06
so it's like, it's kind of this don't think it has to be this one thing, but my brain immediately
00:37:11
goes to it's a moral flaw in the character. And then here, here's the second part. So I said that
00:37:16
the form of the story is very different between him and me. All of his examples are like
00:37:22
heady academic English and British literature and like, you know, all this stuff. And here I am
00:37:29
thinking like Marvel super hero, you know, this type of thing, this type of thing. So it's like,
00:37:34
I'm seeing all the same things he is, but I'm using none of the like Lawrence of Arabia example
00:37:40
or citizen Kane or all this stuff. Like this guy is operating at a significantly different
00:37:45
level of literature than I would even think about operating it. So I think that's points.
00:37:51
Points could be the same though, right? Oh, they're absolutely the same. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
00:37:55
Yeah. Think about every, think about every Marvel super hero. Like they've got some flaw
00:37:59
either in their thinking or in their person. And therefore we develop an entire story around that.
00:38:05
I mean, Iron Man, like my goodness, like the entire Iron Man saga is, you know, Tony Stark
00:38:11
trying to get out of his own way, you know, as this flawed, this flawed genius or whatever,
00:38:15
we're trying to understand his backstory. So, so I think that's really, really cool.
00:38:19
But then I think he hit some points here that are like incredibly, incredibly spot on from the
00:38:26
psychology and like science and sociology literature. This idea of like play and storytelling are
00:38:32
essential to our culture. I mean, I've got young kids right now, Mike, you do too, right? Like most
00:38:37
of what they do and the way they understand the world is through play and storytelling. So like,
00:38:41
they'll start to play. And really what they're looking for is like, is this character that I'm
00:38:47
playing right now doing things the right way? Like, you know, daddy, would you create, would you
00:38:52
correct this character? Would you like give this character any feedback or like so and so was so
00:38:57
and so and they jumped out of a plane, blah, blah, blah. And I'm like, Oh, you wouldn't want to do that
00:39:01
because blah, blah, blah. And they're learning about culture that way. Like they're learning
00:39:04
about how to interact with the world that way. And I just think that's like spot on. And I think
00:39:09
we still are doing that. Like, I think no matter how old we get, we just do it where we try to do
00:39:15
it. Like I should say in more sophisticated forms. So instead of us creating an imaginary
00:39:20
character that's going to go do all these other things, we read books and we try to analyze the
00:39:24
fiction books. We watch movies and we try to analyze those things. The last one I'll say and then I'll
00:39:30
I'll stop. I'll get off my soapbox. But it's like the last one is this theory of control.
00:39:33
The idea of theory of control. I can't remember if he if he introduced it in the last chapter or
00:39:37
this chapter, but he talks about it here again. And it's basically like, what level of control
00:39:44
do I have? What level of control do I want? What level of control do I expect? And then how is my
00:39:50
flawed thinking or my flawed moral character impacting that level of control? And then how am I
00:39:57
being pushed and not pushed and challenged and not challenged? And I just think this idea of like
00:40:03
control within characters and yourself and all these other things. I think it's a really like
00:40:09
cool idea that drives a story, drives a story forward, whether it's a big story or a small story.
00:40:16
I don't really care on that level. Like it can be a 100 page story or a two minute video. And I
00:40:21
think that's a that's a cool idea. Yeah. So the thing that you're you're hitting it there with
00:40:26
the element of of control, essentially a good story. You mentioned this at the beginning of this
00:40:31
section is where you identify and accept your flaws, then you change who you are, meaning the
00:40:37
the protagonist or the character. But to do that means breaking down the very structure of our
00:40:42
reality before rebuilding it. So that can be really scary. And when you have no idea how it's
00:40:47
going to turn out, but those are also the the best stories. The other thing that really
00:40:53
stood out to me from this section, and it sort of clicked as you were you were talking through
00:40:58
things, is that the events don't matter if there isn't a character attached to them.
00:41:03
And that one, I feel like has immediate application for me. When I read that just now,
00:41:10
I was thinking about the book I read not too long ago, Ghost Town Living by Brent Underwood,
00:41:15
literally a guy who bought this ghost town and is trying to to fix it up, essentially make it like
00:41:23
a tourist place. Like it had this old historic hotel. But the thing that makes that book interesting
00:41:29
is not that he is rehabbing this ghost town. It's that he tells all of these stories about
00:41:36
these interactions that he had with people who were local to the area, who didn't trust them
00:41:41
at the beginning. And he had to show up, get up early, work late, do the work. They had to believe
00:41:47
that he was really interested in improving that town, even though there's nobody that that lives
00:41:53
there. And he's not gonna just like blow everything up and all there goes the neighborhood, you know,
00:41:59
because they've lived there and their families for hundreds of years and they want everything
00:42:03
preserved the way it was. So the situations that he gets into and the conversations that he has with
00:42:09
these these crazy people who live on the land, you know, that's what made that book fascinating.
00:42:16
You take him out of that, you take those stories out of that, and it's just the the lessons he's
00:42:21
trying to communicate or historically, you know, this, the hotel, which is the reason why he bought
00:42:27
the town burned down, you know, shortly after he he bought it and then he rebuilt it. Like that's
00:42:32
boring. But when he tells the details about how he's aching from the previous day's work, and then
00:42:37
he wakes up early to the the smell of smoke and he like heart jumps up in his chest and he runs
00:42:44
out there. And yeah, like that is what makes that book. And that's where I feel like I can I can
00:42:51
benefit from taking this approach. I don't know how you necessarily translate because there is like
00:42:56
the long arc emphasis in a lot of this stuff. The Niax section, or maybe it's the last section
00:43:02
talks about like the standard five act structure. You know, you you can't do that when you've got
00:43:08
three minutes to tell the story. Maybe you can. Maybe he'd push back on that. I don't know. But
00:43:12
well, I think it does take a different approach. And there's probably a better book for that.
00:43:17
Or at least there's probably a better course or book or or something for for that one. But
00:43:21
if you're ready, I'm ready to go to chapter three. Yep.
00:43:25
This episode of Bookworm is brought to you by our friends at Vitaly, the AI powered workspace
00:43:29
for customer success managers. Vitaly's purpose built AI is for scaled customer success. It's
00:43:35
there to help you better understand customers to reduce churn to unlock growth and to always
00:43:40
stay a step ahead. Basically, all the things that make you great at your job. Vitaly delivers the
00:43:46
clarity automation and AI driven insights that your team needs. So you can move faster, stay
00:43:50
aligned and drive customer outcomes at scale. Vitaly AI services insights from every customer
00:43:56
interaction to unlock another level of CS productivity, visibility, and collaboration.
00:44:01
It's why Vitaly is trusted by more than 600 leading B2B SaaS customer success teams.
00:44:06
And how's this for a great offer? Vitaly is offering a free pair of AirPods Pro for every
00:44:11
bookworm listener who takes a qualified demo call. So if you're a customer success decision-maker,
00:44:17
schedule your call by visiting vitally.io/bookworm. That's v-i-t-a-l-l-y.io/bookworm to get a free
00:44:27
pair of AirPods Pro when you take a qualified demo. Our thanks to Vitaly for supporting our show.
00:44:33
All right, so chapter three is the dramatic question. Do you remember what the dramatic question is?
00:44:40
Who am I? I think is what it is. Exactly. Who am I? Which again, this just reinforces his whole
00:44:47
point about the character is the thing that matters, not the plot. But once he says that,
00:44:52
that really does make it click and you start to think about all of the good stories that
00:44:58
you've heard and the movies that you liked and the books that you've read, that was this character
00:45:02
trying to figure out and break the social norms and all that kind of stuff. Okay, play along.
00:45:06
What's the first one? When you say like the who am I and you think about it in the story,
00:45:09
what's the first story you think of where you're like somebody's asking who am I?
00:45:13
I'm putting on a spot. Well, okay, so the one that stood out to me but it's recency bias,
00:45:17
I'm reading red rising, right? Okay. Or I read red rising. I'm now on the
00:45:22
about to start second one. I think it's golden sun. But red rising is about this character who's
00:45:27
like the lowest of the low in the caste system and they believe that they're gonna, he's gonna
00:45:31
be the one, you know, turn everything around sort of like Neo with the matrix.
00:45:36
The whole story is them figuring out where their limits are. And that's fascinating.
00:45:45
My mind, I told you this before, like the Harry Potter series, right? Like I love the Harry Potter
00:45:50
series and that's what he's trying to do. Like Harry Potter's trying to figure who is he?
00:45:54
Like who am I? Like I and he's got this flawed origin story and all this stuff. Like,
00:45:59
it's directly related to the way he's describing all of the stuff. And it's just fun. Like it's
00:46:07
interesting to see how spot on he was in a lot of ways. Yeah. And this section about this dramatic
00:46:15
question, really the point is that the narrator is supposed to help people figure this stuff out,
00:46:20
right? And you're telling these stories. One of the things that mentions is facts while nice are
00:46:27
optional for the telling of the story. I'm not sure I feel about that because I tend to want all
00:46:34
the facts, but it makes sense. Plot develops as characters try to control things and can't and
00:46:41
as models fracture and breakdown, previous repressed wills become more dominant. So there's a whole
00:46:46
bunch of like drama that's created here by the struggle for the control that that you were you're
00:46:53
talking about. It talks about the two wired inhibitions that people have to get along with
00:46:58
people and to get ahead of people and how sometimes those can be at odds. And that specifically when
00:47:06
I read this, I thought of red rising because the whole idea behind red rising spoiling alert,
00:47:11
spoiler alert, I guess this guy, you know, gets thrown into this academy for the elites where
00:47:17
it's basically Hunger Games. And they break up into these tribes and they're trying to survive.
00:47:23
And like, who's the leader of this tribe? But also your tribe has to battle all the other tribes.
00:47:30
So who's going to actually win? Yeah, I'll stop there. But I remember reading the sections like,
00:47:39
they just followed the formula. Yeah, exactly. But it worked. And when he addresses that later,
00:47:46
like, you can't just follow the formula. But then I'm reading this book thinking about all of the
00:47:51
stories that I know of that have just followed this formula. Like they are true. They seem or
00:47:55
they seemingly have just followed this formula. So I'm kind of torn on that. Like if I'm being
00:48:00
real honest with you, I was like, well, does the formula work? I don't know. Like, how much in the
00:48:03
background did they like, did they mess with the formula? I don't really know kind of how that works.
00:48:09
I think there's probably some confirmation bias because there's a lot of points that are in here,
00:48:13
which when you hear them and you're thinking about a specific story, you can be like, oh,
00:48:16
yeah, I see how they did that. Like, one of the things that they mentioned is that nothing is
00:48:22
likely to make a person more mad than the removal of their status. So again, red rising as the example.
00:48:28
I'm the leader. I'm no longer the leader. Who's with me? Yadda yadda yadda.
00:48:33
And like, you can cherry pick examples and be like, oh, I see how they applied this. But when
00:48:37
you're starting from scratch, I think I think of it more as like a paint palette. You've got these
00:48:41
different things that you can you can use. And yeah, you're not going to use all of them. You may
00:48:47
use most of them. You may combine them in different and interesting ways. But yeah, the end of a
00:48:55
perfect story, he says, a hero or a heroine must represent the coming together of four virtues,
00:49:00
strength, order, feeling, and understanding. What do you think about that?
00:49:05
This one didn't stand out to me. So like, as you say this, I was like, I don't really remember
00:49:09
that section. So we say it again, as a the hero must do what has to the the at the end of a perfect
00:49:15
story. The hero, the hero's transformation must represent a coming together of four virtues,
00:49:21
strength, order, feeling, and understanding. But there's also, you know, mentioned the eastern
00:49:26
tales that don't give you the answer. So I don't know exactly if this is from a Western perspective
00:49:32
that we want these four virtues to come together. Or maybe there's a I think I think I can see how
00:49:38
this would get applied in other cultures as well. But I don't think, you know, it has to be, I am
00:49:44
the strongest things are now under my control. I feel good about things and I completely understand
00:49:49
things. It's just those questions about how strong am I? Yeah. What's the order of things? That's
00:49:55
actually what gets answered by the. So that actually makes a lot more sense to me. Like before that
00:49:59
didn't really resonate with me. When you said at the very end, is like, if I tie it to the most
00:50:03
essential question, like the who am I? Well, who am I from a strength standpoint? Who am I from a
00:50:07
what's the order of the world and where do I stand in it status standpoint? Like that all makes sense
00:50:12
to me is like the the character, which he would say drives the entire story, is trying to figure
00:50:19
those things out where I would go. And and I kind of do that just off the off the cuff is are those
00:50:25
the only four? Or are there other ones that could swap in and out and still make a really, really
00:50:31
good story? I think my gut would say there are there are others that could swap in and out that
00:50:37
could make a good story, but not that those four are bad. It's just that I think there are others
00:50:42
that probably could those might be the most common. Maybe I but I don't remember that that
00:50:45
section at all. So that's that didn't stand out to me when I was reading. I think those four virtues
00:50:51
are probably accurate. Maybe there are some other ones that you can insert in there, but I don't
00:50:59
know that feels right to me that those are the ones that you should be thinking about if you're
00:51:02
trying to wrap up your your story. You have to kind of have an idea of what that transformation
00:51:08
is going to look like by the end. Yeah, I got I got one for us in the chapter. Go for it. So he
00:51:16
refers to Brian Little who's a who's a professor and psychologist and he says all individuals are
00:51:21
essentially scientists erecting and testing their hypothesis about the world and revising them in
00:51:26
light of experience of their experience. And I think about this and I think about it in relation
00:51:31
to storytelling. Like those are that like that makes sense. Like this is what we're trying to do
00:51:36
is like I'm making hypothesis about the way the world works and then I'm going to test that and
00:51:40
then I'm going to revise and this is where we get into mental models and we get into like so many
00:51:45
other concepts that we've we've talked about is like I'm constantly developing a mental model,
00:51:51
testing the mental model, revising the mental model, right? And and he describes it, you know,
00:51:55
as hypotheses. Well, I think throw in mental model in there. But then like the stories that
00:52:01
I think I resonate the most with, I bet you if I went back and looked at them, the same thing is
00:52:05
happening. The character has a mental model. They test that mental model and then they figure out
00:52:11
whether or not that's true. So whether it's a love story where they're testing like, I have a
00:52:15
mental model that like this person feels the same way about me as I do about that. Yeah, they test
00:52:19
that and weren't like, you know, like it either goes well or it doesn't. Or I have the mental model
00:52:25
that I'm the best runner in the high school. And then I go and I test that model and I find out
00:52:30
that I either am or I'm not, you know, like I think that really checks out in terms of
00:52:36
the reason why those stories work so well and that concept works so well is because
00:52:41
that's really what we're trying to do all the time as humans. Like we're trying to test those
00:52:45
mental models and we're trying to get to and I'm putting in air quotes for anybody that's not
00:52:49
watching. We're trying to get to the best mental model. And it's like, is there one or is or the
00:52:55
mental model is just going to evolve until we die. And that's okay. Like that's what they're
00:52:59
supposed to do. They're supposed to continually just adapt and adapt and adapt and get closer to,
00:53:05
you know, a true understanding of reality or truth or whatever. You're like, I just really like
00:53:10
that part of this chapter. Yeah, to that point, there is a phrase that he uses here in life,
00:53:17
the dramatic question of who we are never has a final and fulfilling answer. But that is the
00:53:22
journey for as long as you are on this earth. What do you think about? What do you think about
00:53:27
dialogue? So he talks about meaningful words and he talks about dialogue between the characters.
00:53:33
Do you think I'm going to give it as a binary, but you don't have to answer it as a binary. Do you
00:53:37
think like dialogue really drives a story forward for you or does dialogue just something that happens?
00:53:45
Like, how do you think about dialogue? Great question. I think it generally drives the story
00:53:52
forward. However, the example that comes to mind for me is Wally, where like the first 50 minutes
00:54:00
of the movie, there's not a word that is spoken. Yeah, essentially, the boys wanted nothing to do
00:54:06
with that because there wasn't a word spoken for the first long time of the movie. Yeah, exactly.
00:54:11
Our young kids are the same way. Now they all love it. And yeah, I think that's really a fascinating
00:54:18
approach to telling the story. So I think the point maybe they were making with Wally is that
00:54:25
you don't need to rely on that. Maybe in some ways, people rely on it too much and it ends up
00:54:29
being a little bit of a crutch that you can lean on. It's like, well, we've got an insert dialogue
00:54:34
here. I think, I don't know, I think my general approach, my general takeaway from this would be
00:54:45
use dialogue when absolutely necessary, but look to communicate things other ways, whether it's
00:54:50
internal, like this is what I'm thinking through the character. When they talked about dialogue,
00:54:56
and you mentioned the words the character speaks to both sound true and rise with meaning.
00:55:01
So every word that comes out of a character's mouth, not just the protagonist, I feel like
00:55:05
really has to mean something. And then he talks about gossip and that being society's way of
00:55:12
a policing people morally, even when there isn't a police force to do that kind of thing.
00:55:18
I don't know. Maybe it's just the types of stories that I tell where there's not a whole
00:55:23
lot of dialogue that happens there. So maybe I just kind of skipped over that part a little bit.
00:55:32
Did you ever watch the West Wing? I did not know. So this is the one that pops into my head where
00:55:37
normally dialogue is not the most important thing. I know that it's telling me stuff about the story
00:55:45
and it's people, but I don't call it out. It might just because it's so natural. I don't call it
00:55:50
out as like, oh, that dialogue was incredible. But there have been a few shows where the show is
00:55:58
all about the dialogue. The story is all about the dialogue. And that's 100% of the driver of the
00:56:04
show. The West Wing is a show about the White House. And I forget when it came in the early 2000s,
00:56:09
something like that. I can't remember when it was. But the way it was written and the dialogue
00:56:14
between the characters was so fast and sharp and back and forth that it just completely drove the
00:56:20
show. And he talks about this idea of time compression. And you see that in that storytelling
00:56:26
to where it's like, you kind of just forgot where you are. And everybody's talking so fast and
00:56:30
making these points and they're going so hard at it that you're just like, oh my gosh, what just
00:56:35
happened? Holy cow, what just happened? So that was the example that popped into my brain of a time
00:56:40
when I remember dialogue being super, super valuable into a story. But then to get to your
00:56:48
gossip point, I completely agree with his point that that is a large driver of why we will or won't
00:56:57
do certain things. And for better or worse, they think about high school. You know, like, oh man,
00:57:03
like, why aren't you going to do that thing? Because everybody's going to talk about it on
00:57:06
Monday. And I don't want them to talk about that thing on Monday. So therefore, and it's like,
00:57:11
that's just the, that's a way that we control, you know, like people. And that's a way that we
00:57:19
control the culture, if you will. So I've got a follow up question for you on that. But actually,
00:57:25
I need the next chapter as context. So if you're ready, let's go to chapter four.
00:57:30
All right. So chapter four is plots, endings, and meaning. And this is where
00:57:37
we find out about the standard five act structure. Act one, this is me and it isn't working. Act
00:57:42
two is there another way? Act three, there is I have transformed act four, but I can handle.
00:57:47
But can I handle the pain of change and act five is who am I going to be? So that's kind of like
00:57:54
the structure that a good story would follow. And to your point about dialogue moving things
00:58:00
forward and it being effective. The example that came to mind. So as I was reading these last two
00:58:06
sections is the Disney cartoon Finneas and Ferb, which is fascinating to me. I'm not
00:58:12
sure if you've ever seen this. Have you seen the show? I know of it. I got a picture of the
00:58:16
characters in my head, but I've never watched a full episode. Okay. So here's the thing that's
00:58:19
interesting about Finneas and Ferb. It's, I don't know, hundreds of episodes. Okay.
00:58:26
The premise of the show is exactly the same every single time. Okay. They like use specific things
00:58:35
over and over and over again. So the, the, you know, it's a hundred, there's a hundred and some days
00:58:40
a summer vacation. And basically every episode is like, what are we going to do today? And then
00:58:47
there are certain plot elements that happen every single episode. They decide they're going to
00:58:52
do something. And then the Perry, the platypus is no longer there. So there's a line in every
00:58:57
episode. Hey, where's Perry? You know, and then there's a character Isabelle who shows up and he's
00:59:01
like, what you do? And there's a bad guy, Dr. Dufen Schmerz, like the, the plot is exactly the same.
00:59:10
They build some crazy contraption. The older sister tries to bust them. Dr. Dufen Schmerz tries
00:59:16
to take over the tri-state area. Perry, the platypus, saves the day, comes back. You know,
00:59:21
everything gets reset to normal basically at the end. And it's like one of the best cartoons that
00:59:29
I've ever seen. Like it's consistently, if you look at, you know, and these are obviously subjective
00:59:35
ratings. But if you look at like lists of top cartoons, Dufenis and Ferb is up there. And I
00:59:40
think one of the things that makes it so appealing to people is the fact that it kind of like pushes
00:59:47
back against all this structural stuff. So going back to the beginning, like when to break the rules,
00:59:51
they've literally built a show about breaking all of the rules. And then think about two, like,
00:59:57
the sitcoms and stuff where, like, okay, the procedural dramas, there we go. Like, I was trying
01:00:03
to figure out what the phrase was, but like the CSI, whatever, or, you know, the law and orders,
01:00:08
or whatever. Sure. They are the exact same, like they're the adult version of Finneas and Ferb.
01:00:12
Like, the only thing you're describing to me is like the adult version of that. What's going to
01:00:15
happen? We're going to start off with some shocking thing. That's true. We're going to investigate it
01:00:19
for 23 minutes. And then in 20, minute 24, we're going to have the big reveal. But then even,
01:00:26
like, action movies, they're the exact same way. Like, so I don't know what, I don't know what my
01:00:31
main point is here. But my main point is we are incredibly like, predictable people who want the
01:00:39
same thing over and over and over again. And we've proven it with our attention and our time and
01:00:44
our dollars. Like, like, we've proven this to people. Yeah. I guess the thing that makes,
01:00:50
again, Finneas and Ferb is the one that stands out to me. But the archetypal ending that they
01:00:55
talk about in this section. Basically, the perfect archetypal ending reassures us that despite all
01:01:00
the chaos and sadness and struggle that fill our lives, there is control. And on one sense,
01:01:07
it's there isn't control because there's certain, quote unquote, main characters that, you know,
01:01:14
never are able to get what they want. But in the middle of the episode, the thing that I think
01:01:19
makes it work is there's so much going on and there is just so much chaos. And then it all gets
01:01:26
resolved by the end. And that's sort of what makes these 20 minute episodes so fascinating is like,
01:01:33
okay, they went some crazy directions. How in the world is this going to be reset to normal?
01:01:43
I don't know. It's interesting, though, like the plots endings and meanings, that's the whole
01:01:47
last section. I think that's kind of interesting that the whole, you know, 25% of this book is really
01:01:53
about like, how do you tie all this stuff together? But then, you know, they give you some structures
01:01:57
and things like that. But essentially, I don't, I think this is the one where maybe there's there's
01:02:02
the least amount of formula possible. Yeah, this book does a, oh, it's got me in a confused place.
01:02:11
I don't have confused as the right word, but like, I'm mixed up not being somebody who writes
01:02:17
long form stories, you know, and has practiced this art or whatever. Because he's throwing things
01:02:22
out there almost like, this is the formula, follow the formula. This is the formula, follow the
01:02:26
formula. But then on the other side, he's like, he's going, but it's not just a formula. So therefore,
01:02:32
like, you can't just follow the formula. Like there are tweaks and there are things and it's like,
01:02:37
it really goes with the idea of there is there are the people who can just write a story.
01:02:42
Then there are the people who write the, like, you know, lightning in a bottle, just absolutely,
01:02:48
like, take the world by storm story. And that's the difference between the novice and the master.
01:02:54
And it's the difference between the people who like, figure out the way to take the formula stuff
01:02:58
and like tweak it in the right ways and accentuate this piece. And then part of that's probably culture,
01:03:05
part of that's probably timing, part of that's probably luck. But like, I think about, you know,
01:03:08
the five act story. Okay, cool. We got that, we get that as a formulaic thing. I think about crisis
01:03:13
struggle resolution. You know, we've got that as like a formulaic kind of a thing. Like, there's
01:03:17
all these like formulaic pieces that he's throwing out there. And then I look at those and I think,
01:03:22
yeah, but if I'm going to write a fiction story, I can't just follow the formula. Like, I mean,
01:03:26
I know I could for like a rough outline of the story, but it's like, then it's got to get good.
01:03:32
Like, then it's got to, you know, you got to do something to it. And that's where he's probably
01:03:36
like, come take my class, right? Like, and that's what I'll do is like, is like, come take my class,
01:03:40
which I, which I totally get. One of the concepts that came out of, at a chapter four that I thought
01:03:45
was, was cool is, and I'm probably going to say it wrong, eutomonia. I'm going to say eutomonia.
01:03:50
I'm familiar with that, right?
01:03:52
Striving after a noble goal, living in a way that fulfills our purpose, and then the hero's
01:03:56
journey or the hero's quest is the way I captured that last, that last bullet point.
01:04:01
But it's this idea of like, I like stories that give us a purpose, that give us a goal, that like,
01:04:09
it's clear to see like, this is the task that we're going to do. And I can probably forgive a lot
01:04:17
of chaos in the middle there, knowing that there's a goal at the end that we're going to think about.
01:04:21
So you get back into your Phineas and Ferb thing, right? Like, I can go through that entire chaotic,
01:04:26
like, what on earth is happening? Oh my gosh, this is crazy. And then boom, there's going to be a
01:04:31
resolution. And I know there's going to be a resolution. I don't like stories. And I get so
01:04:36
bothered by the ones where it's like chaos, chaos, chaos, chaos. And then we kind of just drift away,
01:04:42
like chaotic. And like, we never reached the goal and like, nothing ever happened.
01:04:46
And I don't know what that says about my personality. But like, this first section really,
01:04:51
really hit home with me with this eutomonia thing where it's like, yeah.
01:04:55
And that's, you do accomplish that goal. That's the thing with Phineas and Ferb is like,
01:05:00
things are crazy. And then the minute that Candice like gets her mom, like,
01:05:03
mom, mom, come see, you know, Phineas and Ferb are doing by the time they get to the backyard,
01:05:08
everything is normal. Everything's normal. Yeah.
01:05:13
I also like, I guess I have another one. I also like this idea of transportation and like,
01:05:21
being lost in the world. When we're transported, our beliefs, attitudes and intentions are vulnerable
01:05:26
to being altered, right? Like this idea of essentially escape. But like, I don't mean it in the negative
01:05:32
way. Like a lot of times we talk about like escaping into the story as like a way to get out of reality.
01:05:37
And I don't mean it in that way. I mean, it is in like getting immersed, getting captured,
01:05:40
getting transported into this world. And this is like something along the lines of, you know,
01:05:45
it's not this big novel type story that he's describing here. It's much more of like a Dungeons
01:05:51
and Dragons campaign. Like I totally understand how people play Dungeons and Dragons. I totally
01:05:58
understand how people get lost in video games that have these immersive worlds that you're telling
01:06:02
the story and you've got this goal and you're, you're essentially transported into that world.
01:06:08
And then I can totally even see how people get lost in those worlds, right? And they lose this
01:06:14
sense of reality. And you know, we talked about it a couple of weeks ago, you talked about reading
01:06:19
Ready Player One. Like that is actually a scary thing in my mind if we get too immersive,
01:06:27
that like, I think we are naturally prone to want to be transported into these worlds,
01:06:31
want to be lost in these worlds. And if we get too immersive, like in Ready Player One,
01:06:36
I think there's a really good chance that like reality becomes less interesting than the immersive
01:06:43
world and we kind of check out of reality. So it's like, I mean, not to get too like heady or too
01:06:48
philosophical, but like that, that's what comes out of all this, you know, this, this kind of last
01:06:54
meaning, you know, plot and meaning part of it for me is we got to be careful about what we do,
01:06:59
but it's so powerful. Like we have the ability to be so powerful in this.
01:07:02
Well, the thing for me with this is like applying this to your everyday life, because it mentions
01:07:10
that what we see and feel at any given moment depends on what we're trying to get. The hero
01:07:15
making brain wants to feel like we're constantly moving towards something better. And goal direction
01:07:22
is what gives story much of its tension and thrill. So as it pertains to like the life-themed
01:07:27
stuff that we're doing, which I guess I should have mentioned at the beginning, we've got a
01:07:32
life-themed cohort that is going to be kicking off in April. So I'll put the link to that in the
01:07:39
the show notes if it's available by the time this this goes live. But that's basically about
01:07:47
crafting the story that you want to be told about your life. So I think a lot of the principles
01:07:53
are the same. It's really just how are they being applied? I think it's actually, I don't know,
01:08:03
on the one hand, to compare your real life with a fictional story feels like you're devaluing it.
01:08:11
But also on the other hand, I feel like it actually can do a lot of good to think about it that way,
01:08:17
and in some ways it enriches it. You know, when you talk about the meaning that you apply to things
01:08:25
being subjective, I guess, that can make you feel a little bit uncomfortable if you've seen things
01:08:33
as black and white forever. And you feel like your perspective is the single source of truth in the
01:08:40
world. But going back to the liminal thinking model presented by Dave Gray back in the day where
01:08:50
you've got your experience, which is a fraction of reality. And on top of that, your focused
01:08:55
attention is what you build all your judgments, beliefs, and opinions on top of. And then you
01:09:00
surround yourself with people who look like you talk like you think like you create this bubble
01:09:07
of belief that just reinforces these preconceived notions. When you think about that, like you have
01:09:15
the ability and the power to change that at any point, that's kind of exciting and a pretty powerful
01:09:21
idea. All right, go to the appendix. Let's do it. Which is really not an appendix. Like we typically
01:09:30
think of appendices. It's the approach. It's the sacred flaw approach. I can kind of understand
01:09:39
why he called it an appendix, but I don't think he did himself justice calling it an appendix.
01:09:44
He should have named it something different because it's really like a primer. It's like the sacred
01:09:49
flaw primer, if you will. I mean, it's not a hill to die on, but at the same time, I think you did
01:09:57
itself a disservice a little bit calling an appendix. Well, I get why it's there, I think,
01:10:01
because everything in the chapters one through four fits very neatly into these different buckets.
01:10:07
There's an alternate world where those first four chapters, which is really most of the book,
01:10:12
that is part one. And part two is here's how you tie all this together using my system. And that
01:10:21
really does need to be there for a book, I feel. So I think it's pretty clear that didn't want to
01:10:29
do that, wanted to keep it tight. And so just packaged it all into an appendix. He walks through
01:10:36
the different steps and he references different points in the other chapters without going into
01:10:41
all the crazy detail in the appendix, which I think is actually kind of cool. So basically,
01:10:46
you go through everything and then this is sort of like a review session before you would actually
01:10:51
try to implement that, but there's still some good stuff in here. And it's not like he didn't
01:10:56
have enough content in the first four chapters, right? I mean, he's got 200 pages of what I think
01:11:01
is good content in the first four chapters. So I, your point is well made in terms of this,
01:11:06
this sits as an appendix. I do agree with you though, that like, if you didn't have this in here,
01:11:11
I think the book is significantly different. Like I think the book is lacking. I think this
01:11:16
really rounds out that book. And I really like the way you just described it, the way you're like,
01:11:21
this is the next thing before you go off and launch into doing this and using all the stuff
01:11:27
we've talked about over the last 200 plus pages. Yeah. And you know, if you're wanting a resource,
01:11:34
which just talks you through the approach that's taught in the class, you can point to this specific
01:11:39
section of the book and it contains everything. So it's, it's effective that way. There's still
01:11:45
some good stuff in here though. So like, essentially it's walking through the different steps. There
01:11:50
isn't a very clear like, these are the 12 steps sort of a thing. I don't know how to try and
01:11:56
summarize this. Really, it's figuring out what the dramatic question is for your character,
01:12:02
figuring out what that origin damage story is, you identify their personality traits, you identify
01:12:10
their hero maker moment, you identify their point of view, you figure out how their flaw
01:12:14
influences their world, the story event and the plot, you kind of like work backwards from that
01:12:19
character and the flaw that they have. So that's like, I guess how you summarize it. But one of the
01:12:24
things that I thought was interesting here was how has their flaw influenced the world? That was
01:12:28
something that stood out to me that I didn't really catch in the content of the chapters itself,
01:12:33
because there's a whole bunch of questions which I think can actually work pretty effectively as a
01:12:38
checklist for this sort of a thing. Like how has their flaw led to material or career gains?
01:12:43
How do they get a sense of status from this flaw? How does it make them feel superior?
01:12:50
What small moments of joy does it bring them? How has a sacred flaw brought them?
01:12:55
Closeness with friends, colleagues, or lovers, what life goals has it generated,
01:13:00
what achievement in the external world, all these kinds of things, which I don't know about you,
01:13:04
but generally I think if I were to craft a character for a story, I might not go that deep. I think
01:13:10
these are great questions to help provide some context there. And he does address in this section,
01:13:17
by the way, the difference between like a dead average character and like a really effective
01:13:23
character. And he says that the moment that you know you've got a character is when they like
01:13:29
lurch to life. Is that what I said? Oh, you'll know you have a character or when you feel your
01:13:36
character lurch alive, which that is a very descriptive way of putting it. It's not like,
01:13:42
well, I'm starting to understand them a little bit better. It's like, no, they were dead and
01:13:46
lifeless previous to this. Now I've got something. So that feels like a very significant moment,
01:13:52
but you have to kind of put in all of this work into the details in order to get that payoff,
01:13:57
I think. Yeah, I think I would tell people if they're wanting to be a fiction writer and they're
01:14:04
thinking about, you know, what's a guide for helping me think through some things. I think
01:14:09
I'd point them to this book for sure. I don't say like, Hey, look at this. Maybe start with the
01:14:14
appendix. See if that resonates with you, but like, don't negate the first four chapters,
01:14:21
because like those are very, very valuable. But you may like figure out whether you like it or not,
01:14:26
or whether it resonates with you by looking at that appendix first, right, like in kind of
01:14:30
working through that first. The other one that's interesting to me is, and I don't know if this
01:14:34
is me wearing my teacher hat too strongly, but like the first four chapters read like a book,
01:14:43
you know, like I'm telling you, you know, information like a book. This appendix reads like
01:14:51
a lesson plan or a series of lesson plans that I would use to teach my class. And the reason the
01:14:58
big driver for me on that one is because with a couple different prompts strategically placed in
01:15:05
here, I'm now having the students go and do the thing. Like, okay, like we reviewed this thing,
01:15:11
go do this thing. And then oh, by the way, here's some examples of where it's been done before,
01:15:16
right? Like in, and it's a natural lesson plan. So it's like, I, I would wonder, and he kind of says
01:15:22
it, but it's like, I would wonder if this, what's in this appendix section is almost directly taking
01:15:28
from his notes from class, like this is like lesson plan one lesson plan two lesson plan three,
01:15:33
and then I just put like a, a little bit of a spin on it in the way it's worded. That way,
01:15:39
it reads a little bit more like a store or like a, like a chapter of a book and a little bit less
01:15:43
like a lesson plan. But like that's, I mean, it jumped out at me in terms of, in terms of that,
01:15:49
that style. 100% agree with that. Yeah, this is the academic portion of the book.
01:15:56
Yeah. But I liked it a lot. Like I thought it, I thought it added a lot of value to,
01:16:00
to the overall book. Cool. All right. I think that's the end of the book then, right? There is no,
01:16:09
like official conclusion. That's, that's basically it. It ends with the appendix and then go write
01:16:13
your story, I guess. Yep. Yep. All right. So action items, I don't think I have any.
01:16:23
Yeah, I, I don't think it's possible to, to have one from this other than go write a story.
01:16:32
There is so much in here though, that is going to be applicable when you do that. But there's,
01:16:37
there's, I don't know, it's, it's a little bit different in terms of the, the type of book that
01:16:41
it is. It's, it's not real. I was going to say practical, but that's not true. I think tactical is
01:16:48
the, yeah, the best way to describe it. Yeah. Like I, I, I feel, I think, right, that I am better off
01:16:57
having read this book. Like I think that there is value in me having read this book. But to your point,
01:17:03
I don't think there's anything that I need to go do. Like there's nothing that it sparks, sparks
01:17:07
me to go do. Now if I was trying to actually publish a fiction book, okay, like there's 50 things
01:17:13
that are going to come out of this book that I need to go think about and I need to go do.
01:17:17
But like my biggest one, like if I was forcing an action item on this book, it would be go look
01:17:22
up the 36 dramatic situations and like just, but it's just because like I'm just interested in like
01:17:27
what are the 36 dramatic situations that he references that are like really good ways to
01:17:31
build a story. And I'm like, oh, that actually seems kind of kind of interesting. But like it
01:17:36
doesn't help me out in really any other area of life. It would only help me out if I was actually
01:17:39
trying to write a, write a book. So no action items here. All right. So then it is style and
01:17:47
rating. And my book, I'll go first. I liked this book much more than I thought I would.
01:17:56
It wasn't exactly what I expected as we mentioned, but I think it was very, very
01:18:03
applicable to, to my life anyways, even though we have no action items. So it's a little bit,
01:18:09
a little bit weird in that sense. I don't think the, you know, I think the most practical action
01:18:15
item is I've read this because I want to write a story. Now I can go write my story. But the way
01:18:20
that it influences your writing, I feel like you just can't put a finger on, I was doing it this
01:18:25
way. Now I'm doing it that way. There's a whole bunch of little things in here that are going to
01:18:28
sort of nudge you towards better storytelling, I feel. So that's what I'm hoping happens from this.
01:18:35
I will say it's 255 pages, I think. It's like the tightest 255 pages I've ever read.
01:18:43
There's a lot in this book, but it's a book, which is an entire course. And I feel like
01:18:51
the examples that are shared here, there's zero fluff in those. And the way that he writes
01:18:56
is very direct. It's very emotional. It's very engaging. I mean, I guess to be expected when
01:19:05
you recognize this as a book about a class about writing. So he's got the research that's gone
01:19:12
into it. He's got the neuroscience aspect that he can talk about. There's a whole bunch of studies
01:19:17
that he references, which I felt like that was a good blend of stuff I was a little bit familiar
01:19:23
with and new stuff. It doesn't get bogged down in the details of those studies and setting everything
01:19:29
up. It's just like, this is the big takeaway. I don't know. I don't consider myself interested
01:19:34
in writing a fiction story. I feel like that's kind of what I got was how to write a fiction story.
01:19:39
But I still really enjoyed reading this. And I think a lot of people in the Bookworm audience
01:19:45
would enjoy reading this and probably get a lot out of it, even if it's not going to be
01:19:50
explicit how that actually influences your day to day work in life, if that makes sense.
01:19:57
So I guess I'm kind of broadly recommending this. Just because, to his point earlier,
01:20:04
I feel like getting better at telling stories is a very valuable skill that will benefit your
01:20:10
life in many unexpected, unintended and surprising ways. I think I'm going to rate it four stars.
01:20:21
I'm struggling between four and five, to be honest, because I think it's really good.
01:20:26
And I think it's better than I thought it was going to be, even though it wasn't what I was
01:20:31
anticipating. I'm really glad that I read this. I feel like this is going to be one of those books
01:20:36
that I can point back to later on in my life and say that had a really big impact.
01:20:42
Maybe not in terms of I was doing this prior and now I'm doing this. And so this was kind of like
01:20:47
the tipping point in terms of change. But the scenario I see is five years from now,
01:20:54
someone walks up to me and they're like, "Man, you're a really good storyteller. How did you get good at
01:20:58
this?" This is probably one of the books that's at the top of the list. But I guess I'm projecting
01:21:05
out when I say that. So maybe it was just a fun read and I don't do anything with it. I don't know.
01:21:13
It's an interesting package though. It's a science-based course about writing better stories. I mean,
01:21:20
that in and of itself is kind of fascinating to me. And if it's interesting at all to you,
01:21:25
I feel like this is one that you should probably pick up.
01:21:28
Yeah, I kind of said it when I was doing action items. I think this book is mainly meant
01:21:37
for the person who is interested in actually writing, right? And interested in storytelling.
01:21:42
I don't think that the general reader is really going to get a lot of actionable things out of
01:21:49
this. That said, I agree with what your last statement was, whereas if somebody comes up to
01:21:55
me in 10 years and is like, "Man, how did you get so good at storytelling?" I'm going to be
01:22:00
hard-pressed to probably say, "Well, I read this book for Bookworm." And it really changed the way
01:22:05
I thought about story. And it changed the way I thought about constructing a story and telling
01:22:09
a story and all of those things. One of the boons for a book for me is if it makes me want to do a
01:22:19
thing that prior to that, I didn't really have a lot of interest in. And I read this book and I go,
01:22:27
I wonder what it would be like to write a fiction story. It would be kind of fun to wrestle around
01:22:32
with some of this stuff and develop the character and see how the character exists in this plot line.
01:22:38
And what are the story events and all that stuff? Not because I inherently have ever wanted to
01:22:44
write a long form. I've wanted to write a children's book before. I've talked about that. But not
01:22:49
that I've ever wanted to write a long form fiction story. But this book actually makes me go, "That
01:22:55
would be cool. I could see the value in that. I could see how that would be a fun and crazy
01:23:01
and stressful process." But this book pushes me towards that even though I didn't really have a
01:23:07
lot of that to begin with. So that is a boon for me when it comes to a book. This might be
01:23:15
something that you think less of me for and that you may even shun me. And I might get an email or
01:23:22
a text in like a day or two that says, "Kori, I can't believe you said that on live and on the
01:23:28
recording." I think this is one of those books that if you're like kind of interested in it,
01:23:36
you may want to do one of the like short form summary things for it before you dive deep into
01:23:42
the whole 250. Not that the 250 isn't of value, but I just think it's like the scope of it is so
01:23:49
narrow that like where you really get the value out of the 250 pages is if you're in that narrow
01:23:55
scope of audience. And I think the rest of us can get 80% of what we could get out of this book
01:24:02
from the shorter form of this. So forgive me. I know that's not the goal is to recommend.
01:24:09
But like and that's not a knock on the value of what's in here. It's a matter of the scope of
01:24:14
I think what the target audience is for this book. I think that's more of what it is than anything.
01:24:20
So here's my rating. I think I agree with you. I think this is a four star book. Like I come out
01:24:26
of this book going, man, I'm kind of glad I read that book. Like I'm not going to real write a fiction
01:24:31
book. That's not an interest of mine. I'm not going to go develop characters and build plots
01:24:35
and do all that stuff, right? Like that's not interesting. But it's one of those ones that like
01:24:41
I feel as though I'm better off having read it. And I don't exactly know why. Like I don't I
01:24:47
can't put a finger on why I'm better off on it. That said, I don't think I would have needed to
01:24:52
read the entire thing if I wasn't doing a podcast for it. Yeah, that's fair. So that's why it's a
01:24:58
four and out of five for me. All right. To your point about the short form, I generally disagree.
01:25:06
I think if you could grab the appendix, that short form, that would be okay. That I would
01:25:12
agree with. Okay. The content itself, I feel like it's already condensed. And if you're just like
01:25:17
pick specific spots out of the course, I'm not sure how that that actually works. But I do agree
01:25:22
with you. There's a shorter version of this, which is the appendix. If you could just read that first,
01:25:27
that would be yeah, this is for me or no, this isn't. And that's the mass audience version of this
01:25:31
book. Yeah. And then for anybody who's interested in actually writing fiction and writing stories,
01:25:37
it's the full book, like without a doubt, full book and probably full book plus course
01:25:42
plus plus because I think he's got more in his head that he just couldn't fit into a
01:25:46
Oh, for sure. For sure. Shortish book, you know. All right. Let's put the science of storytelling
01:25:52
on the shelf. What's next, Corey? All righty. So my book is next. It's the six types of working
01:25:57
genius. The full title is six types of working genius, a better way to understand your gifts,
01:26:03
your frustrations and your team. This book is from 2022 by Patrick Lencioni. I have not read
01:26:11
any Patrick Lencioni books, but I've heard about Patrick Lencioni books. And I've heard that they
01:26:17
tend to be pretty reliable and pretty good. And he's a pretty good author. For those of you who
01:26:21
are going to pick this one up and read it with us, it is a fable style book. So it's going to tell us,
01:26:27
you know, his principle, his model, if you will, in forms of a fable, which I sometimes like that
01:26:34
sometimes don't. So I'm intrigued to see how well Lencioni does it. But one of the last little
01:26:41
caveat I'll give to it is basically they touted as how fast you can learn and apply
01:26:48
this model. And that that's one of the benefits of not only this model itself, but the book is like
01:26:54
it communicates it quickly and effectively to where you can apply it pretty quick. So if you're
01:26:59
reading along with us, pick up the six types of working genius by Patrick Lencioni. What's after
01:27:05
that? After that, we'll cover the way of excellence by Brad Stolberg. I have heard him talk about
01:27:13
this on Kel Newport's podcast and feels like the perfect type of book for bookworm, how to be
01:27:20
excellent at stuff. It's kind of why we're here, right? We want to get better. Thanks. All right,
01:27:26
got any gap books? I do not have any gap books other than the books that I have to read for other
01:27:32
things. So, okay, like I've said them all before, I'm behind on those books. So I'm trying to get
01:27:36
caught up on those books, but no, no fun gap books, no interesting gap books. All right. Well, I mentioned
01:27:41
the second red rising book, which is Golden Sun by Pierce Brown. So I am actually going to start
01:27:47
on that one. I've got some travel coming up. Hopefully this big snowstorm doesn't hit.
01:27:54
So I'm going to probably read that one on the plane. Nice. All right. Thank you for listening.
01:28:01
If you want to support the show, we would love to have you do that. We have a bookworm pro membership,
01:28:09
which you can find out more at bookworm.fm/pro@7 dollars a month gets you access to a longer
01:28:15
ad-free show where there's a bonus segment today. We talked about max stock and my crazy session
01:28:22
idea that I am going to teach people how to create YouTube channels in 90 minutes.
01:28:29
We've got a bootleg version of the podcast, which is the live stream version, essentially,
01:28:34
that gets published right after we record. So technically you get those episodes usually about
01:28:39
two weeks in advance. There's a 4k wallpaper access to my reading master class that I did a
01:28:44
while back and helps us keep the lights on here at bookworm. So if you want to support the show,
01:28:49
we'd love to have you do that $7 a month bookworm.fm/pro. Thanks to everybody who
01:28:56
joined us live. If you're reading along with us, you can pick up the six types of working genius
01:29:01
by Patrick Oncioni. And we'll talk to you next time.